I've a sidebar which is positioned sticky but in some cases larger than the height of the screen.
If the sidebar is in fact larger as the screen height, I don't want it to stick on the top. It should scroll down with the content of the page.
I'm using Bootstraps sticky-top class for that.
It has the following attributes:
.sticky-top {
position: sticky;
top: 0;
z-index: 1020;
}
I changed the top: 0 to top: 50px in my case because I need the space above.
Here's some example code: https://codepen.io/cray_code/pen/ZEaOXwo
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-lg-3">
<div class="toc sticky-top">
<nav class="list-group">
Links (see example)
</nav>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-lg-9">
Content (see example)
</div>
</div>
</div>
I tried the solution from here and added the following code to my class:
.toc {
overflow-y: auto;
max-height: 100vh;
}
But that doesn't help.
Is there a pure CSS solution for that or do I need to use JavaScript?
Not sure if this is what you want, but maybe using the calc() in your css could help you.
.toc{
overflow-y: auto;
max-height: calc(100vh - 50px);
}
Hope this pen helps
Some explanations:
in js we use .offsetHeight&.clientHeight to get height we check weather this height(493px) + 50px offset is more than screen height or not.
When screen size is small we set position to static
Also we set margin-top: 50px instead of top: 50px
because top works only for sticky and margin-top works for static
For aside blocks that higher then window height you can use smartSticky script
Just add "data-smartsticky" atribute to your aside block
https://www.npmjs.com/package/smartsticker
Parent block of sticky block must be height 100%, or for flex - flex-grow:1
So I'm using Bootstrap 4 with two columns. The two columns currently match each other in height, but I will have so much content in the left column that I'll need a scrolling div whose height spans the rest of the container. The issue I'm running into is that it's currently within a column div whose height is set to 100% (which makes it match the other column).
As a sidenote, this class only has a max-height set in the fiddle so that it doesn't stretch the left column, which already matches the height of the right:
.recent-articles-list {
max-height: 30rem;
}
Any help would be much appreciated, thank you! I have a feeling it might be something simple, but I haven't been fruitful in my research. (I've tried solutions using absolute positioning, setting height to 0/1px...)
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/3zeh7af4/
(Do note that the viewport has to be above 1200px to see what I'm talking about.)
Added image for desired effect:
What I understand from your problem depiction is that you want left column to be exactly same as right even if right column height is varying, and off course for left column to have scroll you need to fix it's height so you have done.
.recent-articles-list {
max-height: 30rem;
}.
if that's the case, the good solution for this situation is the code below
.recent-articles {
background-color: #fff;
padding: 1rem;
height: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.recent-articles-list {
padding-right: 1rem;
position: absolute;
top: 50px;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
overflow-y: auto;
}
What you seem to be asking for is to shrink the height of the left column, to match the height of the right, and then scroll any overflow in the left column which is this: https://www.codeply.com/go/UTOSeASfnt
.recent-articles {
flex: 1 1 0;
overflow-y: auto;
}
.recent-articles-list {
overflow-y: auto;
}
However, IMO, that layout doesn't work well 😞 since the user must scroll the body of the entire page in order to see all content in the left column (when the content on right is taller than the viewport). The question doesn't explain what you expect to happen when the content on the right is taller than the viewport.
A better solution is to create a full-height layout, and then have the 2 sides scroll independently. You can do this by making the left side fixed or sticky as shown here...
Sticky left column:
.mvh-100 {
height: 100vh;
}
.recent-articles {
overflow-y: auto;
position: sticky;
top: 1rem;
}
.recent-articles-list {
overflow-y: auto;
}
<div class="container-fluid body-container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xl-5 py-3">
<div class="shadow recent-articles bg-white mvh-100 p-3">
<h5>Recent Articles</h5>
<div class="recent-articles-list">
...
...
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="col-xl-7 py-3">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-xl-12 shadow">
...
</div>
<div class="col-xl-12 shadow">
...
</div>
<div class="col-xl-12 shadow">
...
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
https://www.codeply.com/go/cNfS3EOQdV
Fixed left side:
Another option is to make the left side position:fixed, but it's more complex as it requires calc to adjust for spacing.
https://www.codeply.com/go/AqFxOD8gst
Related: Fixed and scrollable column in Bootstrap 4 flexbox
To start off I'm relatively new to CSS, Bootstrap and HTML. I want to position a responsive element at the bottom of the screen.
So I have this code which makes it behave responsively:
<div class="col-sm-12">
test
</div>
But how do I get it to stick to the bottom of the page? I already tried ID/ Class selectors with an absolute position. It moved the element to the bottom, but it wasn't responsive anymore.
One solution might be to wrap the desired element in another div, then target the wrapper element to fix it to the bottom of your screen. Your markup could look like:
<div class="fixed-container">
<div class="col-sm-12"><!--your content here--></div>
</div><!--end .fixed-container-->
And you styles could look like:
.fixed-container {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
}
This would affix the .fixed-container element to the bottom left of the viewport, and would set the width to 100% of the viewport. The layout-specific rules applied to .col-sm-12 would remain intact.
<div id="my-element" class="col-sm-12">
test
</div>
#my-element {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
}
Here is a simple solution to your problem.
Make sure your elements are in a wrapping div. Since you are using Bootstrap, use:
<div class="container-fluid">
Inside this container place your elements/sections including your footer:
<footer class="col-md-12">
Your footer should have the following CSS.
footer {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
height: 100px /* Height of your footer */
width: 100%;
}
Here is a fiddle. You can see the footer is at the bottom of the container which has a black border.
http://jsfiddle.net/gward90/ehf2wm83/
I am using the columnal(http://www.columnal.com/) responsive grid framework and am trying to create a vertical divider line in between columns that will stay centered in the right margin as the viewport is resized.
I have tried a couple of solutions using background images and pseudo elements but neither has been successful. The right margin is used by the columnal framework so this can't be used as part of the solution which is why I think a vertically repeating background image or pseudo element is required.
I am also trying to avoid using additional html elements in the code, I would like to keep this as clean as possible. However if that's the only solution, then so be it.
Here's the HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="col_4 vertical_divider">
<div class="content">I want a vertical divider line to appear in the centre of the margin to the right of this grey box ->
<br/>
<br/>If you don't see columns to the right re-size this window to make it bigger.</div>
</div>
<div class="col_4 vertical_divider">
<div class="content">This example uses the Columnal responsive framework</div>
</div>
<div class="col_4 last">
<div class="content">Solution could be using a repeating image, pseudo elements or something else. I would like to avoid using additional html if possible. Solution should preferably be css applied to the 'vertical_divider' class.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
and here's the CSS:
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.content {
background-color:#ddd;
min-height:400px;
padding:5px;
}
/* Solution preferably applied to this class */
.vertical_divider {
}
I've put it up as fiddle here which also includes a little more explanation:
http://jsfiddle.net/NtuZJ/12/
I've came up with a nice solution using :after pseudo class. The only disadvantage is that you have to specify half the size of the margin (to the right setting).
jsFiddle Demo
.vertical_divider:after {
background: red;
width: 1px;
content: "";
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: -15px;
}
here is sample link: http://bootply.com/76369
this is html i use.
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-6">.col-md-6</div>
<div class="col-md-6">.col-md-6</div>
</div>
bootstrap 3 has no container-fluid and row-fluid.
i cannot wrap it with .container class because it will become fixed layout.
how to make it fluid (full page width) layout? (without horizontal scrollbar)
with these markup. when you view in the result the x-scroll bar is visible so you can scroll to left and right that it should not.
edited: 2015-12-09
Already got answer and Bootstrap already released the fix since 3.1.0
I also have it and while waiting on them to fix it, I added this shame css :
body { overflow-x: hidden;}
it's an horrible alternative, but it work. I'll be happy to remove it when they'll have fixed the issue.
An other alternative, as pointed out in the issue, is to override .row :
.row {
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
}
This was introduced in v3.1.0: http://getbootstrap.com/css/#grid-example-fluid
Commit #62736046 added ".container-fluid variation for full-width containers and layouts".
This is a known issue in BS 3 - https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/9862?source=cc
I have tested on Bootply using the latest build, so keep watching GitHub for the latest updates/fix.
In Bootstrap 3, .row is must be used inside a .container or .container-fluid to counteract the negative margins on the row. This will eliminate the horizontal scrollbar.
From the docs...
"Rows must be placed within a .container (fixed-width) or
.container-fluid (full-width) for proper alignment and padding."
Bootstrap 4
The container>row>col relationship work the same way as 3.x...
"Containers are the most basic layout element in Bootstrap and are
required when using our default grid system"
If I understand you correctly, Adding this after any media queries overrides the width restrictions on the default grids. Works for me on bootstrap 3 where I needed a 100% width layout
.container {
max-width: 100%;
/* This will remove the outer padding, and push content edge to edge */
padding-right: 0;
padding-left: 0;
}
Then you can put your row and grid elements inside the container.
Update from 2014, from Bootstrap docs:
Grids and full-width layouts Folks looking to create fully fluid
layouts (meaning your site stretches the entire width of the viewport)
must wrap their grid content in a containing element with padding: 0
15px; to offset the margin: 0 -15px; used on .rows.
Just my 2 cents here. Mostly this will work for you, as it did for me.
body > .row {
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
}
I ran in to the same problem (wanting a fluid layout) but wanted to keep the responsive options with rearranging columns and so on for smaller screens and ended up with a small change to in variables.less:
// Large screen / wide desktop (last row of file)
#container-lg-desktop: 100%; //((1140px + #grid-gutter-width));
This value is used once in grid.less and sets
#media (min-width: #screen-lg-desktop) {
.container {
max-width: #container-lg-desktop;
}
....
}
The result is that over 1200px the grid is fluid (without horizontal scrollbars). Below that the normal responsive rules apply. You can of course set this to other media queries as well just as easily.
If you do not want to edit and compile .less yourself you could override the maxwidth in your own style sheet similair to below:
#media (min-width: 1200px) { /* or min-width: wherever-you-want-your-fluid-breakpoint */
body .container {
max-width: 100%;
}
}
All this assumes you use the normal Bootstrap grid syntax, including container, like below:
<div class="container">
<div class="row" >
<div class="col-md-6">.col-md-6</div>
<div class="col-md-6">.col-md-6</div>
</div>
</div>
Hope this helps!
In the latest version of Twitter Bootstrap the layout is fluid by default, hence you don't need extra classes to declare your layout as fluid.
You can further refer to -
http://bassjobsen.weblogs.fm/migrate-your-templates-from-twitter-bootstrap-2-x-to-twitter-bootstrap-3/
http://blog.getbootstrap.com/
This worked for me. Tested in FF, Chrome, IE11, IE10
.row {
width:99.99%;
}
The horizontal scrollbar can appear if the container-fluid div is placed directly inside the body.
The correct way to use a container-fluid structure is:
<body>
<section>
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<!-- content goes here -->
</div>
</div>
</section>
</body>
So, try wrapping your container-fluid DIVs inside an outer div, such as a <div id="wrap"> or a <section> or <article> or <aside> or other specialized <div>, and presto! no horizontal scrollbar.
In Bootstrap 3, putting columns immediately under body should give you a fluid layout without horizontal scroll bar
<body>
<div class="col-md-6">.col-md-6</div>
<div class="col-md-6">.col-md-6</div>
</body>
Bootstrap 3.0 version is tricky they will add fix for this issue and probably return container-fluid in Bootstrap 3.1. But until then here is a fix that I'm using:
First of, you would need custom container and set it to 100% width, and then you will need to fix row margin disposition, and navbar too if you have it:
/* Custom container */
.container-full {
margin: 0 auto;
width: 100%;
}
/*fix row -15px margin*/
.container-fluid {
padding: 0 15px;
}
/*fix navbar margin*/
.navbar{
margin: 0 -15px;
}
/*fix navbar-right margin*/
.navbar-nav.navbar-right:last-child {
margin-right: 0px;
}
You can stack container-full and container-fluid classes on root div, and you can use container-fluid later on.
Hope it helps, if you need more info let me know.
Found this workaround
.row {
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 0;
}
[class^="col-"] > [class^="col-"]:first-child,
[class^="col-"] > [class*=" col-"]:first-child
[class*=" col-"] > [class^="col-"]:first-child,
[class*=" col-"]> [class*=" col-"]:first-child,
.row > [class^="col-"]:first-child,
.row > [class*=" col-"]:first-child{
padding-left: 0px;
}
[class^="col-"] > [class^="col-"]:last-child,
[class^="col-"] > [class*=" col-"]:last-child
[class*=" col-"] > [class^="col-"]:last-child,
[class*=" col-"]> [class*=" col-"]:last-child,
.row > [class^="col-"]:last-child,
.row > [class*=" col-"]:last-child{
padding-right: 0px;
}
This is what worked for me. I added a style inline to remove the small margin on the right. I don't really like to do inline styling, but this lone style attribute in my html makes it easy for me to remember about the hack-job spliced into my otherwise well separated code. It also eliminates the concern of my external styles loading before or after the bootstrap default stylesheet.
<div class="row" style="margin-right:0px;">
<div class="col-md-6">
<div class="col-md-6">
</div>
Apply to the body seems to get rid of the horizontal scrollbar
overflow-x: hidden;
If it still actual for someone, my solution was as follows:
.container{
overflow: hidden;
overflow-y: auto;
}
It's already fluid by default. If you want to be fluid for less width instead of col-md-6 use col-sm-6 or col-xs-6.
You can fix this problem without disturbing the bootstrap css and wait for a fix in the next version, so you can simply wrap your row by defining you own class .container-fluid with padding.
//Add this class to your global css file
<style>
.container-fluid {
padding: 0 15px;
}
</style>
//Wrap your rows in within this .container-fluid
<div class="container-fluid">
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-3">content</div>
<div class="col-md-9">content</div>
<div class="col-md-3">content</div>
</div>
</div>
You can add a 10px padding on the sides to your body element if all it's children are rows
body {
padding: 0 10px;
}
if your HTML markup looks something like this:
<body>
<div class="row"></div>
<div class="row"></div>
<div class="row"></div>
</body>
The rows have a 10 px negative margin. That's what's causing the overflow. If you add 10px padding to the body, they will cancel each other out.
The only thing that assisted me was to set margin:0px on the topmost <div class="row"> in my html DOM.
This again wasn't the most appealing way to solve the issue, but as it is only in one place I put it inline.
As an fyi the container-fluid and apparent bootstrap fixes only introduced an increased whitespace on either side of the visible page... :( Although I came across my solution by reading through the back and forth on the github issue - so worthwhile reading.
Summarizing the most relevant comments in one answer:
this is a known bug
there are workarounds but you might not need them (read on)
it happens when elements are placed directly inside the body, rather than inside a container-fluid div or another containing div. Placing them directly in the body is exactly what most people do when testing stuff locally. Once you place your code in the complete page (so within a container-fluid or another container div) you will not face this problem (no need to change anything).