I am currently creating a website with over 700 pages and I would like to be able to link them together before I upload the files to my host server if possible. Is there a good way to link pages together pre-upload without for sure knowing what the final URLs are going to be?
I am working in and plan to upload/manage my website files through Dreamweaver.
I have seen the prompt in Dreamweaver to update links before. If I link the file paths now, will it update to the URLs when the site is uploaded?
you need to use root-relative links. do some searching on that. as long as you don't change your file structure you will be good where your site is run.
instead of using absolute links such as http://www.website.com/folder1/page1
you would use /folder1/page1
as long as your root was where you started the paths from you can start with "/" as above.
there are some instances where you would do a relative link from a certain folder to another one ../folder1/page1 this is not something i would recommend here.
good luck and comment on this if you have more questions.
Related
I just came up with an idea. Instead of using an .htaccess file to remove .html from the URL, why not just use a simple folder structure and in each folder add an index.html?
For instance:
example.com/index.html → Home
example.com/about/index.html → About
Now simply use a hyperlink on the homepage to the about folder, since typically index.html files are opened automatically.
The upside of this kind of navigation, is that it would be easily possible to create sub pages with no crazy database / .htaccess setup.
Now my question is: is there any reason not to create a webpage like that and is it legitimate to use multiple index.html files?
I appreciate all the help.
With the index.html route, there would be three URL's that can access the same page. For example for an about page:
www.yourwebsite.com/about
www.yourwebsite.com/about/
www.yourwebsite.com/about/index.html
Using the .htaccess file would likely give you more benefit from an SEO perspective. You can tell the search engine which one to use, by using 301 redirects. See more about how Google does this here:
https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2010/04/to-slash-or-not-to-slash.html
Of course you could set up your website using folders and index.html's, and still
use the .htaccess file to take care of the SEO. But, depending on your sites size and structure, this might be more work.
The only downsides would be having to create a folder in addition to a file whenever you want to create a new page, and having to take more time to navigate into a folder in order to edit a page.
As long as you are using Apache, or a similar server software, multiple index files will function normally and be served from each folder.
I'm using HexoJS to create a blog. I was able to generate the static files using hexo generate. Even though there are css files and JS files generated, they are not properly linked to the index.html.
So, I have to open each html page and correct each page links given in href and src attributes one by one. I believe that this is not very practical. Can anyone help ?
The localhost is used for preview the website. When we publish our blog, it should be on a server, then the path will be interpreted correctly, we don't need to change any thing. What we saw on http://localhost:4000 will be same when you published your website.
So, we don't have to worry about the broken paths in the public folder.
When we launch a website, we usually see webpage name (menu.php or admin.aspx) but I would like to hide that name and show only virtual path or just website name. I don't want it for the first page because I did that with default.aspx but I want to implement it for the whole website.
Showing www.abcd.com/faq/ instead of www.abcd.com/faq/faq.html
Note: My code is not MVC code and server is Apache.
Use .htaccess to rewrite the URL. Millions of tutorials are out there for that ;)
What you are asking is achieved using (for xampp, wamp, lamp or any other apache powered webserver setup) htaccess rewriterules. The rules take the URL and break it into parts that can be modified or used as variables to feed other pages - whilst still keeping the URL you typed. Neat huh!
Showing www.abcd.com/faq/ instead of www.abcd.com/faq/faq.html
call the file placed into the folder faq simply index.html (not faq.html) and then www.abcd.com/faq/
will display the page without the filename. (Make sure, you have defined index.html as a valid Directory index.)
There are more options with using mod_rewrite etc - but since you seem to use a prety static directory based navigation layout, that would be the easiest way.
I have been working on a local website for awhile now, but I can't figure out how to link the html files I have created together so that viewers on other computers can click through them like a website.
I am building the site on my own computer, but have two other people who I want to send the files to. I can link the html pages together so they click through fine on my computer, but when I send them to the other people, the links don't work.
I imagine this is just a simple solution, but I can't seem to find it anywhere. Any help is much appreciated.
(1) Assuming you have all html files in a single folder, e.g. "somefolder" and you used
<a href="C:\somepath\somefolder\filename.html">
to reference other html files, then just replace it with a relative path:
<a href="filename.html">
(2) If you sent the pack of html pages as an archive, then it has to be extracted completely for links to work.
I think, your links are in the form C:\Users\Username\... etc. You should replace these absolute paths by relative paths.
See this answer: https://stackoverflow.com/a/22375071/2321643
I was wondering how other people are organising their assets for individual posts when using Jekyll. For example, if a post has an image, do you just dump it in a shared images folder? I don't really like the idea of doing this - it means that an image is completely separated from a post, when I think they should be paired.
I wrote a plugin to let me organise assets in subdirectories easily:
https://github.com/samrayner/jekyll-asset-path-plugin
{% asset_path my-image.png %}
in post 2013-01-01-post-title would output:
/assets/posts/post-title/my-image.png
in page my-first-page would output:
/assets/my-first-page/my-image.png
I prefer to think of images as stand alone assets that are included in zero or more pages. Most of the time, my images show up in a single page. There are times when I want to have them in multiple pages and in other cases I don't link an image at all. If your workflow is to put each image in a directory with a post, finding them starts to require a significant amount of searching and you have to come up with something different for images that don't belong to a specific post.
The approach I use is on the opposite side of the spectrum. I have a single image directory (served from "/images") and 100% of my images are housed there. Benefits of this are:
When I'm adding an image to a post it's easy to know what path to use. It's always:
/images/{image-name}
For example: http://alanwsmith.com/i/aws-20111017--0906-02. This makes it possible to write a plug-in so all you have to enter is the image name and the rest of the known path is filled out automatically.
With an application like Photo Mechanic, it's incredibly easy to browse the single directory locally and see every image. If I want to include an image on another page, this drastically reduces the time to find it.
There isn't a separate location/process if I want to send an image to someone without actually including it in a page (i.e. send them a direct link to the image file). I just throw the image in the standard directory and send the direct link.
If you want to get a little more advanced, keeping all your images in a single directory makes some nice tweaks possible as well. For example, even though the URLs for my images start with "/images", the images are actually stored in a directory outside of the ones jekyll uses. In my case, the top of my source tree looks like this:
./html
./source-files
./image-files
All of my images are stored in the "./image-files" directory. In my apache config, I've setup an alias so that the URL "/images" points to the "./image-files" directory. For example:
Alias /images /webroot/image-files
When I run jekyll, it process everything in "./source-files" and drops it in "./html". Because all of the images are outside those two directories, jekyll never sees/touches them. As your image library grows this will help speed things up and will prevent a tremendous amount of unnecessary file copying.
Another tweak I like in Apache is turning on:
Options +MultiViews
This lets you call your images without having to use the file extension (e.g. no '.jpg', '.png', etc...). You can see that in the example link I provided above. It doesn't really matter for performance. I just like the way it looks and it saves me from having to type the extension every time I'm calling an image.
MultiViews also makes it possible to replace an image of one format with another without having to recode anything else. For example, if you remove "some-image.gif" and replace it with "some-image.png", you wouldn't have to touch any HTML. It would still be served form "/images/some-image". Needing to make changes like that is probably exceedingly rare. I just think it's an interesting thing to be able to do.
Finally, you can make a single decision about allowing or disallowing your image directory to be browsed. Personally, I only want my images to show up where I place them. So, I've set the .htaccess file in my images directory to:
Options -Indexes
If you are going to be working on a site with many thousands or tens of thousands of pages and images, this might not scale. For a normal sized, personal site, I find that this approach makes maintaining images easier.
I have now managed to develop a Jekyll plugin that helps keep posts assets alongside the Markdown file:
https://nhoizey.github.io/jekyll-postfiles/
Just like you, I really hate having all images in one single shared folder.
Most, if not all, of my images are useful in one single post, and keeping them alongside the Markdown file is really better for posts management:
I can drop a new post as one single sub-folder of /_posts/ in one step, without having to put the Markdown at one place and the image(s) at another
When I want to edit the image(s) of an existing post, I don't have to find the right image in a huge /assets/ folder, it is located just near the Markdown file
In my Markdown, I can use the image file name directly, without any path
If I want to use any Markdown editor with live preview, it works, no need for a specific assets folder configuration
I tried to have this for my blog (example post here).
For responsive images, I used the Jekyll Picture Tag plugin, but I had to fork it, because the Pull Request to deal with such paths was not accepted.
Now that Jekyll 3 is there, I wish it could let us use images both in a post folder AND in the /assets/ one, looking for an image marked with  in both, in that order.
For JavaScript and CSS, you may want to consider an asset pipeline. You can get a good performance improvement through bundling and compression. I also use CoffeeScript and Sass, so I needed a preprocessor to convert my assets. I use Jekyll Asset Pipeline to manage this whole process automatically when I run the jekyll command.
For images/video, I recommend you develop a convention for naming folders in your project. I generally have an "assets" folder then subfolders with the date of each post that holds the images related to those posts. If you have multiple posts per day, you might consider including the name of the post.
This answer:
Does not use plugins (works with GitHub Pages)
Allows you to keep images directly next to their relevant posts
Allows you to edit using Typora locally and see the images WYSIWYG
Just name your folders like _posts/2020-10-10-My-Title/ and include files like index.md and hero.svg or other images.
Then set your permalink: key in _config.yaml to :path.
Caveats:
Your folder names must be sluggified
Your images must all be SVG