OK, in good old fashioned PHP MVC, I might use a model to hit the DB, send info to my PHP controller that I pass on to the View. In the View, I might take that info (say i ajax'ed my controller for the info) and create a table or ul to display the data returned.
I've had trouble finding any modern (ver 6.1 is what i'm on) tutorial to show me how to preform this action in typo3.
Can anyone just "steer" me in the right direction? Perhaps provide an example via answer, or some links to further information that may compare it down to "old fashioned MVC"?
Extension has been suggested, but I'd like to know the very base process of what I'm asking before I try writing some extension, unless the extension is the only way. Although, my table is now on the SAME DB my typo3 is on, so shouldn't there be some command to just simply call my table and get the rows? Maybe send them to a ###sub-part###?
You can use a typoscript cObj content and the select option together with the function render_obj when your table name is like the typo3 nameing convention. The select pulls the record from the table and pass it to the render_obj function. It's a function that can apply to all cObj and iterate over the entire selection. stdWrap works only on the entire cObj. When you need to work through each record you need the render_obj function. For example:
10 = CONTENT
10 {
select {
pidInList = 1
where = colpos=1
orderBy = sorting
}
table = tt_content
renderObj.stdWrap.wrap = <li>|</li>
renderObj.stdWrap.required = 1
}
10.stdWrap.wrap = <ul>|</ul>
This gives you an unorderd list from the tt_content table with pid=1 and the content from the far left column.
Related
I'm working on a project where users could upload excel files into a MySQL database. Those files are the main source of our data as they come directly from the contractors working with the company. They contain a large number of rows (23000 on average for each file) and 100 columns for each row!
The problem I am facing currently is that the same file could be changed by someone (either the contractor or the company) and when re-uploading it, my system should detect changes, update the actual data, and save the action (The fact that the cell went from a value to another value :: oldValue -> newValue) so we can go back and run a versions comparison (e.g 3 re-uploads === 3 versions). (oldValue Version1 VS newValue Version5)
I developed a tiny mechanism for saving the changes => I have a table to save Imports data (each time a user import a file a new row will be inserted in this table) and another table for saving the actual changes
Versioning data
I save the id of the row that have some changes, as well as the id and the table where the actual data was modified (Uploading a file results in a insertion in multiple tables, so whenever a change occurs, I need to know in which table that happened). I also save the new value and the old value which is gonna help me with restoring the "archives data".
To restore a version : SELECT * FROM 'Archive' WHERE idImport = ${versionNumber}
To restore a version for one row : SELECT * FROM 'Archive' WHERE idImport = ${versionNumber} and rowId = ${rowId}
To restore all version for one row : SELECT * FROM 'Archive' WHERE rowId = ${rowId}
To restore version for one table : SELECT * FROM 'Archine' WHERE tableName = ${table}
Etc.
Now with this structure, I'm struggling to restore a version or to run a comparaison between two versions, which makes think that I've came up with a wrong approach since it makes it hard to do the job! I am trying to know if anyone had done this before or what a good approach would look like?
Cases when things get really messy :
The rows that have changed in a version might not have changed in the other version (I am working on a time machine to search in other versions when this happens)
The rows have changed in both versions but not the same fields. (Say we have a user table, the data of the user with id 15 have changed in 2nd and 5th upload, great! Now for the second version only the name was changed, but for the fifth version his address was changed! When comparing these two versions, we will run into a problem constrcuting our data array. name went from "some"-> NULL (Name was never null. No name changes in 5th version) and address went from NULL -> "some' is which obviously wrong).
My actual approach (php)
<?php
//Join records sets and Compare them
foreach ($firstRecord as $frecord) {
//Retrieve first record fields that have changed
$fFields = $frecord->fieldName;
//Check if the same record have changed in the second version as well
$sId = array_search($frecord->idRecord, $secondRecord);
if($sId) {
$srecord = $secondRecord[$sId];
//Retrieve straversee fields that have changed
$sFields = $srecord->fieldName;
//Compare the two records fields
foreach ($fFields as $fField) {
$sfId = array_search($fField, $sFields);
//The same field for the same record was changed in both version (perfect case)
if($sfId) {
$sField = $sFields[$sfId];
$deltaRow[$fField]["oldValue"] = $frecord->deltaValue;
$deltaRow[$fField]["newValue"] = $srecord->deltaValue;
//Delete the checked field from the second version traversee to avoid re-checking
unset($sField[$sfId]);
}
//The changed field in V1 was not found in V2 -> Lookup for a value
else {
$deltaRow[$fField]["oldValue"] = $frecord->deltaValue;
$deltaRow[$fField]["newValue"] = $this->valueLookUp();
}
}
$dataArray[] = $deltaRow;
//Delete the checked record from the second version set to avoid re-checking
unset($secondRecord[$srecord]);
}
I don't know how to deal with that, as I said I m working on a value lookup algorithm so when no data found in a version I will try to find it in the versions between theses two so I can construct my data array. I would be very happy if anyone could give some hints, ideas, improvements so I can go futher with that.
Thank you!
Is there a way to store database modifications with a versioning feature (for eventual versions comparaison [sic!])?
What constitutes versioning depends on the database itself and how you make use of it.
As far as a relational database is concerned (e.g. MariaDB), this boils down to the so called Normal Form which is in numbers.
On Database Normalization: 5th Normal Form and Beyond you can find the following guidance:
Beyond 5th normal form you enter the heady realms of domain key normal form, a kind of theoretical ideal. Its practical use to a database designer os [sic!] similar to that of infinity to a bookkeeper - i.e. it exists in theory but is not going to be used in practice. Even the most demanding owner is not going to expect that of the bookkeeper!
One strategy to step into these realms is to reach the 5th normal form first (do this just in theory, by going through all the normal forms, and study database normalization).
Additionally you can construe versioning outside and additional to the database itself, e.g. by creating your own versioning system. Reading about what you can do with normalization will help you to find better ways to decide on how to structure and handle the database data for your versioning needs.
However, as written it depends on what you want and need. So no straight forward "code" answer can be given to such a general question.
I am extremely new to Ruby on Rails, having only a couple days of experience. So far, I have created a new app, and loaded data into the database called name which is comprised of date:string, value:decimal, and unique_id:integer. So now, I can go to "(my local port)/name" and view the table successfully.
What I would like to do is this:
In a new html page, have a SIMILE Timeplot (http://www.simile-widgets.org/timeplot/) with an HTML drop-down list below it in order to select a unique_id and another drop-down box to select a year.
From there, I would like to search through the database and display all of the data on the Timeplot that matches the unique_id and that is in the specified year.
I believe I must make an HTTP GET request for a date_to, date_from, and unique_id, but I do not know how to implement this (admittedly I have been searching the web for ages, but could not figure out the solution).
Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you.
Edit: Even just advice on what component to tackle first
First you need to create a route for your search such as this:
match "name/search" to: "name#search" as: "name_search", via: :get
Then if you are using AJAX, and using jQuery you make an HTTP request like this:
$.get("/name/search", {
unique_id: <your_unique_id>,
date_from: <your_date_from>,
date_to: <your_date_to> },
function(result) {
// You do whatever you want with the result here
}
}
P.S:
The Javascript code might not be 100% correct, since I rarely use it.
i'm working in a symfony project and using sfPropelPager to show a paged list of elements.
The problem is that with a great amount of data to list (i.e. thousands of registers) it makes a query to the database for each page to show!!!! That means about 100 extra queries in my case, and that is unacceptable.
Showing some of my code: the function that returns the pager object
$pager = new sfPropelPager('MyTable',sfConfig::get('sfPropelPagerLines'));
$c = new Criteria();
$c->add('my_table_field',$value);
$c->addDescendingOrderByColumn('date');
$pager->setCriteria($c);
$pager->init();
return $pager;
So, please, if you know a way to get all the results with only one query, it would be a great solution for my problem. Otherwise i must implement that list with an ajax call for every page the user wants to see
Thank you very much for your time.
I'm not sure to get your problem but, anyway, avoid the use of Criteria. Try to make queries with the ModelCriteria API: http://www.propelorm.org/reference/model-criteria.html.
For each paginated page, a query to the database will be done, this is the standard behavior for all pagers I know. If it's related to related objects (assuming you want to display information from relations), you may want to create a query that links those objects before to paginate, that way you'll get one query per page for all your data to display.
Read this doc for instance: http://www.propelorm.org/documentation/03-basic-crud.html#query_termination_methods
At last i did'nt get a solution for the problem, i had to implement the list via AJAX call, calling to a function that returns the requested page, so at the load of the page, no query for this list is slowing the user experience.
Thank you anyway to help me :)
I am absolute beginner to drupal.
I have added a contact form (using Webform module).
Now I want to save the data entered in the form. But I am lost. I have searched over internet, found db_query() is used to query database.
But I dont know where to write the php code. Please help me or if you know any link,please give me.
The tables you'll be most interested in are webform, webform_submissions, webform_submitted_data and webform_component. Have a look at those tables and it becomes very obvious how they're linked together.
You'll want to look at the Drupal 7 Database API to learn how to use the query system but here's an example to get you going:
/* Get a list of all submissions from webform for the node with ID (`nid`) of 1 */
$nid = 1;
$submissions = db_select('webform_submissions', 'ws')
->fields('ws')
->condition('nid', $nid)
->execute();
/* If you want to use db_query and a plain old SQL statement instead you'd do it like this:
$submissions = db_query('SELECT * FROM webform_submissions WHERE nid = :nid', array('nid' => $nid)); */
/* Loop through the submissions and load up the submitted data for each */
$submission_data = array();
foreach ($submissions as $submission) {
$query = db_select('webform_submitted_data', 'wsa')
->fields('wc', array('name'))
->fields('wsa', array('data'))
->condition('sid', $submission->sid);
/* Join in the component table to get the element label */
$query->join('webform_component', 'wc', 'wc.nid = wsa.nid AND wc.sid = wsa.cid');
$submission_data[] = $query->execute()->fetchAllKeyed();
}
At the end of that code you'll have an array ($submission_data), which contains a list of arrays of submission data for the provided node. Each of those arrays' items has a key of the component label, and a value of the submitted user value.
Hope that helps
It's worth noting that for most normal use cases you'll never need to look at the databases or do any kind of coding. The UI allows you to view submissions of a form (and see what was submitted). You can also configure the Webform to send you a copy of each submission (via email)... There is a lot you can do without "looking under the hood" or messing with the database in any way.
If you are really new to Drupal and Webforms, I just thought I'd point that out. There are a lot of tabs in the UI which might easily be overlooked.
Webform has Views support, so you probably don't really need to write database queries to generate the report you want.
I have the following query
#initial_matches = Listing.find_by_sql(["SELECT * FROM listings WHERE industry = ?", current_user.industry])
Is there a way I can run another SQL query on the selection from the above query using a each do? I want to run geokit calculations to eliminate certain listings that are outside of a specified distance...
Your question is slightly confusing. Do you want to use each..do (ruby) to do the filtering. Or do you want to use a sql query. Here is how you can let the ruby process do the filtering
refined list = #initial_matches.map { |listing|
listing.out_of_bounds? ? nil : listing
}.comact
If you wanted to use sql you could simply add additional sql (maybe a sub-select) it into your Listing.find_by_sql call.
If you want to do as you say in your comment.
WHERE location1.distance_from(location2, :units=>:miles)
You are mixing ruby (location1.distance_from(location2, :units=>:miles)) and sql (WHERE X > 50). This is difficult, but not impossible.
However, if you have to do the distance calculation in ruby already, why not do the filtering there as well. So in the spirit of my first example.
listing2 = some_location_to_filter_by
#refined_list = #initial_matches.map { |listing|
listing.distance_from(listing2) > 50 ? nil : listing
}.compact
This will iterate over all listings, keeping only those that are further than 50 from some predetermined listing.
EDIT: If this logic is done in the controller you need to assign to #refined_list instead of refined_list since only controller instance variables (as opposed to local ones) are accessible to the view.
In short, no. This is because after the initial query, you are not left with a relational table or view, you are left with an array of activerecord objects. So any processing to be done after the initial query has to be in the format of ruby and activerecord, not sql.