I want to get the effect of "the wall", something like the walls of the maze.
if(gameObject1.overlaps(gameObject2)){
}
GameObject1 is moving and GameObject2 is to be wall. How to do it?
Define both objects (moving and wall) as Rectangles (or set of Rectangles).
Now you can use n^2 overlapping test on all of them.
You need to implement appropriate collision response once the collisions are detected.
This would include disabling motion in that direction. You can do it using flags for each direction.
Alternatively, you could use a physics engine and let it handle the collision handling completely.
Related
I have a problem with a game that I'm doing. I basically have objects that are in a map and I have to check for each of them if they collide with the walls (and then do something). Since was working with AS2, I thought about doing the same way: I drew a picture with only the walls, so with only rectangles and everything else in between is transparent (does not exist, then the floor for example). In AS2 I put the image to the screen, let's call it wall, and then I did a hitTest to wall with every object. That is for instance, the object was actually on the image, since that the transparent parts were part of it, but the function was testing only on the visible parts, and so with the walls. So it worked.
Now in AS3 there is no HitTest but hitTestObject, which I used, and I do for example wall.hitTestObject(object). The problem is that this function is as if it doens't see the transparencies, and the objects while not touching the walls collide with them!
I found the PixelPerfectCollisionDetection that actually solves the problem but it is huge and heavy so in my case, with so many objects to be tested (at least 60) at each frame, the game slows down a lot!
What I need is a function like hitTestObject (i don't need a lot of accuracy!) that take care of the transparent parts of an image.
How can I do?
As mentioned in the comments, physics/game libraries will have this code built-in for you and should work out of the box.
But if you want to build it yourself, or even introduce your own optimizations, the first step (which is very inexpensive) is checking for bounds collision using entirely built-in functionality of DisplayObject.getBounds and Rectangle.intersects (though you must do so in a consistent coordinate space, i.e. the stage):
if (obj1.getBounds(stage).intersects(obj2.getBounds(stage)) {
// Cheap bounds intersection is true, now do pixel-perfect detection...
}
Then if the bounds check is true, perform the pixel-perfect collision detection.
It seems that BitmapData.hitTest is your best bet - see a blog post by Mike Chambers.
Prior to this method, if you're interested in neat techniques, there was a method outlined by Grant Skinner in his blog. It's quite a clever algorithm using built-in bitmap routines (aka, fairly fast), creating a BitmapData only as large as the overlapping region (or even scaling that down), and drawing the two objects into specific channels of the bitmapdata, then using BitmapData.getColorBoundsRect() to determine if there are any pixels touch. I'm guessing BitmapData.hitTest is faster, but it'd be fun to compare.
I ran into the same problem and to be honest i found the easy way to get rid of that is just generating a "mask" layer for the collisions. You can always place this under your background so it doesn't show, or change the transparencies and whatsoever. Do this in Flash, and after "covering" with rectangles (or whatever) the collisions, just select them all and make that a movie clip.
I'm guessing since you made the symbol in Flash, it obviously knows that even if the symbol consists of several individual drawings or whatever, it's not just an image.
For me this worked fine .
I'm totally beginner in Flash and Actionscript so sorry if my questuon is stupid.
I have to make a platform game - I'm planning to write something like Icy Tower - my character is jumping from one platform to another to get to the top of a tower of something. And here is my problem - I want to allow the character to jump onto a platform only from the top, but if he collides with whe platform from the bottom, or from the side, I want him to bounce (I hope you understand what I want mean).
So, to do something like that, I need to be able to detect where exactly do these two objects collide - the only solutions that comes to my mind is to keep the coordinates of every platform in some array and compare them with the characeter's position evertime he jumps, but it just doesn't seem right. Is there an better way to solve this problem?
I will be grateful for any advice.
PS. Sorry for my English
You can make use of a game library like flixel, or flashpunk. They are both great.
Essentially, you will need to iterate over all objects that your character can collide with. You can make use of .hitTestObject() to roughly determine if your character is colliding with any of the objects. Thereafter you can then get the coordinates and dimensions of your character on the stage and compare them to the coordinates and dimensions of the hit object to determine directions.
So in psuedo code
for each (var platform:DisplayObject in platforms) {
if (character.hitTestObject(platform)) {
if (collideFromBottom || collideFromSide) {
// allow movement
}
if (collideFromTop) {
// stop downward velocity
}
break; // might as well, as you have detected the collision
}
}
CollideFromBottom would be comparing the top of your character with the bottom of the platform. Remember that as Sprites, both player and platform have [x,y] properties and [width,height], allowing you to determine coordinates.
P.S. this question should have been asked at gamedev.stackexchange.com
I'd recommend you to use a Physics Engine like Box2D(
behold the examples), instead of creating some hitTest colision based game from scratch.
The probability of you having serious code/design problems and leaving the project aside are big.
There's a lot of good tutorials on internet, here a good resource - Using Box2d to Create a Side Scrolling Game:
Part 1
Part 2
I have an array of points that I will use to generate a closed polygonal fence on the outside of a game stage (2D). I wish to have collision detection between this fence and a bouncing ball-like object on the inside.
Additionally, I would like to be able to arbitrarily add/remove/redraw the fence in realtime and have the collision detection still operate realistically.
I have considered drawing a Sprite/Shape from the points and doing a HitTest at each frame to check whether to bounce or not.
My question: is this the best/correct way to accomplish this goal? Consider something like JezzBall with diagonal lines of any angle a simulation of what I'm trying to do.
Check the corners of your bouncing ball with four hitTestPoints. If it succeeds, then do hitTestPoints from the fence with shapeflag set to true.
There may be better solutions as I do not know the performance impact of shapeflag, but combined with the corners optimization I think it will be good, but I'm also interested if there is a better way.
Math will be your friend here. Do a quick search for circle-line, or point-line collision (here's one: Circle line-segment collision detection algorithm?).
What you do is run through your array of points, creating lines. So line 1 will be points[0] and points[1], and line 2 will be points[1] and points[2]. After that you check each line against your ball (if you want proper collision that will work no matter the frame rate, then you create a ball line, which is the line that the ball has travelled along between the last frame and this one). Do your collision detection against the ball line and each line made from your points (there's tons of line-line collision detection algos on the web). What you'll get out of an algorithm like that is the time the collision takes place in the current time step, as well as the normal of the colliding line, which will give you the reflection angle.
If you don't know Vector math, then learn it, it'll make your life a ton easier. Again, there are tons of implementations of a Vector2 class on the net.
You can arbitrarily remove parts of the wall as needed by just ignoring those points in your check.
Another lazy solution would be to use a physics engine like Box2D http://box2dflash.sourceforge.net/ or Nape: http://code.google.com/p/nape/ - it might be overkill for what you want for your game, but hey, it's easy.
For bonus points, another technique which might be easier for you is the Separating Axis Theorem, which is used in the flash game N: http://www.metanetsoftware.com/technique.html
Well, imagine the scenario where i have 3 objects, hanging from the "ceiling", each one by a string (inside a b2World). They are touching each other side by side.
Each object has a Flash Mouse_Over event that makes itself use tweenlite to scale bigger, and Mouse_Out it scales back to the original size.
My question is: do the other two objects respond to those TweenLite animations, using the Box2D motor?
Thanks
Answer: Sort of.
Box2D objects do not scale. But you can make it appear that they do.
Here is a great tutorial walking you through exactly how to do that:
http://www.emanueleferonato.com/2009/12/16/scaling-objects-with-box2d-part-2/
I'm trying to create a multi-level dungeon adventure in Flash CS4. The layout is an instance created of a symbol called Level, within the symbol are multiple wall subsymbols (wall), instances of Wall. There is a collision routine to stop the player walking through the walls, called from Wall.As.
Level is drawn about the centre point (0,0).
When I create an instance on the stage of Level (level), the collision tester is using the xy coordinates for the walls drawn about 0,0, not the "real" xy where it's appearing on the stage.
So what I need to know, is how to "update" the xy for each wall subsymbol with the live stage information, overriding the XYs drawn in the parent. It has to be updated unfortunately (I can't keep it static), as the levels are big so have to scroll.
Thanks for your advice.
With all due respect forget your approach, you're reinventing the wheel for nothing and probably to end up getting worse performance. What you need is pixel-perfect collision detection and probably including basic physics so already we're talking a huge amount of work. If you want to build levels in a design way for a game, use this, it'll blow your mind how awesome/easy/cool this is:
http://www.gotoandlearn.com/play.php?id=135
Its always a guess when trying to answer questions like this, as there are a lot of unknowns. That being said, in programming, there are always more than a few ways to solve a problem. Examine your collision detection routine - if you worked with hitTestPoint, and the point that was being tested (mouseX,Y or your main actor) with localToGlobal, you likely wouldn't need to test for the x,y variables of your collision objects. Read up on those two subjects and this question might be rendered moot.
At any rate, you could update relative coordinates in your Wall.as instance by leveraging globlaToLocal:
public function get curLoc():Point
{
return globalToLocal(new Point(this.x, this.y));
}
and retrieve them from your parent class as a point you can then test against:
trace(_wall.curLoc);
Hope that helps
I suppose you could accomplish what you're trying to do by manipulating the transform property of the wall symbols, but honestly I would concur with Ascension Systems and just abandon your collision testing routine for something different.
You may not need to go all out with a physics engine for your game, in which case just use hitTestObject to do the collision detection.