I will start off with saying I know that it is impossible to prevent your software from reverse engineering.
But, when I take a look at crackmes.de, there are crackmes with a difficulty grade of 8 and 9 (on a scale of 1 to 10). These crackmes are getting cracked by genius brains, who write a tutorial on how to crack it. Some times, such tutorials are 13+ pages long!
When I try to make a crackme, they crack it in 10 minutes. Followed by a "how-to-crack" tutorial with a length of 20 lines.
So the questions are:
How can I make a relatively good anti-crack protection.
Which techniques should I use?
How can I learn it?
...
Disclaimer: I work for a software-protection tools vendor (Wibu-Systems).
Stopping cracking is all we do and all we have done since 1989. So we thoroughly understand how SW gets cracked and how to avoid it. Bottom line: only with a secure hardware dongle, implemented correctly, can you guarantee against cracking.
Most strong anti-cracking relies on encryption (symmetric or public key). The encryption can be very strong, but unless the key storage/generation is equally strong it can be attacked. Lots of other methods are possible too, even with good encryption, unless you know what you are doing. A software-only solution will have to store the key in an accessible place, easily found or vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle attack. Same thing is true with keys stored on a web server. Even with good encryption and secure key storage, unless you can detect debuggers the cracker can just take a snapshot of memory and build an exe from that. So you need to never completely decrypt in memory at any one time and have some code for debugger detection. Obfuscation, dead code, etc, won't slow them down for long because they don't crack by starting at the beginning and working through your code. They are far more clever than that. Just look at some of the how-to cracking videos on the net to see how to find the security detection code and crack from there.
Brief shameless promotion: Our hardware system has NEVER been cracked. We have one major client who uses it solely for anti-reverse engineering. So we know it can be done.
Languages like Java and C# are too high-level and do not provide any effective structures against cracking. You could make it hard for script kiddies through obfuscation, but if your product is worth it it will be broken anyway.
I would turn this round slightly and think about:
(1) putting in place simple(ish) measures so that your program isn't trivial to hack, so e.g. in Java:
obfuscate your code so at least make your enemy have to go to the moderate hassle of looking through a decompilation of obfuscated code
maybe write a custom class loader to load some classes encrypted in a custom format
look at what information your classes HAVE to expose (e.g. subclass/interface information can't be obfuscated away) and think about ways round that
put some small key functionality in a DLL/format less easy to disassemble
However, the more effort you go to, the more serious hackers will see it as a "challenge". You really just want to make sure that, say, an average 1st year computer science degree student can't hack your program in a few hours.
(2) putting more subtle copyright/authorship markers (e.g. metadata in images, maybe subtly embed a popup that will appear in 1 year's time to all copies that don't connect and authenticate with your server...) that hackers might not bother to look for/disable because their hacked program "works" as it is.
(3) just give your program away in countries where you don't realistically have a chance of making a profit from it and don't worry about it too much-- if anything, it's a form of viral marketing. Remember that in many countries, what we see in the UK/US as "piracy" of our Precious Things is openly tolerated by government/law enforcement; don't base your business model around copyright enforcement that doesn't exist.
I have a pretty popular app (which i won't specify here, to avoid crackers' curiosity, of course) and suffered with cracked versions some times in the past, fact that really caused me many headaches.
After months struggling with lots of anti-cracking techniques, since 2009 i could establish a method that proved to be effective, at least in my case : my app has not been cracked since then.
My method consists in using a combination of three implementations :
1 - Lots of checks in the source code (size, CRC, date and so on : use your creativity. For instance, if my app detects tools like OllyDbg being executed, it will force the machine to shutdown)
2 - CodeVirtualizer virutalization in sensitive functions in source code
3 - EXE encryption
None of these are really effective alone : checks can be passed by a debugger, virtualization can be reversed and EXE encryption can be decrypted.
But when you used altogether, they will cause BIG pain to any cracker.
It's not perfect although : so many checks makes the app slower and the EXE encrypt can lead to false positive in some anti-virus software.
Even so there is nothing like not be cracked ;)
Good luck.
Personaly I am fan of server side check.
It can be as simple as authentication of application or user each time it runs. However that can be easly cracked. Or puting some part of code to server side and that would requere a lot more work.
However your program will requere internet connection as must have and you will have expenses for server. But that the only way to make it relatively good protected. Any stand alone application will be cracked relatively fast.
More logic you will move to server side more hard to crack it will get. But it will if it will be worth it. Even large companies like Blizzrd can't prevent theyr server side being reversed engineered.
I purpose the following:
Create in home a key named KEY1 with N bytes randomly.
Sell the user a "License number" with the Software. Take note of his/her name and surname and tell him/her that those data are required to activate the Software, also an Internet conection.
Upload within the next 24 hours to your server the "License number", and the name and surname, also the KEY3 = (KEY1 XOR hash_N_bytes(License_number, name and surname) )
The installer asks for a "Licese_number" and the name and surname, then it sends those data to the server and downloads the key named "KEY3" if those data correspond to a valid sell.
Then the installer makes KEY1 = KEY3 XOR hash_N_bytes(License_number, name and surname)
The installer checks KEY1 using a "Hash" of 16 bits. The application is encrypted with the KEY1 key. Then it decrypts the application with the key and it's ready.
Both the installer and application must have a CRC content check.
Both could check is being debugged.
Both could have encrypted parts of code during execution time.
What do you think about this method?
Are there benefits to developing an application on two or more different platforms? Does using a different compiler on even the same platform have benefits?
Yes, especially if you plan to distribute your code for multiple platforms.
But even if you don't cross platform development is a form of futureproofing; if it runs on multiple (diverse) platforms today, it's more likely to run on future platforms than something that was tuned, tweeked, and specialized to work on a version 7.8.3 clean install of vendor X's Q-series boxes (patch level 1452) and nothing else.
There seems to be a benefit in finding and simply preventing bugs with a different compiler and a different OS. Different CPUs can pin down endian issues early. There is the pain at the GUI level if you want to stay native at that level.
Short answer: Yes.
Short of cloning a disk, it is almost impossible to make two systems exactly alike, so you are going to end up running on "different platforms" whether you meant to or not. By specifically confronting and solving the "what if system A doesn't do things like B?" problem head on you are much more likely to find those key assumptions your code makes.
That said, I would say you should get a good chunk of your base code working on system A, and then take a day (or a week or ...) and get it running on system B. It can be very educational.
My education came back in the 80's when I ported a source level C debugger to over 100 flavors of U*NX. Gack!
Are there benefits to developing an application on two or more different platforms?
If this is production software, the obvious reason is the lure of a larger client base. Your product's appeal is magnified the moment the client hears that you support multiple platforms. Remember, most enterprises do not use a single OS or even a single version of the OS. It is fairly typical to find a section using Windows, another Mac and a smaller version some flavor of Linux.
It is also seen that customizing a product for a single platform is often far more tedious than to have it run on multi-platform. The law of diminishing returns kicks in even before you know.
Of course, all of this makes little sense, if you are doing customization work for an existing product for the client's proprietary hardware. But even then, keep an eye out for the entire range of hardware your client has in his repertoire -- you never know when he might ask for it.
Does using a different compiler on even the same platform have benefits?
Yes, again. Different compilers implement different extensions. See to it that you are not dependent on a particular version of a particular compiler.
Further, there may be a bug or two in the compiler itself. Using multiple compilers helps sort these out.
I have further seen bits of a (cross-platform) product using two different compilers -- one was to used in those modules where floating point manipulation required a very high level of accuracy. (Been a while I've heard anyone else do that, but ...)
I've ported a large C++ program, originally Win32, to Linux. It wasn't very difficult. Mostly dealing with compiler incompatibilities, because the MS C++ compiler at the time was non-compliant in various ways. I expect that problem has mostly gone now (until C++0x features start gradually appearing). Also writing a simple platform abstraction library to centralize the platform-specific code in one place. It depends to what extent you are dependent on services from the OS that would be hard to mimic on a new platform.
You don't have to build portability in from the ground up. That's why "porting" is often described as an activity you can perform in one shot after an initial release on your most important platform. You don't have to do it continuously from the very start. Purely for economic reasons, if you can avoid doing work that may never pay off, obviously you should. The cost of porting later on, when really necessary, turns out to be not that bad.
Mostly, there is an existing platform where the application is written for (individual software). But you adress more developers (both platforms), if you decide to provide an independent language.
Also products (standard software) for SMEs can be sold better if they run on different platforms! You can gain access to both markets, WIN&LINUX! (and MacOSx and so on...)
Big companies mostly buy hardware which is supported/certified by the product vendor only to deploy the specified product.
If you develop on multiple platforms at the same time you get the advantage of being able to use different tools. For example I once had a memory overwrite (I still swear I didn't need the +1 for the null byte!) that cause "free" to crash. I brought the code up to speed on Windows and found the overwrite in about 1 minute with Rational Purify... it had taken me a week under Linux of chasing it (valgrind might have found it... but I didn't know about it at the time).
Different compilers on the same or different platforms is, to me, a must as each compiler will report different things, and sometimes the report from one compiler about an error will be gibberish but the other compiler makes it very clear.
Using things like multiple databases while developing means you are much less likely to tie yourself to a particular database which means you can swap out the database if there is a reason to do so. If you want to integrate something that uses Oracle into a existing infrastructure that uses SQL Server for example it can really suck - much better if the Oracle or SQL Server pieces can be moved to the other system (I know of some places that have 3 different databases for their financial systems... ick).
In general, always developing for two or three things means that the odds of you finding mistakes is better, and the odds of the system being more flexible is better.
On the other hand all of that can take time and effort that, at the immediate time, is seen as an unneeded expense.
Some platforms have really dreadful development tools. I once worked in an IB where rather than use Sun's ghastly toolset, peole developed code in VC++ and then ported to Solaris.
I know that there is no way to fully protect our code.
I also know that if a user wants to crack our app, then he or she is not a user that would buy our app.
I also know that it is better to improve our app.. instead of being afraid of anticracking techniques.
I also know that there is no commercial tool that can protec our app....
I also know that....
Ok. Enough. I've heard everything.
I really think that adding a little protection won't hurt.
So.... have you ever used code virtulizer from oreans or vmprotect?
I've heard that they are sometimes detected as virus by some antivirus.
Any experiences that I should be aware of before buying it.
I know it creates some virtual machines and obfuscates a little the code to make it harder to find the weaknesses of our registration routines.
Is there any warning I should know?
Thanks.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Jag
In my humble opinion, you should be lucky or even eager to be pirated, because that means your product is successful and popular.
That's plain incorrect. My software that I worked many months on was cracked the moment it was released. There are organised cracking groups that feed off download.com's RSS channel etc and crack each app that appears. It's a piece of cake to extract the keygen code of any app, so my response was to:
a) resort to digital certificate key files which are impossible to forge as they are signed by a private AES key and validated by a public one embedded in the app (see: aquaticmac.com - I use the stl c++ implementation which is cross-platform), along with.
b) The excellent Code Virtualizer™. I will say that the moment I started using Code Virtualizer™ I was getting some complaints from one or two users about app crashes. When I removed it from their build the crashes ceased. Still, I'm not sure whether it was a problem with CV per se as it could have been an obscure bug in my code, but I since reshuffled my code and I have since heard no complaints.
After the above, no more cracks. Some people look at being cracked as a positive thing, as it's a free publicity channel, but those people usually haven't spent months/years on an idea only to find you're being ripped off. Quite hard to take.
Unfortunately, VM-protected software is more likely to get affected by false positives than conventional packing software. The reason for that is that since AV protection is so complicated, AV software are often unable to analyze the protected code, and may rely on either pattern libraries or may issue generic warnings for any files protected by a system it can't analyze. If your priority is to eliminate false positives, I suggest picking a widely-used protection solution, e.g. AsProtect (although Oreans' products are becoming quite popular as well).
Software VM protection is quite popular today, especially as it's now available at an accessible price for small companies and independent software developers. It also takes a considerable amount of effort to crack in comparison to non-VM techniques - the wrappers usually have the standard anti-debugging tricks that other protections have, as well as the VM protection. Since the virtual machine is generated randomly on each build, the crackers will need to analyze the VM instruction set and reverse engineer the protected code back to machine code.
The main disadvantage of VM protection is that if it's overused (used to protect excessive parts of the code), it can slow down your application considerably - so you'll need to protect just the critical parts (registration checks, etc). It also doesn't apply to certain application types - it likely won't work on DLLs that are used for injection, as well as device drivers.
I've also heard that StrongBit EXECryptor is a decent protection package at a decent price. (I'm not affiliated with said company nor guarantee any quality what-so-ever, it's just word of mouth and worth checking out IMO).
As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.
Closed 11 years ago.
Sometimes you don't have the source code and need to reverse engineer a program or a black box. Any fun war stories?
Here's one of mine:
Some years ago I needed to rewrite a device driver for which I didn't have source code. The device driver ran on an old CP/M microcomputer and drove a dedicated phototypesetting machine through a serial port. Almost no documentation for the phototypesetting machine was available to me.
I finally hacked together a serial port monitor on a DOS PC that mimicked the responses of the phototypesetting machine. I cabled the DOS PC to the CP/M machine and started logging the data coming out of the device driver as I feed data in through the CP/M machine. This enabled me to figure out the handshaking and encoding used by the device driver and re-create an equivalent one for a DOS machine.
Read the story of FCopy for the C-64 here:
Back in the 80s, the Commodore C-64 had an intelligent floppy drive, the 1541, i.e. an external unit that had its own CPU and everything.
The C-64 would send commands to the drive which in turn would then execute them on its own, reading files, and such, then send the data to the C-64, all over a propriatory serial cable.
The manual for the 1541 mentioned, besides the commands for reading and writing files, that one would read and write to its internal memory space. Even more exciting was that one could download 6502 code into the drive's memory and have it executed there.
This got me hooked and I wanted to play with that - execute code on the drive. Of course, there was no documention on what code could be executed there, and which functions it could use.
A friend of mine had written a disassembler in BASIC. and so I read out all its ROM contents, which was 16KB of 6502 CPU code, and tried to understand what it does. The OS on the drive was quite amazing and advanced IMO - it had a kind of task management, with commands being sent from the communication unit to the disk i/o task handler.
I learned enough to understand how to use the disk i/o commands to read/write sectors of the disc. Actually, having read the Apple ]['s DOS 3.3 book which explained all of the workings of its disk format and algos in much detail, was a big help in understanding it all.
(I later learned that I could have also found reserve-eng'd info on the more 4032/4016 disk drives for the "business" Commodore models which worked quite much the same as the 1541, but that was not available to me as a rather disconnected hobby programmer at that time.)
Most importantly, I also learned how the serial comms worked. I realized that the serial comms, using 4 lines, two for data, two for handshake, was programmed very inefficiently, all in software (though done properly, using classic serial handshaking).
Thus I managed to write a much faster comms routine, where I made fixed timing assumtions, using both the data and the handshake line for data transmission.
Now I was able to read and write sectors, and also transmit data faster than ever before.
Of course, it would have been great if one could simply load some code into the drive which speeds up the comms, and then use the normal commands to read a file, which in turn would use the faster comms. This was no possible, though, as the OS on the drive did not provide any hooks for that (mind that all of the OS was in ROM, unmodifiable).
Hence I was wondering how I could turn my exciting findings into a useful application.
Having been a programmer for a while already, dealing with data loss all the times (music tapes and floppy discs were not very realiable back then), I thought: Backup!
So I wrote a backup program which could duplicate a floppy disc in never-before seen speed: The first version did copy an entire 170 KB disc in only 8 minutes (yes, minutes), the second version did it even in about 4.5 minutes. Whereas the apps before mine took over 25 minutes. (Mind you, the Apple ][, which had its disc OS running on the Apple directly, with fast parallel data access, did this all in a minute or so).
And so FCopy for the C-64 was born.
It became soon extremely popular. Not as a backup program as I had intended it, but as the primary choice for anyone wanting to copy games and other software for their friends.
Turned out that a simplification in my code, which would simply skip unreadable sectors, writing a sector with a bad CRC to the copy, did circumvent most of the then-used copy protection schemes, making it possible to copy most formerly uncopyable discs.
I had tried to sell my app and sold it actually 70 times. When it got advertised in the magazines, claiming it would copy a disc in less than 5 minutes, customers would call and not believe it, "knowing better" that it can't be done, yet giving it a try.
Not much later, others started to reverse engineer my app, and optimize it, making the comms even faster, leading to copy apps that did it even in 1.5 minutes. Faster was hardly possible, because, due to the limited amount of memory available on the 1541 and the C-64, you had to swap discs several times in the single disc drive to copy all 170 KB of its contents.
In the end, FCopy and its optimized successors were probably the most-popular software ever on the C-64 in the 80s. And even though it didn't pay off financially for me, it still made me proud, and I learned a lot about reverse-engineering, futility of copy protection and how stardom feels. (Actually, Jim Butterfield, an editor for a C-64 magazine in Canada, told its readers my story, and soon he had a cheque for about 1000 CA$ for me - collected by the magazine from many grateful users sending 5$-cheques, which was a big bunch of money back then for me.)
I actually have another story:
A few years past my FCopy "success" story, I was approached by someone who asked me if I could crack a slot machine's software.
This was in Germany, where almost every pub had one or two of those: You'd throw some money in what amounts to about a US quarter, then it would spin three wheels and if you got lucky with some pattern, you'd then have the choice to "double or nothing" your win on the next play, or get the current win. The goal of the play was to try to double your win a few times until you'd get in the "series" mode where any succeeding win, no matter how minor, would get you a big payment (of about 10 times your spending per game).
The difficulty was to know when to double and when not. For an "outsider" this was completely random, of course. But it turned out that those German-made machines were using simple pseudo-randomized tables in their ROMs. Now, if you watched the machine play for a few rounds, you'd could figure out where this "random table pointer" was and predict its next move. That way, a player would know when to double and when to pass, leading him eventually to the "big win series".
Now, this was already a common thing when this person approached me. There was an underground scene which had access to the ROMs in those machines, find the tables and create software for computers such as a C-64 to use for prediction of the machine's next moves.
Then came a new type of machine, though, which used a different algorithm: Instead of using pre-calc'd tables, it did something else and none of the resident crackers could figure that out. So I was approached, being known as a sort of genius since my FCopy fame.
So I got the ROMs. 16KB, as usual. No information on what it did and how it worked whatsoever. I was on my own. Even the code didn't look familiar (I knew 6502 and 8080 by then only). After some digging and asking, I found it was a 6809 (which I found to be the nicest 8 bit CPU to exist, and which had analogies to the 680x0 CPU design, which was much more linear than the x86 family's instruction mess).
By that time, I had already a 68000 computer (I worked for the company "Gepard Computer" which built and sold such a machine, with its own developer OS and, all) and was into programming Modula-2. So I wrote a disassembler for the 6809, one that helped me with reverse engineering by finding subroutines, jumps, etc. Slow I got a an idea of the flow control of the slot machine's program. Eventually I found some code that looked like a mathmatical algorithm and it dawned on me that this could be the random generating code.
As I never had a formal education in computer sciences, up to then I had no idea how a typical randomgen using mul, add and mod worked. But I remember seeing something mentioned in a Modula-2 book and then realized what it was.
Now I could quickly find the code that would call this randomgen and learn which "events" lead to a randomgen iteration, meaning I knew how to predict the next iterations and their values during a game.
What was left was to figure out the current position of the randomgen. I had never been good with abstract things such as algebra. I knew someone who studied math and was a programmer too, though. When I called him, he quickly knew how to solve the problem and quabbled a lot about how simple it would be to determine the randomgen's seed value. I understood nothing. Well, I understood one thing: The code to accomplish this would take a lot of time, and that a C-64 or any other 8 bit computer would take hours if not days for it.
Thus, I decided to offer him 1000 DM (which was a lot of money for me back then) if he could write me an assembler routine in 68000. Didn't take him long and I had the code which I could test on my 68000 computer. It took usually between 5 and 8 minutes, which was acceptable. So I was almost there.
It still required a portable 68000 computer to be carried to the pub where the slot machine stands. My Gepard computer was clearly not of the portable type. Luckly, someone else I knew in Germany produced entire 68000 computers on a small circuit board. For I/O it only had serial comms (RS-232) and a parallel port (Centronics was the standard of those days). I could hook up some 9V block battieries to it to make it work. Then I bought a Sharp pocket computer, which had a rubber keyboard and a single-line 32 chars display. Running on batteries, which was my terminal. It had a RS-232 connector which I connected to the 68000 board. The Sharp also had some kind of non-volatile memory, which allowed me to store the 68000 random-cracking software on the Sharp, transfer it on demand to the 68000 computer, which then calculated the seed value. Finally I had a small Centronics printer which printed on narrow thermo paper (which was the size of what cash registers use to print receipts). Hence, once the 68000 had the results, it would send a row of results for the upcoming games on the slot machine to the Sharp, which printed them on paper.
So, to empty one of these slot machines, you'd work with two people: You start playing, write down its results, one you had the minimum number of games required for the seed calculation, one of you would go to the car parked outside, turn on the Sharp, enter the results, it would have the 68000 computer rattle for 8 minutes, and out came a printed list of upcoming game runs. Then all you needed was this tiny piece of paper, take it back to your buddy, who kept the machine occupied, align the past results with the printout and no more than 2 minutes later you were "surprised" to win the all-time 100s series. You'd then play these 100 games, practically emptying the machine (and if the machine was empty before the 100 games were played, you had the right to wait for it to be refilled, maybe even come back next day, whereas the machine was stopped until you came back).
This wasn't Las Vegas, so you'd only get about 400 DM out of a machine that way, but it was quick and sure money, and it was exciting. Some pub owners suspected us of cheating but had nothing against us due to the laws back then, and even when some called the police, the police was in favor of us).
Of course, the slot making company soon got wind of this and tried to counteract, turning off those particular machines until new ROMs were installed. But the first few times they only changed the randomgen's numbers. We only had to get hold of the new ROMs, and it took me a few minutes to find the new numbers and implement them into my software.
So this went on for a while during which me and friends browsed thru pubs of several towns in Germany looking for those machines only we could crack.
Eventually, though, the machine maker learned how to "fix" it: Until then, the randomgen was only advanced at certain predictable times, e.g. something like 4 times during play, and once more per the player's pressing of the "double or nothing" button.
But then they finally changed it so that the randomgen would continually be polled, meaning we were no longer able to predict the next seed value exactly on time for the pressing of the button.
That was the end of it. Still, making the effort of writing a disassembler just for this single crack, finding the key routines in 16KB of 8 bit CPU code, figuring out unknown algorithms, investing quite a lot of money to pay someone else to develop code I didn't understand, finding the items for a portable high-speed computer involving the "blind" 68000 CPU with the Sharp as a terminal and the printer for the convenient output, and then actually emptying the machines myself, was one of the most exciting things I ever did with my programming skills.
Way back in the early 90s, I forgot my Compuserve password. I had the encrypted version in CIS.INI, so I wrote a small program to do a plaintext attack and analysis in an attempt to reverse-engineer the encryption algorithm. 24 hours later, I figured out how it worked and what my password was.
Soon after that, I did a clean-up and published the program as freeware so that Compuserve customers could recover their lost passwords. The company's support staff would frequently refer these people to my program.
It eventually found its way onto a few bulletin boards (remember them?) and Internet forums, and was included in a German book about Compuserve. It's still floating around out there somewhere. In fact, Google takes me straight to it.
Once, when playing Daggerfall II, I could not afford the Daedric Dai-Katana so I hex-edited the savegame.
Being serious though, I managed to remove the dongle check on my dads AutoCAD installation using SoftICE many years ago. This was before the Internet was big. He works as an engineer so he had a legitimate copy. He had just forgotten the dongle at his job and he needed to do some things and I thought it would be a fun challenge. I was very proud afterwards.
Okay, this wasn't reverse engineering (quite) but a simple hardware hack born of pure frustration. I was an IT manager for a region of Southwestern Bell's cell phone service in the early 90s. My IT department was dramatically underfunded and so we spent money on smart people rather than equipment.
We had a WAN between major cities, used exclusively for customer service, with critical IP links. Our corporate bosses were insistent that we install a network monitoring system to notify us when the lines went down (no money for redundancy, but spend bucks for handling failures. Sigh.)
The STRONGLY recommended solution ran on a SPARC workstation and started at $30K plus the cost of a SPARC station (around $20K then), together which was a substantial chunk of my budget. I couldn't see it - this was a waste of $$. So I decided a little hacking was in order.
I took an old PC scheduled for destruction and put a copy of ProComm (remember ProComm?) and had it ping each of the required nodes along the route (this was one of the later versions of ProComm that scripted FTP as well as serial lines, KERMIT, etc.) A little logic in the coding fired-off a pager message when a node couldn't be reached. I had already used it to cobble together a pager system for our techs, so I reused the pager code. The script ran continuously, sending a ping once each minute across each of the critical links, and branched into the pager code when a ping wasn't returned.
We duplicated this system at each critical location for a cost of less than $500 and had a very fast notification when a link went down. Next issue - one of our first trouble-shooting methods was to power-cycle our routers and/or terminal servers. I got some dial-up X10 controllers and a few X10 on/off appliance power switches. You had to know the correct phone number to use and the correct tones to push, but we printed up a cheat card for each technician and they kept it with their pager. Instant fast response! One of my techs then programmed the phones we all had to reset specific equipment at each site as a speed-dial. One-tech solves the problem!
Now the "told-you-so" unveiling.
I'm sitting at lunch with our corporate network manager in Dallas who is insisting on a purchase of the Sun-based network management product. I get a page that one of our links is down, and then a second page. Since the pager messages are coming from two different servers, I know exactly which router is involved (it was a set-up, I knew anyway, as the tech at the meeting with me was queued to "down a router" during the meal so we could show-off.) I show the pager messages to the manager and ask him what he would do to resolve this problem. He eyes me suspiciously, since he hasn't yet successfully been paged by his Solaris NMS system that is supposed to track critical links. "Well, I guess you'd better call a tech and get them to reset the router and see if that fixes it." I turned to the tech who was lunching with us and asked him to handle it. He drew out his cell phone (above the table this time) and pressed the speed-dial he had programmed to reset the router in question. The phone dialed the X10 switch, told it to power-off the router, paused for five seconds, told it to power-up the router, and disconnected. Our ProComm script sent us pages telling us the link was back up within three minutes of this routine. :-)
The corporate network manager was very impressed. He asked me what the cost was for my new system. When I told him less than $1K, he was apoplectic. He had just ordered a BIG set of the Sun Solaris network management solution just for the tasks I'd illustrated. I think he had spent something like $150K. I told him how the magic was done and offered him the ProComm script for the price of lunch. TANSTAAFL. He told me he'd buy me lunch to keep my mouth shut.
Cleaning out my old drawers of disks and such, I found a copy of the code - "Pingasaurus Rex" was the name I had given it. That was hacking in the good old days.
The most painful for me was for this product where we wanted to include an image on a Excel Spreadsheet (few years back before the open standards). So I had to get and "understanding" if such thing exists of the internal format for the docs, as well. I ended up doing some Hex comparison between files with and without the image to figure out how to put it there, plus working on some little endian math....
I once worked on a tool that would gather inventory information from a PC as it logged into the network. The idea was to keep track of all the PCs in your company.
We had a new requirement to support the Banyan VINES network system, now long forgotten but pretty cool at the time it came out. I couldn't figure out how to get the Ethernet MAC address from Banyan's adapter as there was no documented API to do this.
Digging around online, I found a program that some other Banyan nerd had posted that performed this exact action. (I think it would store the MAC address in an environment variable so you could use it in a script). I tried writing to the author to find out how his program worked, but he either didn't want to tell me or wanted some ridiculous amount of money for the information (I don't recall).
So I simply fired up a disassembler and took his utility apart. It turned out he was making one simple call to the server, which was an undocumented function code in the Banyan API. I worked out the details of the call pretty easily, it was basically asking the server for this workstations address via RPC, and the MAC was part of the Banyan network address.
I then simply emailed the engineers at Banyan and told them what I needed to do. "Hey, it appears that RPC function number 528 (or whatever) returns what I need. Is that safe to call?"
The Banyan engineers were very cool, they verified that the function I had found was correct and was pretty unlikely to go away. I wrote my own fresh code to call it and I was off and running.
Years later I used basically the same technique to reverse engineer an undocumented compression scheme on an otherwise documented file format. I found a little-known support tool provided by the (now defunct) company which would decompress these files, and reverse engineered it. It turned out to be a very straightforward Lempel-Ziv variant applied within the block structure of their file format. The results of that work are recorded for posterity in the Wireshark source code, just search for my name.
Almost 10 years ago, I picked up the UFO/XCOM Collector's Edition in the bargain bin at a local bookstore, mostly out of nostalgia. When I got back home, I got kinda excited that it had been ported to Windows (the DOS versions didn't run under win2k)... and then disappointed that it had garbled graphics.
I was about to shrug my shoulders (bargain bin and all), but then my friend said "Haven't you... bugfixed... software before?", which led to a night of drinking lots of cola and reverse-engineering while hanging out with my friend. In the end, I had written a bugfix loader that fixed the pitch vs. width issue, and could finally play the two first XCOM games without booting old hardware (DOSBOX wasn't around yet, and my machine wasn't really powerful enough for fullblown virtualization).
The loader gained some popularity, and was even distributed with the STEAM re-release of the games for a while - I think they've switched to dosbox nowadays, though.
I wrote a driver for the Atari ST that supported Wacom tablets. Some of the Wacom information could be found on their web sites, but I still had to figure out a lot on my own.
Then, once I had written a library to access the wacom tables (and a test application to show the results) - it dawned on me that there was no API for the OS (GEM windowing system) to actually place the mouse cursor somewhere. I ended up having to hook some interrupts in something called the VDI (like GDI in windows), and be very very careful not to crash the computer inside there. I had some help (in the form of suggestions) from the developers of an accelerated version of the VDI (NVDI), and everything was written in PurePascal. I still occasionally have people asking me how to move the mouse cursor in GEM, etc.
I've had to reverse engineer a video-processing app, where I only had part of the source code. It took me weeks and weeks to even work out the control-flow, as it kept using CORBA to call itself, or be called from CORBA in some part of the app that I couldn't access.
Sheer idiocy.
I recently wrote an app that download the whole content from a Domino Webmail server using Curl. This is because the subcontractor running the server asks for a few hundred bucks for every archive request.
They changed their webmail version about one week after I released the app for the departement but managed to make it working again using a GREAT deal of regex and XML
When I was in highschool they introduced special hours each week (there were 3 hours if i recall correctly) in which we had to pick a classroom with a teacher there to help with any questions on their subject. No of course everybody always wanted to spend their time in the computer room to play around on the computers there.
To choose the room where you would have to be there was an application that would monitor how many students would go to a certain room, and so you had to reserve your slot on time or otherwise there was not much choice where to go.
At that time I always liked to play around on the computers there and I had obtained administrator access already, only for this application that would not help me so much. So I used my administrator access to make a copy of the application and take it home to examine. Now I don't remember all the details but I discoverd this application used some access database file located on a hidden network share. Then after taking a copy of this database file I found there was a password on the database. Using some linux access database tools I could easily work around that and after that it was easy to import this database in my own mysql server.
Then though a simple web interface I could find details for every student in the school to change their slots and promote myself to sit in my room of choice every time.
The next step was to write my own application that would allow me to just select a student from the list and change anything without having to look up their password which was implemented in only a few hours.
While not such a very impressive story as some others in this thread, I still remember it was a lot of fun to do for a highschool child back then.
A friend of mine brought up this questiont he other day, he's recently bought a garmin heart rate moniter device which keeps track of his heart rate and allows him to upload his heart rate stats for a day to his computer.
The only problem is there are no linux drivers for the garmin USB device, he's managed to interpret some of the data, such as the model number and his user details and has identified that there are some binary datatables essentially which we assume represent a series of recordings of his heart rate and the time the recording was taken.
Where does one start when reverse engineering data when you know nothing about the structure?
I had the same problem and initially found this project at Google Code that aims to complete a cross-platform version of tools for the Garmin devices ... see: http://code.google.com/p/garmintools/. There's a link on the front page of that project to the protocols you need, which Garmin was thoughtful enough to release publically.
And here's a direct link to the Garmin I/O specification: http://www.garmin.com/support/pdf/IOSDK.zip
I'd start looking at the data in a hexadecimal editor, hopefully a good one which knows the most common encodings (ASCII, Unicode, etc.) and then try to make sense of it out of the data you know it has stored.
As another poster mentioned, reverse engineering can be hairy, not in practice but in legality.
That being said, you may be able to find everything related to your root question at hand by checking out this project and its' code...and they do handle the runner's heart rate/GPS combo data as well
http://www.gpsbabel.org/
I'd suggest you start with checking the legality of reverse engineering in your country of origin. Most countries have very strict laws about what is allowed and what isn't regarding reverse engineering devices and code.
I would start by seeing what data is being sent by the device, then consider how such data could be represented and packed.
I would first capture many samples, and see if any pattern presents itself, since heart beat is something which is regular and that would suggest it is measurement related to the heart itself. I would also look for bit fields which are monotonically increasing, as that would suggest some sort of time stamp.
Having formed a hypothesis for what is where, I would write a program to test it and graph the results and see if it makes sense. If it does but not quite, then closer inspection would probably reveal you need some scaling factors here or there. It is also entirely possible I need to process the data first before it looks anything like what their program is showing, i.e. might need to integrate the data points. If I get garbage, then it is back to the drawing board :-)
I would also check the manufacturer's website, or maybe run strings on their binaries. Finding someone who works in the field of biomedical engineering would also be on my list, as they would probably know what protocols are typically used, if any. I would also look for these protocols and see if any could be applied to the data I am seeing.
I'd start by creating a hex dump of the data. Figure it's probably blocked in some power-of-two-sized chunks. Start looking for repeating patterns. Think about what kind of data they're probably sending. Either they're recording each heart beat individually, or they're recording whatever the sensor is sending at fixed intervals. If it's individual beats, then there's going to be a time delta (since the last beat), a duration, and a max or avg strength of some sort. If it's fixed intervals, then it'll probably be a simple vector of readings. There'll probably be a preamble of some sort, with a start timestamp and the sampling rate. You can try decoding the timestamp yourself, or you might try simply feeding it to ctime() and see if they're using standard absolute time format.
Keep in mind that lots of cheap A/D converters only produce 12-bit outputs, so your readings are unlikely to be larger than 16 bits (and the high-order 4 bits may be used for flags). I'd recommend resetting the device so that it's "blank", dumping and storing the contents, then take a set of readings, record the results (whatever the device normally reports), then dump the contents again and try to correlate the recorded results with whatever data appeared after the "blank" dump.
Unsure if this is what you're looking for but Garmin has created an API that runs with your browser. It seems OSX is supported, as well as Windows browsers... I would try it from Google Chromium to see if it can be used instead of this reverse engineering...
http://developer.garmin.com/web-device/garmin-communicator-plugin/
API Features
Auto-detection of devices connected to a computer Access to device
product information like product name and software version Read
tracks, routes and waypoints from supported recreational, fitness and
navigation devices Write tracks, routes and waypoints to supported
recreational, fitness and navigation devices Read fitness data from
supported fitness devices Geo-code address and save to a device as a
waypoint or favorite Read and write Garmin XML files (GPX and TCX) as
well as binary files. Support for most Garmin devices (USB, USB
mass-storage, most serial devices) Support for Internet Explorer,
Firefox and Chrome on Microsoft Windows. Support for Safari, Firefox
and Chrome on Mac OS X.
Can you synthesize a heart beat using something like a computer speaker? (I have no idea how such devices actually work). Watch how the binary results change based on different inputs.
Ripping apart the device and checking out what's inside would probably help too.