I have a database that has the following columns:
-------------------
id|domain|hit_count
-------------------
And I would like to perform this query on it:
SELECT id,MIN(hit_count)
FROM table WHERE domain='$domain'
GROUP BY domain ORDER BY MIN(hit_count)
I would like this query to give me the id of the row that had the smallest hit_count for $domain. The only problem is that if I have two rows that have the same domain, say www.bestbuy.com, the query will just group by whichever one came first, and then although I will get the correct lowest hit_count, the id may or may not be the id of the row that has the lowest hit_count.
Does anyone know of a way for me to perform this query and to get the id that matches up with MIN(hit_count)? Thanks!
Try this:
SELECT id,MIN(hit_count),domain FROM table GROUP BY domain HAVING domain='$domain'
See, when you're using aggregates, either via aggregate functions (and min() is such a function) or via GROUP BY or HAVING operators, your data is being grouped. In your case it is grouped by domain. You have 2 fields in your select list, id and min(hit_count).
Now, for each group database knows which hit_count to pick, as you've specified this explicitly via the aggregate function. But what about id — which one should be included?
MySQL internally wraps such fields into max() aggregate function, which I find an error prone approach. In all other RDBMSes you will get an error for such a query.
The rule is: if you use aggregates, then all columns should be either arguments of aggregate functions or arguments of GROUP BY operator.
To achieve the desired result, you need a subquery:
SELECT id, domain, hit_count
FROM `table`
WHERE domain = '$domain'
AND hit_count = (SELECT min(hit_count) FROM `table` WHERE domain = '$domain');
I've used backticks, as table is a reserved word in SQL.
SELECT
id,
hit_count
FROM
table
WHERE
domain='$domain'
AND hit_count = (SELECT MIN(hit_count) FROM table WHERE domain='$domain')
Try this:
SELECT id,hit_count
FROM table WHERE domain='$domain'
GROUP BY domain ORDER BY hit_count ASC;
This should also work:
select id, MIN(hit_count) from table where domain="$domain";
I had same question. Please see that question below.
min(column) is not returning me correct data of other columns
You are using a GROPU BY. Which means each row in result represents a group of values.
One of those values is the group name (the value of the field you grouped by). The rest are arbitrary values from within that group.
For example the following table:
F1 | F2
1 aa
1 bb
1 cc
2 gg
2 hh
If u will group by F1: SELECT F1,F2 from T GROUP BY F1
You will get two rows:
1 and one value from (aa,bb,cc)
2 and one value from (gg,hh)
If u want a deterministic result set, you need to tell the software what algorithem to apply to the group. Several for example:
MIN
MAX
COUNT
SUM
etc etc
There is a most simplist way your query is OK just modify it with DESC keyword after GROUP BY domain
SELECT
id,
MIN(hit_count)
FROM table
WHERE domain = '$domain'
GROUP BY domain DESC
ORDER BY MIN(hit_count)
Explanation:
When you use group by with aggregate function it always selects the first record but if you restrict it with desc keyword it will select the lowest or last record of that group.
For testing puspose use this query that has only group_concat added.
SELECT
group_concat(id),
MIN(hit_count)
FROM table
WHERE domain = '$domain'
GROUP BY domain DESC
ORDER BY MIN(hit_count)
If you can have duplicated domains group by id:
SELECT id,MIN(hit_count)
FROM domain WHERE domain='$domain'
GROUP BY id ORDER BY MIN(hit_count)
Related
My database is called: (training_session)
I try to print out some information from my data, but I do not want to have any duplicates. I do get it somehow, may someone tell me what I do wrong?
SELECT DISTINCT athlete_id AND duration FROM training_session
SELECT DISTINCT athlete_id, duration FROM training_session
It works perfectly if i use only one column, but when I add another. it does not work.
I think you misunderstood the use of DISTINCT.
There is big difference between using DISTINCT and GROUP BY.
Both have some sort of goal, but they have different purpose.
You use DISTINCT if you want to show a series of columns and never repeat. That means you dont care about calculations or group function aggregates. DISTINCT will show different RESULTS if you keep adding more columns in your SELECT (if the table has many columns)
You use GROUP BY if you want to show "distinctively" on a certain selected columns and you use group function to calculate the data related to it. Therefore you use GROUP BY if you want to use group functions.
Please check group functions you can use in this link.
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/group-by-functions.html
EDIT 1:
It seems like you are trying to get the "latest" of a certain athlete, I'll assume the current scenario if there is no ID.
Here is my alternate solution:
SELECT a.athlete_id ,
( SELECT b.duration
FROM training_session as b
WHERE b.athlete_id = a.athlete_id -- connect
ORDER BY [latest column to sort] DESC
LIMIT 1
) last_duration
FROM training_session as a
GROUP BY a.athlete_id
ORDER BY a.athlete_id
This syntax is called IN-SELECT subquery. With the help of LIMIT 1, it shows the topmost record. In-select subquery must have 1 record to return or else it shows error.
MySQL's DISTINCT clause is used to filter out duplicate recordsets.
If your query was SELECT DISTINCT athlete_id FROM training_session then your output would be:
athlete_id
----------
1
2
3
4
5
6
As soon as you add another column to your query (in your example, the column called duration) then each record resulting from your query are unique, hence the results you're getting. In other words the query is working correctly.
MySQL GROUP BY clause groups records even when they have different values.
However I would like it to as with DB2 SQL so that if records not contain exactly the same information they are not grouped.
Currently in MySQL for:
id Name
A Amanda
A Ana
the Group by id would return 1 record randomly (unless aggregation clauses used of course)
However in DB2 SQL the same Group by id would not group those: returning 2 records and never doing such a thing as picking randomly one of the values when grouping without using aggregation functions.
First, id is a bad name for a column that is not the primary key of a table. But that is not relevant to your question.
This query:
select id, name
from t
group by id;
returns an error in almost any database other than MySQL. The problem is that name is not in the group by and is not the argument of an aggregation function. The failure is ANSI-standard behavior, not honored by MySQL.
A typical way to write the query is:
select id, max(name)
from t
group by id;
This should work in all databases (assuming name is not some obscure type where max() doesn't work).
Or, if you want each name, then:
select id, name
from t
group by id, name;
or the simpler:
select distinct id, name
from t;
In MySQL, you can get the ANSI standard behavior by setting ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY for the database/session. MySQL will then return an error, as DB2 does in this case.
The most recent versions of MySQL have ONLY_FULL_GROUP_BY set by default.
Group by in mysql will group the records according to the set fields. Think of it as: It gets one and the others will not show up. It has uses, for example, to count how many times that ID is repeated on the table:
select count(id), id from table group by id
You can, however, to achieve your purpose, group by multiple fields, something among the lines of:
select * from table group by id, name
I do not think there is an automated way to do this but using
GROUP BY id, name
Would give you the solution you are looking for
I'm trying to get the highest version within a group. My query:
SELECT
rubric_id,
max(version) as version,
group_id
FROM
rubrics
WHERE
client_id = 1
GROUP BY
group_id
The Data:
The Results:
The rubric of ID 2 does not have a version of 2, why is this being mismatched? What do I need to do to correct this?
Edit, not a duplicate:
This is not a duplicate of SQL Select only rows with Max Value on a Column , which is a post I have read and referenced before writing this. My question is not how to find the max, my question is why is the version not matched to the correct ID
MySQL is confusing you by letting you get away with having a column in your select that isn't in your group by. To resolve the issue, make sure you don't select any field that isn't in the group by.
Instead of trying to get everything in one statement, you will need to use a subquery to find the max_version_id and then join to it.
SELECT T.*
FROM rubrics T
JOIN
(
SELECT
group_id,
max(version) as max_version
FROM
rubrics
GROUP BY
group_id
) dedupe
on T.group_id = dedupe.group_id
and T.version_id = dedupe.max_version_id
WHERE
T.client_id = 1
Edit: So MySQL allows it, but I don't think it's a good practise to use it.
You are trying to query non-aggregated data from an aggregated query. You should not do that.
A GROUP BY takes the field it should make group of rows with (in your case, what you say with your GROUP BY is: give me a result per different group_id) and gives a result (the aggregated data) based on the grouping.
Here, you try to access non aggregated data (rubric_id in your case). For some reason, the query does not crash and picks a "random" id in your aggregated data.
let's see I have a simple table like this:
name id
tom 1
jerry 2
... ...
And from the outside, I got a list contains the names (tom, jerry, kettie...)
I am trying to use WHERE IN clause to retrieve the id based on the name list.
I can do
SELECT id FROM mySimpleTable where name in ('tom','jerry','kettie');
So just iterate the name list and generate the contents in the parentheses.
This works, but the results is not in the input order, for example, the input is tom, jerry, kettie, the expected the result is 1,2,3, however, the output actually could be in any order.
Then how can I modify the SQL clause to make sure I get my input and output matched so that I can do the following process accrordingly. I heard JOIN may help in this situation.
SELECT id
FROM mySimpleTable
where name in ('tom','jerry','kettie')
order by field(name, 'tom','jerry','kettie')
I heard JOIN may help in this situation.
Yes it can help:
SELECT m.id
FROM mySimpleTable m
JOIN (
SELECT 'tom' AS name, 1 AS orderNum
UNION ALL
SELECT 'jerry' AS name, 2 AS orderNum
UNION ALL
SELECT 'kettie' AS name, 3 AS orderNum
) AS sub
ON m.name = sub.name
ORDER BY sub.orderNum ASC;
SqlFiddleDemo
This solution can be also used in different RDBMS. field is MySQL specific.
How it works:
Create derived table/subquery with values you need to check and ordering column
JOIN will return only rows that correspond each other based on name
ORDER BY column you've added in subquery
just select id,name from table_a where name in ('tom','jerry','happy') , you will have the combination of the input name and output id.
this entirely depends on where you're getting the list for your "in" clause.
if it's from somewhere on the outside, you probably should first turn the list into a temp table, adding an id column that indicates the order (see this answer for a start on how to do that) - and then do an inner join with it.
I did try to run your SQL query, and me for one did get the resultant output in the same order as that of the input. Well, but still it isn't necessary it would happen the same way every time, so the best way to arrange your output in a particular hierarchy is to use the ORDER BY clause. The syntax would be:
SELECT column_name
FROM table_name
WHERE conditions
ORDER BY column_name;
So in your case, the query would read as:
SELECT id
FROM mysimpletable
WHERE name
IN('tom','jerry','kettie'....)
ORDER BY id;
You can get more help with MySQL concepts here for further information.
Select
id
from mySimpleTable
where name in ('tom','jerry','kettie')
Order by id
We can use * to select all attribute from table ,I am using distinct and my table contain 16 columns, How can I use distinct with it.I cannot do select distinct Id,* from abc;
What would be the best way.
Another way could be select distinct id,col1,col2 etc.
If you want in the results, one row per id, you can use GROUP BY id. But then, it's not advisable to use the other columns in the SELECT list (even if MySQL allows it - that depends on whether you have ANSI setting On or Off). It's advisable to use the other columns with aggregate functions like MIN(), MAX(), COUNT(), etc. In MySQL, there is also a GROUP_CONCAT() aggregate function that will collect all values from a column for a group:
SELECT
id
, COUNT(*) AS number_of_rows_with_same_id
, MIN(col1) AS min_col1
, MAX(col1) AS max_col1
--
, GROUP_CONCAT(col1) AS gc_col1
, GROUP_CONCAT(col2) AS gc_col2
--
, GROUP_CONCAT(col16) AS gc_col16
FROM
abc
GROUP BY
id ;
The query:
SELECT *
FROM abc
GROUP BY id ;
is not valid SQL (up to 92) because you have non-aggregated results in the SELECT list and valid in SQL (2003+). Still, it's invalid here because the other columns are not functionally dependent on the grouping column (id). MySQL unfortunately allows such queries and does no checking of functional dependency.
So, you never know which row (of the many with same id) will be returned or even if - horror! - you get results from different rows (with same id). As #Andriy comments, the consequences are that values for columns other than id will be chosen arbitrarily. If you want predictable results, just don't use such a technique.
An example solution: If you want just one row from every id, and you have a datetime or timestamp (or some other) column that you can use for ordering, you can do this:
SELECT t.*
FROM abc AS t
JOIN
( SELECT id
, MIN(some_column) AS m -- or MAX()
FROM abc
GROUP BY id
) AS g
ON g.id = t.id
AND g.m = t.some_column ;
This will work as long as the (id, some_column) combination is unique.
use group by instead of distinct
group by col1, col2,col3
its doing like distinct
SELECT DISTINCT * FROM `some_table`
Is absolutely valid syntax.
The error is caused by the fact that you call Id, *. Well * includes the Id column too, which usually is unique anyway.
So what you'll need in your case is just:
SELECT DISTINCT * FROM `abc`
SELECT * FROM abc where id in(select distinct id from abc);
You can totally do this.
Hope this helps
Initially I thought it would work for group by is best one. This is same as doing select * froom abc. Sorry guys