Is it possible at all, or traces are part of the API which is not avalible from background Worker?
Consider this code:
public class Main extends Sprite {
public function Main(container : DisplayObjectContainer = null)
{
if(Worker.current.isPrimordial) {
trace("isPrimordial");
var m_worker : Worker = WorkerDomain.current.createWorker(this.loaderInfo.bytes);
m_worker.start();
}
else {
trace("is NOT Primordial");
}
}
The string "is NOT Primordial" does not appear, however I do see that m_worker.state is "WorkerState.RUNNING".
Some UPDATE: The main thread works and racts to events, however it appears like the backgroung worker does not start until I desconnect the debugger.
And if it is possible, how do I setup the fdb to show these logs?
PS. Im using flash standalone debug player 13 with latest FDT and Apache Flex 4.12.1 SDK.
Ok, so the results for now are:
The background thread (Worker) can write traces with no problems at all if the debugger is not attached, for example if we are using flashlog.txt for the output (output to file).
What is required is: flash debug player (me used v. 14 stand alone and firefox versions).
The setup for using text file as output discussed here:
http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/configure-debugger-version-flash-player.html
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/flex/using/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e3d11c0bf69084-7fc9.html
Correct location of mm.cfg on modern operating systems (and not on Win95!) discussed here:
https://forums.adobe.com/thread/1218258
For me the output to file started to work only after the flashlog.txt file was created by some 3rd party tool (I used Vizzy), but probably it is a permission problem of flasho n windows 8 and the file just can be created manually.
Detailed discussion of the flash traces topic (althoug a little old, but mostly still relevant) is here:
See trace() of Flash when running in browser
Thanks everyone for help.
Create a static Log class that output it's log to trace. Use this log class in your main thread and in your worker. Only the main thread log definition will be used allowing to trace from anywhere.
Related
I'm attempting to create a version of the UWP app for the TipCalc sample here: https://github.com/MvvmCross/MvvmCross-Samples/tree/master/TipCalc
There already is a UWP version in the sample, which works fine. However I'm attempting to use Template10 (https://github.com/Windows-XAML/Template10) and I am having trouble getting the two libraries to work together.
MvvmCross wants me to modify the OnLaunched method, which has a reference to the root Frame. However, Template 10 instead abstracts this method exposing OnStartAsync which has no such reference...
There is an override in Template 10 for CreateRootFrame which seems like the right place to initialize the mvvmcross app, but this doesn't appear to work the way I expected...
Although the launched app DOES navigate to the appropriate page, and does also appear to initialize the view model (a breakpoint on the Start method in the associated VM does get hit), the page itself is blank.
comparing the Visual Tree of both apps reveals that while the existing UWP app from the sample has a Frame:
my Template10 App is loading a Modal Dialog:
I forked the original sample project and added the template 10 version, if you wish to try it for yourself: https://github.com/selaromdotnet/MvvmCross-Samples
Has anyone else been able to integrate MvvmCross with template 10? do you have any idea what i'm doing wrong, and any advice for the best practices in using both of these libraries together?
hmm it turns out that the ModalDialog is the expected behavior for Template10, according to the current docs here: https://github.com/Windows-XAML/Template10/wiki/Docs-|-Bootstrapper
I'm not familiar enough with Template10 to say why this is the case, but it does also say you can change this by overriding OnInitializeAsync, which I did, restoring the original frame in the same way the regular UWP project does:
public override async Task OnInitializeAsync(IActivatedEventArgs args)
{
Frame rootFrame = Window.Current.Content as Frame;
// Do not repeat app initialization when the Window already has content,
// just ensure that the window is active
if (rootFrame == null)
{
// Create a Frame to act as the navigation context and navigate to the first page
rootFrame = new Frame();
if (args.PreviousExecutionState == ApplicationExecutionState.Terminated)
{
//TODO: Load state from previously suspended application
}
// Place the frame in the current Window
Window.Current.Content = rootFrame;
}
if (rootFrame.Content == null)
{
var setup = new Setup(rootFrame);
setup.Initialize();
}
await Task.CompletedTask;
}
This did the trick! I'm sure I still have a ways to go (I believe Template10 has it's own way of restoring state, so I probably shouldn't be doing it here)...
but this at least change finally got me to a working app. IF you know more about what I'm doing incorrectly here or what I should be doing instead, your comments would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
I'm using MVVM Light and everything is fine except when launching my Windows Phone 8.1 WinRT app as a Share Target.
When I try to assign MainViewModel viewModel = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<MainViewModel>(); I get an exception for ServiceLocator.Current.
Exception Message: ServiceLocationProvider must be set.
Do I need to do something extra in App.xaml.cs OnShareTargetActivated event to insure the Locator is running?
UPDATE:
A ShareTarget page needs to be thought of as a small extension of your app. It seems that not all of the app's resources are loaded (including app-wide resources in App.xaml). So I just created a new instance of MainViewModel in the share page's constructor, loaded only the things I need for the share to complete, save the information and call ShareOperation.ReportCompleted. This returns the user back to the app that is sharing.
I still haven't found a good solution for getting other resources in my ViewModel, but this works for now.
This indicates that the following line has not been executed:
ServiceLocator.SetLocatorProvider(() => SimpleIoc.Default);
This line will instruct the ServiceLocator class to use the SimpleIoc.Default instance as its ServiceLocator.Current. When you run your app as a Share target, the initialization is slightly different and probably the ViewModelLocator doesn't get initialized. You need to find a good location to perform the initialization before you use the ServiceLocator.
Cheers
Laurent
I'm trying basic stuff with JavaFX with Clojure, on Java8 64-bit (1.8.0_05-b13) on Windows 7.
In my imports (whether in .clj file or in REPL), I can (import 'javafx.scene.control.ButtonBuilder) (and other builders), but I cannot (import 'javafx.scene.control.Button) or any other final widget from javax.scene.control.
If I try importing javafx.scene.control.Button or other widget, I get the Toolkit Not Initialized error. Same with trying to create the button via the ButtonBuilder, even though the ButtonBuilder class itself seems to work fine, and it appears I'm quite able to import other things from the javafx heirarchy.
In order to get it to work I have to force the toolkit to initialize, as shown here, which I think leaves me with an Orphan panel somewhere, which feels kind of dirty: https://gist.github.com/zilti/6286307
(ns hello.core
(:import (javafx.event ActionEvent EventHandler)
(javafx.scene Scene SceneBuilder)
(javafx.scene.layout VBox VBoxBuilder)
;;(javafx.scene.control Button) -- MUST COMMENT THIS OUT OR FAIL
(javafx.scene.control ButtonBuilder)
(javafx.stage Stage StageBuilder)))
(defonce force-toolkit-init (javafx.embed.swing.JFXPanel.))
This was not the case with Java 7 and javafxrt.jar. The only discussion about this I've found (on SO) shows this is required for Swing interop, which I'm not using.
Can someone please explain why this is required now with Java8, and why it only seems to be required for final widgets like Button?
This looks like a magic workaround. Is there a real solution somehow?
JavaFX requires initialization code which starts UI threads, handles application running modes and load native libraries.
JavaFX application are strongly advised to start from a class extending javafx.appication.Application which will perform all initialization routines.
Calling JFXPanel will perform initialization too but it's kinda hack (unless you are really using swing and FX in one app).
I am trying to build a general exception handler for a swing application as described here: http://www.javaspecialists.eu/archive/Issue081.html
I work in jython (python syntax getting compiled to java and executed). My code looks roughly like this (updated):
def launcher(func):
class launcherThread(Runnable):
def __init__(self):
super(launcherThread, self).__init__()
def run(self):
func()
#trying to get the name which can be used to instantiate this in java
cls = ExceptionGroup().getClass()
fullName = cls.__module__ + '.' + cls.__name__
System.setProperty("sun.awt.exception.handler", fullName)
Thread(ExceptionGroup(), launcherThread(), 'Cross ExceptionHandlerThread').start()
class ExceptionGroup(ThreadGroup):
def __init__(self):
super(ExceptionGroup, self).__init__("HardenedGroup")
def uncaughtException(self, thread, exception):
#make a fancy dialog displaying str(exception)
If I test it it works fine however in the production enviornment it failes.
For testing I launch my program in Eclipse (PyDev), the production enviornment is a third party application written in Java, that has a Jython console build in. The application supports adding of custom menu entries, and putting jython scripts on these.
The main difference I see between testing and production enviornment is that in the production enviornment the swing threads are allready started (the third party application utilitizes swing). Does this cause my ThreadGroup setting to fail, or is there another reason why this is not working?
How can I get the Involved threads (exceptions ar thrown as a result of buttonActions) to check their defaultException handlers? If (as I am afraid) it should turn out that the third party installed its own handler (all exceptions are written to a log file) how can I make a new swing worker thread? (I don't want to catch the exceptions created by the host application after all)
Question recap:
1. How can I check which threads are started for the function func passed into the launcher function and see thier uncaught exception handler?
2. Can I enforce a seperate swing dispatcher for my gui part and the main applications gui part? (If I exitOnClos on a frame of my add in, the third party application closes)?
Update:
Considering the anwser from lbalazscs I am trying to use the sun.awt.exception.handler property, but it has no effect, the exceptions still end up in the log file (applications dfeault behaviour). Am I using it right? (p.s.: I am on Java 1.6)
If you have Java 5 or higher, you can also use Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(), which is also described in a newer "Java Specialists' Newsletter":
http://www.javaspecialists.eu/archive/Issue089.html
And here is the newest Java 7 version:
http://www.javaspecialists.eu/archive/Issue196.html
Also see this:
Why bother with setting the "sun.awt.exception.handler" property?
EDIT: This is how I use Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler (in Java...):
public static void setupGlobalExceptionHandling() {
Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(new Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler() {
#Override
public void uncaughtException(Thread t, Throwable e) {
handleException(e);
}
});
}
I'm using the WkHtmlToXSharp wrapper library in my project to generate PDF file from HTML.
I was using this library a lot of times in different PCs and, suddenly, I came across the following problem:
System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt.
at WkHtmlToXSharp.WkHtmlToPdfConverter.wkhtmltopdf_convert(IntPtr converter)
at WkHtmlToXSharp.WkHtmlToPdfConverter.Convert(String inputHtml)
at WkHtmlToXSharp.WkHtmlToPdfConverter.Convert()
at WkHtmlToXSharp.MultiplexingConverter.b_8()
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
at Sanford.Threading.DelegateQueue.EndInvoke(IAsyncResult result)
at Sanford.Threading.DelegateQueue.Invoke(Delegate method, Object[] args)
at WkHtmlToXSharp.MultiplexingConverter.Convert()
This seems to be a common problem with this library (I've found some feedback on the web about it - however no fix was provided). BTW, in my case it happens somewhat randomly. I was not experiencing this problem in other dev machines. I wonder if somebody has a fix for it. I also wonder if this is a problem with the wrapper library, if with the WkHtmlToPDF library itself.
Any suggestion? I'm also open to use another converter, as long as it is free and stable and, if possible, without spawning a new process. It must work properly and stable in all Windows versions and do a decent job converting (the HTML to be converted is fixed - contains a few pics and tables and basic CSS).
I would suggest an alternate route: simply use wkhtmltopdf.exe directly, building your own wrapper. They are not very complicated if you have control of the input and then you know exactly how to update it and how the options work. I've never encountered with that problem when using wkhtmltopdf directly (on Win7, Win server 2008 r2, Ubuntu and CentOS). They do spawn process for every conversion though.
For an example, check out the Derp class in another answer of mine regarding wkhtmltopdf. Or try something like the untested code below (your true code will be more complicated, this is just a demo/POC).
var pi = new ProcessStartInfo(#"c:\wkhtmltopdf\wkhtmltopdf.exe");
pi.CreateNoWindow = true;
pi.UseShellExecute = false;
pi.WorkingDirectory = #"c:\wkhtmltopdf\";
pi.Arguments = "http://www.google.com gogl.pdf";
using (var process = Process.Start(pi))
{
process.WaitForExit(99999);
Debug.WriteLine(process.ExitCode);
}