I have a method with a request parameter and I'm trying to link to this method from another resource. I want the link to be something like this:
"rel":{
"href":".../resources{?param}",
"templated":true
}
I tried the following without success:
//First attempt
resources.add(linkTo(methodOn(Controller.class).method(null)).withRel("rel")
//Second attempt
resources.add(linkTo(methodOn(Controller.class).method("{parameter}")).withRel("rel")
//Third attempt
resources.add(entityLinks.linkToCollectionResource(LinkedResource.class).withRel("rel");
It does work now, you can check the following issue which has been resolved now - https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-hateoas/issues/169.
As you have mentioned above in your first attempt -
resources.add(linkTo(methodOn(Controller.class).method(null)).withRel("rel")
should work.
This isn't currently a part of spring-hateoas, see this open bug report, which suggests adding this functionality to ControllerLinkBuilder and this previous question which has an answer with a custom implementation for doing this.
Related
I'm using attempting to add an "onclick" object to a page in a singlesite (i.e. rather than multisite) WordPress that triggers an event. The code is:
Send a voice message
When attempting to save the code, WordPress strips the onclick object leaving:
Send a voice message
A user on another forum suggested that this restriction should only apply to multisite non-superadmin users. Again, this is a siglesite with only one admin user.
It is understood that WordPress removes "onclick" from HTML to prevent malicious code. Still, does anyone know how to resolve this?
Thanks.
It appears that with current Wordpress (I'm on 4.9.4), TinyMCE does the filtering directly on the editor screen, not when the form is submitted. The allowedtags and allowedposttags don't seem to matter, so the solution above does not solve the problem for me.
The method I have developed uses the tiny_mce_before_init filter to alter the allowed tags within TinyMCE. The trick is to add the extended_valid_elements setting with the updated versions of the elements allowed for a.
First, look in the page http://archive.tinymce.com/wiki.php/Configuration3x:valid_elements to find the current value for a, which right now is
a[rel|rev|charset|hreflang|tabindex|accesskey|type|name|href|target|title|class|onfocus|onblur]
And add to the end of that the onclick attribute:
a[rel|rev|charset|hreflang|tabindex|accesskey|type|name|href|target|title|class|onfocus|onblur|onclick]
Then use that in the filter function like this:
function allow_button_onclick_mce($settings) {
$settings['extended_valid_elements'] = "a[rel|rev|charset|hreflang|tabindex|accesskey|type|name|href|target|title|class|onfocus|onblur|onclick]";
return $settings;
}
add_filter('tiny_mce_before_init', 'allow_button_onclick_mce');
which you install in your functions.php file in Wordpress. You can see it in action by toggling the text and visual view on the edit page. Without the extended list, the onclick goes away. With it, it remains.
You can solve this by changing the anchor tag into button and adding a script. For more info please refer to this link: Wordpress TinyMCE Strips OnClick & OnChange (need jQuery).
By resolving, I'm assuming you mean to allow the onclick attribute. You will want to be careful with this, because modifying the allowed tags does this for all your users.
You can modify the list of allowed tags and attributes, by adding this to your functions.php file:
function allow_onclick_content() {
global $allowedposttags, $allowedtags;
$newattribute = "onclick";
$allowedposttags["a"][$newattribute] = true;
$allowedtags["a"][$newattribute] = true; //unnecessary?
}
add_action( 'init', 'allow_onclick_content' );
I suggest trying it with only $allowedposttags first to see if that works for you. According to this other stackexchange post, you should only need allowedtags if you need it for comments or possibly non-logged-in users, but when I did something similar in the past, I needed both of them to work.
On a side note, if you want a list of all already allowed tags and attributes, look inside your /wp-includes/kses.php file.
I have a PHPBB forum along with PJAX.
PJAX works well with links however whenever I try use a .pjax function I get an error in firebug, claiming that .pjax is not defined?
Here is what works:
pjax.connect('wrap');
Here is what doesn't work:
$(document).pjax('a', '#pjax-container')
$.pjax.submit(event, '#pjax-container')
and anything that contains .pjax.
I have the pjax/pjax-standalone.min.js file included in my header.
Am I misunderstanding something here?
Thanks,
Peter
I am trying to open HTML file from the local URI which I use as XML Editor, to edit xml data that come from Silverlight application, then close browser window and return back edited xml data to the Silverlight application.
I tried to use HtmlPage.Window.Navigate but I don't quit like it.
I have tried using a method from: http://weblogs.asp.net/dwahlin/archive/2010/05/10/integrating-html-into-silverlight-applications.aspx
but instanly got an exception "failed to invoke ShowJobPlanIFrame"
Is there any way to handle this task?
"Out of browser" mode doesn't fit.
Thanks.
===========================================================================
Update:
It worked out using IFrame overlay.
Button click invokes the following code in C#:
var scriptObject = (ScriptObject)HtmlPage.Window.GetProperty("ShowJobPlanIFrame");
scriptObject.InvokeSelf(url);
Where "ShowJobPlanIFrame" is as defined at:
http://weblogs.asp.net/dwahlin/archive/2010/05/10/integrating-html-into-silverlight-applications.aspx
This allowed me to pass data into XML editor and then get it back.
An error with JavaScript function invocation I told above, was my fault in JavaScript code itself.
A very similar scenario: https://stackoverflow.com/a/7919065/384316
Try using an iframe overlay, then you can load any HTML-like content.
There is an excellent explanation of how to do this here:
http://www.wintellect.com/cs/blogs/jlikness/archive/2010/09/19/hosting-html-in-silverlight-not-out-of-browser.aspx
It worked out using IFrame overlay.
Button click invokes the following code in C#:
var scriptObject = (ScriptObject)HtmlPage.Window.GetProperty("ShowJobPlanIFrame");
scriptObject.InvokeSelf(url);
Where "ShowJobPlanIFrame" is as defined at:
http://weblogs.asp.net/dwahlin/archive/2010/05/10/integrating-html-into-silverlight-applications.aspx
This allowed me to pass data into XML editor and then get it back.
An error with JavaScript function invocation I told above, was my fault in JavaScript code itself.
Did you try NavigationFramework of Silverlight? It's capability may support your needs in a more simple way than using multiple browser pages.
I am simply trying to increment the amount of page views per visit with CodeIgniter's active record. For some reason, the following code is incrementing twice. So it adds 2 page views per visit. What is strange is that this is used on another website that shares the same table and the same method code and it works properly on the other website. The views field is a simple int(11). I am only calling this method once in the controller, I thought maybe I had a duplicate but I do not.
function increment_video_view($video_pk) {
$this->db->where('video_pk', $video_pk);
$this->db->set('views', 'views+1', FALSE);
$this->db->update('videos');
}
Any ideas or help would be great! Thanks!
Try putting an echo (or log) statement inside the function to see if it actually gets called twice. Let us know if it only echo's once.
function increment_video_view($video_pk) {
echo "We in increment_video_view";
$this->db->where('video_pk', $video_pk);
$this->db->set('views', 'views+1', FALSE);
$this->db->update('videos');
}
Are you sure that the controller is executed only once?
This happens when you have a 404 link (image/css/favicon) in your HTML, or if you have a missing favicon.ico
Chrome looks for a favicon.ico even if you don't insert it in your HTML, and when it finds it missing, I think it calls another request.
I'm trying to restraint editing on the Wiki (using MediaWiki) that I'm creating as an internal project for my company.
We would like to be able to let the page creators specify none or one of the two following options:
Nobody besides the creator of this page can edit the content of this page
Anybody can edit the content of this page, but there must be an approval by the page creator before the changes are visible (whether it'd be by mail, on the wiki directly or something else - does not matter).
If the creator does not specify any of the 2 options, anybody can edit the page, and the changes are immediatly visible (default behaviour).
I've been browsing the net but I did not find an out-of-the-box solution for this. We managed to make some great custom stuff thanks to the edition of the LocalSettings file but not this.
Is there a solution for that functionality?
I don't know of an extension that would make this easy.
What I think you could do would be to take an extension like Flagged Revs or Approved Revs and make it so that instead of using groups as the determiner of approval status, it uses username. This might not be too difficult. Does this make sense?
I had the same problem as you and now i fixed it, here is the solution:
I am using http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension%3aApproved_Revs for article protection but it didn't fulfil my need it allowed the user to change the currently approved revision of the article and so the change was immediately reflected on the main page so I hacked it a bit, basically you need only one change
go to ApprovedRevs/ApprovedRevs.hooks.php
and find the following code:
static public function setLatestAsApproved( &$article , &$user, $text,
$summary, $flags, $unused1, $unused2, &$flags, $revision,
&$status, $baseRevId ) {
this is a function declaration just after it add the following code:
return false;
and it will work the way you wanted it to be i.e (the change you did will not be reflected until you approve it)