We have a pretty large React-Redux based web app. In the app - and specifically in the UI - we have a lot of strings and constants (URL, name of app, button labels etc...). What's a recommended way of managing those strings and constants, considering the following requirements:
We have a lot of on premise installations and we want to be able to easily change things like system name / link url / button names.
We want to easily be able to go over the language in the UI and modify it.
We want to be able to localize the app in multiple languages.
The obvious method is to have the strings scattered all over and utilize find-and-replace, but we are wondering if there is a better way to centralize string management.
You could route your scripts though a configuration file so that you have all of these in one place to modify them. This is common in most CMS systems, i.e. Wordpress, Opencart.
Google the term i18n and you should be able to find a heap of information on internationalisation.
Here is a simple class that I saw which might make it easier to understand how this might work out for you in your project.
Related
I need to push an object to prismic.io. For example, I want to send a simple object like a string to the CMS.
I don't see any hints in the documentation that can help me achieve this. I'm using angular 7.
I already made my custom type, I can get the data I created with the CMS with prismatic predicates but can't send any data.
(full disclosure I'm working at Prismic ;) ) So the answer is: you can import data into Prismic. But it's not through a write API.
We want to introduce this at some point, but we also believe we can bring better solutions then just a write API for specific cases (like importing legacy content, connecting Prismic with an external data base, or with a translation service, etc.)
So our plan is to solve the most common use-cases of a "write API" in a more adapted/cleaner way, and then provide a write API afterwards.
Two solutions were already implemented:
1/ If you're looking to migrate existing content from another system into Prismic, you should check out our Import/Export feature: https://intercom.help/prismicio/import-export
2/ If you have content that lives in another system or in a custom API, it is possible to integrate this with Prismic using our Integration Fields feature: https://intercom.help/prismicio/integration-fields
3/ If what you want to do is not covered by these two solutions please let me know, that would be super helpful!
no you can not do a write api. Its a read system, the only way to input is via their writing room or import (which is in writing room as well)
I'm processing a variety of RSS feeds, which contain summaries, as well as the target page URL content, and trying to use a uniform transformation method.
XSLT was the first thing that occurred to me to try, as it would accomplish what I want, in a standard way, without a lot of fuss aside from adding new XSLT stylesheets to accommodate uniquely formatted sites and feed content.
Problem: XSLT libraries are considered "private" in iOS, and even linking statically against your own copy will get you rejected by the Apple Store analysis tools.
I've looked into the possibility if injecting the stylesheet and data into a UIWebView that wasn't displayed, but this seems like a really roundabout and hackish way to get at the system's underlying XSLT processor in an "approved" fashion.
What alternative techniques/libraries exist which would let me do this in a standard fashion, ie: without rolling my own.
I'm not sure I fully understand your requirements, but one possbility would be to use libxml (which is allowed in iOS) to parse the XML and if necessary manipulate the DOM. If you really need to do XML transformations this is going to be more effort than XSLT, but if you just need to extract data from the XML, that can be done fairly easily with xpath queries.
That said, I have read several people claiming they got XSLT working on iOS and had their apps approved in the app store. In particular, I've seen this stackoverflow answer claimed as a working solution by multiple people. And if that fails, another answer suggested building the libxslt library yourself with renamed symbols to bypass the app store checks. I would only suggest that as a last resort though.
You'll probably want to look into Hpple for something powerful but light weight / native. See the tutorial on getting started here: http://www.raywenderlich.com/14172/how-to-parse-html-on-ios. Good luck!
I'm going to also recommend TFHpple but I'm also going to elaborate on the solution. I've explored an app that navigates a 3rd party (well, I'm the 3rd party, they're the source but that's semantics) website/data source but there are some pitfalls. The biggest pitfall is obvious: if the data source DOM changes you need to change your app and re-release. A creative way around this would be to publish/expose a global copy of the DOM on a public server that way the end user doesn't have to update their app any time the data source changes (as long as the change isn't radical).
For instance, if your expected DOM search in TFHpple is #"//figure[#class='figure']/a" and then a week from now your data source's resource you're looking for is altered to #"//figure1[#class='figure1']/a" you just opened yourself to an App Store release... UNLESS... you publish the expected DOM searches on a web server you control in a data dictionary that your app can consume and serve out to the various DOM search elements within your app. The only problem I foresee here is that if the data source adds or removes a data element you want to consume you either have to release a build or handle the removal ahead of time (respectively).
Lastly if the data source DOM isn't well formed or consistent you may be beating your head against a wall more times than not.
This question has been troubling me for the past week. Below, I will list my issue, and the research I have put into it.
The scenario: I was given a .csv file with 5000 rows and three columns. The three columns are defined as:
Site ID|Site Name|Site URL
My task: To create an HTML interface for the designers of the company to rate each site on a scale of 1-5.
My plan of action: I am a new hire. I am getting accustomed to the language I was hired for, which was Objective-C.
My algorithm for the project was to:
Parse the .csv
Remove the "Site Name" variable
Create a new .csv that contains the below variables: Site ID|Site URL|Rating|Image
Display the new .csv (with all aforementioned items) as an HTML page where there are toggles for "Ratings", which when pressed, will log the rating into the .csv which it was imported (or loaded) from.
The "Image" section I will be using a piece of software by the name of Paparazzi (on the Mac OS X operating system) which takes a fully formatted screenshot of the main page and saves it as a PNG file. I plan on using the file extension URL (which is stored locally) and load it into the "Image" column, thus when the designer clicks on the image, he is able to load the image that is stored locally.
My issue: As Objective-C is not entirely a scripting language, I am confused with some of the libraries I may need and/or methods I can implement this. I have the algorithm, but I am wholy unsure with the implementation.
My questions: If you have done a project similar to this before with Objective-C, what tips can you provide for me? How does one load the .csv as a HTML interface where upon edit, it will save this edit into the .csv? Will I need any servers for this, or is everything executable from just a machine? How do you grab an image (stored locally), extract its file extension, and load it onto the .csv?
The most important question: Is this achievable through Objective-C? My reasoning behind it is, I want to advance my knowledge of OC through a task like this. Yes, using Python is easier, but is it possible to do this with Objective-C?
Thank you.
It certainly is achievable, but I doubt you'd really want to go this way. If I understand it correctly, you want to serve the HTML page to others via web browser - that would mean either writing a (simple) http daemon, that would run on the server or writing a CGI script that would communicate with a standard http daemon. Python/PHP/Ruby do this for you readily, so there is much less room for possible errors.
As for
As Objective-C is not entirely a scripting language
I would perhaps rephrase it as
As Objective-C is entirely not a scripting language
I am developing a "dumb" front-end, it's an AIR application that interacts with a "smart" LiveCycle server. There are currently about 20 request & response pairs for the application. For many reasons (testing, developing outside the corporate network, etc), we have several XML files of fake data, and if a certain configuration flag is set, the files are loaded, a specific file is parsed and used to create a mock response. Each XML file is a set of responses for different situation, all internally consistent. We currently have about 10 XML files, each corresponding to different situation we can run into. This is probably going to grow to 30-50 XML files.
The current system was developed by me during one of those 90-hour-week release cycles, when we were under duress because LiveCycle was down again and we had a deadline to meet. Most of the minor crap has been cleaned up.
The fake data is in an object called FakeData, with properties like customerType1:XML, customerType2:XML, overdueCustomer1:XML, etc. Then in the FakeData constructor, all of the properties are set like this:
customerType1:XML = FileUtil.loadXML(File.applicationDirectory.resolvePath("fakeData/customerType1.xml");
And whenever you need some fake data (this happens in special FakeDelegates that extend the real LiveCycle Delegates), you get it from an instance of FakeData.
This is awful, for many reasons, but it works. One embarrassing part is that every time you create an instance of FakeData, it reloads all the XML files.
I'm trying to figure out if there's a design pattern that is not Singleton that can handle this more elegantly. The constraints are:
No global instances can be required (currently, all the code dealing with the fake data, including the fake delegates, is pulled out of production builds without any side-effects, and it needs to stay that way). This puts the Factory pattern out of the running.
It can handle multiple objects using the XML data without performance issues.
The XML files are read centrally so that the other code doesn't have to know where the XML files are, and so some preprocessing can be done (like creating a map of certain tag values and the associated XML file).
Design patterns, or other architecture suggestions, would be greatly appreciated.
Take a look at ASMock which was developed by a good friend of mine (and a member here Richard Szalay) and is based on .nets Rhino mocks. We've used it in several production environments now so i can vouch for it's stability.
should be able to get rid of any fake tests (more like integration tests) by using the mock object instead.
Wouldn't it make more sense to do traditional mocking with a mocking framework? Depending on your implementation, it might be possible to set up the Expects by reading the fake-data XML files.
Here is a Google Code project that offers mocking for ActionScript.
looking for best practices in web development, when you are writing a web application in a traditional non-framework environment (core PHP or Perl / CGI), what is the cleanest way to organize or map calls from the client to server processes?
The answer is rather trivial when working in a single-scope page where, for example, you have a form to complete and a submit button. You could set the action of the form to "save.php" and have a one-to-one relation between the page and the function it is bound to. So save.php could execute the save action and write to the client the form.
Now, the only non out-of-the-box php enhancement i'm using is a template engine (tinybutstrong). Whenever i have a complex page with multiple forms (for example, for sorting a grid, saving something, requesting something else, an ajax component and a search box), what is your way to lay down the various functions (search, sort, insert, retrieve) to a single display page (index)?
Do you use something like index.php?action=search / index.php?action=insert or something like setting each action to a page that acts like a function (search.php, sort.php, insert.php) each delegating the presentational function to a single script (index.php)? What if the "search" function can be used by varius "views"?
I'm using general terms like search or insert as an example, and the referece to PHP is also only for example, as I think my question is rather general on best practices.
Thanks.
By creating something where there's an action which refers you to a view, you're essentially creating a controller for views, and you're two thirds of the way to MVC. (not that there's anything wrong with that, just that's where you're headed)
Q1. what is the cleanest way to organize or map calls from the client to server processes?
A1. Using the filesystem, but structured semantically based on the structure of your data (if possible) doing something like /search/mysearch is your semantically correct option. Requires a little Apache Mojo
Q1. Do you use something like index.php...
A1. Yes, I wouldn't shy away from this approach. It's ideal to use a little Apache rewrite magic to create nice paths, but aside from that, there isn't any other magic way to create an controller.