Word that encompasses constants and variables, but not literals or classes? [closed] - terminology

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there a word for a token that has a name, a type, and a value (i.e. can be used in an expression)?
Variables and constants would fit the definition, but literals wouldn't because they don't have names, and classes wouldn't because they don't have values. Properties in C# would fit the definition as well.

It's close to lvalue in C/C++ though I don't think C# property fits.

Related

Quotation marks in HTML [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
ok so I was wondering what the purpose of quotation marks were in this code:
style= "color:orange;font-size:20;"
Every time I use autocomplete it does
style= ""
What is this? what is it purpose?
Sorry about the weirdness, still new to using code blocks.
Quotes are there to indicate what the attribute's value is. In this case, the style attribute's value is color:orange;font-size:20;. If you don't know that though, I recommend looking up a HTML tutorial site. This is literally one of the very first things you learn in those.

What is an antonym of a "wrapper function"? [closed]

Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
What is an antonym of a "wrapper function"?
Is there a term to reference the function that actually does most of the work?
I ran into this as I was writing comments.
There's a function doXYZ(), doXYZ2() exposed to the users, but these functions are actually just wrappers and the real work is done in actually_doXYZ() for both of them, hidden from the users.
And I want to write in comments for actually_doXYZ() "This is ???? function for doXYZ()".
Does "Delegated function" make any sense?
No, I don't think is delegation. In OOP a wrapper is often used to decorate an object. When you think of a pizza you can decorate it with other tops and prize. Then you can run the outmost wrapper of the object to pass the object to the other wrappers and to sum the prize for the whole pizza.

is mupdf pdf library really open-source GPL? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I cannot find fitz.c file in mupdf folders. I can find fitz.h but, for example, I am not able to inspect the function
void fz_debug_obj(fz_obj *obj);
in detail, and other things I need.
Is it possible that some proprietary code is there so that using mupdf is not legal and they sue you when you make a derived work?
mupdf's full source is available via git at git://git.ghostscript.com/mupdf.git or in tar.gz format http://mupdf.googlecode.com/files/mupdf-0.9-source.tar.gz via http://code.google.com/p/mupdf/downloads/list.

Licensing specification [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm making open specification and I want people to be able implement specification for commercial and open source purposes. But I want to control all modifications to specification, so all modifications to specification itsef must be prohibited. What kind of license I can use for this specification?
Creative Commons +Attribution +NoDerivs?
This license allows for
redistribution, commercial and
non-commercial, as long as it is
passed along unchanged and in whole,
with credit to you.
See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/.

HTML Tidy license question [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking to use the HTML Tidy source code and modify it to add a few more features. Having read the license, I'm not quite sure if I will have to release the source of my modified application? I don't want to.
No, you don't have to. This is just a normal BSD-style licence.