I've created sqlfiddle to try and get my head around this http://sqlfiddle.com/#!2/21e72/1
In the query, I have put a max() on the compiled_date column but the recommendation column is still coming through incorrect - I'm assuming that a select statement will need to be inserted on line 3 somehow?
I've tried the examples provided by the commenters below but I think I just need to understand this from a basic query to begin with.
As others have pointed out, the issue is that some of the select columns are neither aggregated nor used in the group by clause. Most DBMSs won't allow this at all, but MySQL is a little relaxed on some of the standards...
So, you need to first find the max(compiled_date) for each case, then find the recommendation that goes with it.
select r.case_number, r.compiled_date, r.recommendation
from reporting r
join (
SELECT case_number, max(compiled_date) as lastDate
from reporting
group by case_number
) s on r.case_number=s.case_number
and r.compiled_date=s.lastDate
Thank you for providing sqlFiddle. But only reporting data is given. we highly appreciate if you give us sample data of whole tables.
Anyway, Could you try this?
SELECT
`case`.number,
staff.staff_name AS ``case` owner`,
client.client_name,
`case`.address,
x.mx_date,
report.recommendation
FROM
`case` INNER JOIN (
SELECT case_number, MAX(compiled_date) as mx_date
FROM report
GROUP BY case_number
) x ON x.case_number = `case`.number
INNER JOIN report ON x.case_number = report.case_number AND report.compiled_date = x.mx_date
INNER JOIN client ON `case`.client_number = client.client_number
INNER JOIN staff ON `case`.staff_number = staff.staff_number
WHERE
`case`.active = 1
AND staff.staff_name = 'bob'
ORDER BY
`case`.number ASC;
Check below query:
SELECT c.number, s.staff_name AS `case owner`, cl.client_name,
c.address, MAX(r.compiled_date), r.recommendation
FROM case c
INNER JOIN (SELECT r.case_number, r.compiled_date, r.recommendation
FROM report r ORDER BY r.case_number, r.compiled_date DESC
) r ON r.case_number = c.number
INNER JOIN client cl ON c.client_number = cl.client_number
INNER JOIN staff s ON c.staff_number = s.staff_number
WHERE c.active = 1 AND s.staff_name = 'bob'
GROUP BY c.number
ORDER BY c.number ASC
SELECT
case.number,
staff.staff_name AS `case owner`,
client.client_name,
case.address,
(select MAX(compiled_date)from report where case_number=case.number),
report.recommendation
FROM
case
INNER JOIN report ON report.case_number = case.number
INNER JOIN client ON case.client_number = client.client_number
INNER JOIN staff ON case.staff_number = staff.staff_number
WHERE
case.active = 1 AND
staff.staff_name = 'bob'
GROUP BY
case.number
ORDER BY
case.number ASC
try this
Related
I want to get all the data from the users table & the last record associated with him from my connection_history table , it's working only when i don't add at the end of my query
ORDER BY contributions DESC
( When i add it , i have only the record wich come from users and not the last connection_history record)
My question is : how i can get the entires data ordered by contributions DESC
SELECT * FROM users LEFT JOIN connections_history ch ON users.id = ch.guid
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM connections_history ch1
WHERE ch.guid = ch1.guid
HAVING Max(ch1.date) = ch.date)
The order by should not affect the results that are returned. It only changes the ordering. You are probably getting what you want, just in an unexpected order. For instance, your query interface might be returning a fixed number of rows. Changing the order of the rows could make it look like the result set is different.
I will say that I find = to be more intuitive than EXISTS for this purpose:
SELECT *
FROM users u LEFT JOIN
connections_history ch
ON u.id = ch.guid AND
ch.date = (SELECT Max(ch1.date)
FROM connections_history ch1
WHERE ch.guid = ch1.guid
)
ORDER BY contributions DESC;
The reason is that the = is directly in the ON clause, so it is clear what the relationship between the tables is.
For your casual consideration, a different formatting of the original code. Note in particular the indented AND suggests the clause is part of the LEFT JOIN, which it is.
SELECT * FROM users
LEFT JOIN connections_history ch ON
users.id = ch.guid
AND EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM connections_history ch1
WHERE ch.guid = ch1.guid
HAVING Max(ch1.date) = ch.date
)
We can use nested queries to first check for max_date for a given user and pass the list of guid to the nested query assuming all the users has at least one record in the connection history table otherwise you could use Left Join instead.
select B.*,X.* from users B JOIN (
select A.* from connection_history A
where A.guid = B.guid and A.date = (
select max(date) from connection_history where guid = B.guid) )X on
X.guid = B.guid
order by B.contributions DESC;
I am not sure if my method is possible, but i'm trying to do a group_concat on a select statement that concats 2 fields. I get the error: Subquery returns more than 1 row each time. Can anyone help me as to a solution, or better way around this.
select t.recnum, (select group_concat((select concat(b.origtests,'^', d.name) as testing
from order_origtests b
join profile c on c.code = b.origtests
join department d on d.recnum = c.dept
)))
FROM order_ t
You don't put SELECT inside GROUP_CONCAT. It should be
select t.recnum, (
select group_concat(concat(b.origtests,'^', d.name))
from order_origtests b
join profile c on c.code = b.origtests
join department d on d.recnum = c.dept
) AS testing
FROM order_ t
Note that your subquery isn't correlated to anything in t, so you'll get the same testing column for every recnum.
I am trying to bring through the site.Site_Name, for each hive.hiveno and it's max(hiverdg.invdate). Running the code below doesn't work because site.Site_Name is not aggrigated. If I add site.Site_Name to the Group By, the code runs, but the ouput displays the results repeated, once for each site.Site_Name
select site.Site_Name ,hive.hiveno, max(hiverdg.invdate)
from hiverdg
inner join hive
on hiveRdg.hive_Link = hive.hive_Link
inner join Customer
on customer.Customer_Link = hive.Customer_Link
inner join site
on site.Customer_Link = customer.Customer_Link
where
(hiverdg.xtype = 'N'
and customer.CustomerName = 'Cust1')
or
(hiverdg.xtype = 'A'
and customer.CustomerName = 'Cust1')
group by hive.hiveno
The easiest way to do this, with your query, is the substring_index()/group_concat() trick:
select substring_index(group_concat(s.Site_Name order by rdg.invdate desc separator '|'
), '|', 1
) as SiteName,
h.hiveno, max(rdg.invdate)
from hiverdg rdg inner join
hive h
on rdg.hive_Link = h.hive_Link inner join
Customer c
on c.Customer_Link = h.Customer_Link inner join
site s
on s.Customer_Link = c.Customer_Link
where rdg.xtype in ('N', 'A') and c.CustomerName = 'Cust1')
group by h.hiveno;
I also made the following changes to your query:
Introduced table aliases, to make the query easier to write and to read.
Changed the where to use in, simplifying the logic.
I have written an sql statement that besides all the other columns should return the number of comments and the number of likes of a certain post. It works perfectly when I don't try to get the number of times it has been shared too. When I try to get the number of time it was shared instead it returns a wrong number of like that seems to be either the number of shares and likes or something like that. Here is the code:
SELECT
[...],
count(CS.commentId) as shares,
count(CL.commentId) as numberOfLikes
FROM
(SELECT *
FROM accountSpecifics
WHERE institutionId= '{$keyword['id']}') `AS`
INNER JOIN
account A ON A.id = `AS`.accountId
INNER JOIN
comment C ON C.accountId = A.id
LEFT JOIN
commentLikes CL ON C.commentId = CL.commentId
LEFT JOIN
commentShares CS ON C.commentId = CS.commentId
GROUP BY
C.time
ORDER BY
year, month, hour, month
Could you also tell me if you think this is an efficient SQL statement or if you would do it differently? thank you!
Do this instead:
SELECT
[...],
(select count(*) from commentLikes CL where C.commentId = CL.commentId) as shares,
(select count(*) from commentShares CS where C.commentId = CS.commentId) as numberOfLikes
FROM
(SELECT *
FROM accountSpecifics
WHERE institutionId= '{$keyword['id']}') `AS`
INNER JOIN account A ON A.id = `AS`.accountId
INNER JOIN comment C ON C.accountId = A.id
GROUP BY C.time
ORDER BY year, month, hour, month
If you use JOINs, you're getting back one result set, and COUNT(any field) simply counts the rows and will always compute the same thing, and in this case the wrong thing. Subqueries are what you need here. Good luck!
EDIT: as posted below, count(distinct something) can also work, but it's making the database do more work than necessary for the answer you want to end up with.
Quick fix:
SELECT
[...],
count(DISTINCT CS.commentId) as shares,
count(DISTINCT CL.commentId) as numberOfLikes
Better approach:
SELECT [...]
, Coalesce(shares.numberOfShares, 0) As numberOfShares
, Coalesce(likes.numberOfLikes , 0) As numberOfLikes
FROM [...]
LEFT
JOIN (
SELECT commentId
, Count(*) As numberOfShares
FROM commentShares
GROUP
BY commentId
) As shares
ON shares.commentId = c.commentId
LEFT
JOIN (
SELECT commentId
, Count(*) As numberOfLikes
FROM commentLikes
GROUP
BY commentId
) As likes
ON likes.commentId = c.commentId
While working with following query on mysql, Its getting locked,
SELECT event_list.*
FROM event_list
INNER JOIN members
ON members.profilenam=event_list.even_loc
WHERE (even_own IN (SELECT frd_id
FROM network
WHERE mem_id='911'
GROUP BY frd_id)
OR even_own = '911' )
AND event_list.even_active = 'y'
GROUP BY event_list.even_id
ORDER BY event_list.even_stat ASC
The Inner query inside IN constraint has many frd_id, So because of that above query is slooow..., So please help.
Thanks.
Try this:
SELECT el.*
FROM event_list el
INNER JOIN members m ON m.profilenam = el.even_loc
WHERE el.even_active = 'y' AND
(el.even_own = 911 OR EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM network n WHERE n.mem_id=911 AND n.frd_id = el.even_own))
GROUP BY el.even_id
ORDER BY el.even_stat ASC
You don't need the GROUP BY on the inner query, that will be making the database engine do a lot of unneeded work.
If you put even_own = '911' before the select from network, then if even_own IS 911 then it will not have to do the subquery.
Also why do you have a group by on the subquery?
Also run explain plan top find out what is taking the time.
This might work better:
( SELECT e.*
FROM event_list AS e
INNER JOIN members AS m ON m.profilenam = e.even_loc
JOIN network AS n ON e.even_own = n.frd_id
WHERE n.mem_id = '911'
AND e.even_active = 'y'
ORDER BY e.even_stat ASC )
UNION DISTINCT
( SELECT e.*
FROM event_list AS e
INNER JOIN members AS m ON m.profilenam = e.even_loc
WHERE e.even_own = '911'
AND e.even_active = 'y' )
ORDER BY e.even_stat ASC
Since I don't know whether the JOINs one-to-many (or what), I threw in DISTINCT to avoid dups. There may be a better way, or it may be unnecessary (that is, UNION ALL).
Notice how I avoid two things that are performance killers:
OR -- turned into UNION
IN (SELECT...) -- turned into JOIN.
I made aliases to cut down on the clutter. I moved the ORDER BY outside the UNION (and added parens to make it work right).