How to execute set command without printing output on the screen? I want to read a file without displaying the contents on the screen.
set a [open "giri.txt" r]
set b [read $ifile]
What you're observing is just the standard behaviour of an interactive Tcl shell: each Tcl command returns a result value, and a return code. If the Tcl shell is interactive (that is, its input and output streams are connected to a terminal), after executing each command, the string representation of the result value the command returned is printed, and then the prompt is shown again. If the shell is not interactive, no results are printed and no prompt is shown.
(On a side note, such behaviour is ubiquitous with interpreters — various Unix shells, Python and Ruby interpreters do the same thing.)
If you want to inhibit such printouts in an interactive session (comes in handy from time to time), a simple hack to achieve that is to chain the command you want to "silence" with a "silent" command (producing a value whose string representation is an empty string), for instance:
set a [open "giri.txt" r]; list
Here, the list returned by the list command having no arguments is an empty list whose string representation is an empty string. In an interactive shell, this chain of commands will output literally nothing.
It bears repeating that such a hack might only ever be needed in an interactive session — do not use it in scripts.
In Mentor ModelSim Tcl it is possible to do:
quietly set answer 42
Also in Mentor Questa:
help quietly
The quietly command turns off transcript echoing for the specified command.
You can turn this off in an interactive tclsh
set tcl_interactive false
but that will also turn off the prompt.
Related
I have a program read from stdin and process it. ( like "tee /some/file" )
This program wait stdin end to exit itself.
If I spawn it from Expect, after I send many content, how to send an "EOF" to the program?
there is a close command in Expect, but it will also send a SIGHUP, and can not expect program output anymore.
Expect works (on non-Windows) by using a virtual terminal which the spawned program runs within. This means that you can do things by sending character sequences to simulate keys. In particular, the EOF control sequence is done with Ctrl+D, which becomes the character U+000004. The terminal processes this to turn it into a true EOF.
There's a few ways to write it, depending on which escape sequence you prefer, but one of these will work:
# Hexadecimal-encoded escape
send \x04
# Octal-encoded escape
send \004
# UNICODE escape (also hexadecimal)
send \u0004
# Generate by a command
send [format "%c" 4]
When Expect is using Tcl 8.6, these all generate the same bytecode so use whichever you prefer.
I am confused as to why Sublime Text 2 build systems tend to put the exec command as an array. Though this is suggested in the docs (and works), just putting the command as a string works just as well, and is (in my opinion) more straightforward.
The Sublime Text build system uses subprocess.Popen, which recommends the usage of an array. Otherwise the interpretation is platform-dependent.
Cited from the python 2 subprocess documentation:
args should be a sequence of program arguments or else a single string. By default, the program to execute is the first item in args if args is a sequence. If args is a string, the interpretation is platform-dependent (...). Unless otherwise stated, it is recommended to pass args as a sequence.
Additional important cite (thanks #Dimpl for pointing that out):
The shell argument (which defaults to False) specifies whether to use the shell as the program to execute. If shell is True, it is recommended to pass args as a string rather than as a sequence.
The shell argument is set True if you use the shell_cmd and False for cmd. Hence based on the cites I would suggest to use an array for cmd and a string for shell_cmd.
I have a Tcl program where I often find expressions of the following kind:
proc func {} {...}
...
lappend arr([set v [func]]) $v
The intended meaning of the last line is
set v [func]
lappend arr($v) $v
It obviously works. What I would like to know: Does it work "by accident", or does Tcl guarantee, that the first parameter passed to lappend is evaluated before the second?
Tcl is always evaluated from left to right as you can read on the documentation, I quote the part:
Substitutions take place from left to right, and each substitution is evaluated completely before attempting to evaluate the next. Thus, a sequence like:
set y [set x 0][incr x][incr x]
will always set the variable y to the value, 012.
Agreed with Jerry. Adding some flavor in it.
Tcl commands are evaluated in two steps : parsing & execution.
First the Tcl interpreter parses the command string into words, performing substitutions along the way.
Then a command procedure processes the words to produce a result string. Each command has a separate command procedure.
Let us consider the following code.
%set input "The cat in the hat"
The cat in the hat
%string match "*at in*" $input
1
In the parsing step the Tcl interpreter applies the rules described in this chapter to divide the command up into words and perform substitutions.
Parsing is done in exactly the same way for every command. During the parsing step the Tcl interpreter does not apply any meaning to the values of the words. Tcl just performs a set of simple string operations such as replacing the characters $a with the string stored in variable a. Tcl does not know or care whether a or the resulting word is a number or the name of a widget or anything else.
In the execution step meaning is applied to the words of the command. Tcl treats the first word as a command name, checking to see if the command is defined and locating a command procedure to carry out its function. If the command is defined then the Tcl interpreter invokes its command procedure, passing all of the words of the command to the command procedure. The command procedure is free to interpret the words in any way that it pleases, and different commands apply very different meanings to their arguments.
Major rule to remember here
Tcl parses a command and makes substitutions in a single pass from left to right. Each character is scanned exactly once.
At most a single layer of substitution occurs for each character; the result of one substitution is not scanned for further
substitutions.
Reference : Tcl and the Tk Toolkit
I am running a shell script which emits lots of line while executing...they are just status output rather than the actual output....
I want them to be displayed on a JTextArea. I am working on jython. The piece of my code looks like:
self.console=JTextArea(20,80)
cmd = "/Users/name/galaxy-dist/run.sh"
p = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,stderr=subprocess.PIPE, shell=True)
self.console.append(p.stdout.read())
This will wait until the command finishes and prints the output. But I want to show the realtime out put to mimic the console. Anybody have the idea ?
You're making things more complicated than they need to be. The Popen docs state the following about the stream arguments:
With the default settings of None, no redirection will occur; the child’s file handles will be inherited from the parent. [my emphasis]
Therefore, if you want the subprocess' output to go to your stdout, simply leave those arguments blank:
subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True)
In fact, you aren't using any of the more advanced features of the Popen constructor, and this particular example doesn't need any parsing by the shell, so you can simplify it further with the subprocess.call() function:
subprocess.call(cmd)
If you still want the return code, simply set a variable equal to this call:
return_code = subprocess.call(cmd)
>> set signal_name [get_fanout abc_signal]
{xyz_blah_blah}
>> echo $signal_name
#142
>> set signal_name [get_fanout abc_signal]
{xyz_blah_blah}
>> echo $signal_name
#144
>>
I tried other stuff like catch etc, and every where, it returns #number. My goal is to be able to print the actual value instead of the number - xyz_blah_blah.
I am new to tcl. Want to understand, if this is an array or a pointer to an array or something like that. When I try the exact same thing with a different command, which returns just a value, then it works. This is a new command which returns value in parenthesis.
Please help. Thanks.
Every Tcl command produces a result value, which you capture and use by putting the call of the command in [square brackets] and putting the whole lot as part of an argument to another command. Thus, in:
set signal_name [get_fanout abc_signal]
the result of the call to get_fanout is used as the second argument to set. I suggest that you might also like to try doing this:
puts "-->[get_fanout abc_signal]<--"
It's just the same, except this time we're concatenating it with some other small string bits and printing the whole lot out. (In case you're wondering, the result of puts itself is always the empty string if there isn't an error, and set returns the contents of the variable.)
If that is still printing the wrong value (as well as the right one beforehand, without arrow marks around it) the real issue may well be that get_fanout is not doing what you expect. While it is possible to capture the standard output of a command, doing so is a considerably more advanced technique; it is probably better to consider whether there is an alternate mechanism to achieve what you want. (The get_fanout command is not a standard part of the Tcl language library or any very common add-on library like Tk or the Tcllib collection, so we can only guess at its behavior.)