I have some confusion about the storage of html5 vs web browser storage
the thing which is confusing me is that when we say that html5 storage what do we mean by it and what do we mean when we say web browser storage are they different things or same thing with different Terminalogies kindly correct me
HTML 5 added additional storage options that allow you to store a lot more data. They are localStorage and sessionStorage
In the past your only option was "cookies," which were not reliable beyond a 100K or so. At best these would just save a session pointer, with most of the data actually stored on a server. Unlike cookies, localStorage isn't bound by an expiration date.
"Web browser storage" is a generic term, that doesn't necessarily mean cookies. Your two basic options are server storage (database, flat files, etc) or web browser storage (cookies, HTML5 localStorage, sessionStorage, page variables, etc).
Related
I am developing a mobile application using Sencha Touch. My app needs to store some data (which comes from a database, in JSON format) in the device itself, so that the app retains its previous state if it's closed and rerun.
Is HTML 5 localstorage the best possible solution?
What are its limitations/shortcomings?
If I delete the browser cookies, will I also lose the locally saved data?
What alternative do I have other than to save in web browser's cache?
LocalStorage is a viable solution, along with IndexedDB. LocalStorage is supported in more browsers, but only supports storage of strings in Name/Value pairs. Here are the support tables:
LocalStorage Support
IndexedDB Support
Another option would be SequelSphere, an HTML5 Relational Database Engine that uses LocalStorage and IndexedDB to store its data. It also has an Extension for Ext JS 4 (Sencha's big brother), and a Sencha Extension in the works. Even without an extension, it can store your data locally, provide SQL access, and put the data in a form for easy use by Sencha. As a disclaimer: I work for SequelSphere. That's how I know a Sencha extension is in the works.
When it comes to reliability, all forms of client side data storage are reliant upon the end user not clearing the data from their browser. Please note: this is usually a different option than clearing the browser's cookies.
I had a doubt regarding HTML5 storage technologies like WebSQL, WebStorage/LocalStorage, and indexedDB and to a lesser extent appCache.
Considering the case of chrome (my default browser), these stores are maintained in chrome browser's own directory. Do they impact the starting-up time of the browser?
A colleague has said to experience browser slowing down or behaving in sluggish manner when a larger amount of data is stored.
Couldn't find references to how these technologies impact the browser working, so would love if any fellow-stacker could guide me.
Be careful : the WebSQL API is dead (it was based on sqlite instead of a generic API and so was judged not desirable by the Mozilla team, the Indexed Database API will be used instead but you should probably wait for it to be more supported).
LocalStorage is fine, I use it in all my web applications without problems nor measurable boot time. But keep it for parameters, preferences, and so on, as the only reliable storage is always server side. The local storage can be removed, lost, modified, not readable for many reasons (user uses another browser or computer for example). And it seems to me that a big local storage is a burden to the user and thus not very correct (which is probably the reason why this size is limited).
BTW, there is no reason a reasonnable local storage could slow in a measurable manner the launching of a browser.
I agree with dystroy; Normally the local storing is harmless if done the right way. Storing MASSIVE amounts of data in the browser on the other hand is quite discouraged. It won't slow down the browser performance overall but will slow down the web app using it (as far as I know, Chrome fetches the local storage values dynamically when the 'owner app' is called).
How long can I expect data to be kept in localStorage. How long will an average user's localStorage data persist? If the user doesn't clear it, will it last till a browser re-install?
Is this consistent across browsers?
localStorage is also known as Web Storage, HTML5 Storage, and DOM Storage (these all mean the same thing).
localStorage.setItem('bob', varMyData);
sessionStorage.setItem('bob', varMyData);
localStorage is similar to sessionStorage, except that data stored in localStorage has no expiration time, while data stored in sessionStorage gets cleared when the browsing session ends (i.e. when the browser / browser tab is closed). (See Limitations section below for up-to-date storage size limitations.)
Session storage is used much less often than localStorage, and exists only within the current browser tab - even two tabs loaded with the same website will have different sessionStorage data. sessionStorage data survives page refresh, but not closing/opening the tab. LocalStorage data, on the other hand, is shared between all tabs and windows from the same origin. LocalStorage data does not expire; it remains after the browser is restarted and even after OS reboot.
localStorage is available on all browsers, but persistence is not consistently implemented. In particular, localStorage can be cleared by user action and may be cleared inadvertently (who would think that clearing all cookies also clears localStorage?).
In Firefox, localStorage is cleared when these three conditions are met: (a) user clears recent history, (b) cookies are selected to be cleared, (c) time range is "Everything" -- or when LocalStorage is full - see "Limitations" section below.
In Chrome, localStorage is cleared when these conditions are met: (a) clear browsing data, (b) "cookies and other site data" is selected, (c) timeframe is "from beginning of time" -- or when LocalStorage is full (see "Limitations" section below). In Chrome, it is also now possible to delete localStorage for one specific site.
In IE, to clear localStorage: (a) Tools--Internet Options, (b) General tab, (c) delete browsing history on exit, (d) ensure "Cookies and website data" (or "temporary internet files and website files") is selected, (e) consider unchecking "Preserve Favorites website data" at the top
In Safari: (a) Click Safari (b) Preferences (c) Select the Privacy tab (d) Click Remove all website data (e) Click Remove Now
Opera: Despite excellent articles on localStorage from the Opera site, I haven't yet found clear (non-programmatic) instructions to users on how to clear localStorage. If anyone finds, please leave a comment below this answer with reference link.
Limitations:
TOTAL localStorage is limited to 50% of free disk space.
ALSO, the localStorage for any one "origin" (domain + any subdomains) is (theoretically) limited to 20% of total localStorage - in practice, though, the localStorage for one domain (as of Oct/2022) is:
minimum: 10Mb
maximum: 2Gb Source
actual: 5Mb (limit on my system with 6Gb free space, per a modified version of this script )
(Test System: i7 / 32Gb / 500Gb SSD w 6Gb free / Brave browser:
Version 1.45.133 Chromium: 107.0.5304.141 (Official Build) (64-bit)
When the TOTAL localStorage is full, then the browser will start clearing out data (called "origin eviction") based on an LRU policy — the Least Recently Used domain will be deleted first, then the next one, until the browser is no longer over the limit.
Note that this origin eviction process will delete an entire domain's worth of data until the storage amount goes under the limit again. Deletion of a domain's localStorage data is "all-or-nothing" -- there is no trimming effect put in place to delete parts of origins (domains) because partial data could be much worse than no data.
The Opera dev site has an excellent summary of localStorage:
The current way of storing data on the client-side — cookies — is a
problem:
Low size: Cookies generally have a maximum size of around 4 KB, which
is not much good for storing any kind of complex data
It’s difficult for cookies to keep track of two or more transactions on the same
site, which might be happening in two or more different tabs
Cookies
can be exploited using techniques such as cross site scripting,
resulting in security breaches
Other (less popular) alternatives to
cookies include techniques involving query strings, hidden form
fields, flash based local shared objects, etc. Each with their own set
of problems related to security, ease of use, size restrictions etc.
So up until now we have been using pretty bad ways of storing data on
the user’s end. We need a better way, which is where Web Storage comes
in.
Web Storage
The W3C Web Storage specification was designed as a better way of
storing data on the client-side. It has two different types of
storage: Session Storage and Local Storage.
Both Session and Local Storage will typically be able to store around
5 MB of data per domain, which is significantly more than cookies. NOTE THAT although MDN's numbers were updated (Oct 2022) and now say: minimum: 10Mb / Maximum: 2Gb, this author is unable to exceed 5Mb per domain/origin. M.D.N. / test script
Resources:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/sessionStorage
MDN - Browser_storage_limits_and_eviction_criteria
https://javascript.info/localstorage
https://dev.opera.com/articles/web-storage/
http://www.quirksmode.org/html5/storage.html
http://www.ghacks.net/2015/02/05/how-to-clear-web-storage-in-your-browser-of-choice/
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2014/11/05/how-to-clear-out-cookies-flash-cookies-and-local-storage/
http://www.opera.com/dragonfly/documentation/storage/
DOMStorage article on MDN (written by John Resig)
http://ejohn.org/blog/dom-storage/
W3C draft says this
User agents should expire data from the local storage areas only for security reasons or when requested to do so by the user. User agents should always avoid deleting data while a script that could access that data is running.
So if browsers follow the spec it should persist untill the user removes it on all browsers, I have not found any that have deleted on any off my projects.
A good article to read is also http://ejohn.org/blog/dom-storage/
Duration
Unlimited. The data persists through browser & OS restarts.
Capacity
Each domain can store minimum of 5MB of data in LocalStorage.
For some browsers you can store up to 1GB of data.
In Chrome while performing 'clear browsing data' , if you choose 'Cookies and other site and plugin data' option then sessionStorage data will be erased.
The content in localstorage is persistent as long as the user chooses to clear the storage (entirely or a single value inside it)
About the consistency across browser, localstorage is currently available on every major browser, including IE8+ (see http://caniuse.com/#feat=namevalue-storage)
I know HTML5 has offline storage capabilities. What were others doing for offline storage capabilities in the pre-HTML5 days?
For small amounts of data, cookies & response caching.
For large amounts of data, Flash (or similar plugin tech) to save files.
HTML and JS deliberately avoid having the ability to explicitly modify the client's file-system in any way, for security reasons.
You can use plug-ins like Flash, Silverlight, Google Gears to store data. You can also use cookies or browser specific features (like IE userdata). If you don't want to build your own adapter to switch between all these solutions, you can use PersistJS.
You could have built/used something like YUI's local storage library.
YUI3 - http://yuilibrary.com/gallery/show/storage-lite
YUI2 - http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/storage/
It's a combination of different ways like SWF storage, HTML5 and older browser specific APIs.
What is new in HTML 5’s “offline web applications” feature which was not already available in all browsers?
Offline caching is the job of the browser — how did it become a job of HTML?
A web cache is a mechanism for the
temporary storage (caching) of web
documents, such as HTML pages and
images, to reduce bandwidth usage,
server load, and perceived lag. A web
cache stores copies of documents
passing through it; subsequent
requests may be satisfied from the
cache if certain conditions are met.
As written in Wikipedia’s article for Web cache.
And this is written for offline web cache in the W3C website:
In order to enable users to continue
interacting with Web applications and
documents even when their network
connection is unavailable — for
instance, because they are traveling
outside of their ISP's coverage area —
authors can provide a manifest which
lists the files that are needed for
the Web application to work offline
and which causes the user's browser to
keep a copy of the files for use
offline.
What is HTML 5 doing better and different in caching?
Is it similar to offline mode in Internet Explorer 5? And can we cache the data beyond the limit of amount of space set in browser?
Please give me an example so that I can understand the difference of HTML 5 offline cache, and browser caches.
Web browser caching is when browsers decide to store files locally to improve performance. HTTP allows web servers to suggest browsers how long to store the files for, and allows browsers to ask the server whether a file has changed (so that they can avoid re-downloading it).
However, it’s not designed to reliably store assets required by an offline application. It’s ultimately up to the browser whether, and for how long, it caches the files. And browsers will often stop using their cached version if they can’t contact the server to check that it’s up-to-date.
The HTML5 offline web applications spec provides web authors with the ability to tell browsers what to store for offline access, and requires browsers to keep those files up-to-date when it is online. It also provides a DOM property that tells the developer whether the browser is online or offline, and events that fire when the online status changes.
As Peeter describes in his answer, this allows web app developers to store user-inputted data whilst the user is offline, then sync it with the server when they’re online again. The developer has to do this storage and syncing manually, as the browser only provides the events indicating online status, but if the browser also supports localStorage, the developer can store the data there.
I can do no better than point you to the relevant chapter of Dive into HTML5: http://diveintohtml5.ep.io/offline.html
You can now cache dynamic data, instead of just js/css/html files / images.
Lets say you've got a todo list application open in your browser. You're connected to the internet and you're adding a bunch of stuff you have to do.
Boom, you're on an airplane without a connection. You've got 6 hours of time to kill so you decide to get some work done. You finish all of the things on your todo list (the list was still open in your browser). You select all of the items and change their state to "finished".
Your plane lands, you open up your laptop and refresh the page. All the changes you did without a connection are now synced to the server as you have a internet connection now.