So I was casually looking in inspect element, to try to gather an image from a webpage (https://forsvaret.no/karriere/forstegangstjeneste). The creator of the page had linked to the image through the css ::before selector using content: ""; does anyone know what “” this sign means, and why it have been used ?
This is the Css:
.iconForsvaret-fighter::before {
content: "";
}
And the Html:
<ul>
<li><a href="/karriere/forstegangstjeneste/muligheter/........">
<span class="iconForsvaret-tank"></span>
<span>Hæren</span></a></li>
</ul>
Thanks ..
It is the non-printable character symbol. It is used when you are trying to display a character that is not available in the font being used to render the text.
Most likely that specific character is in the range of Unicode reserved for private use and that there is some code which sets the font for that pseudo-element to one which has a font with characters defined in that range.
"" usually indicates a unicode character that your browser cannot display. It might very well be some sort of emoji from an iphone that your operating system hasn't implemented yet.
Usually upgrading your OS to the latest version fixes those issues.
"" means your font file is missing. when you link you font then show exact font.
Related
Why does the lang attribute effect rendering? For example, the following html renders like this on my computer
<html>
<p lang="zh">lang=zh: 才 Aa</p>
<p lang="zh-tw">lang=zh-tw: 才 Aa</p>
<p lang="ja">lang=ja: 才 Aa</p>
</html>
But if I explicitly specify a Chinese or Japanese only font-family, then they will look identical.
Does this mean my system/browser default font family contains multiple glyph for the same character, or does the browser select different font for each language?
Oh it's a browser feature. I found the related settings.
Note: They aren't new. Just "not supported", somehow.
I'm trying to make simple controls for a element on my website, along the lines of a simple "mute" or "not mute" control.
However, I haven't been able to find any fonts capable of handling the newer Unicode symbols, such as the speaker symbols (🔇 to 🔊, or 🔇 to 🔊) which are broken (🔇 🔈 🔉 🔊) even on Stack Overflow, yet still - They can be found in the Unicode character listings and are somehow able to be displayed in my PDF reader and Internet Explorer, but not Chrome.
This is the first paragraph (above), from my perspective, with the characters broken:
Anyway, here's my snippit of the code. (The video controls are in plain view for testing purposes). The actual element has a z-index: -1000 attached to it; used as a video background.
function mute() {
document.getElementById("jsControl").setAttribute ("href", "javascript:unmute()");
document.getElementById("jsControl").innerHTML = "🔈";
document.getElementById("videoPlayer").volume = 0.0
};
function unmute() {
document.getElementById("jsControl").setAttribute ("href", "javascript:mute()");
document.getElementById("jsControl").innerHTML = "🔊";
document.getElementById("videoPlayer").volume = 1.0
};
<html>
<head>
<style>
body {
font-family: [Insert font names and attempts];
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<video id="videoPlayer" src="..."></video>
<a id="jsControl" href="javascript:unmute()">🔈</a>
</body>
</html>
I've tried different web-safe fonts, such as Arial, Times New Roman and Tahoma and Sergoe UI.
Question: Is there any font that can be used that supports those unicode characters that works on Chrome?
(Even a font that has these remapped onto regular letters like Wingdings will be accepted as they can be attached using #font-face { ... }.)
Also, please don't complain about the broken Javascript (if it is not written correctly) - I can fix that myself. It's the font; text (missing symbols) that I'm worried about.
Update: Viewing the icons in Internet Explorer works fine. Seems to be a chrome-and/or-other-browser sort of issue.
Since you would use just a few symbols in a special context, rather than as text characters, the practical choice is to use images.
However, if you really want to use characters, there is a very limited set of fonts to consider. According to fileformat.info, U+1F507 is supported only by Quivira, Symbola, Segoe UI Symbol, and Segoe UI Emoji. The latter two are proprietary fonts, available only in relative new versions of Windows, and as different variants (e.g., my Windows 7 lacks Segoe UI Emoji and has a variant of Segoe UI Symbol that lacks the character).
Thus, the only way that works reasonably is to use either Quivira or Symbola as a downloadable font, via #font-face. As they are rather large fonts, and you would need to serve them in different font formats for cross-browser functionality, this approach is hardly a practical option (unless you have many other special characters, possibly used in text, that also need such special fonts).
You shouldn't assume the person viewing your site has necessary fonts installed. Instead, you should add an external font. Find a font that has an appropriate licence and contains the required symbols (for example http://emojisymbols.com/), and add it to CSS as with #font-face declaration:
/*
EmojiSymbols Font (c)blockworks - Kenichi Kaneko
http://emojisymbols.com/
*/
#font-face {
font-family: "EmojiSymbols";
src: url('EmojiSymbols-Regular.woff') format('woff');
text-decoration: none;
font-style: normal;
}
.controlIcon {
font-family: "EmojiSymbols";
}
imagine that you want to design a website that learns English to Iranian people (Persian (Farsi) language) . English and Persian (Farsi) doesn't have any similarity in alphabet because Persian is RIGHT TO LEFT and English is LEFT TO RIGHT and completely are different . i didn't find any tags to set one font for all Persian (Farsi) words and other font for all English words . for example set B-Nazanin for Persian and set Times New Roman for English automatically that don't need to define font for every word every time . just define once these fonts . what can we do ?
thanx
One possible option is to give a lang="fa-IR" attribute/value to the <html> or to any other elements within the document when the website is shown in persian language.
Hence you can override CSS declarations by using [lang|="fa"] selector.
For instance:
[lang|="fa"] p { font-family: "B-Nazanin"; }
<html lang="fa-IR">
<p> سلام دنیا </p>
</html>
Or:
p[lang|="fa"] { font-family: "B-Nazanin"; }
<p>Hello World!</p>
<p lang="fa-IR">سلام دنیا!</p>
you can use the following link for this purpose:
Display text with two language in webpage with different fonts with font-face at rule in css
#font-face { /* Persian Font */
font-family: 'MyFont';
src: url(Fonts/BYekan.ttf);
unicode-range:U+0600-06FF;
}
#font-face { /* english font */
font-family: 'MyFont';
src: url(Fonts/ALGER.TTF);
unicode-range: U+0020-007F;
}
Usage:
body{
font-family: 'MyFont';}
tip: for different languages you can use different "unicode-range".
using style content by language in HTML is to use the :lang selector in your CSS style sheet. ex :
:lang(ta) {
font-family: Latha, "Tamil MN", serif;
font-size: 120%;
}
and dont forget use lang in you HTML code
<p lang="en">Ceci est un paragraphe.</p>
If you really want to use two different fonts for two different languages, your options are:
1) Use some markup that distinguishes between the languages. This could be a class attribute or (more logically, but with slightly more limited browser support) a lang attribute. Of course, you would use this for the language with smaller frequency. This is a lot of work of course. Depending on content generation system, it might or might not be automated.
2) Select the fonts so that the primary font does not contain glyphs for characters in the other language. For example, if you set * { font-family: foo, bar } and foo contains Latin letters but no Arabic characters, foo will be used for English and bar for Farsi. Punctuation characters would still be a problem. More importantly, it will be hard to find such fonts.
3) Use CSS code that selects font family by Unicode range. I won’t go into details, since this approach has too limited browser support to be practically useful yet.
However, it seems that you are trying to create a problem rather than solve one. By typographic principles, the same font should be used for copy text if possible. You should select a font that is suitable for both English and Farsi, or better still a list of such fonts (since no font is available on all computers), or a downloadable font of that kind. Failing that, you might select two fonts, or two lists of fonts, carefully selected, so that you list them both or all and browsers will use them in a natural way: using, for each character, the first font in the list that contains it.
use B-Nazanin or others for persian content and use Open sans for english contect.
If you want to set B-nazanin for persian and set open sans for english, try this code in css:
body{
font-family: "Open sans","B-nazanin";
}
If I understand your question correctly, you will mix Farsi and English on one web site.
Assign two classes, perhaps "farsi" and "english" with appropriate font-family declarations. Then put the Farsi text inside <div class="farsi"> and the English in <div class="english">.
Edited to address mixing languages: You put the <div> around the primary language and use <span> for words in the other language.
I don't think there is an easy way to finely mix languages with different alphabets and even writing directions. Perhaps you can use a macro in your HTML composition tool, or something, to accomplish adding the necessary tags.
I have tried countless plugins, codyfying HTML with escape keys, and my blood is beginning to boil. Switching between Visual and HTML mode is actually changing my content, ie destroying it!!!
OK, i figured out what to do.
First go into visual mode.
Select Preformatted in the formatting drop down. A little grey box is created.
Inside the grey box, copy and paste your raw HTML.
Save it and switch from visual to HTML views a few times. There should be no mangling.
IT IS ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL that you paste into visual tab, instead of in the text tab, or it will get stuffed up completely (very unintuitive. You would think it would work the other way araound).
Wordpress does a strange thing where if you switch between visual and "text" mode (HTML mode was renamed in 3.5 update) it strips any tags that appear empty which often times may not be. This might be what you are experiencing if I am understanding the problem correctly.
If you are just trying to display code on your website you should be able to wrap the code like this:
<code><p>Example code post</p></code>
This is laid out in these guidelines here: http://codex.wordpress.org/Writing_Code_in_Your_Posts
If it is a block of code that needs to not wrap you could also use the "pre" tag like so:
<pre><code><p>Example code post</p></code></pre>
This is described very well here: <code> vs <pre> vs <samp> for inline and block code snippets
Yes, it is absolutely possible. You can follow any of the above mentioned methods. I prefer the following way.
First of all, decode the HTML code using online html decoder. You can find any on google. Then, You can paste the decoded code on your post. The benefit of this method is that, your indentation won't be lost.
Decoded Code
Rendered View File
Hope, it helps future reader to find a way.
Wordpress is very buggy. It took me a long time to finally succeed. For my Wordpress.org installed on my pc I tried: go to visual mode, add pre-formatted text block, copy/paste decoded or encoded. I tried :
<pre><code><p>Example code post</p></code></pre>
That did not work.
The only way it works for me is:
Go to visual, instead of adding a pre-formatted text block I create a paragraph text block, copy/paste the encoded HTMl and then convert it to preformat.
Hope that helps.
Perhaps, You should try out this plugin
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/insert-html-snippet/
Hope this helps!
One way to do is to make the code commented. Something like,
<!--div>
<md-divider class="org__meta-divider md-soc-theme"></md-divider>
<h4 class="org__meta-heading">Technologies</h4>
<ul layout="" layout-wrap="" class="org__tag-container layout-wrap layout-row">
<li class="organization__tag organization__tag--technology">web services</li>
</ul>
</div-->
instead of
<div>
<md-divider class="org__meta-divider md-soc-theme"></md-divider>
<h4 class="org__meta-heading">Technologies</h4>
<ul layout="" layout-wrap="" class="org__tag-container layout-wrap layout-row">
<li class="organization__tag organization__tag--technology">web services</li>
</ul>
</div>
I'm facing this problem,
If opened in IE9 under windows 7, in my pre formatted html block \ is rendered as wong symbol ₩ if courier font is used. If I set Tahoma, e.g. it's ok. In chrome, even if courier is set, symbol is rendered as backslash.
How to fix it?
Edit: code that reproduces this:
<html><head>
<style>
pre {
margin-top: 10px;
padding-left: 7px;
padding-top: 5px;
margin-left: 50px;
font-family: courier;
background-color:#ddd;
}
</style></head><body>
<pre>
Can\'t
</pre>
</body></html>
I cannot reproduce the problem on my Win 7, so I still suspect the reason is that your system has an actual font under the name “Courier” (normal Windows 7 is not shipped with such a font). Either that font is broken regarding the backslash, or it simply lacks it and the browsers picks up the character from another font. In the latter case, that font might be broken.
There are surprisingly many fonts that have a glyph for “₩” U+20A9 WON SIGN where they should have a glyph for backslash. There has been some speculation about the reasons. But the point is that there should be no reason why such a font would be used unless your browser resorts to picking up backup fonts. In that case, IE might have been set to use e.g. Batang Che as the default monospace font – and it’s one of the fonts with that problem.
On the practical side, “Courier” should almost never be used. In systems that have a font under such a name, it is often a bitmap font that looks rather bad especially when font size is changed. Use “Courier New” instead. Or something better, such as
pre, tt
{ font-family : Consolas, Lucida Console, Courier New, monospace; }
As Raymond Chen pointed out in the comments, the browser has likely guessed the encoding incorrectly.
If you want to specify the encoding directly in the file, then you can use a meta tag in the head element of the page, like this:
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=my_encoding_here">
Where my_encoding_here is actually a string representing the encoding you used when creating the HTML. Common encodings are utf-8 and ISO-8859-1, but you should figure out exactly which encoding your editor is using and make sure you match it.
If you're serving pages like this, then you might choose to specify the encoding in your webserver, which will put the information into an HTML header when it returns the page.