My fixed header is overlapping my content.
Much like here (Position fixed content overlapping problem)
but my header is dynamic so not always 50px in height sometimes 52, 100 ...
Try to position it in your box better.
When you create a fixed element, it requires an exact position:
Example:
#header{
height: 95px;
width: 640px;
position: fixed;
top: 30px;
right: 30px;
}
So, this is how your browser will read this: I will place a fixed element in the top-right corner of the screen: 30 pixels from the top, and 30 pixels from the right of my screen.
THE REASON those fixed elements are one on top of another it's because he didn't define a top/bottom and left/right position correctly. Add more text and you will see if you can scroll on the fixed elements (you can't..).
Put everything in a div and ID'it #bigBody. Give the #bigBody an exact width and height, let's say 1000 width and 600 height.
Now add these:
#header {
height: 50px;
width: 600px;
position: fixed;
top: 30px;
right: 30px;
}
#footer {
background: #fff;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
height: 30px;
width: 600px;
position: fixed;
}
min-width is irrelevant here... you use this only if you design big websites that require multiple devices access like iPhones, Tablets etc... if your just playing with the code just stick with the basics.
You can do that via JavaScript, updating both the size of the header and the margin of other widgets. See my fiddle for an example (with CoffeeScript, tested on Firefox and Chrome), or this other fiddle that uses jQuery. Basically it's changing the CSS together for more than one element.
header { height: value + "px"; }
.contents { margin-top: anotherValue + "px"; }
If the size change isn't done by JavaScript/CoffeeScript, you'll have to put a event listener to update the .contents CSS.
Related
I have to add a video from Youtube within certain limits (the red borders on screenshot). To add the video within these limits I need to use padding-bottom: 36%. Because of this you can't press the bottom block (with the date).
If I reduce this padding-bottom, the block with date moves to the right place but the height is reduced too.
Here is the part of css:
.calendar__general-slyde-video {
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 36%;
height: 0;
overflow: hidden;
width: 315px;
}
.calendar__general-slyde-video iframe {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 60%;
}
I would be grateful for any help!
ok,if the link you provided is your code and your problem is to place the calendar just below the left most message , i.e "calendar__changing-content" div, then here are some of problems i found
first ,your calendar__general-slyde-video clearfix have height:0 which means your video is being placed on the padding of the div.(which represents it's entire height)
second, your "calendar__changing-content" div does not contain it's children in a single row (assuming that's what you intended based on the given picture) hence your calendar is in the right place but it's sibling div's height is large which makes it appear distorted.
here is the solution to them:
add a height to the video and remove the padding also make the iframe 100% height, also you can remove height from other children's if your wish.
.calendar__general-slyde-video {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
width: 315px;
height: 233px;
}
.calendar__general-slyde-video iframe {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
here is the code pen
this should solve your problem, also you can use reset.css to remove browser default settings (just suggesting)
I'm working on this page and trying to get the slideshow to display correctly at tablet and mobile widths with media queries. However, all of the slider container elements are setting their height to 590px and this is creating a large gap beneath the slider and its content. I don't belive any of the elements have a fixed height set, but I have used some max-height:590px here and there. Any thoughts on how to get rid of that gap and force the containers to resize correctly?
Slider uses Cycle2.
Some HTML code
<div id="slider" class="cycle-slideshow" data-cycle-pager="#adv-custom-pager" data-cycle-slides="> div" data-cycle-timeout="7000">
<div class="singleSlide">
<!-- content goes in here -->
</div>
And some CSS that I think is important:
#homeslider {
height: auto;
}
#homeslider, #slider img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
#homeslider {
width: 1090px;
margin: 0px auto;
max-height: 590px;
}
For reference, this slideshow is the expected behavior.
ETA: Added some of the code that I think is important?
In your .slidercaption you have a top:-200px which is causing the issue. Unlike margin, elements with position:relative won't physically move when you set a top or left style. That means the occupied space for that element will still remain on that position.
So to fix that, remove top: -200px and replace with margin-top: -200px instead.
From this:
.slidercaption {
position: relative;
top: -200px;
}
To this:
.slidercaption {
margin-top: -200px
}
Take note, in your css there's a margin:0 set in that element. Make sure your update will override that existing style.
Update:
A far better solution is to use position:absolute instead, since having a negative margin or position is more likely to get an issue with that huge value.
So...
From:
.slidercaption {
position: relative;
top: -200px;
}
To:
.slidercaption {
position: absolute;
bottom:0;
}
Then what was causing the below elements to go up is because of this:
#sliderNav {
margin-top: -190px;
}
Change that to:
#sliderNav {
position: absolute;
bottom: 168px;
z-index: 99;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
When you came to a point where you are using large negative values, you can use position:absolute instead which is very helpful and less likely to have some issues if used properly.
I have a div which has its CSS initially defined as:
.mydiv {
position: absolute;
top: 60px;
left: 60px;
right: 60px;
bottom: 60px;
background-color: cyan;
overflow: hidden;
}
That is with equal distance from screen borders and I wanted to make it draggable via jQuery. This wouldn't work because of the right and bottom CSS directives.
So my next idea was to use this CSS definition:
.mydiv {
position: absolute;
width: 90%;
height: 90%;
margin-left: 5%;
margin-top: 5%;
background-color: cyan;
overflow: hidden;
}
Which according to my understanding would create a div with a width and height equal to 90% of the screen width/height and additionally the margin directives (5% on each side) would position it in the center of the screen.
This solution doesn't seem to work for 100%.
It works horizontally, the div is centered horizontally BUT vertically the space in the bottom is less than the space on top. Which is not what I want it to be.
I know I could use calc() to solve it in a different way but I want to avoid it due to browser compatibility (IE8).
I was wondering what I'm doing wrong?
i'm kind of stupid today.
i removed the margins and used:
top: 5%;
left: 5%;
and it solved my problem.
I am trying to create a footer that is responsive and sticks to the bottom right of a page but can't get it to work consistently when a absolutely positioned div is on the same page.
The code I am using can be seen at:
http://192.241.203.146/sample-page/
I have tried:
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
margin-bottom: 10px;
margin-top: 40px;
As well as:
float: right;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
margin-bottom: 40px;
margin-top: 40px;
To get it to work, but it does not respect the absolutely positioned content on the page when it is resized down to mobile. It clashes like so:
I know that using position:absolute means that the div is removed from the flow of objects but I need to use it on the element in the middle of the page to avoid the objects jumping around when I use jQuery fades.
I suspect this is because it is not inside a span or row as per the bootstrap base I am using. Is that the problem?
I'm at a loss here - any guidance appreciated :)
Your problem is that the div is normal to the page, but his position is absolute. Inspecting your code i saw this:
if you want the footer is always visible in the bottom, you can wrap the footer to the div which width will be 100% of the width of the page. Like this:
div#footer_container{
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100px;
position: relative;
}
div#footer_container div#footer{
position: absolute;
right: 0px;
bottom: 0px;
}
Result:
Red - main container of your page, Green - container of your footer (its always will be after the main container), Blue - your footer.
P.S. sorry for my english :)
I think I've found it!
Try this:
.main {
padding-bottom: 140px;
}
It works for me even if I reduce the width of the browser.
#header
{
position: absolute;
top: 0%;
height: 24px;
}
#body
{
position: absolute;
top: 24px;
bottom: 20%;
overflow: auto;
}
#footer
{
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
height: 17.2%;
min-height: 80px;
overflow: auto;
}
My problem is that when I compress the browser window, the middle element (the 'body') starts to slip into the footer's area (when 20% from the bottom becomes larger than the minimum height of the footer). The footer can be larger in height than its minimum, but it cannot be smaller.
Any good way to do this without Javascript code?
No. When an element is positioned absolutely it is removed from the flow of the document and has no knowledge of any other elements.
I have not seen a sticky-footer solution that will work with a variable height footer.
There are some examples of headers and footers on Dynamic Drive. These are pure CSS layout examples.
You should be able to achieve the same effect with a combination of these two.