Objects within a parent div are still overflowing - html

Codepen link: [removed for privacy]
(Ignore the search button, I am mainly concerned with results displayed within it's parent element of #results_container).
On the actual app, results will be generated based on a search term,
I have the overflow set to "scroll", but as you can see, the bottom result still overflows. What gives?
#results_container {
height: 430px;
overflow: scroll;
margin-top: 5px;
}

The unwanted "bottom result still overflows" seems to be due to the height: 100%; CSS definition for the #wrapper div.
If you remove "height: 100%; from #wrapper, I think you'll see the results you were looking for.
Also, notice that the #wrapper div expands and collapses as the browser's display is expanded and collapsed. Once the height: 100%; is removed from #wrapper, the #wrapper height does not change.

I made a fork from your codepen.
#sidebar {
border: 1px solid black;
width: 40%;
margin-top: 22px;
height: 93%;
overflow-y: hidden;
}
#results_container {
height: 430px;
overflow: auto;
margin-top: 5px;
}
Here the full example: codepen fork

Related

Chrome won't render right padding when the overflow style is set to "auto"

I have the following code :
CSS
#div1 {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
padding: 40px;
background-color: blue;
overflow: auto;
}
#div2 {
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
background-color: red;
}
HTML
<div id="div1">
<div id="div2">
</div>
</div>
What I want to know is why I can't see the right padding of #div1 in chrome, but I can see bottom padding.
Are the padding-right and padding-bottom have some differences?
And how could I let the chrome render the padding-right correctly?
JsFiddle Link
Thank you for your help.
UPDATE 06/11/2014
Thanks to #PradeepPansari for the 'inline-block' solution, it works perfect.
And thanks to #Gaurav for the explanation how scroll bar works.
But it is still confusing me, why when I set display to 'inline-block', #Gaurav 's explanation seems to go wrong.
And when I use chrome to view the demo, the padding-bottom will be rendered.
And again, can anybody explain why the "display: inline-block" works?
I see FF also gives same result as chrome.
I will try to explain your question by following images
- The whole process of getting both div and positioning it
- Now the watch out the various scroll positions
The whole problem is because of the Div 2 height and width is larger than Div 1,
As we know, Padding width and height is not added to the element width and height as it is done for margin. So the scroll get the scroll width and height of the Div 2, and as the div 2 height and width is greater than Div 1, padding to right and bottom is not visible.
Using this code
#div1
{
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
padding: 40px;
background-color: blue;
}
#div2
{
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
background-color: red;
}
You can try below code:
Working Demo
#div1 {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
padding: 40px;
background-color: blue;
overflow: auto;
}
#div2 {
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
background-color: red;
display:inline-block
}

Responsive page height as a div expands html css

My situation:
On my page I have multiple collapsible panels in the right hand column of my main content.
At the moment what happens is when I expand the panel (which contains a large amount of text) it goes off the page.
Therefore meaning that the user can't read it. This due the fact that the height is hard coded.
Now what I want to happen is when the div expands, if it reaches the max height of the page, the page height expands to incorporate all of the text.
Question:
Is there a way to make it possible that the page height expands along with the div?
My CSS:
.container {
width: 1000px;
margin: 0px auto;
background-color:White;
height: 0px auto;
}
#page {
overflow: hidden;
width: 900px;
padding: 0px 50px 50px 50px;
background-color: #FFFFFF;
}
#content {
float: right;
width: 580px;
}
Thankyou for any suggestions
Instead of using height you could try to set position to "absolute" and 0px top and bot on the .container?
.container {
width: 1000px;
margin: 0px auto;
background-color:White;
top: 0px;
bottom: 0px;
}
You can make .container a clearfix so it will expand to the size of the floated element inside of it. Here's a great article on using clearfix.
.container {
width: 1000px;
margin: 0px auto;
background-color:White;
height: 0px auto;
}
.container:after {
visibility: hidden;
display: block;
font-size: 0;
content: " ";
clear: both;
height: 0;
}
That code will work for everything outside of IE6&7. If you need tose too just take a look at the article.
Never mind guys, I solved it....It was due to the fact that i was positioning the div with a relative height and width, so i just used margin-top instead.
Thanks to everyone

No padding when using overflow: auto

I can’t get padding-bottom to work when I use overflow-y: auto on a box. I use Firefox.
#container {
padding: 3em;
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: red;
}
#some_info {
height: 900px;
background: #000;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="some_info"></div>
</div>
See the JSFiddle.
One more solution without extra DIVs.
#container:after {
content: "";
display: block;
height: 50px;
width: 100%;
}
Working in FF, Chrome, IE8-10.
I'm late to the party, but I thought it was worth adding a different solution that addresses some of the concerns raised above.
I came here because of exactly the kind of situation that #Philip raised in response to Alexandre Lavoie's solution: I have dynamically generated content inside the container, so I can't just apply styling to a specific div name like #some_info.
Happily, there's a simple solution for browsers that support CSS3: instead of applying bottom padding to the container, apply a bottom margin to the last child element inside the container.
#container > :last-child {
margin-bottom: 3em;
}
As long as the last child element in the container div is a block-level element, this should do the trick.
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/rwgZu/240/
P.S. If Firefox's failure to scroll to the bottom of the padding is indeed a bug (as suggested by #Kyle), it still hasn't been fixed as of Firefox 47.0. Frustrating! Internet Explorer 11.0.9600.17843 exhibits the same behavior. (Google Chrome, in contrast, shows the bottom padding as expected.)
The solutions above were not working for my needs, and I think I stumbled on a simple solution.
If your container and overflowing content share the same background color, you can add a top and bottom border with the color matching the background color. To create equal padding all around, set the border width equal to the left and right padding of the container.
Link to modified version of OP's fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/dennisoneil/rwgZu/508/
A simple example below.
Note: Stack Overflow puts the snippet results into an overflow scroll, which makes it a little harder to see what's going on. The fiddle may be your best preview option.
#container {
background: #ccc;
overflow-y: scroll;
height: 190px;
padding: 0 20px;
border-top: 20px solid #ccc;
border-bottom: 20px solid #ccc;
}
#overflowing {
background: #ccc;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="overflowing">
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
This is content<br/>
</div>
</div>
Here is a possible approach that is working perfectly :
#container {
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
}
#some_info {
height: 900px;
background: #000;
border: 3em solid red;
}
Style the parent div normally and make the inner div do what you want it to do.
Remove overflow-x and overflow on #container, change height to 100% and add overflow-y:scroll; on #some_info
#container {
padding: 3em;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: red;
}
#some_info {
height: 100%;
background: #000;
overflow-y:scroll;
width:100%;
}
Working Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/9yuohxuh/
For those who are looking for a simple solution and can change the DOM, put the overflow on the outer element and the padding on the inner element.
.scroll {
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
}
.scroll__inner {
padding: 3em;
}
In the example from the original question, it would look like this:
#container {
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: red;
}
#some_info {
height: 900px;
background: #000;
padding: 3em;
box-sizing: border-box; /* only needed if wanting padding to not be added to height */
}
Note the use of box-sizing: border-box here, which is only needed as the OP has a hardcoded height (generally bad practice but could be needed in edge cases), so adding this border-box enables the 3em padding to not increase the height, but pad inside the 900px.
A final note, I'd advise avoiding ID's for styling, mostly due to their extremely high specificity, see this post for more info on that.
Demo
Hi now used to this css
#container {
padding: 3em;
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: red;
padding-bottom:0; // add this line in your css
}
#some_info {
height: 900px;
background: #000;
margin-bottom:3em; // add this line in your css
}
Demo
It's not only with bottom padding. Right padding/border/spacing is also ignored (you can't see it in your example because it has no content, and the width is not scrolling)
All the answers above fail in chrome 43, generating up to 3 scrollbars! or if the content overflows #some_info.
Example: http://jsfiddle.net/LwujL3ad/
If it worked for you, it's probably because the content was not as wide as the scrolling element, or fixed sized.
The right solution is:
Set #some info to display:table, and add padding or border to it, not to the scrolling container.
#container {
overflow: scroll;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: red;
padding-bottom:0;
}
#some_info {
display:table;
border: solid 3em red;
height: 900px;
background: #000;
margin-bottom:3em;
color: white;
}
DEMO: http://jsfiddle.net/juh7802x/
The only element that doesn't fail, and respects ANY border and padding you add in there as separator is a TABLE.
I tried, and no matter if it's the next direct child or it's nested many items deep, any non-content styling will NOT expand to wrap the content, and will stay 100% width of the parent. Which is nonsense, because having content BIGGER than the parent is EXACTLY the scenario in which a scrolling div is required!
For a dynamic solution (both the container and the content) set the container of the elements inside the scrolling container to display:table.
Based on isHristov's answer:
#container {
padding: 3em 3em 0 3em; /* padding-bottom: 0 */
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: red;
}
#container:after {
content: "";
display: block;
height: 0;
width: 100%;
margin-bottom: 3em; /* length you wanted on padding-bottom */
}
However, his solution adds extra space in browsers that handle this situation properly.
Dan Robinson's answer is great too unless you have multiple elements, in #container, that are dynamically shown/hidden. In that case :last-child might target a hidden element and have no effect.
You just need to add box-sizing: border-box to the same element where you applied the overflow rule.
I think #-moz-document url-prefix() is what you need.
#container {
padding: 3em;
overflow-x: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: red;
}
#some_info {
height: 900px;
background: #000;
}
#-moz-document url-prefix() {
#container > :last-child {
margin-bottom: 3em;
}
}
<div id="container">
<div id="some_info"></div>
</div>
The top answers did not work in FireFox 89. The only sensible solution I could think of is to use a div containing only a non-breaking space and with a fixed height set.
HTML
<div className="spacer"> </div>
CSS
.spacer {
height: 30px;
}
This works as it does not utilize margin or padding.
I have just faced this issue, it persists even in Firefox 87, version being released in 2021.
But it is finally fixed very recently. After update to Firefox 93 bottom padding with scroll works normally.

div class randomly positioned in center

Live site.
Toward the bottom of the page "Parlour Policies" is floating in the middle of the page, though it should be styled according to this:
.content {
height: 100%;
padding-bottom: 40px;
padding-left: 20px;
width: 600px;
}
Any ideas what's causing the location shift? I didn't see anything in Firebug, and the few validation errors(which I'm working to fix right now) all pertain the WP generated header and don't negatively effect any of the other <div class="content"> on different pages.
Just add overflow: hidden to .content - it will clear your floats
.content {
height: 100%;
padding-bottom: 40px;
padding-left: 20px;
overflow: hidden; /* this */
width: 600px;
}

Bottom margin of last child gets hidden when overflow applies

I have a container div which has children anchored to the bottom. The problem is that when the div's overflow scrollbar appears, the bottom margin of the last child gets hidden.
Please see http://jsfiddle.net/TxEAP/3/. At first, there's a correct margin underneath the 1 div. Clicking "append one" so that the scrollbar eventually appears makes the last div not have a bottom margin anymore. Opening DevTools shows that the margin of that last child is there, but it is outside of the container's viewport, even when scrolling completely to the bottom.
How can this be solved? It would suffice to get this working in Google Chrome.
HTML:
<div class="main">
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<!-- several of these .item divs -->
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.main {
height: 200px;
overflow-y: scroll;
position: relative;
border: 1px solid black;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
.item {
padding: 20px;
margin: 15px;
border: 1px solid black;
}​
Here's my final solution using flexbox. It's supported well enough on Chrome despite all -webkit- prefixes. Basically, the idea is to have a dummy element that, in case of no overflow, fills up the space of the container starting from the top (so that the real children are anchored to the bottom); in case of overflow, it is hidden automatically because of height: 0. It does not suffer from the margin issue, and it does not collapse margins.
http://jsfiddle.net/mCYLm/1/
HTML:
<div class="main">
<div class="gap-filler"></div>
<div class="item">foo</div>
<!-- more `div.item`s -->
</div>
CSS:
div.main {
display: -webkit-box;
-webkit-box-orient: vertical;
height: 200px;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
div.main div.gap-filler {
-webkit-box-flex: 1;
height: 0;
}
div.main div.item {
border: 1px solid black;
margin: 20px;
padding: 20px;
}​
Edit: This was a solution without flexbox, but it had selection issues.
A solution that eventually worked was the following: http://jsfiddle.net/TxEAP/7/. This appends hidden "content" which makes Chrome not hide the margin of the last .item div.
.container:after {
content: "";
font-size: 0;
display: block;
height: 1px;
}
Edit: The following only works if display: inline-block is possible.
Finally I found a solution. If all .items have display: inline-block except the first one, then the margin does not get hidden.
http://jsfiddle.net/TxEAP/5/
.item:not(:first-child) {
display: inline-block;
/* attempt at getting `width: auto` like `display: block` has */
width: -webkit-calc(100% - 2 * 15px);
box-sizing: border-box;
}
If you just move the overflow-y: scroll; from .main. to .container class then the margin is preserved. The only drawback is for less than 3 items (for the given container height) you get a small scrollbar placeholder, instead of a full height one.
Removing max-height:100% on the container seems to fix it for my test in Chrome 21.
Moving the properties so that the overflow is on the container, preserves the margin/padding for an element added to the end that results in the scrollbar appearing.
.main {
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid black;
}
.container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
overflow-y: scroll;
}