I am making an interactive animation which background images are masked by a shape captured in a camera. In the every frames, camera changes images into black and white images and then it's used to mask background images.
In the code, "now" is the images captured by camera, "P1" is the back ground image.
After I masked by using blend mode multiply, I wish to store the result image which is masked and use for other things.
I don't understand when I use blendmode function, how the result is defined well.
Can I capture, copy or store the result image?
var P1:MovieClip = new p1();
var mskimg:MovieClip = new maskimage();
var bitmap_obj:Bitmap = new Bitmap(now);
addChild(P1);
P1.blendMode = BlendMode.LAYER;
addChild(bitmap_obj);
bitmap_obj.blendMode = BlendMode.MULTIPLY;
You can draw a masked object if you put everything that you intend to be drawn into a container, then call BitmapData.draw() to draw the complete layered object to some BitmapData. Then, you can use that bitmap data to do whatever you want, Graphics.beginBitmapFill(), FileReference.save(), whatever. The operation is however expensive, so it'll be better if you trigger the drawing by responding to a user action, and not do that every frame by default, unless required by your application's logic.
Related
I have an object manipulation function that(right now) manipulates the scale of the objects inside of an array to give real-time size changes in relation with each other.
What I would like to know is if there's a way to change an object's width/height(to fit the screen size since it's a mobile app) and then reset the scale so that the new width/height has a scaleX/scaleY value of 1.
The width/height are properties that directly influence the scale of a DisplayObject. You cannot resize it without affecting the scale.
You can however:
Draw the image as bitmap
Redraw it if it's a primitive
Put it in a holder
A little about every solution:
Drawing a DisplayObject (or any IBitmapDrawable) is done through creating a BitmapData and using a draw() call. The up-side is that it will be a bitmap and thus save some rendering time. The downside is that if it's a large image it will take memory (can be critical for mobile) and it won't have interactivity/animation unless you make a script that would read the animation.
If you're drawing the element though the Graphics class's API, you might just make something like a resize() method that you would call on window resize/flip-orientation. Just utilise the clear() method of the Graphics object and redraw the whole thing.
Lastly, probably your best pick. Resize your object. Make a new Sprite (I choose Sprite because it's interactive and you probably want that) and add the resized object to that newly made sprite while the Sprite is just added to the display list like you added the resized object before. If it's hard to understand, here's some code:
myResizeableObject.width = newWidth;
myResizeableObject.scaleY = newScaleY;
var holderSprite:Sprite = new Sprite();
myResizeableObject.parent.addChild(holderSprite); // if you don't have a specific place to add the myResizeableObject, don't use myResizeableObject.parent - it's ugly
holderSprite.addChild(myResizeableObject);
Hope that helps you!
I only want to show a portion of a shape drawn on a canvas.
My line is essentially this, and it works fine:
ctx.fillRect( xPosition, rectHeight - offsetV , rectWidth, rectHeight);
The second variable there is going to be negative. So, my quesiton is: is it bad practice (or am I setting myself for errors down the road) to draw a path that starts off the canvas (with a negative coordinate) and then continue drawing on to the canvas.
No problem at all. If you have very large number of drawing object you can (like GameAlchemist said) prevent drawing that object .If you use canvas like map for explore (zoom out/in ctx, translate whole context) that preventing draw can cost more that clip cost. And its complicated ...
I have some expire with drawing object out of canvas. You can have a problem if you put calculation and other (no drawing) staff intro draw function.
Important :
-Make canvas draw function code clear(only draw canvas code).
-If your app no need for const update make update call only when it needs.
-Clear canvas only in (0,0,canvas.w,canvas.h)
-Use style only when it needs (stroke,fill,font etc.)
I am working on a Action Script 3.0 application , in which i ill be allowed to load the image and make them draggable. Consider i am loading the deer image and making it as draggable.
Problem with this is , if i click on the translucent area ( white space around the bitmap ), i dont want the bitmap to draggable.is there any way to draw the deer boundary region exactly without the white space around it.
You can use BitmapData methods to get each pixel color, and then, you can either :
On creation, for each pixel if it's not fully transparent (!= 0) you can draw a point of a Shape, which will be transparent, and make it dragable in place of your bitmap (as noticed in comment, it will be quite CPU consuming, so use the second method)
On click, get the click coordinate relative to the bitmap, check if the pixel is transparent and make it drag only if it's not.
In either way, that will be quite CPU consuming. You may also consider convert your bitmap to a vector image (Sprite). This will allow flash to detect real images boundaries.
I am working on a 2D AS3 project, where the different layers are rendered via Stage3D, in a single drawTriangles() call, as a single mesh.
(if you are familiar with the BunnyMark GPUSprite mini render engine, that will give you an idea: http://www.bytearray.org/?p=4074)
What I would like is to draw one of these entire 'render layers', with an overall alpha transparency value, that would apply to ALL triangles drawn, adding to their own alpha values.
IE I am not looking to change the alpha by using textures with alpha transparency or via having to go through setting each triangle separately to have the same alpha: I want a master switch that would affect the alpha value of everything that is drawn? ( something computationally cheap)
Is this possible? Perhaps via a Shader, or a setProgramConstantsFromVector command?
Well you could render your layer to a texture, then you could put this texture on the stage with the alpha you want, this way your whole layer would have the same alpha!
You can do this in two ways, the first way is to render it to a texture, and display that texture with Stage3D and create a shader that adjusts the alpha.
The second way is rendering it to a bitmapData, and displaying it on the normal stage. I'll give an example for this way:
var bmd:BitmapData = new BitmapData(renderWidth, renderHeight, true, 0);
var bit:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmd);
bit.alpha = 0.5;
addChild(bit);
//In your render loop at the beginning
context3D.renderToBitmapData(bmd);
I'm trying to make a shape available for duplicating. Here's an explanation of what I've done, what I'm trying to do, and where I'm stuck:
Drew a shape manually in the Flash IDE (paintbrush).
Created a new movieclip containing the shape; exports as a class.
Instantiate the class (var mc:MovieClip = new shapeMovieClip()).
Add a reference to the shape in mc that I want (var myShape:Shape = mc.getChildAt(0) as Shape;
This works perfect and I now have my shape, but how can I duplicate it without instantiating the parent MovieClip class - is it possible?
I've tried creating a new shape and using the copyFrom() graphics method with no avail, I believe this method just copies draw calls when they're made on the referenced graphics and instead I just have a reference of a shape that's already been drawn.
Right now I'm extending the movieclip as a sprite instead, instantiating, pulling the shape from the parent and saving its reference, and then nulling the sprite. Does anyone know of a better, more lightweight, strategy for duplicating Shapes in this manner?
Basically depends on whether you need to scale your shapes. If you don't, and you can work it out with a fixed sized bitmap representation of the shape, then you will get much better performance drawing your shape to a BitmapData (it's called rasterisation) and instanciating Bitmap objects (as other commenters have pointed out). The code would go something like this:
var base:Sprite = new shapeMovieClip();
var bmd:BitmapData = new BitmapData(base.width, base.height, true, 0);
bmd.draw(base);
var clip1:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmd);
var clip2:Bitmap = new Bitmap(bmd);
If you do need to scale the clips, you will get pixelation using bitmaps. When scaling down Bitmap.smoothing can help to some extent (also when rotating), but if you need to scale up, you will probably have to use some kind of mip-mapping. This is basically creating a few bitmaps of the shape at different scale levels, and then swap them depending on the current scale. Coding this has some complexity (using a helper parent to adjust the scale can help) but it will definitely perform better than using many shape symbols (with or without a sprite parent).
This is very old, but it still comes up high in Google, so I just wanted to share a true shape duplicating method:
var shapeonstage:Shape = shapeMadeInIDE;
var g:Vector.<IGraphicsData> = shapeonstage.graphics.readGraphicsData();
var shapecopy:Shape = new Shape();
shapecopy.graphics.drawGraphicsData(g)
And boom. It works. Had to share this because it would have helped me a looooong time ago and in so many ways.
UPDATE:
There is some clarification I'd like to add why you would want to use this method, for duplicating AND for storing references to Shapes that are within an swf.
If you target a Shape object on the stage or in a movie clip, the Flash Rendering engine does something strange. It will RECYCLE Shape objects to render new graphics thus making your Shape reference point to a COMPLETELY different rendering.
For example:
Create an fla with a movieclip.
Inside the movie clip make 10 frames.
On each frame, draw a different shape
In your code, get a reference to the shape (The Shape on Frame 1)
Draw and verify your shape (draw to a bitmap then put the bmp on stage)
Now let the flash engine play for 5 frames
Draw and verify your shape again
The second time you draw your shape without EVER reassigning your shape reference, will SOMETIMES yield a completely different shape.
Just know, this little quirk can leave you pulling your hair out if you don't know what you're looking for :)