I got these settings.. The red is a image.
I used
marging-left: -8px;
on the image so the left goes outside his parent div. But what my question is how to counter the gap on the right side. (at the arrow in the second picture).
Easiest solution is probably to not assign a width to the element. Then you can use a negative margin-left to achieve your effect.
See this fiddle for an example...
I used a CSS triangle, but it should work with an image as well.
Related
Well , I have a site with margins and a footer with different background color.
The problem is that the footer margins do not get colored in the same color as the specified footer color.
The Html code -
Here I would like color the green space orange.
I have tried replacing the margin with padding , but it does not work .
Now the problem has been resolved. Do not answer.
Usepadding css property on footer instead of margin.
Margin, as such, doesn't have background color. Margin is invisible border, a space between two objects.
Refer this Stack Overflow answer to understand more.
Hard to tell without seeing the code but I'm assuming that if changing the margin to padding for your footer div didn't work then that element might be nested inside of the element with the margin that you're saying you're applying for the site. Move the footer DIV outside of that element and apply the padding to it, not sure though without seeing the code so I could be off on that
You should use padding instead of margin in such case..
So I asked this question: google chrome issue with fixed position and margin-top which finally got me to realize that top and margin-top are not the same thing. I don't know how I've missed that all these years.
Anyways that got me thinking what is the difference exactly between margin-top and top, which is how I found this question: CSS: Top vs Margin-top.
I already knew what margin-top did. But I had never extrapolated that out to think "hmm, this element is not in the DOM flow so what exactly is margin-top pushing it away from?"
From the question I asked I know that margin-top behaves in very unexpected ways when applied to an element with a fixed position. And that in Chrome at least this can lead to some crazy rules (like margin-top: -273%;).
So my Question is: How do browsers apply margin rules to elements not in the DOM flow (i.e. elements with a position value of fixed or absolute . And what about the way they are applied and rendered leads to rules, like the one described above, actually rendering the element inside the view-port?
The top property simply determines how far from the top of the containing element that the box-model should start being rendered. In the case of position: fixed, that is the window itself. In the case of position: absolute, it is the next parent element with a non-static position.
Margin, on the other hand, is part of the box-model itself. Adding margin to the top of the box increases the empty space present above the box.
Consider the following layers for a position: fixed box:
top:10px
margin-top:10px
------------border-top:1px------------
padding-top:10px
content
All of the margin, border, and padding are part of the box model. That entire element, or "piece", is just one big square when positioning. So, if you have a margin of 10px on the top of the box, and position the element 10px from the top, it will have the appearance of having 20px of margin between the top of the window and where the visible box starts.
I've also made a very simple example in jsFiddle.
If you like graphics, take this example, where the red box has a position: fixed:
As you can see in the first section, only setting position: fixed on the element doesn't actually move it anywhere. It just removes it from the flow of the document.
In the section section, adding a margin-top: 10px makes the element move down 10px because the box now has 10px of margin on the top of it. However, it hasn't actually moved anywhere. The box has just gotten taller because the box model has changed.
In the third section, using a top: 10px actually moves the box to be 10px from the top of the window container. It has the exact same box model as in the first section.
Section four is like the second section above it, except the negative margin causes it to move up ten pixels. The box model is still taller and the box still hasn't moved.
When you set an absolute position on an element, the element doesn't move at all if you don't set any other position properties. So, without a top, right, bottom, or left property set, the element stays in the position it would have been in if it had been rendered as part of the flow, it's just now removed from the flow. So adding a margin, either positive or negative, makes it appear to move up or down from that position. In reality, you're just changing the element's box model though.
You also have to realize that using a percentage on top and bottom margins (and even paddings) has nothing to do with the height. It actually uses the width to figure out how much margin is there. Saying margin-top: 10% will make that value 10% of the available width, not the available height, and making it negative will just negate that value. I mentioned this because it is relevant to that first question you linked where you were using percentages for margin-top.
I hope this covered what you were looking for. I couldn't tell what exactly you were confused about so I just explained as much as I could.
I'm working on a simple design here, but i have a little issue.
Please have a look at the final design example here: http://ronnieaarebrot.com/demo/cms/
On the menu to the left and right, you can see a small border going from the top to the bottom (following the height of the center content).
How can i do this? i was planning on having a background-image with the small border on both sides, but how should i "calculate" the height of the center content? or make the two borders follow the height of the center div. This is a bit hard to explain.. but check the image and here is an html example of how far I've come. http://ronnieaarebrot.com/demo/cms_html/
Any good solutions?
The easiest way would be to contain the centre content in a div element and use the border CSS property to apply it. You can then adjust padding and margins to butt the centre and side elements against one another. Given the model, it seems like some padding on the centre element combined with almost no margins on the sides would do the trick.
If you put overflow:hidden on the #page_wrap element that it will extent to the height of its contents (the left, center and right parts).
So you can put the backgorund image (1px height repeated vertically) on that element and be sure that it will extend all the way down..
So, I have a layout where I have a repeating transparent shadow element set to the background of my parent container element. Set atop this, and supposedly hovering over the topmost edge of this background, is supposed to be an image with a frame and drop shadow.
However, because the image frame continues the parent element, the background image also continues upward. This is visible as the vertical lines above the top edge of the frame's drop shadow. See screenshot below:
This happens regardless if I use a transparent image or CSS3's box-shadow property. Setting negative margins doesn't work to bring it out of the parent element, nor does setting positioning as relative or absolute.
Normally I'd try to "fake" the transparency effect by setting a solid image at the top edge of the image frame, but there's a repeating stucco pattern set as the body background, which means there'd be a visible, unnatural-looking edge. (Insert cursing re: repeating patterns here.)
Any suggestions how I could prevent a parent element's background from showing through a child element, or offsetting the image frame somehow?
Many thanks!
I figured it out.
I was modifying the WordPress TwentyEleven theme, which has #primary and #secondary divs as floats atop the main content div. In order to make the background extend all the way to the bottom of the content div (I.e., past the two floats), I had overflow: set to auto.
Since I don't need to float anything (It's one column with no sidebar now), I removed both floats and removed the overflow declaration I had. Tah-dah, totally works now.
If someone else finds him/herself in this issue, have a look at my jsFiddle, which I used to figure it out. Thanks to Paker for the suggestion.
I'm trying to make a box with rounded corners where the height and width of the div depends on the content, so it's automatically adjust to it...
You can see the example here: http://pastehtml.com/view/1duizyf.html
The problem is that i can't get the "test_mid_left" (black background) and "test_mid_right" (turquoise background) to inherit the height from the "test_mid_center" (green background). I have tried height: 100% and auto, but none of thoose work. So how do I get them to inherit the height from the content?
(The reason why I have used "min-height: xx" in the left and right content on the example is just to show which boxes I am talking about)
As already mentioned this can't be done with floats, they can't inherit heights, they're unaware of their siblings so for example the side two floats don't know the height of the centre content, so they can't inherit from anything.
Usually inherited height has to come from either an element which has an explicit height or if height: 100%; has been passed down through the display tree to it.. The only thing I'm aware of that passes on height which hasn't come from top of the "tree" is an absolutely positioned element - so you could for example absolutely position all the top right bottom left sides and corners (you know the height and width of the corners anyway) And as you seem to know the widths (of left/right borders) and heights of top/bottom) borders, and the widths of the top/bottom centers, are easy at 100% - the only thing that needs calculating is the height of the right/left sides if the content grows -
This you can do, even without using all four positioning co-ordinates which IE6 /7 doesn't support
I've put up an example based on what you gave, it does rely on a fixed width (your frame), but I think it could work with a flexible width too? the uses of this could be cool for those fancy image borders we can't get support for until multiple background images or image borders become fully available.. who knows, I was playing, so just sticking it out there!
proof of concept example is here
The Problem
When an element is floated, its parent no longer contains it because the float is removed from the flow. The floated element is out of the natural flow, so all block elements will render as if the floated element is not even there, so a parent container will not fully expand to hold the floated child element.
Take a look at the following article to get a better idea of how the CSS Float property works:
The Mystery Of The CSS Float Property
A Potential Solution
Now, I think the following article resembles what you're trying to do. Take a look at it and see if you can solve your problem.
Equal Height Columns with Cross-Browser CSS
I hope this helps.
The negative margin trick:
http://pastehtml.com/view/1dujbt3.html
Not elegant, I suppose, but it works in some cases.
You need to take out a float: left; property... because when you use float the parent div do not grub the height of it's children... If you want the parent dive to get the children height you need to give to the parent div a css property overflow:hidden;
But to solve your problem you can use display: table-cell; instead of float... it will automatically scale the div height to its parent height...
Most of the times, the Previous parent has a heigt manually set, so you can use that value as reference, no other dirty tricks will be needed, and if the number is not the same for any reason maybe a comment can be added with the original number so in case you need to change it, by searching at the all the values, this one can be adjusted or even changed, in the time someone resolve this one for us.