SELECT distinct t1.vssyspackageid,CA.rAmount as Amount,Curr.vsShortCode AS Currency
from tblPrograms
INNER JOIN tblProgramsAndPackages ON tblPrograms.vsSysProgramId = tblProgramsAndPackages.vsSysProgramId
inner join tblPackages t1 on tblProgramsAndPackages.iPackageId=t1.iPackageId
right join tblPkgContractAwardDetails as CA on CA.iPackageId=t1.iPackageId
join tblCurrencies as Curr on CA.iCurrency =Curr.iCurrencyId
where tblPrograms.vsSysProgramId='JICA'
group by t1.vssyspackageid,CA.rAmount,Curr.vsShortCode
if which package assigned to Contractor Award Detail then it will show in one column.
Example: GWSSP/01,GWSSP/02 then after it it shows total package in next column.
I'm not sure exactly what you are wanting as your question is a little vague, but I'm guessing that you want a single row for the specified Package that will show the sum of the Amount column. This is what I can understand from your question anyway!
SELECT DISTINCT t1.vssyspackageid,
SUM(CA.rAmount) AS TotalAmount,
Curr.vsShortCode AS Currency
FROM tblPrograms
INNER JOIN tblProgramsAndPackages ON tblPrograms.vsSysProgramId =
tblProgramsAndPackages.vsSysProgramId
INNER JOIN tblPackages AS t1 ON tblProgramsAndPackages.iPackageId =
t1.iPackageId
RIGHT JOIN tblPkgContractAwardDetails AS CA ON CA.iPackageId =
t1.iPackageId
JOIN tblCurrencies AS Curr ON CA.iCurrency =
Curr.iCurrencyId
WHERE tblPrograms.vsSysProgramId = 'JICA'
AND t1.[YOUR_COLUMN_NAME_HERE] = 'GWSSP/01'
GROUP BY t1.vssyspackageid,
Curr.vsShortCode
Just a few things to note:
I don't know the column name in the tblPackages table that the values such as 'GWSSP/01' belongs, so I have left that for you to fill in.
You will still get multiple rows if there are multiple currencies for your package, you will have to remove the Curr.vsShortCode from your Select and Group By clauses if that is the case.
I also tided up your code a bit because it was quite messy and hard to understand as well as using multiple standards and short-cuts!
Related
i want to know, why in this case, it keeps saying Quantity column is ambiguous, can anybody help?
SELECT SUM(AmountPaid),SUM(Quantity), ice_cream.IceCream
FROM ice_cream
INNER JOIN ice_cream_ingredient ON (ice_cream.IceCreamID =
ice_cream_ingredient.fkIceCreamID)
INNER JOIN ingredients ON (ice_cream_ingredient.fkIngredientID =
ingredients.IngredientID)
INNER JOIN sales ON (sales.fkIceCreamID =
ice_cream.IceCreamID)
WHERE IceCream='Vanilla Dream'
You should always qualify column names when you have more than one table in a query. In addition, learn to use table aliases.
It is unclear what the correct qualified names are. Here is one guess:
SELECT SUM(s.AmountPaid), SUM(s.Quantity), ic.IceCream
FROM ice_cream ic INNER JOIN
ice_cream_ingredient ici
ON ic.IceCreamID = ici.fkIceCreamID INNER JOIN
ingredients i
ON ici.fkIngredientID = i.IngredientID INNER JOIN
sales s
ON s.fkIceCreamID = ic.IceCreamID
WHERE ic.IceCream = 'Vanilla Dream';
I'm really struggling with this query and I hope somebody can help.
I am querying across multiple tables to get the dataset that I require. The following query is an anonymised version:
SELECT main_table.id,
sub_table_1.field_1,
main_table.field_1,
main_table.field_2,
main_table.field_3,
main_table.field_4,
main_table.field_5,
main_table.field_6,
main_table.field_7,
sub_table_2.field_1,
sub_table_2.field_2,
sub_table_2.field_3,
sub_table_3.field_1,
sub_table_4.field_1,
sub_table_4.field_2
FROM main_table
INNER JOIN sub_table_4 ON sub_table_4.id = main_table.id
INNER JOIN sub_table_2 ON sub_table_2.id = main_table.id
INNER JOIN sub_table_3 ON sub_table_3.id = main_table.id
INNER JOIN sub_table_1 ON sub_table_1.id = main_table.id
WHERE sub_table_4.field_1 = '' AND sub_table_4.field_2 = '0' AND sub_table_2.field_1 != ''
The query works, the problem I have is sub_table_1 has a revision number (int 11). Currently I get duplicate records with different revision numbers and different versions of sub_table_1.field_1 which is to be expected, but I want to limit the result set to only include results limited by the latest revision number, giving me only the latest sub_table_1_field_1 and I really can not figure it out!
Can anybody lend me a hand?
Many Thanks.
It's always important to remember that a JOIN can be on a subquery as well as a table. You could build a subquery that returns the results you want to see then, once you've got the data you want, join it in the parent query.
It's hard to 'tailor' an answer that's specific to you problem, as it's too obfuscated (as you admit) to know what the data and tables really look like, but as an example:
Say table1 has four fields: id, revision_no, name and stuff. You want to return a distinct list of name values, with their latest version of stuff (which, we'll pretend varies by revision). You could do this in isolation as:
select t.* from table1 t
inner join
(SELECT name, max(revision_no) maxr
FROM table1
GROUP BY name) mx
on mx.name = t.name
and mx.maxr = t.revision_no;
(Note: see fiddle at the end)
That would return each individual name with the latest revision of stuff.
Once you've got that nailed down, you could then swap out
INNER JOIN sub_table_1 ON sub_table_1.id = main_table.id
....with....
INNER JOIN (select t.* from table1 t
inner join
(SELECT name, max(revision_no) maxr
FROM table1
GROUP BY name) mx
on mx.name = t.name
and mx.maxr = t.revision_no) sub_table_1
ON sub_table_1.id = main_table.id
...which would allow a join with a recordset that is more tailored to that which you want to join (again, don't get hung up on the actual query I've used, it's just there to demonstrate the method).
There may well be more elegant ways to achieve this, but it's sometimes good to start with a simple solution that's easier to replicate, then simplify it once you've got the general understanding of the what and why nailed down.
Hope that helps - as I say, it's as specific as I could offer without having an idea of the real data you're using.
(for the sake of reference, here is a fiddle with a working version of the above example query)
In your case where you only need one column from the table, make this a subquery in your select clause instead of than a join. You get the latest revision by ordering by revision number descending and limiting the result to one row.
SELECT
main_table.id,
(
select sub_table_1.field_1
from sub_table_1
where sub_table_1.id = main_table.id
order by revision_number desc
limit 1
) as sub_table_1_field_1,
main_table.field_1,
...
FROM main_table
INNER JOIN sub_table_4 ON sub_table_4.id = main_table.id
INNER JOIN sub_table_2 ON sub_table_2.id = main_table.id
INNER JOIN sub_table_3 ON sub_table_3.id = main_table.id
WHERE sub_table_4.field_1 = ''
AND sub_table_4.field_2 = '0'
AND sub_table_2.field_1 != '';
SELECT a.acikkapali,
b.onay, b.evrakno,
b.tarih,
a.kod,
d.ad,
a.note0,
a.sf_miktar,
a.sf_sf_unit,
a.rtalepedilentestarih,
c.evrakno
FROM stok47T a
LEFT JOIN stok47e b on a.evrakno = b.evrakno
LEFT JOIN stok46t1 c on a.evrakno = c.talepno
LEFT JOIN stok00 d on a.kod = d.kod
WHERE a.tarih = '2013/04/15'
I need to add two my tables into that script with right way that means If I mapped one of them then the normal row count increases this makes me crazy, I have been trying to solve that issue for a couple days but I had been fail many times.
I couldn't find a good mapped fields between stok47t and the others. But there are still a few columns(fields) matches for their types and data.
I need to listen ppl opinions and learns something.
Here is a big part of my query
If you are getting increase in row count then chances are it could be due to using LEFT JOIN. An INNER join might help (see http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2007/10/a-visual-explanation-of-sql-joins.html guidance)
SELECT a.acikkapali,
b.onay, b.evrakno,
b.tarih,
a.kod,
d.ad,
a.note0,
a.sf_miktar,
a.sf_sf_unit,
a.rtalepedilentestarih,
c.evrakno
FROM stok47T a
INNER JOIN stok47e b on a.evrakno = b.evrakno
INNER JOIN stok46t1 c on a.evrakno = c.talepno
INNER JOIN stok00 d on a.kod = d.kod
WHERE a.tarih = '2013/04/15'
However without understanding your data structure then there is a chance you might lose the information that you are after.
If you are getting multiple rows, it is probably due to a Cartesian product occurring in the joins. This is unrelated to the type of join (left/right/full/inner). It is based on the relationships between the tables. You have 1-N relationships along different dimensions.
Your conditions are:
FROM stok47T a
LEFT JOIN stok47e b on a.evrakno = b.evrakno
LEFT JOIN stok46t1 c on a.evrakno = c.talepno
LEFT JOIN stok00 d on a.kod = d.kod
I have no idea what these tables and fields mean. But, if you have a case where there is one row per evrakno in table stok47t, and there are two rows in table stok47e and three in table stok46t1, then you will get six rows in the output.
Without more information, it is impossible to tell you the best solution. One method is to summarize the tables. Another is to take the first or last corresponding row, by doing something like:
from stok47T a left join
(select s.*, row_number() over (partition by evrakno order by id desc) as seqnum
from stok47e s
) b
on a.evrakno = b.evrakno and b.seqnum = 1
I was desperately trying harder and harder to get this thing done but didn`t yet succeed. I am getting repeated values when i run this query.
select
tbl_ShipmentStatus.ShipmentID
,Tbl_Contract.ContractID,
Tbl_Contract.KeyWinCountNumber,
Tbl_Item.ItemName,
Tbl_CountryFrom.CountryFromName,
Tbl_CountryTo.CountryToName,
Tbl_Brand.BrandName,
Tbl_Count.CountName,
Tbl_Seller.SellerName,
Tbl_Buyer.BuyerName,
Tbl_Contract.ContractNumber,
Tbl_Contract.ContractDate,
tbl_CountDetail.TotalQty,
tbl_CostUnit.CostUnitName,
tbl_Comission.Payment,
tbl_Port.PortName,
Tbl_Contract.Vans,
tbl_Comission.ComissionPay,
tbl_Comission.ComissionRcv,
tbl_CountDetail.UnitPrice,
tbl_Comission.ComissionRemarks,
tbl_CountDetail.Amount,
tbl_LCStatus.LCNumber,
tbl_ShipmentStatus.InvoiceNumber,
tbl_ShipmentStatus.InvoiceDate,
tbl_ShipmentStatus.BLNumber,
tbl_ShipmentStatus.BLDate,
tbl_ShipmentStatus.VesselName,
tbl_ShipmentStatus.DueDate
from tbl_ShipmentStatus
inner join tbl_LCStatus
on
tbl_LCStatus.LCID = tbl_ShipmentStatus.LCStatusID
inner join Tbl_Contract
on
tbl_LCStatus.ContractID = Tbl_Contract.ContractID
inner join Tbl_CountDetail
on Tbl_Contract.ContractID = Tbl_CountDetail.ContractId
inner join tbl_Comission
on
tbl_Comission.ContractID = Tbl_Contract.ContractID
inner join Tbl_Item
on
Tbl_Item.ItemID = Tbl_Contract.ItemID
inner join Tbl_Brand
on Tbl_Brand.BrandID = Tbl_Contract.BrandID
inner join Tbl_Buyer
on Tbl_Buyer.BuyerID = Tbl_Contract.BuyerID
inner join Tbl_Seller
on Tbl_Seller.SellerID = Tbl_Contract.SellerID
inner join Tbl_CountryFrom
on Tbl_CountryFrom.CountryFromID = Tbl_Contract.CountryFromID
inner join Tbl_CountryTo
on
Tbl_CountryTo.CountryToID = Tbl_Contract.CountryToID
inner join Tbl_Count
on
Tbl_Count.CountID = Tbl_CountDetail.CountId
inner join tbl_CostUnit
on tbl_Comission.CostUnitID = tbl_CostUnit.CostUnitID
inner join tbl_Port
on tbl_Port.PortID = tbl_Comission.PortID
where tbl_LCStatus.isDeleted = 0
and tbl_ShipmentStatus.isDeleted =0
and tbl_LCStatus.isDeleted = 0
and Tbl_CountDetail.isDeleted = 0
and Tbl_Contract.isDeleted = 0
and tbl_ShipmentStatus.LCStatusID = 5
I have also attached a picture of my result set of rows.
Any suggestions why this is happening would really be appreciable.
Result Set
Typically this happens when you have an implicit partial cross join (Cartesian product) between two of your tables. That's what it looks like to me here.
This happens most often when you have a many-to-many relationship. For example, if a single Album allows both multiple Artists and multiple Songs and the only relationship between Artists and Songs is Album, then there's essentially a many-to-many relationship between Artists and Songs. If you select from all three tables at once you're going to implicitly cross join Artists and Songs, and this may not be what you want.
Looking at your query, I see many-to-many between Tbl_CountDetail and tbl_Comission through Tbl_Contract. Try eliminating one of those joins to test to see if the behavior disappears.
Try using the DISTINCT keyword. It should solve your issue
Select DISTINCT ....
Wait as far as I can see your records are not duplicates.
HOWEVER
Notice the CountName column and Shipment ID column
The combination is unique for every row. Hence the values are unique as far as I can see. Try not selecting CountName.
Well if you have distinct rows its not a duplication problem. The issue is during the join a combination is occurring you don't want it to duplicating the results.
Either don't select CountName or you have a mistake in your data.
Only one of those rows should be true either 6 with Count2 or 6 with Count1. Likewise for 7. The fact that your getting both when your not supposed to indicates a logic mistake
hi I am doing A query to get some product info, but there is something strange going on, the first query returns resultset fast (.1272s) but the second (note that I just added 1 column) takes forever to complete (28-35s), anyone know what is happening?
query 1
SELECT
p.partnumberp,
p.model,
p.descriptionsmall,
p.brandname,
sum(remainderint) stockint
from
inventario_dbo.inventoryindetails ind
left join purchaseorders.product p on (p.partnumberp = ind.partnumberp)
left join inventario_dbo.inventoryin ins on (ins.inventoryinid= ind.inventoryinid)
group by partnumberp, projectid
query 2
SELECT
p.partnumberp,
p.model,
p.descriptionsmall,
p.brandname,
p.descriptiondetail,
sum(remainderint) stockint
from
inventario_dbo.inventoryindetails inda
left join purchaseorders.product p on (p.partnumberp = inda.partnumberp)
left join inventario_dbo.inventoryin ins on (ins.inventoryinid= inda.inventoryinid)
group by partnumberp, projectid
You shouldn't group by some columns and then select other columns unless you use aggregate functions. Only p.partnumberp and sum(remainderint) make sense here. You're doing a huge join and select and then the results for most rows just end up getting discarded.
You can make the query much faster by doing an inner select first and then joining that to the remaining tables to get your final result for the last few columns.
The inner select should look something like this:
select p.partnumberp, projectid, sum(remainderint) stockint
from inventario_dbo.inventoryindetails ind
left join purchaseorders.product p on (p.partnumberp = ind.partnumberp)
left join inventario_dbo.inventoryin ins on (ins.inventoryinid = ind.inventoryinid)
group by partnumberp, projectid
After the join:
select T1.partnumberp, T1.projectid, p2.model, p2.descriptionsmall, p2.brandname, T1.stockint
from
(select p.partnumberp, projectid, sum(remainderint) stockint
from inventario_dbo.inventoryindetails ind
left join purchaseorders.product p on (p.partnumberp = ind.partnumberp)
left join inventario_dbo.inventoryin ins on (ins.inventoryinid = ind.inventoryinid)
group by partnumberp, projectid) T1
left join purchaseorders.product p2 on (p2.partnumberp = T1.partnumberp)
Is descriptiondetail a really large column? Sounds like it could be a lot of text compared to the other fields based on its name, so maybe it just takes a lot more time to read from disk, but if you could post the schema detail for the purchaseorders.product table or maybe the average length of that column that would help.
Otherswise I would try running the query a few times and see you consistently get the same time results. Could just be load on the database server the time you got the slower result.