I really like to create/delete/disable (and all other actions to breakpoint) multiple breakpoints in just one command line, such as:
b 12 28 30
to create 3 breakpoints at line 12, 28 and 30.
I googled many times, but got nothing.
The only built-in way to create multiple breakpoints with a single command is rbreak, but this isn't applicable to you, as it doesn't allow line numbers.
If you really need this for some reason, you can write a new command to do it. You might be able to do this from the CLI using define, but, if not, you can easily use Python to write new commands.
Many other breakpoint commands like enable (but not all commands -- I think, e.g., not cond for syntax reasons) take a list of breakpoints to work on.
Related
I'm working on custom hardware, and have added a new myboard board to my U-boot repro. The make pattern is very standard:
make myboard_defconfig
make
which sets the U-Boot configuration to the myboard defaults, and then builds the resulting U-boot image. It all works, but I need to take it one step further.
The hardware actually comes in two closely-related flavors, and I need to build slightly different U-Boot images for the two flavors. Rather than defining two completely different boards, I'd like to build the same board type twice, but with a CONFIG_MYBOARD_XXXX symbol having different values. My myboard.c file will then have an #if CONFIG_MYBOARD_XXXX == YYYY test to differentiate the results.
Problem: I want to set CONFIG_MYBOARD_XXXX's value from within my parent Makefile, not by running anything interactive like make menuconfig.
What's the "right" way to do this?
The U-boot make process has a lot of magic in it, and there seems to be a number of unstated rules on how files need to be named. So, I assumed that the configs/myboard_defconfig file, and the argument to make myboard_defconfig, had to match the official name of my board followed by _defconfig.
Turns out I was wrong: these files can be named anything, as long as they end in _defconfig. So, to have two closely-related versions of myboard, I just have two different defconfig files, e.g. myboard_one_defconfig and myboard_two_defconfig, with the configuration values in the two files specifying the configuration for the two different flavors of myboard.
Easy peasy!
I have written a programme which merges two 1D arrays containing names. I print the list of arr1, arr2 and arr3.
I am using Lazarus Free Pascal v. 1.0.14 . I was wondering if anyone knows how to break the results in the dos-like window because the list is so long that I can only see the last few names in the returned results. The rest go by too fast to read.
I know I can save the resuls to file and I also use the delay command, but would like to know if there is a way to somehow break the results or slow them down or even edit the output console?
I appreciate your help.
This isn't really a programming question, because your console application should output the values without pause. Otherwise your program would become useless if you ever wanted it to run as part of another pipeline in an automated fashion.
Instead you need a tool that you wrap around your program to paginate the output if, and when, you so desire. Such tools are known as terminal pagers and the basic one that ships with Windows is called more. You execute your program and pipe the output to the more program. Like this:
C:\SomeDir>MyProject.exe <input_args> | more
You can change the code of your loop in the following way:
say you print the results by the followng loop:
for i:=0 to 250 do
WriteLn(ArrUnited[i]);
you can replace it with:
for i:=0 to 250 do
begin
WriteLn(ArrUnited[i]);
if (i mod 25) = 24 then //the code will wait for the user pressing Enter every 25 rows
ReadLn;
end;
For the future please! post MCVE in your questions otherwise everyone has to guess what your code is.
I am working on migration of 3.0 code into new 4.2 framework. I am facing a few difficulties:
How to do CDR level deduplication in new 4.2 framework? (Note: Table deduplication is already done).
Where to implement PostDedupProcessor - context or chainsink custom? In either case, do I need to remove duplicate hashcodes from the list or just reject the tuples? Here I am also doing column updating for a few tuples.
My file is not moving into archive. The temporary output file is getting generated and that too empty and outside load directory. What could be the possible reasons? - I have thoroughly checked config parameters and after putting logs, it seems correct output is being sent from transformer custom, so I don't know where it is stuck. I had printed TableRowGenerator stream for logs(end of DataProcessor).
1. and 2.:
You need to select the type of deduplication. It is not a big difference if you choose "table-" or "cdr-level-deduplication".
The ite.businessLogic.transformation.outputType does affect this. There is one Dedup only. You can not have both.
Select recordStream for "cdr-level-deduplication", do the transformation to table row format (e.g. if you like to use the TableFileWriter) in xxx.chainsink.custom::PostContextDataProcessor.
In xxx.chainsink.custom::PostContextDataProcessor you need to add custom code for duplicate-handling: reject (discard) tuples or set special column values or write them to different target tables.
3.:
Possibly reasons could be:
Missing forwarding of window punctuations or statistic tuple
error in BloomFilter configuration, you would see it easily because PE is down and error log gives hints about wrong sha2 functions be used
To troubleshoot your ITE application, I recommend to enable the following debug sinks if checking the StreamsStudio live graph is not sufficient:
ite.businessLogic.transformation.debug=on
ite.businessLogic.group.debug=on
ite.businessLogic.sink.debug=on
Run a test with a single input file only and check the flow of your record and statistic tuples. "Debug sinks" write punctuations markers also to debug files.
I'm extremely new at Perl and trying to prove I can pick it up quickly. What I was asked to do is add a string as an argument on my command line, and then feed that into my script. From there it is supposed to search a MySQL table I've made for matches in one column, and spit the contents of another column into an array. It was suggested I used the Getops:Std but I'm uncertain how exactly to do that, and if that's the best technique.
For example: I have a MySQL table with car manufacturers, and car models. I want to run, Perl myscript.pl Ford, and then have it shoot me back an array with
Mustang
Escape
Focus
But I'm uncertain how to get that string input in the first place. Would Getops:Std be best? If so how would it be written? I'm picking this up quickly, but I've been at it less than a week, so the simpler the explanation, the better.
Edit: Basically I was confused why it was suggested I should use GetOpts::Std for this. It seems to be completely inappropriate for what I'm trying to do.
GetOpts::Std is overkill for this. Your command line arguments are in #ARGV. If you haven't been able to work that out after a week, then you need better references for Perl.
The first argument will be in $ARGV[0], the second in $ARGV[1] , and so on.
You should check the DBI module. Google for some tutorial out there.
Then try to write your script and post more specific questions with some code if you need more help.
I am trying to insure that only one instance of a perl script can run at one time. The script performs some kind of db_operation depending on the parameters passed in. The script does not necessarily live in one place or on one machine, and possibly multiple OSs. Though the file system is automounted across the various machines.
My first aproach was to just create a .lock file, and do the following:
use warnings;
use strict;
use Fcntl qw(:DEFAULT :flock);
...
open(FILE,">>",$lockFilePath);
flock(FILE,LOCK_EX) or die("Could not lock ");
do_something();
flock(FILE,LOCK_UN) or die("Could not unlock ");
close(FILE);
but I keep getting the following errors:
Bareword "LOCK_EX" not allowed while "strict subs" in use
Bareword "LOCK_UN" not allowed while "strict subs" in use
So I am looking for another way to approach the problem. Locking the DB itself is also not practical since the db could be used by other scripts(which is acceptable), I am just trying to prevent this script from running. And locking a table for write is not practical, since my script is not aware of what table the operation is taking place, it just launches another perl script supplied as a parameter.
I am thinking of adding a table to the db, with just one value, and to use that as a muetex, but I don't know how practical/reliable that is(a lot of red flags go up in my head). I have a DBI connection to a db that this script useses.
Thanks
The Bareword error you are getting sounds like you've done something in that "..." to confuse Perl with regard to the imported Fcntl constants. There's nothing wrong with using those constants like that. You might try something like LOCK_UN() to see what error that gets you.
If you are using MySQL, you can use the GET_LOCK() and RELEASE_LOCK() mechanism. It works reasonably well for cases like this:
SELECT GET_LOCK("script_lock");
and then when you are finished:
SELECT RELEASE_LOCK("script_lock");
See http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/miscellaneous-functions.html for details.
You may want to avoid the file locking; from what I remember it's notoriously unreliable on non-local filesystems. Your better bet is to just use the existence of the file itself to the indicator that the script is already running (similar to a UNIX PID file) Granted, this won't be 100% reliable but should work reasonably reliably with very low overhead, provided the script isn't getting invoked incessantly.
If you need better reliability than that, using the database for the mutex is a good solution.