I have the object TABLE_LIST which is a list that has tables (I can't provide the contents for privacy policies, sorry).
I first created the object TABLE_LIST (It is a list of data.frames 2x12)
TABLE_LIST=lapply(1:4, function(x) data.frame(rbind(total.ratio4[[x]][-(1)], total.ratio2[[x]][-(1)]), row.names=row))
The following code gives me red and green font colors based on the value on the cell, and it works like a charm:
formattable(TABLE_LIST[[1]], list(area(,-(c(5,10)))~formatter("span", style=x~style(color=ifelse(x>1,"red","green"))),area(,(c(5,10)))~formatter("span", style=x~style(color=ifelse(x>1,"green","red")))))
However, I need COLOR AND comma separated numbers. My failed attempt is:
formattable(TABLE_LIST[[1]], list(area(,-(c(5,10)))~formatter("span", style=x~style(color=ifelse(x>1,"red","green"))),area(,(c(5,10)))~formatter("span", style=x~style(color=ifelse(x>1,"green","red"),digits(x,2))),
area(1:2,1:10)~formatter("span",x~ style(digits(x,2)))))
This code works well, but erases the formatting of the color. I do not know what else to do.
I have to mention I cannot change the original data.frame without messing everything up. So I gotta make the changes on table_list or formattable. Thank you.
I think I solved it. So I will share this small knowledge to people who may have the same problems as me:
formattable(TABLE_LIST[[1]],
list(
area(,-(c(5,10)))~formatter("span",
style=x~style(color=ifelse(x>1,"red","green")),
x~style(digits(x,4))),
area(,(c(5,10)))~formatter("span",
style=x~style(color=ifelse(x>1,"green","red")),
x~style(digits(x,4)))))
Basically, inside the same formatter, on the level of style, add a comma and x~style.
Related
I have this script, there are two portions. There is the filter portion and there is the highlight portion, both work great and as expected on their own. But when you combine them and type into the input field for example "this is" these words are eliminated as the filter function kicks in, the highlight function continues to work as normal. Can anyone help to explain this peculiar behaviour? I have tried the following, changing the keyup to keydown and alternating, changing the referencing names, changing the index values to no avail. This script's function is supposed to filter and highlight from one input field.Sorry about the parenthesis around code but my moblile does not have the code character.
I cannot post code from my mobile. Please see attached picture
Thanks
Change $("#search *") to $("#search > *") or $("#search").children().
I haven't looked at the hilitor code, but it presumably works by putting <span></span> around the highlighted portions, so that it can set their style. #search * matches descendants at any depth, not just the direct children of #search.
I'm using Report Builder 3.0. Long story short, I want to make the font bold for the text in the red box that you see in the image below:
Basically, it's just one expression in the legend field of my value, however, for clarity's sake (for my end users) I wish to make the "title part" bold. I found the following solution for textboxes in a tablix using Html by checking off the "HTML – Interpret HTML tags as styles." checkbox within the Textbox's properties. (http://www.sqlchick.com/entries/2010/10/31/using-different-formats-within-a-single-textbox-in-ssrs.html)
However, I can't find anything similar for graphs! I mean if MS thought about it for tables, I presume they must've given it some thought for a chart setting too.
Thanks to all!
p.s. As an aesthetic solution to my problem, I did think of simply creating a new title field, moving it to the exact same location and formating it. But I'm surious whether there'd be some more "proper" way of doing this.
I'm using the same approach for one of my charts.
STEPS.
Select the Chart series to open property pane. In my case, the chart series name is TWR Chart Series
Select the color property and select to build the expression.
I'm posting one of my expression. You can build your own expression base don your field names etc.
=IIF(Fields!ProductID.Value = 1 OR Fields!ProductID.Value = 6,"#00425E",
IIF(Fields!ProductID.Value = 3 ,"#6B8797",
IIF(Fields!ProductID.Value = 5 OR Fields!ProductID.Value = 7,"#799179",
IIF(Fields!ProductID.Value = 4 AND Fields!sort.Value=99,"#6bb1be","#48597B"))))
If used sensibly, you should get your desired results.Good luck.
We are using the following code (generated by php but finally this is on client side)
c3.generate({'bindto':'#b65d3422__salestaffcommunication_xepan_base_view_chart_chart','data':{'keys':{'x':'name','value':['Email','Call','Meeting']},'groups':[['Email','Call','Meeting']],'json':[],'type':'bar'},'axis':{'x':{'type':'category'},'rotated':true},'onrendered':function(ev,ui){$(".widget-grid").masonry({'itemSelector':'.widget'})}});
c3.generate({'bindto':'#f67e14d8__t_masscommunication_xepan_base_view_chart_chart','data':{'keys':{'x':'name','value':['Newsletter','TeleMarketing']},'groups':[['Newsletter','TeleMarketing']],'json':[],'type':'bar'},'axis':{'x':{'type':'category'},'rotated':true},'onrendered':function(ev,ui){$(".widget-grid").masonry({'itemSelector':'.widget'})}});
c3.generate({'bindto':'#517df254__ableworkforce_xepan_base_view_chart_chart','data':{'columns':[['present',11.111111111111]],'type':'gauge'},'color':{'pattern':['#FF0000','#F97600','#F6C600','#60B044'],'threshold':{'values':[30,60,90,100]}},'onrendered':function(ev,ui){$(".widget-grid").masonry({'itemSelector':'.widget'})}});
And last graph is not drawn. showing
SyntaxError (DOM Exception 12): The string did not match the expected pattern.
However, I can run ANY two and it works fine. that means all code is perfect but once second one is drawn ( no matter in which order). Third one doesn't draws.
Is it any known bug, or any workaround known.
Using v0.4.11 of c3 from c3js.org
Here is my jsfiddle
https://jsfiddle.net/2yy2mjaf/1/
Thank you.
IDs cannot start with a number, which is the case of your third ID.
The simple solution is just adding a letter to it:
'bindto':'#a517df254_ //just put an "a" before the number here
Here is your fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/7dkLdg32/
I have SSRS solution for SQL 2005 and 2008.
I am showing output in the form of chart- column chart with each column representing different database.
Is there a way to display each column in different color?
Regards
Manjot
You can use a formula to set the colour of each column, but that would work best if you knew what the individual series values ('databases'?) were going to be.
Right-click on your chart and bring up its properties. Now switch to the Data tab and select the first item in the Values list. Click the Edit... button to show the properties for the values (the columns) in your chart. Over on the Appearance tab there's a Series Style... button which takes you to another dialog.
On this new Style Properties dialog, switch to the Fill tab. That's where you set the colour for each of your columns. This can be a formula, so you might make it something like:
=Switch(
Fields!Database.Value = "master", "Blue",
Fields!Database.Value = "msdb", "Red",
"Green")
If you don't know in advance which 'databases' are going to be represented on the chart, this method won't work very well. In that case you might be able to come up with a formula which hashes the database name and comes up with a colour to match. That sounds like an interesting challenge, so add to your question if you need help doing something like that.
Edit
I just got a hash-based-colour-scheme working. It's a pretty nasty piece of code, but it did manage to get me a unique colour for every (string valued) column. Perhaps someone can come up with a better algorithm and post it here. Here's mine:
="#" & left(Hex(Fields!Database.GetHashCode()), 6)
So that's getting the HashCode for the string (a numeric value) and converting it to hex, then taking the leftmost six characters and prepending it with a "#" sign. That gives us a string that looks like a colour value (eg #AB12F0).
One of the many quirks of Reporting Services we've run across is the complete and utter lack of a CheckBox control or even something remotely similar.
We have a form that should appear automatically filled out based on information pulled from a database. We have several bit datatype fields. Printing out "True" or "False" just looks silly, as this is supposed to look like a form that has been auto-filled out, so we want to have a series of checkboxes and labels that are either checked or unchecked.
We are running SSRS 2005 but I'm not aware of SSRS 2008 having added a CheckBox control. Even if it did, we'd need to have an alternative for the time being. The best we've found so far is:
use Wingdings
use images
use text boxes with borders and print a blank/space or a capital X
All three approaches require IIF expression shenanigans.
The Wingdings approach seemed to work acceptably, and was the most aesthetically pleasing except that for whatever reason it didn't always print correctly. More importantly, PDF exports, also for whatever reason, converted all fonts (generally) to Arial and so we got funky letters instead of the Windings dingbats.
Images, being a pixel-based raster, don't do so well when printed along side vector stuff like text. Unless handled carefully, they tend to stretch, pixelate, and do other unprofessional looking things.
While these methods do work (some with limitations as mentioned above) none of them are particularly elegant.
Are we missing something obvious? Not so obvious? Does someone at Microsoft have a good reason why such a control was not provided in SSRS 2000, let alone 2 versions and 8 years later? This can't be the first time this issue has come up...
I, along with others in my shop, have used images, toggling the hidden attribute based on the field value (true or false). We haven't had any problems with blurring or scaling, unless we tried to increase the scale of the image beyond 100% obviously.
Another option I've used is similar to the wingdings idea, but I just use a plain old "X". On our forms at least, it is not uncommon for someone to use an X in a box instead of a check mark, so it looks completely acceptable. Plus, you don't have to worry about strange characters when printing.
As for why Microsoft does not include a checkbox control, I can't answer that as I've been wondering the same thing myself for a long time now.
I just wanna share the idea on this blog. SSRS: How to Display Checkbox on Report
First create a textbox
Then change the font family to Wingdings
Insert an expression on the textbox and write this expressions.
=IIF(Fields!Active.Value,chr(254),"o")
Fields!Active.Value could be anything from your query that should return a boolean value 1 or 0.
Then click Preview and see the checkbox ;)
More styles can be selected on the blog that I shared above.
Here is an example of my output
What I have used to display a check box (or ballot box):
1- create textbox (that will become your check box)
2- change font to Arial Unicode MS
3- in the expression window use:
ChrW(&H2611) for a filled-in checkbox
ChrW(&H2610) for an empty checkbox
Besides the different methods already presented, as of SQL Server 2008 R2 there's a built-in control that can be used for checkbox-alike functionality: the Indicator!
Have a look here for details on how to use it: https://web.archive.org/web/20190916105459/http://blog.hoegaerden.be/2012/08/04/displaying-checkboxes-in-an-ssrs-report/
To be able to use a field of type bit, you'll have to cast it to int first. This can be done either in the dataset query or by adding a calculated field to the dataset.
If you want the NULLs to come up as yellow, then you'll need to build the expression that way so it takes that requirement into account as well.
Here's a possible expression for a calculated field:
=Switch(
IsNothing(Fields!YourBoolean.Value), 50,
Fields!YourBoolean.Value = False, 0,
Fields!YourBoolean.Value = True, 100)
Depending on the meaning of your fields - is False good or bad - you may need to swap the zero and 100.
Another way to do thisd is go to "Placeholder properties" of TextBox and check Html - Interpret HTML tag as styles
Then in the Value - Expression put this line of code for checked:
="<font face=""Wingdings 2"" color=""green"">" & Chr(81) &"</font>" & "some other text"
Or this code sample for unchecked:
="<font face=""Wingdings 2"" color=""red"">" & Chr(163) &"</font>" & "some other text"
This way you can have checkbox and text in the same textbox.
Later edit:
If you are having problem displaying Wingdings 2 on Azure, then use Wingdings.
Apparently it works.
="<font face=""Wingdings"" color=""green"">" & Chr(253) &"</font>" & "some other text"
Or this code sample for unchecked:
="<font face=""Wingdings"" color=""red"">" & Chr(168) &"</font>" & "some other text"
You can also use a string calculated field like "[X]" or "[ ]". It's less pretty than the textbox with border but you don't have to put a specific control for the value and you can fill table or matrix with this.
At least there is some solution for the checkbox. I'm still looking for full justification for my text (In fact I'm looking for another solution than SSRS know).
ACCESS 97 could make this kind of thing but not SQL SERVER 2012.
I think there is a bug with SSRS and embedding font characters above 128 (some thing todo with ANSI encoding). Basically you can use 1-128 fine, the rest show up as tall rectangular blocks.
I like NY's idea of the textbox with a border and an optional X - this sounds simple and effective.
This is building on Dragos Durlut's answer. I don't have a high enough reputation to comment but I can answer...
I needed a checkbox as part of text that is passed as a parameter. The parameter contains HTML and is used in a placeholder set up just like Dragos suggests: HTML - Interpret HTML tags as styles.
Instead of having to switch between the HTML and the strings, you can use the HTML Escape Codes (& + # + CharCode + ; --> ¨)
="<font face='Wingdings'>¨</font> Empty checkbox"
Since mine is a parameter, it just pass in the string:
<font face='Wingdings'>¨</font> Empty checkbox
If you need the checkbox selected, you would pass in either ý or þ instead:
<font face='Wingdings'>ý</font> filled with an x
<font face='Wingdings'>þ</font> filled with a checkmark