I need to pass a map back to the web application.
I'm used to encapsulating the map in a JSONObject
http://json.org/java/
But since I am using Spring and Jackson Haus.
is there an easier way to maintain the pojo? May I can just annotate the MAP ?
Jackson has com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonNode, and specific subtypes like ObjectNode.
These form so-called Tree Model, which is one of 3 ways to handle JSON with Jackson -- some other libraries (like org.json) only offer this way.
So you should be able to just use JsonNode instead; there is little point in using org.json library; it is slow, and has outdated API.
Alternatively you can just use java.util.Map, and return that. Jackson can handle standard Lists, Maps and other JDK types just fine.
If you need to manipulate the output, ie, you don't want to provide all the fields of the object you can use JSonArray:
#RequestMapping(value = "/api/users", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public
#ResponseBody
String listUsersJson(ModelMap model) throws JSONException {
JSONArray userArray = new JSONArray();
for (User user : userRepository.findAll()) {
JSONObject userJSON = new JSONObject();
userJSON.put("id", user.getId());
userJSON.put("firstName", user.getFirstName());
userJSON.put("lastName", user.getLastName());
userJSON.put("email", user.getEmail());
userArray.put(userJSON);
}
return userArray.toString();
}
Use the example from here
Otherwise if you add jackson to your dependencies and set the controller method anotatted with #ResponseBody the response will automatically mapped to JSON. Check here for a simple example.
Related
Similar to Jersey: Json array with 1 element is serialized as object BUT on the client side. E.g. I recieve a JSON object where a field is an array regulary, but in case there is only one element, it is a single object.
{"fileInfo":[{"fileName":"weather.arff","id":"10"},"fileName":"supermarket.arff","id":"11"}]}
versus
{"fileInfo":{"fileName":"weather.arff","id":"10"}}
I'm parsing/unmarshalling the JSON using Jersey/Genson. Of course, if the JSON doesnt match the target class I recieve an error (such as expected [ but read '{' )
I've read a lot about this bug and how to avoid when creating JSON objects on the SERVER side, but I found nothing about how to handle this issus when dealing on the CLIENT side.
As always, I prefere the most codeless possibility if there are several solutions...
BTW: Moxy works but it does not marshal native Object-type objects which is another requirement...
Update
Starting with Genson 1.3 release you can achieve it by enabling permissiveParsing:
Genson genson = new GensonBuilder().usePermissiveParsing(true).create();
Answer
Uh, do you know what library produces this on server side? I am curious to see who is responsible for all those badly structured jsons out there...
It is not yet supported in Genson. Originally because IMO people should not produce such dynamic json. Anyway, I opened an issue - this can be easily done, you can expect it to be present in the release coming next week.
Otherwise here is a way to achieve it without breaking the existing mechanisms.
You need to register a Factory that will use Gensons collections factory to create an instance of its standard collection converter. Then you will wrap this converter in another one that will handle the object to array logic. Here is the code (not codeless..., but if you wait a bit you won't have to code :)).
import com.owlike.genson.convert.DefaultConverters.CollectionConverterFactory;
import com.owlike.genson.convert.DefaultConverters.CollectionConverterFactory;
class SingleObjectAsCollectionFactory implements Factory<Converter<Collection>> {
// get the default factory
Factory<Converter<Collection<?>>> defaultFactory = CollectionConverterFactory.instance;
#Override
public Converter<Collection> create(Type type, Genson genson) {
// obtain an instance of the correct default converter for this type
final CollectionConverter defaultConverter = (CollectionConverter) defaultFactory.create(type, genson);
// wrap it in your own converter
return new Converter<Collection>() {
#Override
public void serialize(Collection object, ObjectWriter writer, Context ctx) throws Exception {
defaultConverter.serialize(object, writer, ctx);
}
#Override
public Collection deserialize(ObjectReader reader, Context ctx) throws Exception {
if (reader.getValueType() == ValueType.OBJECT) {
Object object = defaultConverter.getElementConverter().deserialize(reader, ctx);
Collection result = defaultConverter.create();
result.add(object);
return result;
} else return defaultConverter.deserialize( reader, ctx );
}
};
}
}
And then register it
Genson genson = new GensonBuilder()
.withConverterFactory(new SingleObjectAsCollectionFactory())
.create();
I have seen the responses from many other posts but would like to understand if there is a better way to do the same thing.
Requirement:-
I am using restTemplate to talk to web service which returns JSON output which is dynamic. As a consumer I don't want to access all fields but is interested in few of them. I am using Spring framework with Jackson parser and found the way of accessing it
String response = restTemplate.getForObject(targetUrl, String.class);
System.out.println(response);
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
JsonNode rootNode = mapper.readValue(response, JsonNode.class);
JsonNode uri = rootNode.get("uri");
System.out.println(uri.asText());
Do you know any better way to do it? Mapping to java Object is something that I dont want to do as the json output is not in my control
If your RestTemplate is configured with the default HttpMessageConverters, which is provided by Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder, you may directly get a JsonNode from restTemplate.getForObject.
For example,
ArrayNode resources = restTemplate.getForObject("/resources", ArrayNode.class);
Or,
ObjectNode resource = restTemplate.getForObject("/resources/123", ObjectNode.class);
Note that ArrayNode and ObjectNode are sub-classes of JsonNode.
Is it possible to configure jackson to always add the type of the serialized object to the generated json output.
For example:
package org.acme;
class ClassA
{
String a;
String b;
}
and I want the generated json to be:
["org.acme.ClassA",{"a":"str1","b":"str2"}]
You can do that with enableDefaultTyping() of the ObjectMapper
e.g.
mapper.enableDefaultTyping(DefaultTyping.OBJECT_AND_NON_CONCRETE);
See ObjectMapper API
If your are free to change from Jackson and do not especially need the format to match the one your are showing you can try Genson http://code.google.com/p/genson.
For example if your requirement is to be able to deserialize interfaces or abstract classes based on the original type of the object you serialized you can do:
interface Entity {}
static class Person implements Entity {}
Genson genson = new Genson.Builder().setWithClassMetadata(true).create();
// json will be equal to {"#class":"my.package.Person"}
String json = genson.serialize(new Person());
// and now Genson is able to deserialize it back to Person using the information
// in the Json Object
Person person = (Person) genson.deserialize(json, Entity.class);
Another nice feature is the ability to define aliases for your classes, so you show less information in the json stream but also this allows you to do refactoring without worring of existing json streams (for example if you store it in a database).
Genson genson = new Genson.Builder().addAlias("person", Person.class).create();
// json value is {"#class": "person"}
String json = genson.serialize(new Person());
Have a look at the wiki.
I'm having issues using Jackson to map a Javascript posted JSON array of hashes (Tag).
Here is the data received by the controller #RequestBody (It is send with correct json requestheader):
[{name=tag1}, {name=tag2}, {name=tag3}]
Here is the controller:
#RequestMapping(value = "purchases/{purchaseId}/tags", method = RequestMethod.POST, params = "manyTags")
#ResponseStatus(HttpStatus.CREATED)
public void createAll(#PathVariable("purchaseId") final Long purchaseId, #RequestBody final List<Tag> entities)
{
Purchase purchase = purchaseService.getById(purchaseId);
Set<Tag> tags = purchase.getTags();
purchaseService.updatePurchase(purchase);
}
When I debug and view the 'entities' value it shows as an ArrayList of generic objects, not as a list of objects of type 'Tag' as I would expect.
How can I get jackson to map a passed array of objects to a list of obejcts of type 'Tag'?
Thanks
It sounds like Spring is not passing full type information for some reason, but rather a type-erased version, as if declaration was something like List<?> tag. I don't know what can be done to fully resolve this (may need something from Spring integration team), but one work-around is to define your own type like:
static class TagList extends ArrayList<Tag> { }
and use that instead. This will retain generic parameterization through super-type declarations so that even if Spring only passes equivalent of TagList.class, Jackson can figure out the Tag parameter.
Another way to do this is to rather obtain an array than a List, as follows:
#RequestBody Tag[] entities
Jackson requires a default constructor with no parameters on custom Objects, so you'll need to simply add a default constructor to your Tag class.
In your case simply add to your Tag class:
public Tag(){}
I want to load an objet and forget that it comes from hibernate! That's it, I just do something as:
MyClass myObject = MyClassDAO.getUnproxiedObject(objectID);
and than I have a real instance of myObj (and not from a Hibernate proxy) with all attributes set with the values from the database, so that I can't distinguish it from a manually created object.
In this thread a method is present to create an unproxied object, but it does not treats the issue of eager loding the objects, what I suppose is necessary for achieving my ultimate goals.
For those who are wondering why would I want such objects, I need to serialize then to Json with Gson, but I think it would have many other uses for many people.
Use FetchType.EAGER to eagerly load all the relations. Specifically for JSON serialization, if you are building a web application consider using an OpenSessionInView interceptor for your HTTP requests.
after testing I found out that the method given in the citted post did exactly what I was looking for.
The reason hibernate doesn't de-proxy while rendering with GSON is that GSON uses reflection to serialize the fields rather than using the getters of the Hibernate object. To workaround, you need to register a new TypeHierarchyAdapter that will de-proxy the object as GSON is serializing.
Here's my approach:
GsonBuilder builder = new GsonBuilder();
builder.registerTypeHierarchyAdapter(HibernateProxy.class, new HibernateProxySerializer());
String jsonLove = gson.toJson(objToSerialize);
Here's the HibernateProxySerializer:
public class HibernateProxySerializer implements JsonSerializer<HibernateProxy> {
#Override
public JsonElement serialize(HibernateProxy proxyObj, Type arg1, JsonSerializationContext arg2) {
try {
GsonBuilder gsonBuilder = new GsonBuilder();
//below ensures deep deproxied serialization
gsonBuilder.registerTypeHierarchyAdapter(HibernateProxy.class, new HibernateProxySerializer());
Object deProxied = proxyObj.getHibernateLazyInitializer().getImplementation();
return gsonBuilder.create().toJsonTree(deProxied);
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
}