I have quite an annoying problem, for which I don't seem to be able to find an easy fix. Consider the following HTML:
<html>
<body>
<div id="page">
<!-- Some HTML here -->
<div id="menu"><!-- Some stuff here --></div>
<!-- Some HTML here -->
</div>
</body>
</html>
With the following CSS:
body {
text-align: center;
}
#page {
margin: 0px auto;
max-width: 1200px;
}
#menu {
width: 100%;
padding: 0px 2000px;
margin-left: -2000px;
}
This would give a centered page div, with a menu bar in there. Thing is, whenever the browser width becomes > 1200px, the div will not grow any further, but the menu div must at all times stretch all the way to the window edges. And the problem with this approach now is, that I get a horizontal scrollbar because the menubar is bigger than the screen. So, I am looking for a solution for this. Something that disables the scrollbar from having impact on the horizontal scrollbar would do. Disabling the horizontal scrollbar isn't an option however, since the content must be scrollable on small devices as well...
I am aware that I could fix this by pulling the menu bar outside of the page div, but that is hard, since I am editing a Drupal theme and I want this change to have as little impact as possible.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions!
What you mean is that you want the div to stay 100% width all the way but to have scrolling inside of it? If so then you should have a wider div inside the main div.
Something like this-
<div id="full-width">
<div id="scrolling-div">
</div>
</div>
<style type="text/css">
#full-width {
float:left;
width:100%;
height:500px;
overflow-x:visible;
}
#scrolling-div {
float:left;
width:300%;
height:500px;
}
</style>
I tested this code, it works :)
You can easy fix this by setting your html and body styling like this:
html, body {
overflow-x:hidden;
}
body {
margin: 0;
}
This should do it with the current code you have now.
I creating an new layout for a personal website.
I'm using Twitter Bootstrap 3, and my initial layout was made using as exemple
the "Bootstrap with sticky footer" sample (http://getbootstrap.com/examples/sticky-footer-navbar/)
This is my html:
<body>
<!-- Wrap all page content here -->
<div id="wrap">
<!-- Begin page navigation -->
<nav id="nav-container" class="navbar navbar-default container" role="navigation">
<div class="container">
<!-- Here I put a very normal Bootstrap 3 navbar -->
</div>
</nav>
<!-- Begin page content -->
<div id="main-container" class="container">
<!-- All my content goes here! -->
</div>
</div>
<!-- Begin page footer -->
<footer id="footer" class="container">
<div class="container">
</div>
</footer>
</body>
The Sticky Footer CSS:
html, body {
height: 100%;
/* The html and body elements cannot have any padding or margin. */
}
/* Wrapper for page content to push down footer */
#wrap {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto;
/* Negative indent footer by its height */
margin: 0 auto -100px;
/* Pad bottom by footer height */
padding: 0 0 100px;
}
/* Set the fixed height of the footer here */
#footer {
height: 100px;
}
And the custom style for my layout:
body {
/* Body's background will be grey */
background-color: #C0C0C0;
}
#main-container {
/* A box where I'll put the content will be white */
background-color: #FFFFFF;
}
#wrap {
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
#main-container {
min-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
This code generate this layout:
But, as you can see, the div #main-container don't grow 'till the end of the layout.
The div keep with the height of his content.
What I want is that this div always fills the entire page, like this:
Many solutions on internet said me to fix min-height to some tested value, but this way
I'll not be able to keep my website responsive (it's very important to me keep my layout
always responsive, that's the main reason I use Bootstrap 3).
Other solution goes to calculate the div height with javascript. Personally I don't like
this solution. I whish I could solve this only by using CSS.
Someone knows how to solve this problem?
As long as you are working on percentage, your site will be responsive. So using
min-height:100% does solve your problem which is just CSS. And if you don't want Javascript involved here, that is the way to go.
See the JS Fiddle DEMO. Your container is filling the entire page.
#main-container {
min-height: 100%;
background: #fff;
}
If you want to have sticky footer AND fullheight #main-container, you have to modify your structure. First, let me explain why you can't solve this with the sticky-footer method you're using right now:
Setting #main-container's height:100% or min-height:100% won't work because you can't use percentage height with a parent whose height is not strictly defined. Note that in the currently accepted answer this is considered a bug but it is not, it's just the way it is supposed to work. In your example #wrap's height is set to auto, so #main-container height just ignores the 100% and fallsback to auto.
To have both sticky footer and REAL fullheight #main-container (instead of faking with background) you have to use display:table and display:table-row. This works because when you use display:table, height:100% works just as your regular min-height:100% and the display:table-rows inside will always stretch to use all the vertical space available.
NOTE: this is different from using html tables, because in this case you don't need to bloat your markup with non-semantic tags, as you'll see in the following example.
Here's the example HTML code:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.css">
</head>
<body>
<div id="maincontainer" class="astable">
<div id="header" class="astablerow">
header
</div>
<div id="middlecontainer" class="astablerow">
content
</div>
<div id="footer" class="astablerow">
footer
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
And here's the CSS
html, body{
margin:0;
padding:0;
height:100%;
}
.astable{
display:table;
height:100%;
table-layout:fixed;
width:100%;
}
.astablerow{
display: table-row;
}
#header{
height:30px;
background-color:#00ff00;
}
#footer{
height:30px;
background-color:#0000ff;
}
#middlecontainer{
background-color:#ff0000;
}
I think that min-height doesn't work due to a reported bug. See this: stackoverflow.com/questions/8468066.
An easy way to create the illusion that #main-container grows till the end, is to set #wrap's background-color the same value as #main-container's.
I am using the following basic html and css pattern (although my live code looks very different)
html, body {height: 100%;}
#wrap {min-height: 100%;}
#main {overflow:auto;
padding-bottom: 150px;} /* must be same height as the footer */
#footer {position: relative;
margin-top: -150px; /* negative value of footer height */
height: 150px;
clear:both;}
/*Opera Fix*/
body:before {
content:"";
height:100%;
float:left;
width:0;
margin-top:-32767px;/
}
<div id="wrap">
<div id="header">
</div>
<div id="main">
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
</div>
to get a sticky footer to the bottom of my page.
I have applied two backgrounds to the body tag. One is a repeating wood texture then a shadow that goes on top. Both of these go under the footer.
It almost works, but on long pages (where you have to scroll down to see the footer) when you resize the browser window the shadow (and not the wood) creeps up the page. I have tried moving the shadow to the bottom right position but that doesnt work at all.
Here is a staging of it:
I have repeated the problem in FF and Safari
http://www.dnbsandbox.com/diablo/
Remove this from the first line of the css:
html {
height: 100%;
}
I have a header element and a content element:
#header
#content
I want the header to be of fixed height and the content to fill up all the remaining height available on the screen, with overflow-y: scroll;.
It this possible without Javascript?
forget all the answers, this line of CSS worked for me in 2 seconds :
height:100vh;
1vh = 1% of browser screen height
source
For responsive layout scaling, you might want to use :
min-height: 100vh
[update november 2018]
As mentionned in the comments, using the min-height might avoid having issues on reponsive designs
[update april 2018] As mentioned in the comments, back in 2011 when the question was asked, not all browsers supported the viewport units.
The other answers were the solutions back then -- vmax is still not supported in IE, so this might not be the best solution for all yet.
The trick to this is specifying 100% height on the html and body elements.
Some browsers look to the parent elements (html, body) to calculate the height.
<html>
<body>
<div id="Header">
</div>
<div id="Content">
</div>
</body>
</html>
html, body
{
height: 100%;
}
#Header
{
width: 960px;
height: 150px;
}
#Content
{
height: 100%;
width: 960px;
}
Actually the best approach is this:
html {
height:100%;
}
body {
min-height:100%;
}
This solves everything for me and it helps me to control my footer and it can have the fixed footer no matter if page is being scrolled down.
Technical Solution - EDITED
Historically, 'height' is tricky thing to mold with, compared to 'width', the easiest. Since css focus on <body> for styling to work. The code above - we gave <html> and <body> a height. This is where magic comes into picture - since we have 'min-height' on playing table, we are telling browser that <body> is superior over <html> because <body> holds the min-height. This in turn, allows <body> to override <html> because <html> had height already earlier. In other words, we are tricking browser to "bump" <html> off the table, so we could style independently.
You can use vh on the min-height property.
min-height: 100vh;
You can do as follows, depending on how you are using the margins...
min-height: calc(100vh - 10px) //Considering you're using some 10px margin top on an outside element
The accepted solution will not actually work.
You will notice that the content div will be equal to the height of its parent, body.
So setting the body height to 100% will set it equal to the height of the browser window. Let's say the browser window was 768px in height, by setting the content div height to 100%, the div's height will in turn be 768px. Thus, you will end up with the header div being 150px and the content div being 768px. In the end you will have content 150px below the bottom of the page. For another solution, check out this link.
With HTML5 you can do this:
CSS:
body, html{ width:100%; height:100%; padding: 0; margin: 0;}
header{ width:100%; height: 70px; }
section{ width: 100%; height: calc(100% - 70px);}
HTML:
<header>blabablalba </header>
<section> Content </section>
For me, the next worked well:
I wrapped the header and the content on a div
<div class="main-wrapper">
<div class="header">
</div>
<div class="content">
</div>
</div>
I used this reference to fill the height with flexbox. The CSS goes like this:
.main-wrapper {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
min-height: 100vh;
}
.header {
flex: 1;
}
.content {
flex: 1;
}
For more info about the flexbox technique, visit the reference
Please let me add my 5 cents here and offer a classical solution:
html {height:100%;}
body {height:100%; margin:0;}
#idOuter {position:relative; width:100%; height:100%;}
#idHeader {position:absolute; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px red;}
#idContent {position:absolute; overflow-y:scroll; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px green;}
<div id="idOuter">
<div id="idHeader" style="height:30px; top:0;">Header section</div>
<div id="idContent" style="top:36px; bottom:0;">Content section</div>
</div>
This will work in all browsers, no script, no flex. Open snippet in full page mode and resize browser: desired proportions are preserved even in fullscreen mode.
Note:
Elements with different background color can actually cover
each other. Here I used solid border to ensure that elements are placed
correctly.
idHeader.height and idContent.top are adjusted to include border,
and should have the same value if border is not used. Otherwise
elements will pull out of the viewport, since calculated width does
not include border, margin and/or padding.
left:0; right:0; can be replaced by width:100% for the same
reason, if no border used.
Testing in separate page (not as a snippet) does not require any
html/body adjustment.
In IE6 and earlier versions we must add padding-top and/or
padding-bottom attributes to #idOuter element.
To complete my answer, here is the footer layout:
html {height:100%;}
body {height:100%; margin:0;}
#idOuter {position:relative; width:100%; height:100%;}
#idContent {position:absolute; overflow-y:scroll; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px green;}
#idFooter {position:absolute; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px blue;}
<div id="idOuter">
<div id="idContent" style="bottom:36px; top:0;">Content section</div>
<div id="idFooter" style="height:30px; bottom:0;">Footer section</div>
</div>
And here is the layout with both header and footer:
html {height:100%;}
body {height:100%; margin:0;}
#idOuter {position:relative; width:100%; height:100%;}
#idHeader {position:absolute; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px red;}
#idContent {position:absolute; overflow-y:scroll; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px green;}
#idFooter {position:absolute; left:0; right:0; border:solid 3px blue;}
<div id="idOuter">
<div id="idHeader" style="height:30px; top:0;">Header section</div>
<div id="idContent" style="top:36px; bottom:36px;">Content section</div>
<div id="idFooter" style="height:30px; bottom:0;">Footer section</div>
</div>
You can also set the parent to display: inline. See http://codepen.io/tommymarshall/pen/cECyH
Be sure to also have the height of html and body set to 100%, too.
The accepted answer does not work. And the highest voted answer does not answer the actual question. With a fixed pixel height header, and a filler in the remaining display of the browser, and scroll for owerflow. Here is a solution that actually works, using absolute positioning. I also assume that the height of the header is known, by the sound of "fixed header" in the question. I use 150px as an example here:
HTML:
<html>
<body>
<div id="Header">
</div>
<div id="Content">
</div>
</body>
</html>
CSS:(adding background-color for visual effect only)
#Header
{
height: 150px;
width: 100%;
background-color: #ddd;
}
#Content
{
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 150px;
bottom: 0;
background-color: #aaa;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
For a more detailed look how this works, with actual content inside the #Content, have a look at this jsfiddle, using bootstrap rows and columns.
In this instance I want my main content div to be liquid height so that the whole page takes up 100% of the browser height.
height: 100vh;
Unless you need to support IE 9 and below, I would use flexbox
body { display: flex; flex-direction: column; }
.header { height: 70px; }
.content { flex: 1 1 0 }
You also need to get body to fill the whole page
body, html{ width:100%; height:100%; padding: 0; margin: 0;}
CSS PLaY | cross browser fixed header/footer/centered single column layout
CSS Frames, version 2: Example 2, specified width | 456 Berea Street
One important thing is that although this sounds easy, there's going to be quite a bit of ugly code going into your CSS file to get an effect like this. Unfortunately, it really is the only option.
#Header
{
width: 960px;
height: 150px;
}
#Content
{
min-height:100vh;
height: 100%;
width: 960px;
}
The best solution I found so far is setting a footer element at the bottom of the page and then evaluate the difference of the offset of the footer and the element we need to expand.
e.g.
The html file
<div id="contents"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
The css file
#footer {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
}
The js file (using jquery)
var contents = $('#contents');
var footer = $('#footer');
contents.css('height', (footer.offset().top - contents.offset().top) + 'px');
You might also like to update the height of the contents element on each window resize, so...
$(window).on('resize', function() {
contents.css('height', (footer.offset().top -contents.offset().top) + 'px');
});
Have you tried something like this?
CSS:
.content {
height: 100%;
display: block;
}
HTML:
<div class=".content">
<!-- Content goes here -->
</div>
I have the following HTML to build a 900 pixel wide, centered page, with a header, footer and content section:
<body>
<div id="mainMaster">
<div id="main">
<form runat="server">
<div id="header">
</div>
<div id="content">
</div>
</form>
</div>
</div>
<div id="footer">
</div>
</body>
The layout is styled with the following (approx) CSS:
html, body
{
height: 100%;
}
#mainMaster
{
min-height: 100%;
background: url(../Images/Background.png);
}
#main
{
width: 930px;
margin: 0 auto;
height:auto !important; /* real browsers */
height:100%; /* IE6: treaded as min-height*/
min-height:100%; /* real browsers */
}
#header
{
}
#footer
{
background-image:none;
background-color:White;
position: relative;
margin-top: -80px; /* negative value of footer height */
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
width: 930px;
height: 80px;
clear: both;
}
#content
{
position:relative;
overflow:hidden;
height:100%;
background-image:none;
background-color:White;
}
The CSS was originally based on a layout I found on the internet for 'sticky footers'. It worked perfectly with a sticky footer, but then I came across these problems:
1) The 'content' is never stretched to full size. This is a big problem on some of my pages because internal controls are set to a height of 100%. Since content isn't stretched, the controls show up all squeeshed.
2) I just added a background image and colour. This background should not show up in the middle content panes. Because the 'content' isn't fully stretched I get the background image showing in the wrong places.
I prefer a CSS only fix for this (ie. no hacks or JS). Any help?
I would expect removing the #mainMaster <div> and moving its background image into #main's CSS would sort your problem out:
<body>
<div id="main">
<form runat="server">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
</form>
</div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</body>
The problem you're running into is that #main's parent (#mainMaster) doesn't have an explicit height declared. Percentage heights only work properly when the elements parent has a height defined.
Try using min-height CSS property to set a minimum height for your content.
Adding a specific background color to #content and #header should prevent the background image from displaying in those areas. Not sure why the content isn't filling up the area, when you say "stretched" do you mean to a height of 100%? Browsers won't recognize a height of 100% without using js.