Set a Fixed div to 100% width of the parent container - html

I have a wrapper with some padding, I then have a floating relative div with a percentage width (40%).
Inside the floating relative div I have a fixed div which I would like the same size as its parent. I understand that a fixed div is removed from the flow of the document and as such is ignoring the padding of the wrapper.
HTML
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="wrap">
Some relative item placed item
<div id="fixed"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
body {
height: 20000px
}
#wrapper {
padding: 10%;
}
#wrap {
float: left;
position: relative;
width: 40%;
background: #ccc;
}
#fixed {
position: fixed;
width: inherit;
padding: 0px;
height: 10px;
background-color: #333;
}
Here is the obligatory fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/C93mk/489/
Does anyone know of a way to accomplish this?
I have amended the fiddle to show more detail on what I am trying to accomplish, sorry for the confusion:
http://jsfiddle.net/EVYRE/4/

You can use margin for .wrap container instead of padding for .wrapper:
body{ height:20000px }
#wrapper { padding: 0%; }
#wrap{
float: left;
position: relative;
margin: 10%;
width: 40%;
background:#ccc;
}
#fixed{
position:fixed;
width:inherit;
padding:0px;
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
jsfiddle

Try adding a transform to the parent (doesn't have to do anything, could be a zero translation) and set the fixed child's width to 100%
body{ height:20000px }
#wrapper {padding:10%;}
#wrap{
float: left;
position: relative;
width: 40%;
background:#ccc;
transform: translate(0, 0);
}
#fixed{
position:fixed;
width:100%;
padding:0px;
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="wrap">
Some relative item placed item
<div id="fixed"></div>
</div>
</div>

How about this?
$( document ).ready(function() {
$('#fixed').width($('#wrap').width());
});
By using jquery you can set any kind of width :)
EDIT: As stated by dream in the comments, using JQuery just for this effect is pointless and even counter productive. I made this example for people who use JQuery for other stuff on their pages and consider using it for this part also. I apologize for any inconvenience my answer caused.

man your container is 40% of the width of the parent element
but when you use position:fixed, the width is based on viewport(document) width...
thinking about, i realized your parent element have 10% padding(left and right), it means your element have 80% of the total page width. so your fixed element must have 40% based on 80% of total width
so you just need to change your #fixed class to
#fixed{
position:fixed;
width: calc(80% * 0.4);
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
if you use sass, postcss or another css compiler, you can use variables to avoid breaking the layout when you change the padding value of parent element.
here is the updated fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/C93mk/2343/
i hope it helps, regards

You could use absolute positioning to pin the footer to the base of the parent div. I have also added 10px padding-bottom to the wrap (match the height of the footer). The absolute positioning is relative to the parent div rather than outside of the flow since you have already given it the position relative attribute.
body{ height:20000px }
#wrapper {padding:10%;}
#wrap{
float: left;
padding-bottom: 10px;
position: relative;
width: 40%;
background:#ccc;
}
#fixed{
position:absolute;
width:100%;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
padding:0px;
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/C93mk/497/

On top of your lastest jsfiddle, you just missed one thing:
#sidebar_wrap {
width:40%;
height:200px;
background:green;
float:right;
}
#sidebar {
width:inherit;
margin-top:10px;
background-color:limegreen;
position:fixed;
max-width: 240px; /*This is you missed*/
}
But, how this will solve your problem? Simple, lets explain why is bigger than expect first.
Fixed element #sidebar will use window width size as base to get its own size, like every other fixed element, once in this element is defined width:inherit and #sidebar_wrap has 40% as value in width, then will calculate window.width * 40%, then when if your window width is bigger than your .container width, #sidebar will be bigger than #sidebar_wrap.
This is way, you must set a max-width in your #sidebar_wrap, to prevent to be bigger than #sidebar_wrap.
Check this jsfiddle that shows a working code and explain better how this works.

Remove Padding: 10%; or use px instead of percent for .wrap
see the example :
http://jsfiddle.net/C93mk/493/
HTML :
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="wrap">
Some relative item placed item
<div id="fixed"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
body{ height:20000px }
#wrapper {padding:10%;}
#wrap{
float: left;
position: relative;
width: 200px;
background:#ccc;
}
#fixed{
position:fixed;
width:inherit;
padding:0px;
height:10px;
background-color:#333;
}

Related

box-sizing: border-box not working as expected [duplicate]

i have 2 divs and a dl:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="header">
<dl id="site_nav_global_primary">
and this is my style:
#wrap {
margin:0 auto;
width:100%;
min-width:760px;
max-width:1003px;
overflow:hidden;
}
#header {
width:100%;
position:relative;
float:left;
padding-top:18px;
margin-bottom:29px;
}
#site_nav_global_primary {
float:right;
margin-right:18px;
margin-bottom:11px;
margin-left:18px;
}
Now i want to change site_nav_global_primary to have a full screen width without
changing the wrap and the header. but when i try:
#site_nav_global_primary {
position: absolute;
width:100%;
top:0px;
left:0px;
}
The navigation gets the 100% of the wrapper which is max 1003px width. i want it to
stretch to the maximum without changing the wrap and header divs.
Is this possible?
You could set both left and right property to 0. This will make the div stretch to the document width, but requires that no parent element is positioned (which is not the case, seeing as #header is position: relative;)
#site_nav_global_primary {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
}
Demo at: http://jsfiddle.net/xWnq2/, where I removed position:relative; from #header
You need to add position:relative to #wrap element.
When you add this, all child elements will be positioned in this element, not browser window.
I have similar situation. In my case, it doesn't have a parent with position:relative. Just paste my solution here for those that might need.
position: fixed;
left: 0;
right: 0;
Adding the following CSS to parent div worked for me
position: relative;
max-width: 100%
Make #site_nav_global_primary positioned as fixed and set width to 100 % and desired height.
This one also works. With this method, there is no need to interfere with positioning of parent divs. I have checked
#site_nav_global_primary {
position: absolute;
width: 100vw;
}
I don't know if this what you want but try to remove overflow: hidden from #wrap

How can I align center this div?

I have this page:
http://fetr.zonedesign.ro/contact/
I have a map and a map over blue div I would like to display at center
This is code HTML:
<div style="float:left;width:100%;padding:0 10%;text-
align:center;margin:10px auto;display:block;">
<div class="date-contact">proba</div>
<?php echo do_shortcode( '[huge_it_maps id="1"]' ); ?>
</div>
This is code CSS:
#media (min-width: 800px) {
.date-contact
{
width:300px;
height:150px;
background:blue;
position:absolute;
z-index:10;
}
}
I tried to use margin: 0 auto but unfortunately not working.
Can you please help me solve this problem?
Thanks in advance!
if you want to keep its position absolute you can use calc for top/left but you need to know the height/width of your div.
Further, the parent of this blue box needs to be position relative/absolute/or fixed:
here's a demo
<div></div>
div {
background: blue;
position: absolute;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
top: calc(50% - 50px);
left: calc(50% - 50px);
}
My suggestion is :
wrap the two div's div#huge_it_google_map1_container and div.date-contact with a parent div. The parent div's width will be same as that of div#huge_it_google_map1_container.
So, the html will be:
<div class="map_parent_wrapper">
<div id="huge_it_google_map1_container"></div>
<div class="date-contact"></div>
</div>
The css will be as follows:
.map_parent_wrapper {
position:relative
}
.date-contact {
position:absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
bottom:0;
right:0;
margin:auto;
}
.date-contact {
background: none repeat scroll 0 0 blue;
clear: both;
height: 150px;
margin: 0 auto -208px;
position: relative;
width: 300px;
z-index: 10;
}
Your Blue div is absolutely positioned so its hard to get a center aliment,
Make it relatively positioned and align center using margin 0px auto;
Now give a negative margin bottom of -208 px so that the blue div overlaps the map.
Set the required z-index so that the blue box is above the map.
-Cheers...!!
EDIT: I didn't realize you site until your edit. You should go for a position: absolute in your .date-contact style. So, my recommended code won't apply here. But you can benefit the explanations I hope.
First of all, you cannot use margin: 0 auto with position: absolute. And using classes in a seperated css file, instead of using inline styles, always help you to see your code clearly. With this seperation of concerns, you'll also be applying the DRY principle in your code.
I tidied up your code to provide your desired effect. Please see and if you'll have questions, fire away. Will try my best to help.
HTML
<div class="outer-div">
<div class="date-contact">proba</div>
</div>
CSS
.date-contact {
width:300px;
height:150px;
background:blue;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.outer-div {
text-align:center;
margin:100px auto;
padding:0 10%;
}
NEW ANSWER FOR EDITTED QUESTION
The other answers say that you should absolutely position your blue div. I say if you do that you'll never make it show in the center. The easy way of doing this, is to place your blue div in another div which is positioned absolute. Your blue div will show in center just like you wanted with margin: 0 auto; Also, I placed your blue div inside the div#huge_it_google_map1 because I believe it's where it belongs.
HTML
<div class="yourMapDiv">
<div class="outer-div" id="huge_it_google_map1">
<div class="date-contact">proba</div>
<!-- Your other divs and map contents inside the div#huge_it_google_map1 -->
</div>
</div>
CSS
.yourMapDiv {
position: relative;
background-color: yellow;
padding: 10px;
}
.outer-div {
position: absolute;
top:0;
left:0;
width:100%;
text-align:center;
background-color:red; /* Remove this attribute to see your map div (yellow) */
}
.date-contact {
background-color:blue;
width:300px;
/*height:150px;*/
margin: 0 auto;
/* or "margin: 50px auto 0" if you like to give a little margin-top for 50px */
}}
For your convenience, this is the working fiddle.
I hope you achieve what you wanted.
Blue div has position : absolute. For centered displaying you need to use left and top:
left: 50% - width block( example 40%)
top:50% - height block( example 40%)

Make element align to absolute positioned element as if it was relative

I want to create responsive popup banner with close button here is my simple scenario:
<div class="banner">
<img src="...">
X
</div>
And my CSS:
.banner img{
max-width:100%;
max-height:100%;
position:absolute;
}
.close-btn{
position:absolute;
right:0;
z-index:2;
color:red;
background:#000;
padding:4px;
}
As you can see I stretch image depending on width and height.
Problem: I want close-btn to stick to the right side of the image and overlap it. To solve this the banner must be the same width as the image. If banner has position:absolute its width and height of course is 0.
Is it possible to achieve only with CSS?
Here is fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/fjckls/qq590xz5/
I need image to be responsive to width and height
To make your image fully width AND height responsive, first off, you need to alter your units. You're currently using %'s which is all well and good, but for the 'fully height responsive' concept, the % units aren't much help.
Instead, you should look into using vh (view-height) and vw (view-width) units, since these are for the actual viewport that the user can see currently.
In order to position your 'x' over the top right of your image, you're going to have to alter your css slightly.
You could possibly include a css rule for your banner, first off. Something like:
.banner {
position:relative;
display:inline-block;
}
Whilst removing the 'position:absolute' rule from your image, since now your banner div will be the size of your image (not the default '100% of screen' that divs are set to originally).
This leaves us one problem, you haven't actually set where abouts you want the 'x' to appear vertically, so it will default to 'where it would position normally', which, in this case, would be below the image. To tackle this, you would need to add a top: or bottom: declaration to your 'x' class, and in my case, i've chosen to set it to the top (top:0;).
The overall fiddle can be shown here
or here:
.banner img {
max-width: 100vw;
max-height: 100vh;
}
.close-btn {
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: 2;
color: red;
background: #000;
padding: 4px;
}
.banner {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
}
<div class="banner">
<img src="http://sockets.hogwartsishere.com/media/book_covers/l-bunny.jpg" /> X
</div>
I have updated the link
http://jsfiddle.net/qq590xz5/3/
<div class="banner">
<div style="position:abolute;">
<img src="http://sockets.hogwartsishere.com/media/book_covers/l-bunny.jpg">
X
</div>
</div>
.banner img{
max-width:50%;
max-height:100%;
}
.close-btn{
position:absolute;
z-index:2;
color:red;
top:1%;
background:#000;
padding:4px;
}
Have a look
Thanks
try this..
Html
<div class="banner">
<img src="http://sockets.hogwartsishere.com/media/book_covers/l-bunny.jpg">
X
</div>
CSS
.banner{
position:relative;
width:200px;
}
img{
max-width:100%;
}
.close-btn{
position:absolute;
right:0;
top:0;
z-index:1;
color:red;
background:#000;
padding:4px;
}
Fiddle Demo
I found a solution that keeps the image centered horizontally and the x button on the top right of the image. It involves:
1) Making the .banner absolutely positioned, with margins from each window edge. This centers the entire .banner, however you might want to use fixed position if you need it to scroll along with the user's viewport.
It'll work as long as there aren't any other positioned elements as its parents.
.banner {
position: absolute;
top: 5%;
left: 25%;
right: 25%;
bottom: 5%;
}
2) Making a thing that sticks around the image, which will serve as a positioning guide for the little X.
<div class="shrinkwrap">
<img src="...">
X
</div>
.shrinkwrap {
/* shrink-wraps this div around its content;
as a side-effect, lets this div be centered with text-align: center; */
display: inline-block;
/* new positioning context! */
position: relative;
/* keeps the responsiveness */
max-width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
3) Positioning the shrinkwrapper to always be in the center of the .banner.
.banner {
/* ... */
text-align: center;
}
.close-btn {
/* ... */
top: 0;
}
The finished version of this is here: http://jsfiddle.net/boxmein/qq590xz5/5/

absolute positioning inside to relative parent overflows div when padding set

Thats my codepen: http://codepen.io/helloworld/pen/JoKmQr
run on IE 11.
Why does the right red div Overflow into the Screen when I set the padding of 5% to the itemContainer?
<div style="background:lightblue;">Absolute position inside container</div>
<div id="itemContainer">
<div class="item i1">1</div>
<div class="item i2">2</div>
<div class="item i3">3</div>
</div>
* {
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body, html {
padding: 0;
margin:0;
height:100%;
}
.item{
position:absolute;
}
#itemContainer{
background:orange;
height:100%;
position:relative;
padding:5%;
}
.item.i1 {
width: 50%;
height:50%;
background:lightgreen;
}
.item.i2 {
width: 50%;
height:50%;
top:50%;
background:lightgray;;
}
.item.i3 {
width: 50%;
height:100%;
left: 50%;
background:red;
}
UPDATE
My Goal is put 3 items on the Screen with a "2-column"-layout and the item of the 2nd "column" should simulate a "Rowspan" by giving it 100% height while item 1 and 2 have 50% height.
This is occurring because padding is counted as part of the height - If you were to put an 'inner' div to your #itemContainer and set the padding on the outer div, you'd be able to fix it. See my fork here: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/XJMMoZ
There is nothing wrong with the padding (when using box-sizing: border-box;).
The #itemContainer has position:relative.
The children divs (.item) have position:absolute.
To absolute position the children (.item), the browser needs to know relative to where (top,left,right and bottom).
In your example simply add these "positioning" properties to your absolute positioned divs:
.item{
position:absolute;
}
.item.i1 {
width: 50%;
height:50%;
background:lightgreen;
top:0;
left:0;
}
.item.i2 {
width: 50%;
height:50%;
top:50%;
background:lightgray;
bottom:0;
left:0;
}
.item.i3 {
width: 50%;
height:100%;
left: 50%;
background:red;
top:0;
right:0;
}
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/GgWVjY
Padding is counted as addition to width/height of the content elements without noticing its padding.
If you got 5% padding, you need to set the content to 90% width and height, because you already have 10% padding (5% top and 5% bottom respectively 5% left and 5% right.
For your 50% content blocks, you need to change it to 45%.
100% gets 90%.
This way it should fit.
I would suggest rewriting your code so it doesn't use absolutely positioned elements, especially for things like columns, or else you're going to keep running into issues like this. And having to reduce your width from 100% because of padding shouldn't be a requirement, especially when border-box would have prevented that need, but even then I still suggest something like this:
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="leftCol">
<div class="box1"></div>
<div class="box2"></div>
</div><!--
--><div class="rightCol">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.container {
display: block;
width: 50%;
height: 500px;
padding: 25px;
background: #DDD;}
.leftCol,
.rightCol {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
height: 100%;
width: 50%;}
.leftCol {
background: #BBB;}
.rightCol {
background: #CCC;}
.box1 {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 50%;
background: gray;}
.box2 {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 50%;
background: #555;}

Expanding a div container vertically to fit in another

I've tried many examples in other questions but none seem to work for me. I'm simply trying to create a div container with a side bar 100px wide and will vertically expand with the container if it dynamically grows. See below;The inner div simply won't grow even when I set the height to 100%
My CSS looks this;
<style>
#outer {
border:10px solid #7A838B;
margin:10px;
border-radius:30px;
max-width:500px;
min-height:200px;
}
#leftblock {
background-color:#7A838B;
width:100px;
height:auto;
border-top-left-radius:20px;
border-bottom-left-radius:20px;
margin-left:-10px;
margin-top:-10px;
}
#inner {
color:white;
height:100%;
}
</style>
and my HTML is like so;
<div id="outer">
<div id="leftblock">
<div id="inner">
Test
</div>
</div>
</div>
It goes as #mmeverdies says,
In order to set height:100%, the parent must establish a defined height too but if height property value is 'inherit', then the grandparent must set it. and so on.
You basically have two options here, either:
1) Define the exact height of the parent element. Then 100% height of the child will work then.
2) Stretch the child element with position: absolute like this: http://jsfiddle.net/r02nbmd9/ - note the position: relative of the parent and position: absolute of child.
<div class="parent"><div class="child"></div></div>
<style>
.parent {
position: relative;
width: 300px; min-height: 200px;
background: yellow;
}
.child {
position: absolute; top: 0; bottom: 0;
width: 100px;
background: red;
}
</style>
In order to set height:100%, the parent must establish a defined height too but if height property value is 'inherit', then the grandparent must set it. and so on.
to understand it take a look to this css.
example: for full browser height.
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#outer {
height: 100%;
}
#leftblock {
height: 100%;
}
#inner {
height:100%;
}
by default the HTML height is 0. so, you must set the height property to other than 'inherit' of at least one parent.