Solving the Points on a Rotated Rectangle - actionscript-3

I am working in AS3.
I have a generic rectangle. This rectangle can have any length, any width and any rotation. I am trying to solve for the x and y coordinates of the four corners of the rectangle. I know the coordinates of the centre of the rectangle, I know its width, its height, the y distance between the highest and lowest point and the x distance between the farthest left and farthest right point as well as knowing the rotation.
My code currently looks like this (Object, of course, being the rectangle in question, keep in mind that when I apply this it can have any dimensions - This is just one possibility. Initial width and height are the actual length and width, while width and height referenced later are the x and y distances between the highest and lowest points and the farthest left and right points, rotation is of course rotation, and x and y are the object's centre coordinates).
import flash.events.Event;
addEventListener(Event.ENTER_FRAME, Rotate, false, 0, true);
var Radius:Number = Math.sqrt(((Object.height / 2) * (Object.height / 2)) + ((Object.width / 2) * (Object.width / 2)));
function Rotate(event:Event)
{
Object.rotation += 1;
Marker1.x = Math.sqrt((Radius * Radius) - ((Object.height / 2) * (Object.height / 2))) + Object.x;
Marker2.x = - Math.sqrt((Radius * Radius) - ((Object.height / 2) * (Object.height / 2))) + Object.x;
Marker3.y = Math.sqrt((Radius * Radius) - ((Object.width / 2) * (Object.width / 2))) + Object.y;
Marker4.y = - Math.sqrt((Radius * Radius) - ((Object.width / 2) * (Object.width / 2))) + Object.y;
Marker1.y = Object.y + (Object.height / 2);
Marker2.y = Object.y - (Object.height / 2);
Marker3.x = Object.x + (Object.width / 2);
Marker4.x = Object.x - (Object.width / 2);
}
As you can see I am attempting to use circle geometry to place four small circles (Markers 1-4) at the corners of the rectangle, just for testing purposes to confirm that I have gathered the correct coordinates. Problem is, the coordinates will always be placed in either +x and +y or -x and -y, but never the other two quadrants of the graph. I can't figure out a simple way of dynamically simulating the +- of the quadratic equation in the program. Does anyone know of a way to find these four points with and length, width and rotation of the rectangle?

If you represent the coordinates of the corners as offsets from the midpoint of the rectangle you can easily rotate them anti-clockwise by an angle θ with
dx' = dx × cos θ - dy × sin θ
dy' = dx × sin θ + dy × cos θ
You can then add the rotated offsets to the midpoint to recover the new coordinates of the corners.

Related

the relation of the bezier Curve and ellipse?

I want to draw a oval in html5 canvas,and i found a good method for it in stackoverflow.but I have another quesition.
function drawEllipse(ctx, x, y, w, h) {
var kappa = 0.5522848;
ox = (w / 2) * kappa, // control point offset horizontal
oy = (h / 2) * kappa, // control point offset vertical
xe = x + w, // x-end
ye = y + h, // y-end
xm = x + w / 2, // x-middle
ym = y + h / 2; // y-middle
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x, ym);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(x, ym - oy, xm - ox, y, xm, y);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(xm + ox, y, xe, ym - oy, xe, ym);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(xe, ym + oy, xm + ox, ye, xm, ye);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(xm - ox, ye, x, ym + oy, x, ym);
ctx.closePath();
ctx.stroke();
}
the method in the above link has use bezierCurveTo to draw a ellipse,but it has draw bezierCurveTo 4 times. but I think just 2 bezierCurveTo can draw a ellipse.like this:
but i'm weak in Mathematics,could someone tell me the relationship of "the control point" and "the oval point" please? or we must draw four bezier Curve to draw a oval?
thanks everybody
My background isn't in mathematics so if I'm wrong I'm sure someone will correct me, but from my understanding we can draw a pretty good approximation of an ellipse with just two cubic bezier curves but the coordinates will be a little tricky.
To answer your question about the relation between the oval point and the control points I think it best be answered by watching this video from the point I've selected if you're familiar with interpolation or from the beginning if you are not. Don't worry it is short.
One problem we're probably going to run into is that when we start from the top and do a bezierCurveTo the bottom of the ellipse with the corners of the rectangle (of the same width and height) as the control points, the ellipses width is going to be smaller than the rectangle. .75 times the size we want. So we can just scale the control points accordingly.
Our control point's x would be adjusted like so (assuming width is the width of the ellipse and we're dividing by two to get its offset from the origin)
var cpx = (width / .75) / 2;
Put together a visualization where you can play with the width and height and see the drawn ellipse.
The red ellipse is how we wanted it to be drawn, with the inner one how it would be drawn if we didnt reposition the control points. The lines illustrate De Casteljau's algorithm that was shown in the video.
Here's a screenshot of the visualization
You only need two cubic bezier curves to draw an ellipse. Here's a simplified version of DerekR's code that uses the original function arguments that you provided--assuming you want x and y to be the center of the ellipse:
jsFiddle
function drawEllipse(ctx, x, y, w, h) {
var width_over_2 = w / 2;
var width_two_thirds = w * 2 / 3;
var height_over_2 = h / 2;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(x, y - height_over_2);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(x + width_two_thirds, y - height_over_2, x + width_two_thirds, y + height_over_2, x, y + height_over_2);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(x - width_two_thirds, y + height_over_2, x - width_two_thirds, y - height_over_2, x, y -height_over_2);
ctx.closePath();
ctx.stroke();
}
Big thanks to BKH.
I used his code with two bezier curves to complete my ellipse drawing with any rotation angle. Also, I created an comparison demo between ellipses drawn by bezier curves and native ellipse() function (for now implemented only in Chrome).
function drawEllipseByBezierCurves(ctx, x, y, radiusX, radiusY, rotationAngle) {
var width_two_thirds = radiusX * 4 / 3;
var dx1 = Math.sin(rotationAngle) * radiusY;
var dy1 = Math.cos(rotationAngle) * radiusY;
var dx2 = Math.cos(rotationAngle) * width_two_thirds;
var dy2 = Math.sin(rotationAngle) * width_two_thirds;
var topCenterX = x - dx1;
var topCenterY = y + dy1;
var topRightX = topCenterX + dx2;
var topRightY = topCenterY + dy2;
var topLeftX = topCenterX - dx2;
var topLeftY = topCenterY - dy2;
var bottomCenterX = x + dx1;
var bottomCenterY = y - dy1;
var bottomRightX = bottomCenterX + dx2;
var bottomRightY = bottomCenterY + dy2;
var bottomLeftX = bottomCenterX - dx2;
var bottomLeftY = bottomCenterY - dy2;
ctx.beginPath();
ctx.moveTo(bottomCenterX, bottomCenterY);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(bottomRightX, bottomRightY, topRightX, topRightY, topCenterX, topCenterY);
ctx.bezierCurveTo(topLeftX, topLeftY, bottomLeftX, bottomLeftY, bottomCenterX, bottomCenterY);
ctx.closePath();
ctx.stroke();
}
You will find this explained slightly more math-based in http://pomax.github.io/bezierinfo/#circles_cubic, but the gist is that using a cubic bezier curve for more than a quarter turn is usually not a good idea. Thankfully, using four curves makes finding the required control points rather easy. Start off with a circle, in which case each quarter circle is (1,0)--(1,0.55228)--(0.55228,1)--(0,1) with scaled coordinates for your ellipse. Draw that four times with +/- signs swapped to effect a full circle, scale the dimensions to get your ellipse, and done.
If you use two curves, the coordinates become (1,0)--(1,4/3)--(-1,4/3)--(-1,0), scaled for your ellipse. It may still look decent enough in your application, it depends a bit on how big your drawing ends up being.
It can be mathematically proven, that circle can not be made with Bézier curve of any degree. You can make "almost circle" by approximating it.
Say you want to draw a quarter of circle around [0,0]. Cubic bézier coordinates are:
[0 , 1 ]
[0.55, 1 ]
[1 , 0.55]
[1 , 0 ]
It is a very good approximation. Transform it linearly to get an ellpise.

How do I calculate the location of points in a rotated shape AS3

I am creating a game in which I draw a series of polygons by creating points around a radius of a cricle.
Later on I rotate the shapes and I need to calculate the new location (X,Y) of the points based on the rotation. I have the Old XY of each point, the XY of the center of the shape, radius of shape and the rotation.
Have a look at my diagram of the problem.
It should be possible to use matrix transformations for this, but you can also do it manually:
http://www.siggraph.org/education/materials/HyperGraph/modeling/mod_tran/2drota.htm
So essentially;
newX = initialX * Math.cos(angle) - initialY * Math.sin(angle);
newY = initialY * Math.cos(angle) + initialX * Math.sin(angle);
//Angle is in radians btw
This assumes that the initialX/Y is relative to the center of rotation, so you would have to subtract the center point before starting, and then add it again after the calculation to place it correctly.
Hope this helps!
For each point do:
alpha = arctan2(x, y)
len = sqrt(x^2 + y^2)
newX = len * cos(alpha + rotation)
newy = len * sin(alpha + rotation)
Original [x,y] and new [newX,newY] coordinates are both relative to the center of your rotation. If your original [x,y] is absolut, you have to calculate relative first:
x = xAbs - xCenter
y = yAbs - yCenter
Make sure your arctan2 function provides a result of PI/2 or -PI/2 if x=0. Primitive arctan functions do not allow x=0.

AS3: diagonal movement

I'm programming a flash game, I made an array of points (x and y positions) that some movieclips must follow. Those movieclips have a certain speed (they make steps of 5 pixels for now). When I want to move them horizontally or vertically, everything's fine, I have to add or remove 5 pixels of those clips' x or y. But sometimes they have to move diagonally and now that's complicated.
What I'm doing:
var angle:Number = Math.atan2(nextPoint.y - this.y, nextPoint.x - this.x) * 180 / Math.PI;
var xstep:Number = Math.cos(angle) * this.speed;
var ystep:Number = Math.sqrt(Math.pow(this.speed, 2) - Math.pow(xstep, 2));
this.x += xstep;
this.y += ystep;
It's only a fraction of the code, but I think it's all you need.
Basically, this makes my movieclip do a little step (of this.speed (currently set to 5) pixels).
If the current point and the next point have the same y position, it works fine. When they don't, it doesn't work. The angle is right at first but it slowly decreases (while it should stay the same). I don't know if it's the angle that isn't computed the right way or if it's the x and y steps, but it's one of those, I'm sure.
Try this instead:
var angle:Number = Math.atan2(nextPoint.y - this.y, nextPoint.x - this.x);
var xstep:Number = Math.cos(angle) * this.speed;
var ystep:Number = Math.sin(angle) * this.speed;
Because cos operates on angles in radians, you don't need to convert to degrees. Computing the y component of an angle uses sin, so it should be similar to x. I'm not able to test this, but it's possible that ystep will be backwards and may need to be multiplied by -1.

Find the point with radius and angle

I'm not a genius in geometry, I'd like to find a point in as3 with the radius and a angle but I don't remember the rule, I know this should be simple!
Here's an example:
alt text http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/4879/examplepr.png
as3.x = centerX + radius * cos(angle)
as3.y = centerY + radius * sin(angle)
Note that the rotation in the picture linked to is in the "negative direction". I.e, an increase of the angle, yields a counter-clockwise rotation.
Let x0, y0 be the center of the circle being considered and t be the angle theta anti-clockwise from the x-axis (right horizontal).
The point you are looking for is then
x = x0 + r*cos(t)
y = y0 + r*sin(t)
You have to adjust your calculator to degree mode before making that calculation
more likley you will use angle in degree

Find the last co-ordinate of isosceles triangle given coordinates of base and altitude

I have no clue about trigonometry, despite learning it in school way back when, and I figure this should be pretty straightforward, but trawling through tons of trig stuff on the web makes my head hurt :) So maybe someone could help me...
The title explains exactly what I want to do, I have a line:
x1,y1 and x2,y2
and want a function to find x3,y3 to complete an isosceles triangle, given the altitude.
Just to be clear, the line x1,y2 -> x2,y2 will be the base, and it will not be aligned any axis (it will be at a random angle..)
Does anyone have a simple function for this??
construct a normal to the vector (x1,y1)->(x2,y2). place it at the midpoint ((x1+x2)/2,(y1+y2)/2) and go out a distance h.
the normal will look like (-(y2-y1),x2-x1). make this a unit vector (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_vector).
add h times this unit vector to the midpoint.
The third point is on the perpendicular bisector of your base, and is altitude units away from the line.
Calculate the midpoint of the base by averaging the x and y coordinates.
Calculate the slope of your altitude: -dx/dy (perpendicular to dy/dx). You now have your line (point and slope).
y - my = -dx/dy * (x - mx)
Substitute your variables in the distance formula: d = sqrt(dx^2 + dy^2)
d = sqrt((x - mx)^2 + (y - my)^2)
d = sqrt((x - mx)^2 + (-dx/dy * (x - mx))^2)
d^2 = (x - mx)^2 + (-dx/dy * (x - mx))^2
d^2 - (x - mx)^2 = (-dx/dy * (x - mx))^2
±sqrt(d^2 - (x - mx)^2) = -dx/dy * (x - mx)
±sqrt(d^2 - (x - mx)^2) * dy/dx = x - mx
±sqrt(d^2 - (x - mx)^2) * dy/dx + mx = x
x = ±sqrt(d^2 - (x - mx)^2) * dy/dx + mx
Calculate the other variable (y here) using your line equation (from #2).
You now have two points; pick whichever you want...
In pseudocode:
dx = x1 - x2
midpoint = ((x1 + x2) / 2, (y1 + y2) / 2)
slope = -dx / (y1 - y2)
x = sqrt(altitude*altitude - dx*dx) / slope + midpoint.x
y = slope * (x - midpoint.x) + midpoint.y
This is probably not the most optimal method. Not sure if it even works. xD
Al I can remember is that an isosceles triangle will have sides of equal length, and equal angles at the base. If you have the height, then you have the final coordinate because this will be the point of intersection, right?