When I open the services.xml in PhpStorm with Symfony Plugin enabled, it's able to resolve all the services, I can Ctrl+Click and go the Service Definition , except doctrine.orm.entity_manager.
It says unable to resolve symbol 'doctrine.orm.entity_manager'
Here is the services.xml file
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<container xmlns="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services http://symfony.com/schema/dic/services/services-1.0.xsd">
<services>
<service id="example_manager" class="Vendor\XysBundle\Manager\ExampleManager">
<argument type="service" id="doctrine.orm.entity_manager" />
</service>
</services>
</container>
PhpStorm Details:
PhpStorm 2016.3.1
Build #PS-163.9735.1, built on December 6, 2016
JRE: 1.8.0_112-release-408-b2 amd64
JVM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM by JetBrains s.r.o
appDevDebugProjectContainer.xml file exists in the app/cache directory .
How can I get get this working ?
I have the same issue. If you open up the vendor\doctrine\doctrine-bundle\Resources\config\orm.xml file where doctrine services are defined, you can see, there is no service with the id "doctrine.orm.entity_manager" but only "doctrine.orm.entity_manager.abstract"
The definition looks like:
<service id="doctrine.orm.entity_manager.abstract" class="%doctrine.orm.entity_manager.class%" abstract="true" />
As you can see the abstract attribute is set to true. This means this service can serve as a parent of other services, and when you define child services with this abstract parent you don't have to define the method calls or the parameters injected into the constructor for example, instead these definitions will be inherited from the parent.
If you investigate a bit deeper you will find that %doctrine.orm.entity_manager.class% is defined in the same file as a parameter that actually references to the Doctrine Entity Manager:
<parameter key="doctrine.orm.entity_manager.class">Doctrine\ORM\EntityManager</parameter>
So I guess we should use doctrine.orm.entity_manager.abstract, however doctrine.orm.entity_manager is recognised as well, although I don't know how.
For further explanation of abstract service definitions have a look at this Symfony doc page: https://symfony.com/doc/current/service_container/parent_services.html
Related
I'm trying to implement gdx-pay for Amazon, but I can't find any info for that.
First problem is when I try to register receiver on manifest fileI get this error :
Unresolved class 'ResponseReceiver'
here is my full code:
<receiver android:name="com.amazon.device.iap.ResponseReceiver">
<intent-filter>
<action
android:name="com.amazon.inapp.purchasing.NOTIFY"
android:permission="com.amazon.inapp.purchasing.Permission.NOTIFY" />
</intent-filter>
</receiver>
In my gradle file I use this dependencies : Configure dependencies using Gradle
Second, when I try to register store I don't know what key should I pass here:
purchaseManagerConfig.addStoreParam(PurchaseManagerConfig.STORE_NAME_ANDROID_AMAZON, "key_here?");
Is there any working simple for gdx-pay Amazon store integration?
Thanks
An example app was added and is linked in the main readme.
I am trying to deploy the Pulse Web Application to an external Tomcat. I get this error when deploying. How should I fix this?
org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException: No
bean named 'org.springframework.security.authenticationManager' is
defined: Did you forget to add a gobal
element to your configuration (with child
elements)? Alternatively you can use the authentication-manager-ref
attribute on your and elements.
OK. This is fixed. To everyone also experiencing this... you must set the Spring Profile "pulse.authentication.default" or it will not load the AuthenticationManager Bean.
The overall issue is with the RowStore's documentation, which says this is OPTIONAL, when in fact it is required.
http://rowstore.docs.snappydata.io/docs/manage_guide/pulse/quickstart.html#topic_795C97B46B9843528961A094EE520782
It says at Step 4.) that configuring security is Optional when in fact you have to pass a Spring Profile. Also, again in the section "Authenticating Pulse Users", it says this is not a requirement.
To fix the issue I had to pass the Spring Profile "pulse.authentication.default" to activate the Bean in spring-security.xml and deploy pulse.war properly.
A better way for SnappyData pulse.war to do this in the future might be to use "!pulse.authentication.custom", which would always load the default AuthenticationManager bean as long as a custom one was not configured.
Example change for future to make it truly optional:
<beans:beans profile="!pulse.authentication.custom" >
<authentication-manager>
<authentication-provider>
<user-service>
<user name="admin" password="admin" authorities="ROLE_USER" />
</user-service>
</authentication-provider>
</authentication-manager>
</beans:beans>
Which version of Tomcat are you using?
Here is another thread on the same issue with TC authentication.
Else, can you just try Pulse in the "embedded mode" ?
Which version of SnappyData you are using ?
You need to mention a pulse.properties file in the classpath . For details you can check http://rowstore.docs.snappydata.io/docs/manage_guide/pulse/quickstart.html#topic_795C97B46B9843528961A094EE520782.
Let us know if you any problems further.
We have one xml configuration file that we use in production. We also have a little test app that has a couple of additional needs. What I'd like to do is create a second, testing-only xml config file that references the embedded production configuration file. Is there any way to do this?
I'm aware of the "include" element, but am not sure where in the file it is supposed to be placed--in the castle node? The components node?
I feel like the answer is here but I'm too dense to figure it out.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
UPDATE
This is how our production config file is set up:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<OurCompany>
<Framework>
<castle>
<installers>
<!-- some installers-->
<installers>
<components>
<!--some components-->
<components>
<castle>
<Framework>
<OurCompany>
My most recent attempt at a non-production config file looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<OurCompany>
<Framework>
<castle>
<include uri="assembly://AssemblyContainingEmbeddedXml/MyEmbeddedConfig.xml" />
<components>
<!--components I only want registered with container when running in non-production environment-->
<components>
<castle>
<Framework>
<OurCompany>
The exception I get reads:
Configuration parser encountered Framework, but it was expecting to find installers, facilities or components. There might be either a typo on or you might have forgotten to nest it properly.
(In the actual message, "Framework," "installers," "facilities," and "components" are enclosed in angle brackets.)
The bottom of the page you reference has an example of loading from an embedded resourced:
IResource resource = new AssemblyResource("assembly://Acme.Crm.Data/Configuration/services.xml");
container = new WindsorContainer(new XmlInterpreter(resource));
I have a Asp.net C# MVC 3 application implementing the Sharp Architecture. I have been trying to get Quartz.net to setup and work nicely with Castle Windsor for a few days without any luck. Based on what I know, I have setup everything correctly, but continue to have issues.
In my Global.cs file, creating my Container and trying to register quartz jobs:
var container = new WindsorContainer(new XmlInterpreter("quartz_jobs.xml"));
container.AddFacility("quartznet", new QuartzFacility());
In my quartz_jobs.xml file I have the following contents:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<quartz xmlns="http://quartznet.sourceforge.net/JobSchedulingData"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
version="1.0"
overwrite-existing-jobs="true">
<job>
<job-detail>
<name>DeleteLoansWithoutClientsJob</name>
<job-type>EasyOptions.Web.Mvc.Code.Jobs.DeleteLoansWithoutClientsJob, EasyOptions.Web.Mvc</job-type>
<durable>true</durable>
</job-detail>
<trigger>
<cron>
<name>DeleteLoansWithoutClientsJobTrigger</name>
<group>MyJobs</group>
<description>A description</description>
<job-name>DeleteLoansWithoutClientsJob</job-name>
<job-group>MyJobs</job-group>
<cron-expression>0 0/1 * * * ?</cron-expression>
</cron>
</trigger>
</job>
Problem is, you're pointing Windsor to the Quartz.NET config file.
There are two separate configurations: Windsor's and Quartz.NET's. Windsor is usually configured with code nowadays (i.e. fluent config), though it still supports XML configuration. However the Quartz.NET facility doesn't currently support code config, you have to use Windsor's XML config (at least for this, other components/facilities may still be configured via code). Then there's Quartz.NET, usually configured via an external quartz_jobs.xml file.
I recommend using the Quartz.NET facility sample app as reference. In particular, here's the sample Windsor config and the sample Quartz.NET config.
EDIT: if Quartz.NET says it can't find quartz_jobs.xml in a web application you need to include the web root in the configuration path: "~/quartz_jobs.xml" (instead of plain "quartz_jobs.xml")
I've written a blog post on how to integrate Quartz.NET with an IoC container. My example code uses Castle Windsor.
The blog post can be found here: http://thecodesaysitall.blogspot.com/2012/02/integrate-quartznet-with-your-favourite.html
I have the following three components defined in the Caste-Windsor XML configuration for my application:
<component id="StringFactory"
service="IStringFactory, MyApp"
type="DefaultStringFactory, MyApp"
lifestyle="singleton"
/>
<component id="TheString"
type="System.String"
factoryId="StringFactory"
factoryCreate="CreateString"
>
<parameters>
<name>SomeString</name>
</parameters>
</component>
<component id="TheTarget"
service="ITarget, MyApp"
type="TheTarget, MyApp"
lifestyle="transient"
>
<parameters>
<aString>${TheString}</aString>
</parameters>
</component>
And the following facility defined:
<facility id="factory.support"
type="Castle.Facilities.FactorySupport.FactorySupportFacility, Castle.MicroKernel"
/>
When I run the application and set a breakpoint in the constructor of the TheObject class, the value passed in as the aString parameter is "${TheString}" when I expect it to resolve to the value of the component with that name.
Also, I have a breakpoint in the StringFactory constructor and CreateString method, neither of which are hit. I know the configuration is being used as other components are resolving correctly.
What am I missing or doing wrong here?
UPDATE
In light of the huge tangient this topic has taken, I've refactored the code above to remove anything to do with connection strings. The original intent of this post was about injecting a property with the value returned from a method on another object. Somehow that point was lost in a discussion about why I'm using XML versus code-based configuration and if this is a good way to inject a connection string.
The above approach is far from an original idea and it was pulled from several other discussions on this topic and our requirements are what they are. I'd like help understanding why the configuration as it is in place (whether the right approach or not) isn't working as expected.
I did verify that the first two components are being instantiated correctly. When I call Container.Resolve("TheString"), I get the correct value back. For whatever reason, The parameter syntax is not working correctly.
Any ideas?
While not a definitive solution to what I need to do in my application, I believe I've figured out what is wrong with the code. Or at least I've found a way to make it work which hints at the original problem.
I replaced the String type for TheString with a custom class. That's it. Once I did that, everything worked fine.
My guess is that it has something to do with the fact that I was trying to use a ValueType (primitive) as a component. I guess Castle doesn't support it.
So, knowing that's the case, I can now move on to figuring out if this approach is really going to work or if we need to change direction.
UPDATE
For the sake of completeness, I thought I'd go ahead and explain what I did to solve my problem AND satisfy my requirements.
As before, I have access to my configuration settings through an IConfigurationService defined as:
<component id="ConfigurationService"
service="MyApp.IConfigurationService, MyApp"
type="MyApp.RuntimeConfigurationService, MyApp"
lifestyle="singleton"
/>
This is automatically injected into my (new) IConnectionFactory which is responsible for generating IDbConnection objects based on the connection strings defined in the application's configuration file. The factory is declared as:
<component id="ConnectionFactory"
service="MyApp.Factories.IConnectionFactory, MyApp"
type="MyApp.Factories.DefaultConnectionFactory, MyApp"
lifestyle="singleton"
/>
In order to resolve what connection is used by my repository, I declare each connection as a component using the ConnectionFactory to create each instance:
<component id="MyDbConnection"
type="System.Data.IDbConnection,
System.Data, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089"
factoryId="ConnectionFactory"
factoryCreate="CreateConnection"
lifestyle="transient"
>
<parameters>
<connectionStringName>MyDB</connectionStringName>
</parameters>
</component>
Notice the fully described reference to System.Data. I found this is necessary whenever referencing assemblies in the GAC.
Finally, my repository is defined as:
<component id="MyRepository"
service="MyApp.Repositories.IMyRepository, MyApp"
type="MyApp.Sql.SqlMyRepository, MyApp.Sql"
lifestyle="transient"
>
<parameters>
<connection>${MyDbConnection}</connection>
</parameters>
</component>
Now everything resolves correctly and I don't have ANY hard-coded strings compiled into my code. No connection string names, app setting keys or whatever. The app is completely reconfigurable from the XML files which is a requirement I must satisfy. Plus, other devs that will be working with the solution can manage the actual connection strings in the way they are used to. Win-win.
Hope this helps anyone else that runs into a similar scenario.
You don't really need XML registrations here, since you probably don't need to swap components or change the method used without recompiling. Writing a configurable app does not imply having to use XML registrations.
The problem with this particular XML registration you posted is that the connection string is a parameter, but it's treated like a service.
Doing this with code registrations is much easier, e.g.:
var container = new WindsorContainer();
container.Register(Component.For<IConfigurationService>().ImplementedBy<RuntimeConfigurationService>());
container.Register(Component.For<ITheRepository>().ImplementedBy<TheRepository>()
.LifeStyle.Transient
.DynamicParameters((k, d) => {
var cfg = k.Resolve<IConfigurationService>();
d["connectionString"] = cfg.GetConnectionString();
k.ReleaseComponent(cfg);
}));
Or if you don't want to depend on IConfigurationService, you could do something like:
container.Register(Component.For<ITheRepository>().ImplementedBy<TheRepository>()
.LifeStyle.Transient
.DependsOn(Property.ForKey("connectionString")
.Is(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings[ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["connName"]].ConnectionString))