Pycharm 2.7.3 on Ubuntu raring.
I've made several configuration changes to my pycharm installation and to various projects. Is there a way to have pycharm report what I've changed versus the default installation?
Related
I have tried several suggestions from the web and I have all the prerequisites to installing MySQL. I have all Visual C++ installed on my laptop.
What could the problem be or is there something I am missing somewhere? Here is the image of the installation process with the error highlighted:
Clear all the installation paths and installed files.. again reinstall it.. Go services and see
I have a LAMP server on an EC2 instance. I downloaded phpMyAdmin using Amazon's guide here: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/install-LAMP.html.
On the phpMyAdmin page it says that:
"A newer version of phpMyAdmin is available and you should consider upgrading. The newest version is 4.6.5.2, released on 2016-12-05."
and I need to update it and also MySQL to use new features they put on the updates.
I'm accessing the EC2 instance from the terminal in my Mac laptop. I've tried a lot of things but I couldn't manage it. I've tried
sudo yum install -y phpMyAdmin
sudo yum install
I tried to manually download the latest version from phpmyadmin.net and change the files in the folder but I couldn't access the phpmyadmin folder in the first place.
Any help would be appreciated,
Thanks
You're using the version of phpMyAdmin maintained by your distribution (presumably Fedora, CentOS, or Red Hat); this means that basically you're not responsible for (or able to) upgrade the software that's under control of the package manager (aside from running the updates occasionally). If you wish to use a different version, you're certainly able to remove the package manager version then install it manually. I don't use EPEL, but I believe the highest version currently distributed is 4.4.15.9 (reference, which I think is because of the older versions of PHP and/or MySQL which are currently shipped. So you might not be able to upgrade due to your MySQL or PHP versions, but YMMV.
Basically, if you're using the package managed version, the whole point is so you don't have to worry about manual updates.
You can disable the notification by adding the directive $cfg['VersionCheck'] = false; to your config.inc.php (which may be in /etc/ or /etc/phpmyadmin, but I'm just guessing about how your distribution may handle it.).
I was wondering why would anyone want to install MySQL via something like BREW or a package manager instead of going to http://www.mysql.com/downloads/ and just downloading the entire installer?
Is there any benefits or time saving capabilities when I install my local MYSQL setup via BREW?
Vs. using the site:
Using brew or your package manager saves you the time (you don't have to hunt around for a download on the site).
The site can deliver the software in one of many unpredictable ways (e.g., as anything from a script that installs things via your package manager or compiles from in situ resources), including ways that disrupt dependencies of other installed software (which is why installing via package manager is safer and why installing things in this way, around the package manager, should be avoided unless necessary).
Vs. your ordinary package manager:
brew doesn't need sudo; it doesn't write new software versions over old software versions on the system or break system dependencies. Indeed, one of brew's perks is installation into user-specific directories and version-specific subdirectories. You can think of it as a more flexible, power-usery version of the package manager.
brew can install things not packaged by your distro or newer versions of those things than are packages by your distro.
brew is also cross-platform (works on Windows, Linux, and macOS).
I have a VB Windows forms application that uses a mysql database to keep track of everything within the application.. The problem that I know will occur is that most of the applications users will not have MYSQL let alone know how to install it properly... To install the application on the users systems I am using the Visual Studio Setup Installer to handle creation of the msi files.. What needs to happen first is the installer needs to check to see if MYSQL is installed on the host system and verify server name.. If true then import database, if not then install followed by import database... The importing is not the issue here... How do I make the installer install mysql with controlled parameters such as server name, etc, etc. Any ideas on this??? I have hammered google for the past 3 hours looking for bread crumbs on this but to no avail...
Usually existing packages (like the MySQL installer) are added as prerequisites. Visual Studio setup projects do not support custom prerequisite creation. However, this can be done by manually generating the required manifests.
You can find the manifests structure here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms229223(VS.80).aspx
These manifests can be generated automatically with the Bootstrapper Manifest Generator tool.
After generating the package manifests, you can add all these files (including the package) in a separate folder in the Visual Studio prerequisites folder, for example:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v7.0A\Bootstrapper\Packages\
You can then select the prerequisite in your setup project properties page.
Well... that's a good question. The first thing that pops up in my mind:
You could build the check in your application instead of the installer and warn the user about it. If needed, you could provide another installer to make sure everything is available (MySQL and the database itself).
I hope it helps you further.
Yours sincerely,
Roland
The issue of importance here is installing and using MySQL on my iMac. To my knowledge, OS X (currently running OS X 10.5.8) has the Apache web server, Perl and PHP already installed (I've verified that by experiment). It does not have MySQL installed however and I'd like to install it.
I stumbled upon a couple versions of the Apache, Perl, PHP, MySQL bundle known by various names such as MAMP, XAMP and XAMPP. XAMPP seems to be the best of the bunch, but that's somewhat irrelevant to the discussion. What I'd like to know is if I install, say XAMPP, will this affect the built-in Apache, Perl and PHP instances installed on the machine? I don't want to mess those up in any way (i.e. will installing XAMPP change those installations?). If it's a separate install, could there be conflicts of some sort between the built-in Apache and the one installed from XAMPP?
In case it isn't obvious, I know next to nothing about web servers or their configuration.
See earlier SO question: XAMPP or MAMP on Mac OS X 10.6.2 (Snow Leopard)
Read the docs: XAMPP - and Bitnami for that matter http://bitnami.org/stacks - don't change or impact current OS X installs of apache, php, etc.
XAMPP docs say that XAMPP "comes as a Mac OS X Installer package which contains all the necessary files and requires no dependencies."
Regarding BitNami, I'd like to mention that if the installer detects any software running in the default port (for instance if you have your own Apache server running in your system), it will asked you to select a different port for BitNami and it will configure the new server using that port. You don't need to manually configure it after the installation, it is automatically done.