I have a problem with the fact that, when I try to print a page, every link gets the URL between () behind it. I have found multiple questions here, and the solutions work. I have one other problem, on top of that, though: My styles in print.css seem to be ignored after adding a solution.
My CSS
.header-breadcrumb {
margin-top: 0 !important;
}
.nonPrint, hr, .shows-more, #videoGallery{
display: none;
}
.single-event .container .col-md-9 {
width: 70%;
float: left;
}
.single-event .container .col-md-3 {
width: 30%;
float: left;
}
.single-calendar .table-responsive table tbody tr td {
padding: 2px 5px;
}
.single-description {
font-size: 10pt !important;
}
h1 {
font-size: 12pt !important;
}
.printLogo {
display: block !important;
width: 200px;
padding-left: 10px;
}
But when I add
a:after {
display: none;
content: "";
}
the font-sizes get ignored and jumps back to their original values (or so it seems). How do I fix this?
On the left you see the file as it should look like (including a link in the sidebar on the right, which has to be removed), and on the right you see the file with the href removed, but where the all new styles in print.css seem to be ignored.
Disregard what I said before. The difference in styling came from the following:
Because of this CSS, the sidebar has to fill 30%:
.single-event .container .col-md-3 {
width: 30%;
float: left;
}
But since it output a URL which could not be broken until the first -, being 30% wide meant resizing the font (which Chrome did automatically). Hiding the URL made it possible to actually apply the font-size I tried to apply through the CSS, making everything bigger than in the original file, where it actually DIDN'T listen to the CSS.
Facepalm
This might be useful in the future for 2 other people, so I'll leave the question here.
Related
I'm having issues with my nav bar, I'm wondering how I can make the set closer to the left most edge.
CSS:
#nav
{
overflow: auto;
user-select: none;
background: grey;
width: 100%;
}
#nav li
{
display: inline-block;
list-style-type: none; /* removes bullets */
padding: 10px;
margin: 0px; /* removes margins */
background: grey;
}
#nav li:hover
{
background: green;
user-select: green;
}
Fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/yumyum0/cgx61w0q/2/
Also, I'm not sure if the background and user select in the #nav li:hover is redundant. I'm modeling it off of the tutorial on https://html.com/css/#example-nav, and I started to add things to try and style it the way I wanted. I'm still a long ways away from knowing what all of the declarations do. It used to be flush so I think I probably added something that has a conflict, or I removed it without knowing.
I also had a question that wasn't really related to this, is this formatting okay? I wasn't sure if there was a agreed upon way with brackets and everything else.
Placing this ruleset at the start of your code will remove the margins at the top of your navbar.
* {
position: relative;
margin: 0 0;
}
Your formatting is slightly off; place the opening bracket on the same line as the CSS selector, and make sure there is a gap between rulesets, for greater readability.
A good thing to do is set the styles for the HTML and Body tags. This is what I would do:
html, body {
margin: 0; // Removes space on the sides
box-sizing: border-box;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#nav
{
overflow: auto;
user-select: none;
background: grey;
width: 100%;
box-sizing: border-box; // Add this to take 100% width without overflowing
margin: 0; // Remove space above nav bar
}
...rest of your CSS
You can position absolute and declare it must be at the left most point of the page.
#nav
{
overflow: auto;
user-select: none;
background: grey;
width: 100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
}
Styling your code is up to you! I like keeping the name in the same line as the curly bracket like #nav {
Navigation spacing: One thing to research is a solution called "CSS Reset". Browsers like Chrome and Firefox have different "base values" for HTML selectors. A reset stylesheet ensures that all of your elements will have the same "base" styles. There are 1000 different reset sheets out there that different people have attempted. They all roughly do the same thing in my opinion.The <body> tag has margin assigned to it by default. A reset sheet would normally assign these to 0 amongst other things.
Kind of the same thing as above, the <ul> tag also has margin on it by default. You should add in the following CSS:
html, body {
margin: 0;
}
#nav
{
background: grey;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
Let's discuss the user-select property. This property is what you would use in order to target a "highlight" or "text select" for a copy/paste situation on a webpage. I do not think this is what you should be using for a "hover" effect. You should be just fine with using the background property.
First of all, I do search and research and try this about a week and has no clue.. so I thought I have earned my right asking somewhat simple, haha!
For some reason, it looks like, width: 210mm; doesn't work as I want. Following screenshot rendered as print mode with F12 tool on chrome.
This is css..
#media screen {
body {
background-color: #eeeeee;
counter-reset: page-number;
}
}
#media print {
#page {
size: A4 portrait;
margin: 0mm;
}
html, body, .page-frame { max-width: 210mm; }
.page-frame {
margin: 0;
}
}
.page-frame
{
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
page-break-after: always;
background-color: white;
width: 210mm;
height: 297mm;
padding: 30mm 20mm 20mm 20mm;
border: 1px solid #dddddd;
column-count: 2;
column-gap: 5mm;
column-rule-width: 2px;
column-rule-color: var(--secondary);
column-rule-style: solid;
counter-increment: page-number;
margin-top: 1em;
}
/* page layouts */
.page-header { position: relative; column-span: all; margin-top: -17mm; margin-bottom: 2mm; height: 15mm; border-bottom: 2px solid var(--secondary); }
.page-footer { position: relative; column-span: all; height: 10mm; padding-top: 2mm; border-top: 2px solid var(--secondary); text-align: center; margin-top: 2mm; }
.page-header > div, .page-footer > div { position: absolute; width: 100%; height: 100%; }
.page-footer .page-number:before { content: counter(page-number); }
.column-frame { height: 100%; width: 100%; }
In other attempts, including uploaded image, the grey area (body element) remains and surround expecting-paper area and I cannot get rid of this surrounding grey area.
Also, .paper-frame div itself looks smaller than actual a4 size.. and I cannot understand whats happening at this point.
All I want is the .page-frame element properly rendered as A4 size on both screen and print.. and it's hard!
I'm using bootstrap 4 on laravel 7.x and latest version of Chrome browser..
Edit 1 --- Chrome Issue #273306 https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=273306
Could it be that problem is the same issue in above link? .. maybe?? or not?.. still I cannot solve this. In my previous work, I used https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/paper-css/0.3.0/paper.css for A4 rendering and it works, but I cannot find whats crucially different so cause the problem.
I've worked with chromes print function in the past and the best way i found to fix these kinds of rendering problems was to brute force it.
Basically change the .page-frame size until it fits.
Although I have to say that your problem seems weird to me since if I remember correctly then the pixel sizes of your .page-frame are inline with what I used.
From the information I can gather from the picture, chrome might be including the margins of .page-frame in to the render. So zero them out forcefully in css.
You could also try to set the "scale" in print options higher to see if that fixes the problem.
For the start, I'd like to introduce might be a rookie problem that there is !important value inside bootstrap.print module.
When you print out, browser using #media print script, yes?
Since I use laravel, hence using webpack, so I generate app.css file that include bootstrap.
During that phase, there are two variables named $print-page-size and $print-body-min-width at the end of node_modules\bootstrap\scss\_variables.css
/* ..(inside node_modules >> bootstrap folder)/_variables.css */
..
// Printing
$print-page-size: a3 !default;
$print-body-min-width: map-get($grid-breakpoints, "lg") !default;
This cause the problem. It's not a bug or any. Well, if you compare the size of actual a4 paper and rendered paper on screen, there might be some difference between those two but it's not a problem. Size is different but result is resemblance.
When you look inside of resource\sass\app.scss file, bootstrap imported after custom scss files like custom or variables.
You can specifiy $print-page-size and $print-body-min-width parameter before importing default bootstrap _print module. When you do that, specified parameter overwrite those value so problem solved. I just set those two value like below.
/* resources/sass/_variables.scss file */
// print
$print-page-size: a4;
$print-body-min-width: auto;
..hey. I sovled!
I’m leveraging Codrops’ slowly aging but still relevant ‘Inline Anchor Styles’ kit. Codrops’ original live demo can be found here. For my site, I’m using the ‘link-arrow’ theme.
I’ve got most of it to work as intended. My problem is that I can’t figure out how to make the longer anchor tagged web links to wrap to the next line.
Here is my reduced test case on CodePen, which also shows the HTML and CSS I am working with. When you are viewing that Pen, if you reduce the size of your browser window, you’ll notice that the very first web link is obscured and extends way over to the right beyond the boundary of the window. What I am trying to do is make the web links wrap to the next line (similar to the way the regular non-anchor tag <li> contents already do).
To further clarify what I am trying to accomplish, you can take a look at this screenshot on imgur. There are 4 red arrows pointing to the anchor tag contents which extend beyond the browser window.
How do you get the content inside the anchor tags to wrap to the next line?
After importing Codrops' HTML, CSS, and JS source code linked to above, these are the only modifications I've made:
body {
background: #f9f9f9;
width: 100%;
font-size: 133%;
margin: auto;
}
.box {
margin-left:-60px;
}
li {
line-height: 150%;
font-size: 1.2em;
padding-bottom: 15px;
}
ol {
margin: 0;
}
ol.dashed {
list-style-type: none;
}
ol.dashed > li {
text-indent: 5px;
}
ol.dashed > li:before {
content: "- ";
text-indent: 5px;
}
.container {
width:100%;
}
What I’ve tried:
I’ve tried adjusting width and max-width values from 100% progressively down to 50% for all the elements in play including the body, ol, li, a elements in addition to the classes in play such as .container and .box. No dice.
I have carefully checked your code on codepen and Codrops's Inline Anchor Styles.
I have found a very simple solution after analyzing your problem, there are two places where the code needs to be adjusted is:
this code code must not include line white-space: nowrap, it should be removed. When removing we need to setup after position of anchor from top: 0
And boom now we changed two snippset as follows:
section a {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
outline: none;
color: #404d5b;
vertical-align: bottom;
text-decoration: none;
}
.link-arrow a::after {
left: 100%;
z-index: -2;
width: 1em;
background: #34495e url('./arrow_right.svg') no-repeat 50% 50%;
background-size: 60% auto;
text-align: center;
font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
-webkit-transition: -webkit-transform 0.3s;
transition: transform 0.3s;
pointer-events: auto;
top: 0
}
Now Your Anchor tag will not be overflown again.
Based on #Umar_Ahmed's code snippet, I was able to reduce the solution down to this:
section a {
color: black;
text-decoration: none;
white-space: normal;
}
.link-arrow a::after {
pointer-events: auto;
top:0;
}
But I am giving full credit to Umar as the official answer to my question. ;)
Thank you Umar!
I am trying to get my page to show 3 image links per line on mobile, instead of two, which is what currently shows. If you view this site in the developer tools as an iPhone 5, you'll see there are two square image links per line. I'd like to get 3 images per line, but am not sure what CSS rule to change to get three.
I tried modifying the width of various Divs, but it only made the image links smaller, and did not bring the third up to the line.
http://50.87.248.154/~thetinat/search/
Please let me know if I can clarify anything. Thanks!
You need to reduce width to: width: 29%; and turn off clear: both; on the odd class.
Like so:
.odd {
clear: none;
float: left;
}
.recipes-bottom .featuredpost .post {
width: 29%;
margin: 20px 5px 0px;
}
#media (max-width: 480px) {
.recipes-bottom article, .home-middle article {
float: none;
clear: none;
display: inline-block;
height: 150px;
vertical-align: middle;
}
}
Please visit this website.
There is a blank space at the bottom. I checked it and there is no minimum height mentioned in my css.
I suspect it's in the body's css details as below:
body {
line-height: 1.5;
font-size: 87.5%;
word-wrap: break-word;
margin-top: 0px;
margin-left: 0px;
margin-right: 0px;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
outline: 0;
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 #EFEFEF;
}
html, body, #page {
height: 100%;
}
This removed the bleed for me in Safari 6.0.3;
#footer-wrapper {
margin-top: 40px;
background: url("../images/footer.png") repeat-x scroll 0 0;
overflow: hidden;
}
You might want to handle that overflow differently tho, based on the content inside it. But this should fix the white space.
I figured it out by just deleting nodes from the DOM bottom-up. It had to be in the #footer-wrapper. As margin-bottom didn't work and you were using relative positioning I figured it was some shadow styling bleeding out of that element.
Update (better fix)
Just found the real issue to the problem;
.clearfix::after {
content: "";
display: block;
height: 0;
clear: both;
visibility: hidden;
}
Change content: "."; to content: ""; and it's fixed. Or just remove that style at all, as it doesn't seem to have use in that case.
"overflow: hidden"
makes things harder but try,
"overflow: auto"
in order to be able to flow when you need.
I'm late to the show here but it may help somebody in my case I had an empty space at the top I added the margin-top=-20px now the empty space at the bottom, tried almost all suggestions I found on these and many threads and nothing. Decided to run it thru some HTML validator there are a few none of them pick up but after a couple one found an extra character(`) at the end of a tag, and that was it, so it was user clumsiness, took that thing out now my page was shifted, took the negative margin and all good. So try a validator and look for something like this.
margin-bottom: 0px;
This would do it
Btw ..nice site dude :)
Sometimes, it's some iframes/objects that are created by third party services that create this blank space. In my case, Google Adwords and Google Analytics was creating this. So, I removed by adding this CSS:
object[type="application/gas-events-cef"],
iframe[name="google_conversion_frame"] {
display: none !important;
height: 0 !important;
width: 0 !important;
line-height: 0 !important;
font-size: 0 !important;
margin-top: -13px;
float: left;
}
Maybe you will need to add some extra rules for your case. Hope that helps.