Licensing specification [closed] - open-source

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm making open specification and I want people to be able implement specification for commercial and open source purposes. But I want to control all modifications to specification, so all modifications to specification itsef must be prohibited. What kind of license I can use for this specification?

Creative Commons +Attribution +NoDerivs?
This license allows for
redistribution, commercial and
non-commercial, as long as it is
passed along unchanged and in whole,
with credit to you.
See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/.

Related

Font Awesome Documentation License [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Regarding font Awesome Licenses:
http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/license/
Does the Documentation License apply if I am just referencing the code (CSS, and fonts (otf,eot,svg,ttf,woff?)
My guess is no.
That's how I would interpret it as well:
Applies to all Font Awesome project files that are not a part of the Font or Code licenses.
In short, don't copy and paste the documentation (readme or any of the io site content) without attributing it back to FA.

is the software in Google's Chromecast devices open source? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have tried to find the answer but I don't see any place explaining what software is in the Chromecast and under what license is distributed. Is the software in Google's Chromecast devices open source?
Please see https://code.google.com/p/chromecast-mirrored-source/ for the open source portions of the product.

Allow richtext commenting on blog [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Is there any security issue in allowing richtext commenting on blog for public visitors?
Is there any blog system that actually supports richtext commenting?
Can anyone advise?
You can always allow Markdown syntax. That way your users can do basic richtext formatting, but still be secure because no HTML code would be allowed.

is mupdf pdf library really open-source GPL? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I cannot find fitz.c file in mupdf folders. I can find fitz.h but, for example, I am not able to inspect the function
void fz_debug_obj(fz_obj *obj);
in detail, and other things I need.
Is it possible that some proprietary code is there so that using mupdf is not legal and they sue you when you make a derived work?
mupdf's full source is available via git at git://git.ghostscript.com/mupdf.git or in tar.gz format http://mupdf.googlecode.com/files/mupdf-0.9-source.tar.gz via http://code.google.com/p/mupdf/downloads/list.

HTML Tidy license question [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm looking to use the HTML Tidy source code and modify it to add a few more features. Having read the license, I'm not quite sure if I will have to release the source of my modified application? I don't want to.
No, you don't have to. This is just a normal BSD-style licence.