is there any chance to translate Interbase/Firebird exception messages ? For eg. I have Exception
TOO_MANY_CONNECTS 'There are to many connect to database, please try again later.'
And now clients from other country (for eg. Russia) want to see exception message in their native lang.
I know that FireBird 2.1 allow to put custom exception message (and it solves my problem), but InterBase 7.5 don't.
Thanks.
Related
It seems catching System.ServiceModel.EndpointNotFoundException doesn't work in orchestrations despite of:
port settings: Delivery Notification = Transmitted (it should work without this in two-way port)
catching exception in specific order
catching Microsoft.XLANGs.BaseTypes.DeliveryFailureException
catching super class exception CommunicationObjectFaultedException like here
scope in scope configuration like here
Orchestration only catches System.Exception. Is that bug or am I missing something?
EDIT :
My configuration:
Sendport WCF-WebHttp
Endpoint REST
I managed to put Microsoft.XLANGs.Core.XlangSoapException catch type by editing odx file in notepad (its hack!)- and This actually works as I want becasue
this type encapsulates System.ServiceModel.EndpointNotFoundException by Biztalk I persume.
This type of exception is thrown in orchesration but VS doesnt let me choose this type of exception I believe that is done in purpose to not to do that.
I have a problem in catching the exceptions in my spring integration application.
Flow of operations in my application.
Http:inbound gateway which receives the request (error-channel defined to my custom error channel)
Service Activator for basic validations (Exceptions which are thrown from here are handled by error-channel defined on the GW)
splitter
Aggregator
Exceptions on my splitter or Aggregator are not handled by my error channel. why?
Steps taken:
I added a chain and included a header enricher and specified an error channel just before the splitter.
After this, any exception on my splitter is handled by my error channel mentioned in the header enricher.
<chain input-channel="invitations">
<header-enricher>
<error-channel ref="failed-invitations" />
</header-enricher>
<int:splitter ref="payloadSplitter" />
</chain>
But the same doesnt work when do the same on my Aggregator. why?
Whenever there is an exception in my code, it retries and gets executed more than one time. why?
I have a "errorChannel" defined which logs the exceptions. it doesnt work.
I know the thread is too old, but I was also facing a similar issue and found I declared error-channel in header-enricher but not provide 'overwrite="true"' as a parameter. And after providing 'overwrite="true"'it is working as needed. I am surprised why spring integration does not provide an overwrite=true by default.
Let us know this is what solution you did in your old code? So everyone can find out the solution for such a scenario.
Every once in a while, at random times my software crashes due to a an exception with this message:
"Additional information: The runtime has encountered a fatal error. The address of the error was at 0x72938d57, on thread 0xe34. The error code is 0xc0000005. This error may be a bug in the CLR or in the unsafe or non-verifiable portions of user code. Common sources of this bug include user marshaling errors for COM-interop or PInvoke, which may corrupt the stack.
If there is a handler for this exception, the program may be safely continued."
It is begin generated from the .net RSACryptoServiceProvider.Encrypt method.
To take a look at it refer to https://github.com/HadiModarres/MRelay/blob/master/ConsoleApplication9/EncryptedRelay.fs line 94
my question is why is this happening and what can I do to catch exceptions that are generated from unmanaged code like this
Reposting from comment:
rsa.Encrypt is not thread-safe.
Does anybody know how to print full stack trace on the Browser, when a Runtime Exception occurs in MULE..??
When a runtime Exception occurs, MULE throws a 500 Server Error to the client , but shows no details to the client. It prints the whole stack trace in Console or Log Files (like the following) :
Root Exception stack trace:
java.sql.SQLException: Invalid column name
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleStatement.getColumnIndex(OracleStatement.java:3677)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleResultSetImpl.findColumn(OracleResultSetImpl.java:2749)
at oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleResultSet.getString(OracleResultSet.java:494)
+ 3 more (set debug level logging or '-Dmule.verbose.exceptions=true'
for everything)
Can i show the same stack Trace on the Browser (to the client)..??
And if possible , then also tell me how to switch ON or OFF printing of Stack Trace on Browser..??
(It may be possible that sometime in future , i dont want to show stack trace on browser)
Yes this is possible. I assume you are using a regular HTTP endpoint and this is a REST type service(?) If so, you can simply put a try/catch around the code causing the exception and return whatever text you want.
There are also exception strategies (http://www.mulesoft.org/documentation/display/MULE3USER/Error+Handling) for doing more sophisticated error handling, but it sounds like you are looking for the simple answer above.
If this doesn't answer your question, please provide more info about your mule config and the service that is raising the exception.
There is nothing out of the box in Mule to do that. You have to implement an exception handler that will format the stacktrace in the Message exception payload and return it to the caller.
In your case, the HTTP transport has a particularity that can be found in the HttpMessageReceiver code:
try
{
conn.writeResponse(processRequest(request));
}
catch (Exception e)
{
...
conn.writeResponse(buildFailureResponse(request.getRequestLine().getHttpVersion(), httpStatus, e.getMessage()));
This means that when an exception crops-up to the top level, the creation of the failure message response is not customizable: you get this pretty technical message back and that is all.
I see two options to solve your problem:
sub-class HttpMessageReceiver and make the response message customizable in your version,
drop the HTTP transport in favor of the Jetty one (look at the bookstore example) and customize the response error messages at the web container level.
I'm looking for a way to catch the actual exception thrown by BizTalk 2006 R2 when a receive port can't parse a message it picks up.
For example, I have a csv file that was not properly created, say it's missing a comma, so when BizTalk tries to determine the message type, it errors out. Without using failed message routing, there are 2 entries in the application event log. One has a pretty generic error description, something along the lines of "The Messaging Engine encountered an error during the processing of one or more inbound messages." The second entry has what I'm looking for. It will contain the details of where the missing comma is, something along the lines of "Unexpected data found while looking for:
','
The current definition being parsed is POSTrailer. The stream offset where the error occured is 44443. The line number where the error occured is 244. The column where the error occured is 1."
I've tried using the ESB toolkit Exception Handler for BizTalk 2006 R2. Using failed message routing and their exception handing framework, the error description it catches is the first, generic, error description.
I do not see any way to obtain the second, more detailed error description. I'm assuming somewhere in the bowels of the biztalk messaging engine this exception is getting thrown, which is caught by something a little bit higher in the process, which throws it's own generic biztalk exception. I would also assume that the more specific error description is contained as the inner exception of the exception that gets routed to the ESB toolkit, however by the time I can get a hold of it, as far as I can tell, the actual exception object has been replaced by the message context, which is nothing more than a bunch of name/value pairs. The error description is now the generic one that is not helpful, and anything resembling an inner exception is just a hexidecmal code, which means nothing to my end users.
Everything I've found regarding obtaining a specific error message deals with exceptions thrown from an orchestration. I am not dealing with an orchestration, though, I'm dealing with a receive port. The closest thing I can find is here. But even if I could create a custom pipeline component using that, that means I either need to add that component into every exising custom pipline, or create a new one to validate XML and use that instead of the XMLRecieve or XMLSend pipelines that come with BizTalk... That also means trapping errors generated from EDI is out of the question. Does anyone know of a way to get at this more detailed error description from the BizTalk generated error message?
I'm not sure of a tool that will do exactly what you're looking for, but I do have a couple of options.
1) I'm pretty sure SCOM can grab those errors and alert whoever needs to be alerted. I've had some problems with this in the past, though, so it may not be your best bet.
2) For basic Failure handling, you can write code to scrape the EventLog for any warning or error from BizTalk and pass that down the line (my current client does this- it's not super elegant, but it works well).
3) What I would encourage- if you don't want orchestrations- is to set up custom pipelines which simply implement your error handling/monitoring in addition to your normal operations. Then, for non-critical messages, you can still use the standard pipelines (reducing overhead/latency) and for critical messages you can use your "GuaranteedDeliveryPassThruPipeline" or your "GuaranteedDeliveryXMLTransmitPipeline" or whatever.