UPDATE - Pretty sure I figured this out. The code is somewhat long, but I threw a page up here so you can view the source: http://www.sorryhumans.com/knockout-header
The concept was based on: http://algemeenbekend.nl/misc/challenge_gerben_v2.html and then adapted for my needs.
The header is responsive and knocked out. (Please ignore the bad, 1 minute responsive bg image implementation!). This implementation also does not use any CSS3, so I would imagine that there wouldn't be many issues with compatibility.
The only issue I find is that when the browser width is an odd number (e.g. 1393px) in Chrome there is a 1px gap between the right hand fluid column and the main center column. I don't see this issue in the latest version of Firefox, Internet Explorer, or when the width is an even number (e.g. 1394px in Chrome). Any ideas?
Original Question:
I'm attempting to code a header that I designed, but am unable to figure out how to get the effect I'm looking for. Please look at the attached image (No, this is not actually what I'm working on :) just an example!)
The photo is a full-width responsive photo. The header is full-width, but its contents are on a responsive grid that does not exceed some arbitrary size (shown by the black lines), but can scale down. I can accomplish all of this, but what I am having trouble figuring out is how to make the make the header bar be transparent where the logo would be. In other words, rather than having the logo be on top of the bar, I would like to "knock it out" of the header.
Is this even possible?
There's no inherent support for knockout effects, so you'll have to have the text as part of an image.
The easiest way to do this would be to have the background behind the knockout effect be the solid part of the image. You can create a .png with a solid background and transparency where you want the knockout effect, and use css opacity to make the entire header partially transparent. You will need to set up the header with multiple sections so that the sections that are not images (i.e. outside the black bars) have a background color, while the sections with images do not.
Very roughly:
<div id="outerHeaderWithOpacity">
<div class="hasBackground">Left side, will stretch</div>
<div class="noBackground">Image(s) go here</div>
<div class="hasBackground">As many sets as you need</div>
<div class="noBackground">Image(s) go here</div>
<div class="hasBackground">Right side, will stretch</div>
</div>
http://jsfiddle.net/GZ8Xv/
not the prettiest solution but using the experimental css3 flexbox: (with display: table fallback)
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="left"><br /></div>
<div class="middle"><br /></div>
<div class="right"><br /></div>
</div>
.left, .right
{
height:100%;
border: 1px solid black;
display:table-cell;
display: -webkit-flexbox;
display: -moz-flexbox;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: -o-flexbox;
-webkit-flex: 1;
}
.middle
{
display: table-cell;
display: -webkit-flexbox;
width: 500px;
height:100%;
border: 1px solid blue
}
.wrapper
{
display: table;
display: -webkit-flexbox;
display: -moz-flexbox;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: -o-flexbox;
-webkit-box-orient: horizontal;
-moz-box-orient: horizontal;
-ms-box-orient: horizontal;
-o-box-orient: horizontal;
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
}
PLEASE NOTE: the flexbox w3c spec is still in flux and could change a third time. I only tested this in IE9 (both IE9 and IE8 modes. Does not work in IE7 mode) and Chrome 20 and 22
A few minor changes: http://jsfiddle.net/GZ8Xv/2/ and you have your 5 div layout without javascript.
Related
I have the following setup:
<div class="container">
<button id="print-button" title="print" type="button">🖨</button>
<label for="print-button">Print Me!</label>
</div>
I wanted to use flex-box to place the button above the label, aligning them to the right of the parent element of the div, making the button the same width as the label.
.container{
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: flex-end;
}
button{
appearance: none;
font-size: 2rem;
border: none;
background-color: yellow;
}
label{
font-family: sans-serif;
}
Works, as expected, but the button logically has it's own (in this case) smaller width.
If I set the container width to fit content and the align-items to stretch I get what I want width-wise but the container by default stays left. I could work around that with floats or positions, but that's not what I'm looking for. I also do not want to ad semantically unnecessary markup. I can (and probably will) use a grid, I just 'felt' that somehow this should be easily achieved with flex, I just couldn't find a way.
Here is a codePen: https://codepen.io/mdrei/pen/QWmMMeO
to play with, if needs be.
Thank you for reading: I'd like to clarify: I'm not interested in other solutions to the problem, I have several in mind. I'm interested to find out if what I wanted is doable with flex-box.
(Lets see if a moderator once again thinks he/she has to censor me because I say thank you)
I think you will achieve it using display grid.
.container {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: max-content;
}
Then just add float right if you want it to align to the right
Using only flex-box, you can add another div to achieve what you want:
(Unnecessary markup is added, I know, but maybe that could help you)
<div class="container">
<div class="another-container">
<button id="print-button" title="print" type="button">🖨</button>
<label for="print-button">Print Me!</label>
</div>
</div>
.another-container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
Here is a codePen : https://codepen.io/Deirok/pen/MWVvrdG
Have a great day :)
I am trying to create a video conferencing like grid. I am trying using css-grid but somehow I am not being able to accomplish what I am looking for. The idea is simple, have a grid of videos on screen and paginate the videos to next page which doesn't fit in the first.
I tried using the following:
<div className="videoContainer">
<div className="videoWrapper">Cam 1</div>
<div className="videoWrapper">Cam 2</div>
<div className="videoWrapper">Cam 3</div>
</div>
CSS
.videoContainer {
display: grid;
width: 100%;
grid-template-columns: repeat(auto-fit, minmax(250px, 1fr));
border: 2px solid blue;
}
.videoWrapper {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
min-height: 250px;
border: 1px solid green;
}
What I am looking for is some pointers/ hints/ any articles(didn't find anything useful) that point to the direction I want to go.
I have a simple layout as follows to explain (Left column for large screen devices, right column for mobile devices):
I do not recommend using widths and heights with percentages. The important thing here is to respect the aspec ratio.
Example:
https://alicunde.github.io/Videoconference-Dish-CSS-JS/
Code:
https://github.com/Alicunde/Videoconference-Dish-CSS-JS
I have solved this problem today. First I started using CSS3 Grid, but the result did not respect the aspect ratio of the cameras.
Then I tried Flex, but it is not possible to cover defined surfaces. So I have created this pretty basic script.
The rest of the screens you need are easy to develop.
Phone version:
It is fast (resize event, load event):
Excuse my English.
I think this gif explains it very well:
https://gfycat.com/FormalReasonableHagfish
Context: I'm working on a digital catalog (I didn't start the project) for a company that sells TONS of products, sometimes they are small, sometimes big, sometimes wide, etc. They go on a specific area, lets say 400px x 400px.
I did horizontal alignment with flexbox and it works very well but on the vertical axis the products have static values (prod_1 top: 0px, prod_2: top 10px, prod_3 top: 20px...)
EDIT: My question/need is: I want to be able to align (responsively in the horizontal and vertical axis) 1 to 6 images inside 1 div but flexbox only let me choose one axis (flex-direction row or column), what can I do?
The code is something like this:
<div class='container'>
<img class='item_0'>
<img class='item_1'>
<img class='item_2'>
<img class='item_3'>
<img class='item_4'>
</div>
If posible the solution should be in CSS, if it can't be done, then it could be in Javascript or maybe changing a little bit the HTML.
This is because I only have access to CSS and JS. The index.html is generated automatically from a database by an application developed/controlled by another team and it's not that easy/quick to ask them for changes.
The best way I thought is with javascript but it may not be that easy, considering it's a big project and there's A LOT of code already written (not by me).
What do you guys think? I don't need the complete solution but some direction would be really appreciated, thank you!
Ok, so I am not 100% sure about what you need, but here's some code I made that does pretty much what your gif showed. You should be able to tweak it to your liking.
https://codepen.io/AlexWulkan/pen/wmmPvL
HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="row">
<div class="box"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="box"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="box"></div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
/* Outer container */
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
background-color: #eee;
height: 400px;
width: 400px;
}
/* Each row of boxes */
.row {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
flex: 1;
padding: 0 1rem;
}
/* determines the position of the boxes in each row */
.row:first-child {
justify-content: flex-end;
}
.row:nth-child(2) {
justify-content: center;
}
.row:last-child {
justify-content: flex-start;
}
/* Each box */
.box {
background-color: #666;
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
}
Tell me if there's anything you have questions about and I'll try to answer. The code should be quite self-explanatory though. :)
I have a transparent .png image and I change the background color with css so i can use the same image with different colors.
This is a dummy image and the problem is with Chrome browser i get a line on top and bottom of that image when you zoom at certain points and on some smartphones like this:
It depends on page resolution I think.
This problem is not reproducable with Firefox whatsoever.
Has anyone seen something like this? How can this be solved?
Here is an example, and try to zoom in with Chrome or open it with smartphone:
.vertical-center {
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
background-color: black;
background-clip: padding-box;
background-clip: content-box;
}
/* CSS used here will be applied after bootstrap.css */ .equal-col-height { display: flex; display: -webkit-flex; flex-wrap: wrap; }
<div class="panel-heading">Heading</div>
<div class="panel-body">
<div class="row equal-col-height">
<div class="col-xs-6 text-center">
<img class="vertical-center" src="https://s21.postimg.org/6hym65mtj/test.png">
</div>
</div>
</div>
update
The whole problem was actually seeing the background color on edges of the element like here Fiddle link you can reproduce it by opening the link on smartphone and try to zoom in. The background-color comes through the edges.
And the solution from Kosh Very solves the problem
Demo on fiddle
The problem is not caused by image itself, but by wrong subpixel rendering in some browsers.
The following code does the trick with the image in my Chrome 58.0.3029.110 (64-bit):
.vertical-center {
position: relative;
top: 50%;
transform: translate3d(-1px,-50%,0);
background-color: black;
background-clip: content-box;
display: block;
border: solid 0.1px transparent;
}
/* CSS used here will be applied after bootstrap.css */ .equal-col-height { display: flex; display: -webkit-flex; flex-wrap: wrap; }
<div class="panel-heading">Heading</div>
<div class="panel-body">
<div class="row equal-col-height">
<div class="col-xs-6 text-center">
<img class="vertical-center" src="https://s21.postimg.org/6hym65mtj/test.png">
</div>
</div>
</div>
Another part of the question was solving the similar problem with https://jsfiddle.net/5maqwgjg/2/ in SGS7 default browser (aka Samsung Internet). It can be solved adding background-clip:content-box; transform:scale(1.01); to .middle (https://jsfiddle.net/aw53wcg4/1/)
Images automatically have vertical-align: middle and that creates the gaps on the edges.
You can make the image a block element to remove the space with display: block. They are by default inline-block.
If you don't want the image to be a block element, add vertical-align: top or vertical-align: bottom to the image element with CSS.
Here is a reference to another SO question, but the accepted answer isn't a perfect solution. Read the others for more ideas.
Remove white space below image
I have a set of images of unknown height. The code for each looks like this:
Code:
<div class="x">
<div class="a"><img src="foto.png" /></div>
<div class="b"></div>
</div>
I tried using display: block for the image, and height: auto for class x.
I don't know why, but I'm getting the expected behavior on Firefox but not Opera 19.
In Firefox I get normal squares with random-height images -- one under one, depending on image height. In Opera I only get flat rectangle(s) and all I can see is top of the image, with the rest of it truncated.
How do I need to do this such that it works on all browsers?
CSS
.x
{
min-height: 200px;
}
.a img
{
display: block;
}
.b
{
display: none;
}
Adding overflow: hidden; or a float to .x. AND .a, should fit the height of .x and .a to the height of the image, as long as you don't specify a height for .x or .a.
The problem was with Masonry I use. Sorry that I didn't mention about it.
Solution I've found so far: jquery masonry breaks(stacks images) in chrome/safari but only on first load