I am trying to select from one database using condition in another but my problem is how to do this in my editor i used this code in my phpmyadmin environment and it work fine, but how will write same query in my source code,my problem here is how to connect to two different db in one statement
select * from users.message where sender in( select id from secured.reg_users)
As long as the 2 databases are in the same mysql server, the above query will work with a single connection. (Remember, phpmyadmin will connect to a single database as well at any point of time!) If not, then you can experiment with federated tables, but most likely you will not be able to do this in sql only.
In the latter case, your code needs to retrieve the list of ids from the secured.reg_users table, then use that list as parameter to the main query.
Related
I am not sure if this has been answered before but what I found i am not sure how to make work for me but here is my problem.
I have a database used to keep track of phones for multiple clients. What needs to be done is have a query that can be ran that will run against multiple databases on the same server. each database uses the same table name that I am looking at but the names are slightly different. I came up with this..
INSERT INTO `export db`.exportinfo2
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT * FROM `export db'.tentantnames).users
WHERE name = 'Caller ID:emergency' AND value > 0
What suppose to happen is from a table that has all the database names is is to got to each database and go into the table labeled users and run a where clause on the data then export results to a different database table
I know the code needs to be dynamic but I am not sure how to make it dynamic and function. The table that has all the names for the databases is automatically created every few days.. I am not sure what else needs to be said without sounding like i repeat myself but i just need help making a dynamic query that uses a table premade as database names and run a where statement on the same named table in each database which have their name stored in a different table.
You should look into Synonyms. It can be used to fulfill your purpose
It is a web application connecting to a MySQL 5.6 server in Amazon. The application using PHP code or Java gets randomly the error FUNCTION getSetting does not exist. It is basically doing a query like select getSetting('a_setting_name'); or while used from the stored procedures.
In order to avoid the error some stored procedures were changed to not using the function and get the value by doing a raw select to the table. Also many not used databases were deleted.
If the function is defined in a different database than the one you've selected as the default, you need to qualify the function name with the database name, just as you would if you wanted to access a table or view in a different DB.
SELECT otherDB.getSetting('a_setting_name');
I am currently working on a query in Access 2010 and I am trying to get the below query to work. I have the connection string between my local DB and the server that I am passing through to working just fine.
Select column1
, column2
from serverDB.dbo.table1
where column1 in (Select column1 from tbl_Name1)
In this situation table1 is the table on the server that I am passing through to get to, but the tbl_Name1 is the table that is actually in my Access DB that I am trying to use to create constraints on the data that I am pulling from the server.
When I try to run the query, I am getting the error that it doesn't think tbl_Name1 exists.
Any help is appreciated!
I just came across a solution that may help others in a similar situation.
This approach is easy because you can just run one query on your local Access database and get everything you need all at once. However, a lot of filtering/churning-through-results may be done on your own local computer behind the scenes, as opposed to on the remote server, so it may not necessarily be quick.
Steps
Create a query, make it a "Pass Through" query, and set up its "ODBC Connect Str" property to connect to the remote database.
Write the pass through query, something like SELECT RemoteId From RemoteTable and give your pass through query a name, maybe PassThroughQuery
Create a new query, make it a regular "Select" query.
Write your new query, using the pass through query you just created as a table in this new query (seems weird to use a query as a table, but it works) and join that PassThroughQuery "table" to your local table and filter it based on values in the local table, something like SELECT R.RemoteId, L.LocalValue FROM PassThroughQuery R INNER JOIN LocalTable L ON L.LocalId = R.RemoteId where L.LocalValue = 'SomeText'
This approach allows you to mix/join the results of a pass through query and the data in a local Access database table cleanly, albeit potentially slowly if there is a lot of data involved.
I think the issue is that a pass through query is one that is run on the server. Since one of the tables is located on the local Access file, it won't find the table.
Possible workaround if you must stay with the pass-through is you can build an SQL string with the results of the nested query rather than the query string itself (depending on the number of results this may or may not be practical)
e.g. Instead of Select column1 from tbl_Name1 you use "c1result1","c1result2",....
I'm getting data from an MSSQL DB ("A") and inserting into a MySQL DB ("B") using the date created in the MSSQL DB. I'm doing it with simple logics, but there's got to be a faster and more efficient way of doing this. Below is the sequence of logics involved:
Create one connection for MSSQL DB and one connection for MySQL DB.
Grab all of data from A that meet the date range criterion provided.
Check to see which of the data obtained are not present in B.
Insert these new data into B.
As you can imagine, step 2 is basically a loop, which can easily max out the time limit on the server, and I feel like there must be a way of doing this must faster and during when the first query is made. Can anyone point me to right direction to achieve this? Can you make "one" connection to both of the DBs and do something like below?
SELECT * FROM A.some_table_in_A.some_column WHERE
"it doesn't exist in" B.some_table_in_B.some_column
A linked server might suit this
A linked server allows for access to distributed, heterogeneous
queries against OLE DB data sources. After a linked server is created,
distributed queries can be run against this server, and queries can
join tables from more than one data source. If the linked server is
defined as an instance of SQL Server, remote stored procedures can be
executed.
Check out this HOWTO as well
If I understand your question right, you're just trying to move things in the MSSQL DB into the MySQL DB. I'm also assuming there is some sort of filter criteria you're using to do the migration. If this is correct, you might try using a stored procedure in MSSQL that can do the querying of the MySQL database with a distributed query. You can then use that stored procedure to do the loops or checks on the database side and the front end server will only need to make one connection.
If the MySQL database has a primary key defined, you can at least skip step 3 ("Check to see which of the data obtained are not present in B"). Use INSERT IGNORE INTO... and it will attempt to insert all the records, silently skipping over ones where a record with the primary key already exists.
So here is my situation: I have a vendor supplied DB we cannot modify and a custom db that imports data from the vendor app and acts on it. Once records are imported form the vendor app, they cannot appear on the list of records to be imported. Also we only want to display the 250 most recent records that have not been imported.
What I originally started with was select the list of ids that have been imported from the custom db, and then query the vendor db, using the list of ids in a .Where(x => !idList.Contains(x.Id)) clause on the remote query.
This worked up until we broke 2100 records imported into the custom db, as 2100 is the limit on the number of parameters that can be passed into SQL. After finding out this was the actual problem and not the 'invalid buffer'/'severe error' ADO.Net reported, my solution was to remove the first 2000 ids in the remote query, and then remove the remaining records in the local query.
Having to pull back a large number of irrelevant records, just to exclude them, so I can get the correct 250 records seems very inelegant. Is there a better way to do this, short of doing a cross db stored procedure?
Thanks in advance.
This might not be the best answer, depending on how many records you're dealing with, but you could force the SQL to execute and just deal with it as in-memory objects. Calling the ToList() method will execute the SQL and convert to an IEnumerable .
What I might suggest is to have started by querying the vendor database first ordering the results by some kind of criteria (perhaps a date field, oldest to most recent).
You could do a Skip().Take() to "skim" the results and then take each bulk set and insert them into the custom db where the ID doesn't already exist. That way you avoid the problem you have now.
If you have db-create access to the SQL Server that the vendor's db is running on (or if your custom db is on the same server), you could create a "has been imported" table in a different database on that same server, and then write a stored proc that does a cross-database join of that table against the vendor db, e.g.:
select top 250 from vendordb.to_be_imported
where not exists
(select 1 from customdb.has_been_imported where idWasImported = idToBeImported)
order by whatever;
You might even be able to do this in Linq 2 SQL -- I've never tried adding objects from different databases into a single DataContext...