Please help me with this responsive design.
This is my HTML layout:
<body>
<div id="container">
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="images">
<div id="cats">
<img src="cat-image-1.png" />
<img src="cat-image-2.png" />
</div>
<div id="dogs" style="display: none;">
<img src="dog-image-1.png" />
<img src="dog-image-2.png" />
</div>
</div>
<div id="chat_wrapper">
<div id="chat_messages">
Chat messages in here
</div>
<div id="chat_input">
<input type="text" value="Type to chat" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
Now let me explain what the CSS should do:
There is a div #images and a div #chat_wrapper in #wrapper.
The divs #cats and #dogs in #images have an unknown number of images in them (= height is unknown).
The #chat_wrapper should always try to fill the entire screen, but if the div #cats or #dogs is visible the #chat_wrapper should collapse to avoid the document element to have a height greater than window height. (min-height should be at least 400px, so if let's say #dogs fills 100% of the window height, you should be able to scroll down to the chat.
I don't known if it's possible with CSS only, can you help? :)
Thanks a lot!
Screenshot #1:
#dogs is visible, the #chat_wrapper fills the rest of the remaining space, you just can scroll the #chat_messages div (the #chat_input doesn't move)
Screenshot #2:
Just chat is visible, you just can scroll the #chat_messages div (the #chat_input doesn't move)
Screenshot #3:
#dogs is visible with some images, you can scroll the entire window, the chat is 400px high, you can scroll the #chat_messages div (the #chat_input just moves if you scroll the entire window)
I edited the 3rd link to add http://.
The #dogs div could be scrollable.
Fix a max-height to the div and use the overflow property to make it scrollable.
As described here : Mozilla Developer Network - overflow property
div {
width:150px;
height:150px;
overflow:scroll;
}
Note : Note: The value "inherit" is not supported in IE7 and earlier. IE8 requires a !DOCTYPE. IE9 supports "inherit".
If you don't want a scrollable #dogs div, then use display: block for img
Try :
img {
display: block;
}
#chat_input {
position: fixed;
background-color: white;
padding: 5px;
witdh: 100%;
bottom: 0px;
}
And fix a max-height for the message-container if you want to.
Related
I have a fixed size wrapper consisting of:
Header that is sized to the whats inside
Footer that is fixed size
Content container that should use the remaining space of the wrapper
The problem occurs with images. I would like for images to resize to fit the content container both in height and width. Right now images overflow the wrapper in height.
Here is the code. The wide image is acting correct, resizing to fit, but the long giraf is not.
In the following fiddle overflow is set to scroll to debug. The endgoal is no overflow.
https://jsfiddle.net/sghp68r0/
A not so flexible solution would simply be to give the imageFit class a height like
img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
.imageFit {
object-fit: contain;
height: 150px;
}
But this I would rather avoid hardcoding the height.
My goal is that it looks like this (no overflow):
if i am right you want this. Please do let me know.
Drag the height in fiddle you see the images are adjusting with heigh.
Here is my fiddle link:-
https://jsfiddle.net/exa3y7w9/
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="header">
Sized to content <br />
Sized to content <br />
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="imageWrapper">
<img src="https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2017/10/10/22/24/wide-format-2839089_960_720.jpg">
</div>
<div> 2 images and some text that fills remaining space </div>
<div class="imageWrapper">
<img src="http://clipart-library.com/data_images/258951.jpg">
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
There is some text in fixed size container
</div>
</div>
So apparently you can fix overflow in flexbox by setting height of the containing div to 0 (for safari it should be min-height: 0). Have a look at this example. If you remove height breaks.
https://jsfiddle.net/oz20qgw9/
.content {
background-color: green;
flex:2;
height: 0; //THIS IS THE KEY!
}
I've been trying all sorts of solutions offered here and other places, and none of them seem to work. I'd like to have an image take up the full width of the browser window, no matter the size (height scaled proportionally). But I need to place this image within a smaller container <div>, as it's part of dynamic content (the body of a blog post). I'm using bootstrap, but I don't think this problem is unique to the framework. Code:
<div class="container">
<div id="content" class="col-md-8">
{dynamic content in here}
<!-- still part of blog post -->
<div class="large"><img src...></div>
{more content}
</div>
</div>
CSS:
div.content { width: 70%; }
div.large img { width: 100%; }
If I put <img src="..." class="large"> inside the container div, it will, of course, be the size of that <div>. If I manually set the width of the image to, say, 1900px, it extends far out to the right of the main content, and I have to experiment to find an appropriate negative margin-left to center the image (margin: 0 auto doesn't center it). And of course that only works on a pixel-specific size. As soon as the window size changes, that code breaks.
If I set position: absolute;, the image appears on top of any following content, which isn't the behavior I want. I also tried this javascript using jQuery:
<script>
$("div.large img").css("width", $(window).width);
</script>
As well as a version without jQuery that iterates over the results of document.getElementsByClassName().
None of these approaches seem to give the results I want. Opening and closing the container would be a Bad Idea(tm), as this would break the isolation between the static layout and dynamic content, and so break the whole site if the static part of the layout changes and the blog posts aren't all manually updated.
It works for me with position absolute
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
body{
margin: 0;
}
div#small{
width: 200px;
background-color: green;
}
div#fullscreen{
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
background-color: red;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="small">
i am a small div inside your browser window
<div id="fullscreen">
i got the same width as your browser window
</div>
</div>
<div id="small">
i am a small div inside your browser window
</div>
</body>
</html>
I think you'll need to do something like this...
<div class="container">
<div id="content">
<div class="col-md-8 etc..."></div>
{ content in here}
</div>
<!-- still part of blog post -->
<div class="large"><img src...></div>
<div class="col-md-8 etc..."></div>
{more content in here}
</div>
</div>
</div>
Set the .container to 100%, the content to 70% and the .large to 100% too
I have a page which looks like this:
Content contains a static table of fixed width (determined by content) inside a centered div. Below content there is a div that contains a line of text and an image below that text. It is meant to float on the left of the Content. The page and image has max-width and max-height. But when page is resized, Image shrinks twice slower than the page. This causes the page to look like this:
I want Image to always be filling the most of that white gap on the left. When the page is resized, the Image should also resize accordingly.
http://jsfiddle.net/FZ4KG/
Html:
<section align="center">
<h4 align="center">Heading</h4>
<div align="center">
<table>Content</table>
<div id="image_box">
<p align="left">Text above image</p>
<img src="img.png" id="image">
</div>
</div>
</section>
Css:
#image_box {
padding-left: 15px;
height: 0px;
top: -75px;
position: relative;
}
#image {
float: left;
max-width: 20%;
}
A few things before I'm able to fully comprehend what it is you're looking for.
It's strange how you're using the HTML5 <section> tag with a deprecated, and as of HTML5 removed, align attribute. And still strange the use of an inline style when using css on those elements.
I will assume you're looking to center those elements within their parent containers. To achieve this, you would need to use a set width and set the horizontal margin of the element to auto.
div {
margin: 0 auto;
}
You also have a typo in your mark up. The DIV id says imabe_box. Assume it's supposed to be image_box.
<div align="center">
<table>Content</table>
<div id="imabe_box"> // ID should be set to 'image_box'
<p align="left">Text above image</p>
<img src="img.png" id="image">
</div>
</div>
Please add more code or reply to the answer and we can help you further.
The problem: I have a layout of the following:
<div class="container">
<div class="filters1">
</div>
<div class="filters1">
</div>
<div class="stream">
<div class="item"/>
<div class="item"/>
<div class="item"/>.......
</div>
</div>
I want the page to have the standard browser scroller but that it would scroll the stream div only
I tried defining the filter1 div's as position:fixed. but this causes some cross-browser problems and resizing issues. (needed chrome css hacks not to talk about IE7)
Is there a standard solution I can use, various searches did not help...
Thanks
By 'fixed' you mean 'position:fixed' or that you gave it a fixed width and lenght? (I don't why this latter option may have such difficult rendering issues).
Try
.stream {
width: XXpx; /*put your width here*/
height: XXpx; /*put height here*/
overflow:scroll;
}
EDIT: sorry misread the question, do you want the WHOLE page having scroll bars or just the DIV .stream?
I'm helpless, tried my best understanding CSS but it's just not for me.
I would like to make a really simple MasterPage:
at the top a div of full width and height 40px (1)
at the bottom also a div of full width and height 40px (2)
in the middle:
on the left: a div of width 200 px (3)
on the right side of the left div: a div with contentPlaceHolder (4)
What I would like to get is: if i make some site that uses my master page and place a panel in the contentPlaceHolder that has width 800px, I would like my site to adjust to it - top, middle and bottom divs to have their width of 1000px (200 + 800). I also wouldn't like (and I have a huge problem with that) the (4) to move down if I resize (shrink) the browser window - I would like all the divs to be blocked.
This is my master page html:
<div>
<div class="header">
</div>
<div>
<div class="links">
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer">
</div>
</div>
What kind of CSS do I have to write to make this finally work?
Not sure if you have checked into this or not, but we use the YUI-Grids CSS Framework for our layouts. It keeps us from having to spend a lot of time on CSS, which we are not great at being developers.
There is even a grid builder which will let you graphically layout a page, and then copy and paste the required HTML to make it happen :)
To prevent floated divs from being "squeezed" out of the alignment you want, you usually use either width or min-width.
For example, in this code the div containing the links and content will never be smaller than 1000 pixels. If the screen is smaller than 1000 pixels, a scrollbar is displayed.
<div style="min-width: 1000px">
<div class="links"></div>
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
You could also use width instead of min-width:
<div style="width: 1000px">
<div class="links"></div>
<div class="content"></div>
</div>
The difference between the two is simple: if you specify min-width, the div CAN grow to be larger if it needs to. If you specify width, the div will be exactly the size you specified.
Be aware that min-width is not supported by IE6.
Here's a quick stab at specific CSS/Markup for this problem.
Markup:
<!-- Header, etc. -->
<div class="contentView">
<div class="links">
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
<!-- Footer, etc. -->
CSS:
.contentView {
/* Causes absolutely positioned children to be positioned relative to this object */
position: relative;
}
.links {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 200px;
}
.content {
padding-left: 200px;
}
You might want your footer to be "sticky." Check here for information on that: http://ryanfait.com/resources/footer-stick-to-bottom-of-page/
How appropriate this is depends on precisely what the design calls for. This makes the links section more of a floating box on the left than a column for example.
This ends up looking like this (.content is green, .links is red):