I want to create responsive popup banner with close button here is my simple scenario:
<div class="banner">
<img src="...">
X
</div>
And my CSS:
.banner img{
max-width:100%;
max-height:100%;
position:absolute;
}
.close-btn{
position:absolute;
right:0;
z-index:2;
color:red;
background:#000;
padding:4px;
}
As you can see I stretch image depending on width and height.
Problem: I want close-btn to stick to the right side of the image and overlap it. To solve this the banner must be the same width as the image. If banner has position:absolute its width and height of course is 0.
Is it possible to achieve only with CSS?
Here is fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/fjckls/qq590xz5/
I need image to be responsive to width and height
To make your image fully width AND height responsive, first off, you need to alter your units. You're currently using %'s which is all well and good, but for the 'fully height responsive' concept, the % units aren't much help.
Instead, you should look into using vh (view-height) and vw (view-width) units, since these are for the actual viewport that the user can see currently.
In order to position your 'x' over the top right of your image, you're going to have to alter your css slightly.
You could possibly include a css rule for your banner, first off. Something like:
.banner {
position:relative;
display:inline-block;
}
Whilst removing the 'position:absolute' rule from your image, since now your banner div will be the size of your image (not the default '100% of screen' that divs are set to originally).
This leaves us one problem, you haven't actually set where abouts you want the 'x' to appear vertically, so it will default to 'where it would position normally', which, in this case, would be below the image. To tackle this, you would need to add a top: or bottom: declaration to your 'x' class, and in my case, i've chosen to set it to the top (top:0;).
The overall fiddle can be shown here
or here:
.banner img {
max-width: 100vw;
max-height: 100vh;
}
.close-btn {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: 2;
color: red;
background: #000;
padding: 4px;
}
.banner {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
}
<div class="banner">
<img src="http://sockets.hogwartsishere.com/media/book_covers/l-bunny.jpg" /> X
</div>
I have updated the link
http://jsfiddle.net/qq590xz5/3/
<div class="banner">
<div style="position:abolute;">
<img src="http://sockets.hogwartsishere.com/media/book_covers/l-bunny.jpg">
X
</div>
</div>
.banner img{
max-width:50%;
max-height:100%;
}
.close-btn{
position:absolute;
z-index:2;
color:red;
top:1%;
background:#000;
padding:4px;
}
Have a look
Thanks
try this..
Html
<div class="banner">
<img src="http://sockets.hogwartsishere.com/media/book_covers/l-bunny.jpg">
X
</div>
CSS
.banner{
position:relative;
width:200px;
}
img{
max-width:100%;
}
.close-btn{
position:absolute;
right:0;
top:0;
z-index:1;
color:red;
background:#000;
padding:4px;
}
Fiddle Demo
I found a solution that keeps the image centered horizontally and the x button on the top right of the image. It involves:
1) Making the .banner absolutely positioned, with margins from each window edge. This centers the entire .banner, however you might want to use fixed position if you need it to scroll along with the user's viewport.
It'll work as long as there aren't any other positioned elements as its parents.
.banner {
position: absolute;
top: 5%;
left: 25%;
right: 25%;
bottom: 5%;
}
2) Making a thing that sticks around the image, which will serve as a positioning guide for the little X.
<div class="shrinkwrap">
<img src="...">
X
</div>
.shrinkwrap {
/* shrink-wraps this div around its content;
as a side-effect, lets this div be centered with text-align: center; */
display: inline-block;
/* new positioning context! */
position: relative;
/* keeps the responsiveness */
max-width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
3) Positioning the shrinkwrapper to always be in the center of the .banner.
.banner {
/* ... */
text-align: center;
}
.close-btn {
/* ... */
top: 0;
}
The finished version of this is here: http://jsfiddle.net/boxmein/qq590xz5/5/
Related
Here is the thing.. I have a web page split to 2 sections (intro and main)
The intro section stretches to 100 based on the browser height with CSS:
#intro {
height: 100vh;
}
I want to add an arrow with href that will be positioned at the bottom section of the intro div no matter which screen size is entering the page.
Do you have any idea how can it be done?
Thanks!
#intro {
...
position: relative; /* or absolute, as appropriate */
}
#down_arrow {
position: absolute;
bottom: 10px;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -25px; /* half the element's width */
}
This assumes markup similar to the following. In the future, please provide your markup in your question.
<div id="intro">
<div id="down_arrow"> ... </div>
</div>
Set position:relative to the #intro element and position:absolute to the arrow.
Also give a bottom and left rule:
#arrow {
width:40px; /* sample width - set as you wish */
position:absolute;
bottom:10px;
left:50%;
margin-left:-20px; /* important: set half of the width (centers the div) */
}
margin-top:90vh
:D and I need to write some text so stackoverflow knows I'm not spamming.
Rich homie quan is a good rapper. I think the limit has been reached, now.
Did You mean something like this Fiddle
I use positioning of intro element as relative and set this viewportheight as you want.
So if i set arrow postion to absolute it will stay inside intro element.
.arrow{
width: 50px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -25px;
}
Using flexbox (demo):
<div class="intro">
<div class="nav"></div>
<div class="link-container">
<a>Arrow</a>
</div>
</div>
<div class="main"></div>
CSS:
.intro {
height: 100vh;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
background: blue;
}
.intro > .link-container {
position: absolute;
bottom: 20px;
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
}
...
Place the arrow inside of the intro container and use:
.arrow{
bottom: 0px;
}
you may also need to fiddle around with the POSITION property as well, but this should give you what you need. Hope this helps!
.section2 {
position:fixed;
bottom:0;
}
#intro {
position: relative;
}
Add appropriate styles to make it as center of the screen.
I have this page:
http://fetr.zonedesign.ro/contact/
I have a map and a map over blue div I would like to display at center
This is code HTML:
<div style="float:left;width:100%;padding:0 10%;text-
align:center;margin:10px auto;display:block;">
<div class="date-contact">proba</div>
<?php echo do_shortcode( '[huge_it_maps id="1"]' ); ?>
</div>
This is code CSS:
#media (min-width: 800px) {
.date-contact
{
width:300px;
height:150px;
background:blue;
position:absolute;
z-index:10;
}
}
I tried to use margin: 0 auto but unfortunately not working.
Can you please help me solve this problem?
Thanks in advance!
if you want to keep its position absolute you can use calc for top/left but you need to know the height/width of your div.
Further, the parent of this blue box needs to be position relative/absolute/or fixed:
here's a demo
<div></div>
div {
background: blue;
position: absolute;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
top: calc(50% - 50px);
left: calc(50% - 50px);
}
My suggestion is :
wrap the two div's div#huge_it_google_map1_container and div.date-contact with a parent div. The parent div's width will be same as that of div#huge_it_google_map1_container.
So, the html will be:
<div class="map_parent_wrapper">
<div id="huge_it_google_map1_container"></div>
<div class="date-contact"></div>
</div>
The css will be as follows:
.map_parent_wrapper {
position:relative
}
.date-contact {
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
bottom:0;
right:0;
margin:auto;
}
.date-contact {
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 blue;
clear: both;
height: 150px;
margin: 0 auto -208px;
position: relative;
width: 300px;
z-index: 10;
}
Your Blue div is absolutely positioned so its hard to get a center aliment,
Make it relatively positioned and align center using margin 0px auto;
Now give a negative margin bottom of -208 px so that the blue div overlaps the map.
Set the required z-index so that the blue box is above the map.
-Cheers...!!
EDIT: I didn't realize you site until your edit. You should go for a position: absolute in your .date-contact style. So, my recommended code won't apply here. But you can benefit the explanations I hope.
First of all, you cannot use margin: 0 auto with position: absolute. And using classes in a seperated css file, instead of using inline styles, always help you to see your code clearly. With this seperation of concerns, you'll also be applying the DRY principle in your code.
I tidied up your code to provide your desired effect. Please see and if you'll have questions, fire away. Will try my best to help.
HTML
<div class="outer-div">
<div class="date-contact">proba</div>
</div>
CSS
.date-contact {
width:300px;
height:150px;
background:blue;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.outer-div {
text-align:center;
margin:100px auto;
padding:0 10%;
}
NEW ANSWER FOR EDITTED QUESTION
The other answers say that you should absolutely position your blue div. I say if you do that you'll never make it show in the center. The easy way of doing this, is to place your blue div in another div which is positioned absolute. Your blue div will show in center just like you wanted with margin: 0 auto; Also, I placed your blue div inside the div#huge_it_google_map1 because I believe it's where it belongs.
HTML
<div class="yourMapDiv">
<div class="outer-div" id="huge_it_google_map1">
<div class="date-contact">proba</div>
<!-- Your other divs and map contents inside the div#huge_it_google_map1 -->
</div>
</div>
CSS
.yourMapDiv {
position: relative;
background-color: yellow;
padding: 10px;
}
.outer-div {
position: absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
width:100%;
text-align:center;
background-color:red; /* Remove this attribute to see your map div (yellow) */
}
.date-contact {
background-color:blue;
width:300px;
/*height:150px;*/
margin: 0 auto;
/* or "margin: 50px auto 0" if you like to give a little margin-top for 50px */
}}
For your convenience, this is the working fiddle.
I hope you achieve what you wanted.
Blue div has position : absolute. For centered displaying you need to use left and top:
left: 50% - width block( example 40%)
top:50% - height block( example 40%)
I have som problems, regarding Max-width and Absolute Positioning.
In the top of my site, I have a '100%-width section' with a background-image.
I want a small image partly covering the bottom of the top image. To do so, I use Position:relative on the section (top image) and position:absolute on the small image. So far so good..
My problem is, that i want the small image to be centered and have a max-width, so it aligns to the content on the site. (Which have a max-width of 500px..)
I really can't figure out, how to do it...
So, is there a way to only affect vertically, when using position:absolute, or maybe something else i can do?
I hope it makes sense.. :)
screens:
http://cvdmark.com/images_help/screens.jpg
<body>
<section id="img_heading">
<img src="#">
</section>
<section id="content">
<ul>
<li>
</li>
</ul>
</section>
</body>
body {
width:100%;
min-width:100%;
background-color:#000;
float:left;
}
#img_heading{
width:100%;
min-width:100%;
height:150px;
margin-bottom:6em;
background:url(../img/heading_img_test.jpg);
background-position: center center;
float:left;
position:relative;
}
#img_heading > img{
width:90%;
height:100px;
position:absolute;
bottom:-75px;
margin: 0 auto 0 auto;
max-width:500px;
/*left:5%;*/
background-color:#F69;
}
#content{
width:90%;
margin: 0 auto 0 auto;
max-width:500px;
}
#content ul{
width:100%;
list-style-type: none;
}
#content ul li{
width:100%;
float:left;
margin-bottom:30px;
}
JS Fiddle : http://jsfiddle.net/rpatil/ukKgx/
I think what you'd want is to align an absolute position div to the bottom of the section and center it.. (this following assumes you have your content in the section centered too..) replace div with img if you want to and give it your required id.. I ve given "foo-id"
div#foo-id
{
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px; /*since you want it at the bottom of section*/
z-index: 2;
width:90%; /*since your asked for 90%*/
max-width: 500px;
/*the following to center your image*/
margin-left:-45%;
left:50%;
}
Believe that helps!
And here is an updated jsfiddle.. thanks #rubyist..
http://jsfiddle.net/ukKgx/2/
This is an other solution to make it centred --> jsFiddle
<section style="position: absolute; left: 50%;width:50%">
<div style="position: relative; left: -50%;background-color:#ccc; border: dotted red 1px;width: 90%;max-width:500px;height:150px">
</div>
</section>
If you want to make it more custom, you have to use Javascript onLoad page to calculate screen width % picture width
I have a wrapper with some padding, I then have a floating relative div with a percentage width (40%).
Inside the floating relative div I have a fixed div which I would like the same size as its parent. I understand that a fixed div is removed from the flow of the document and as such is ignoring the padding of the wrapper.
HTML
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="wrap">
Some relative item placed item
<div id="fixed"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
body {
height: 20000px
}
#wrapper {
padding: 10%;
}
#wrap {
float: left;
position: relative;
width: 40%;
background: #ccc;
}
#fixed {
position: fixed;
width: inherit;
padding: 0px;
height: 10px;
background-color: #333;
}
Here is the obligatory fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/C93mk/489/
Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this?
I have amended the fiddle to show more detail on what I am trying to accomplish, sorry for the confusion:
http://jsfiddle.net/EVYRE/4/
You can use margin for .wrap container instead of padding for .wrapper:
body{ height:20000px }
#wrapper { padding: 0%; }
#wrap{
float: left;
position: relative;
margin: 10%;
width: 40%;
background:#ccc;
}
#fixed{
position:fixed;
width:inherit;
padding:0px;
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
jsfiddle
Try adding a transform to the parent (doesn't have to do anything, could be a zero translation) and set the fixed child's width to 100%
body{ height:20000px }
#wrapper {padding:10%;}
#wrap{
float: left;
position: relative;
width: 40%;
background:#ccc;
transform: translate(0, 0);
}
#fixed{
position:fixed;
width:100%;
padding:0px;
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="wrap">
Some relative item placed item
<div id="fixed"></div>
</div>
</div>
How about this?
$( document ).ready(function() {
$('#fixed').width($('#wrap').width());
});
By using jquery you can set any kind of width :)
EDIT: As stated by dream in the comments, using JQuery just for this effect is pointless and even counter productive. I made this example for people who use JQuery for other stuff on their pages and consider using it for this part also. I apologize for any inconvenience my answer caused.
man your container is 40% of the width of the parent element
but when you use position:fixed, the width is based on viewport(document) width...
thinking about, i realized your parent element have 10% padding(left and right), it means your element have 80% of the total page width. so your fixed element must have 40% based on 80% of total width
so you just need to change your #fixed class to
#fixed{
position:fixed;
width: calc(80% * 0.4);
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
if you use sass, postcss or another css compiler, you can use variables to avoid breaking the layout when you change the padding value of parent element.
here is the updated fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/C93mk/2343/
i hope it helps, regards
You could use absolute positioning to pin the footer to the base of the parent div. I have also added 10px padding-bottom to the wrap (match the height of the footer). The absolute positioning is relative to the parent div rather than outside of the flow since you have already given it the position relative attribute.
body{ height:20000px }
#wrapper {padding:10%;}
#wrap{
float: left;
padding-bottom: 10px;
position: relative;
width: 40%;
background:#ccc;
}
#fixed{
position:absolute;
width:100%;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
padding:0px;
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/C93mk/497/
On top of your lastest jsfiddle, you just missed one thing:
#sidebar_wrap {
width:40%;
height:200px;
background:green;
float:right;
}
#sidebar {
width:inherit;
margin-top:10px;
background-color:limegreen;
position:fixed;
max-width: 240px; /*This is you missed*/
}
But, how this will solve your problem? Simple, lets explain why is bigger than expect first.
Fixed element #sidebar will use window width size as base to get its own size, like every other fixed element, once in this element is defined width:inherit and #sidebar_wrap has 40% as value in width, then will calculate window.width * 40%, then when if your window width is bigger than your .container width, #sidebar will be bigger than #sidebar_wrap.
This is way, you must set a max-width in your #sidebar_wrap, to prevent to be bigger than #sidebar_wrap.
Check this jsfiddle that shows a working code and explain better how this works.
Remove Padding: 10%; or use px instead of percent for .wrap
see the example :
http://jsfiddle.net/C93mk/493/
HTML :
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="wrap">
Some relative item placed item
<div id="fixed"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
body{ height:20000px }
#wrapper {padding:10%;}
#wrap{
float: left;
position: relative;
width: 200px;
background:#ccc;
}
#fixed{
position:fixed;
width:inherit;
padding:0px;
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
I'm finally trying to do away with tables and use CSS.
I have 3 DIVs that make up a three layered layout: header, body and footer. I'm now trying to overlay a 900px wide DIV on top of these layers, center aligned, which will hold some of my content and navigational buttons.
These are the 3 layers:
And this (done in Photoshop), is what I am trying to achieve but transparent to the eye:
My 3 base layers are coded like this:
<div id="main" style="width:100%; z-index:1; position:relative;">
<div id="header" style="width:100%; height:175px; text-align:center; background:#151515; z-index:1;"></div>
<div id="contents" style="width:100%; height:400px; position:relative; background:#FFF; z-index:1;"></div>
<div id="footer" style="width:100%; height:200px; position:relative; background:#151515; z-index:1;"></div>
</div>
I did manage to get a new layer to sit on top but it wasn't center aligned. Could somebody please point me in the right direction?
Somehting like this could help:
JSFiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/DSH5J/
Add:
<div id="square"></div>
#square {
position: absolute;
top:0;
bottom:0;
left:0;
right:0;
margin:0 auto;
margin-top:50px;
width:80%;
height:100%;
background-color:#333;
z-index:10;
}
Set the width and set margin-left and margin-right to auto. That's for horizontal only, though. If you want both ways, you'd just do it both ways.
margin-left:auto;
margin-right:auto;
Easiest way that I know of to centre a div of known width is to give it the following styles:
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
width: 900px;
margin-left: -450px;
"Putting my money where my mouth is": http://jsfiddle.net/YVmBU/2/
HTML:
<div id="main">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="contents-box">
<div id="contents">
<p>Some text</p>
<p>etc</p>
<p>etc</p>
<p>etc</p>
<p>etc</p>
<p>etc</p>
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
CSS:
#main {
}
#header {
position: relative;
height:100px;
background:#151515;
z-index: -1;
}
#contents-box {
border: dashed grey 1px; /* for understanding only, remove it in the end */
z-index: 1;
margin-top: -30px;
margin-bottom: -30px;
/* TODO: address min-height; try only one line of text. */
/* fixed height would work too, but would not let the box stretch dynamically */
}
#contents {
width: 75%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
background: grey;
z-index: 1;
}
#footer {
position: relative;
height:75px;
background:#151515;
z-index: -1;
}
The only problem is with few text content: if min-height is used on #content, then the grey background does not stretch when there is few text; if a static height of N px is used, then the box does not stretch dinamically.
But if the two black bars merging when there is few content is not important, then ignore it.
Remove the grey dashed border and grey background; those are helpers - to know where each box is and understand what is happening.
By the way, the position: relative needs to be there on the z-index: -1; layers, otherwise the background does not go under. Read on position: this is because things in html have position: static by default, and z-index relies on position for its behaviour.
You can read about this in this page: http://tjkdesign.com/articles/z-index/teach_yourself_how_elements_stack.asp
The only problem is with few text content: if min-height is used on #content, then the grey background does not stretch when there is few text; if a static height of N px is used, then the box does not stretch dinamically.
But if the two black bars merging when there is few content is not important, then ignore it.