I would like to use JOIN instead of IN in the following SQL query. I can't figure out how to do it.
SELECT * FROM shop_orders WHERE
id IN (SELECT orders_id FROM shop_orders_data WHERE closed='1' /*AND backorder='0'*/ AND exhibition_id='389' AND
exhibition_id IN (SELECT id FROM shop_exhibitions WHERE
country_id IN (SELECT id FROM countries WHERE id='72')) AND in_country = '72' AND
exhibition_id IN (SELECT id FROM shop_exhibitions WHERE start<=1336946400 AND end>1336600800)) AND
id IN (SELECT orders_id FROM shop_orders_products WHERE
products_id IN (SELECT id FROM shop_products WHERE artno='120000' OR name LIKE '%120000%')) AND created>=1333231200 AND created<1333663200 ORDER BY created DESC
I tried this:
SELECT
s.*
FROM
shop_orders s
INNER JOIN shop_orders_data od ON s.id=od.orders_id
INNER JOIN shop_exhibitions se ON od.exhibition_id=se.id
INNER JOIN countries co ON se.country_id=co.id
INNER JOIN shop_orders_products sop ON s.id=sop.orders_id
INNER JOIN shop_products sp
ON sop.products_id=sp.id
WHERE od.closed=1
AND ( sp.artno='120000' or sp.name LIKE '%120000%' )
AND ( od.exhibition_id='389')
AND ( od.in_country = '72')
AND ( se.start <=1336946400)
AND ( se.end >1336600800)
AND ( se.created>=1333231200)
AND ( se.created<1333663200)
ORDER BY `s`.`created` DESC
I this correct??
See if this works (and study the code to learn how it works):
SELECT *
FROM shop_orders so
JOIN shop_orders_data sod ON (
(so.id = sod.orders_id)
AND (sod.closed = '1')
/*AND (sod.backorder = '0') */
AND (sod.exhibition_id = '389')
AND (sod.in_country = '72')
)
JOIN shop_exhibitions se ON (
(sod.exhibition_id = se.id)
AND (se.start <= 1336946400)
AND (se.end > 1336600800)
)
JOIN countries c ON (
(se.country_id = c.id)
AND (c.id = '72')
)
JOIN shop_orders_products sop ON (
(so.id = sop.orders_id)
)
JOIN shop_products sp ON (
(sop.products_id = sp.id)
AND ((sp.artno='120000') OR (sp.name LIKE '%120000%'))
)
WHERE (so.created >= 1333231200) AND (so.created < 1333663200)
ORDER BY so.created DESC;
The join syntax works like this:
SELECT field1,field2,field3
FROM FirstTable
JOIN SecondTable ON (FirstTable.PrimaryKey = SecondTable.ForeignKey)
JOIN ThirdTable ON (FirstTable.PrimaryKey = ThirdTable.ForeignKey)
Try applying this approach to your query.
Related
I am new to sql. How can i rewrite the below script without using exists
select
distinct oe.*,
o.*,
so.*,
ro.*
from
ms_bvoip_order_extension oe
inner join ms_order o on oe.ms_order_id = o.ms_order_id
inner join ms_sub_order so on so.ms_order_id = o.ms_order_id
inner join ms_job j on j.entity_id = so.ms_sub_order_id
inner join ms_task t on t.wf_job_id = j.wf_job_id
where
o.order_type = 900
and o.entered_date between to_date('12/01/2018 00:00:00', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
and to_date('12/31/2018 00:00:00', 'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi:ss')
and j.entity_type = 5
and exists (
select
'X'
from
ms_task t
where
(
(t.name like '%Error%')
or (t.name like '%Correct%')
or (t.name = '%Create AOTS Ticket%')
)
and t.job_id = hextoraw(j.wf_job_id)
)
order by
o.usrp_order_number;
As Jerry mentioned, you can use EXISTS but if you don't want to you could JOIN the same EXISTS subquery:
INNER JOIN (
SELECT DISTINCT hextoraw(j.wf_job_id) JOB_ID
FROM ms_task
WHERE t.name like '%Error%'
or t.name like '%Correct%'
or t.name like '%Create AOTS Ticket%'
) TASK ON t.job_id = TASK.JOB_ID
You could probably remove your other ms_task table and JOIN ON j.wf_job_id......
I'm not sure how to make the following SQL query more efficient. Right now, the query is taking 8 - 12 seconds on a pretty fast server, but that's not close to fast enough for a Website when users are trying to load a page with this code on it. It's looking through tables with many rows, for instance the "Post" table has 717,873 rows. Basically, the query lists all Posts related to what the user is following (newest to oldest).
Is there a way to make it faster by only getting the last 20 results total based on PostTimeOrder?
Any help would be much appreciated or insight on anything that can be done to improve this situation. Thank you.
Here's the full SQL query (lots of nesting):
SELECT DISTINCT p.Id, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(p.PostCreationTime) AS PostCreationTime, p.Content AS Content, p.Bu AS Bu, p.Se AS Se, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(p.PostCreationTime) AS PostTimeOrder
FROM Post p
WHERE (p.Id IN (SELECT pc.PostId
FROM PostCreator pc
WHERE (pc.UserId IN (SELECT uf.FollowedId
FROM UserFollowing uf
WHERE uf.FollowingId = '100')
OR pc.UserId = '100')
))
OR (p.Id IN (SELECT pum.PostId
FROM PostUserMentions pum
WHERE (pum.UserId IN (SELECT uf.FollowedId
FROM UserFollowing uf
WHERE uf.FollowingId = '100')
OR pum.UserId = '100')
))
OR (p.Id IN (SELECT ssp.PostId
FROM SStreamPost ssp
WHERE (ssp.SStreamId IN (SELECT ssf.SStreamId
FROM SStreamFollowing ssf
WHERE ssf.UserId = '100'))
))
OR (p.Id IN (SELECT psm.PostId
FROM PostSMentions psm
WHERE (psm.StockId IN (SELECT sf.StockId
FROM StockFollowing sf
WHERE sf.UserId = '100' ))
))
UNION ALL
SELECT DISTINCT p.Id AS Id, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(p.PostCreationTime) AS PostCreationTime, p.Content AS Content, p.Bu AS Bu, p.Se AS Se, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(upe.PostEchoTime) AS PostTimeOrder
FROM Post p
INNER JOIN UserPostE upe
on p.Id = upe.PostId
INNER JOIN UserFollowing uf
on (upe.UserId = uf.FollowedId AND (uf.FollowingId = '100' OR upe.UserId = '100'))
ORDER BY PostTimeOrder DESC;
Changing your p.ID in (...) predicates to existence predicates with correlated subqueries may help. Also since both halves of your union all query are pulling from the Post table and possibly returning nearly identical records you might be able to combine the two into one query by left outer joining to UserPostE and adding upe.PostID is not null as an OR condition in the WHERE clause. UserFollowing will still inner join to UPE. If you want the same Post record twice once with upe.PostEchoTime and once with p.PostCreationTime as the PostTimeOrder you'll need keep the UNION ALL
SELECT
DISTINCT -- <<=- May not be needed
p.Id
, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(p.PostCreationTime) AS PostCreationTime
, p.Content AS Content
, p.Bu AS Bu
, p.Se AS Se
, UNIX_TIMESTAMP(coalesce( upe.PostEchoTime
, p.PostCreationTime)) AS PostTimeOrder
FROM Post p
LEFT JOIN UserPostE upe
INNER JOIN UserFollowing uf
on (upe.UserId = uf.FollowedId AND
(uf.FollowingId = '100' OR
upe.UserId = '100'))
on p.Id = upe.PostId
WHERE upe.PostID is not null
or exists (SELECT 1
FROM PostCreator pc
WHERE pc.PostId = p.ID
and pc.UserId = '100'
or exists (SELECT 1
FROM UserFollowing uf
WHERE uf.FollowedId = pc.UserID
and uf.FollowingId = '100')
)
OR exists (SELECT 1
FROM PostUserMentions pum
WHERE pum.PostId = p.ID
and pum.UserId = '100'
or exists (SELECT 1
FROM UserFollowing uf
WHERE uf.FollowedId = pum.UserId
and uf.FollowingId = '100')
)
OR exists (SELECT 1
FROM SStreamPost ssp
WHERE ssp.PostId = p.ID
and exists (SELECT 1
FROM SStreamFollowing ssf
WHERE ssf.SStreamId = ssp.SStreamId
and ssf.UserId = '100')
)
OR exists (SELECT 1
FROM PostSMentions psm
WHERE psm.PostId = p.ID
and exists (SELECT
FROM StockFollowing sf
WHERE sf.StockId = psm.StockId
and sf.UserId = '100' )
)
ORDER BY PostTimeOrder DESC
The from section could alternatively be rewritten to also use an existence clause with a correlated sub query:
FROM Post p
LEFT JOIN UserPostE upe
on p.Id = upe.PostId
and ( upe.UserId = '100'
or exists (select 1
from UserFollowing uf
where uf.FollwedID = upe.UserID
and uf.FollowingId = '100'))
Turn IN ( SELECT ... ) into a JOIN .. ON ... (see below)
Turn OR into UNION (see below)
Some the tables are many:many mappings? Such as SStreamFollowing? Follow the tips in http://mysql.rjweb.org/doc.php/index_cookbook_mysql#many_to_many_mapping_table
Example of IN:
SELECT ssp.PostId
FROM SStreamPost ssp
WHERE (ssp.SStreamId IN (
SELECT ssf.SStreamId
FROM SStreamFollowing ssf
WHERE ssf.UserId = '100' ))
-->
SELECT ssp.PostId
FROM SStreamPost ssp
JOIN SStreamFollowing ssf ON ssp.SStreamId = ssf.SStreamId
WHERE ssf.UserId = '100'
The big WHERE with all the INs becomes something like
JOIN ( ( SELECT pc.PostId AS id ... )
UNION ( SELECT pum.PostId ... )
UNION ( SELECT ssp.PostId ... )
UNION ( SELECT psm.PostId ... ) )
Get what you can done of that those suggestions, then come back for more advice if you still need it. And bring SHOW CREATE TABLE with you.
I have three tables:
cp_projeto (id, nome...)
cp_habilidade_projeto (id, id_projeto)
cp_habilidade (id, nome...)
I need all projects with all cp_habilidade where cp_projeto have one cp_habilidade. My actual query:
SELECT
p.id as id_projeto,
p.nome as nome_projeto,
p.id_tipo_projeto,
p.dhPostagem,
cp_habilidade_projeto.id as id_habilidade_projeto,
cp_habilidade.nome as nome_habilidade
FROM (
SELECT * FROM cp_projeto
WHERE (id_status_projeto = 2)
ORDER BY dhPostagem DESC LIMIT 0, 10
) AS p
inner JOIN cp_habilidade_projeto ON (cp_habilidade_projeto.id_projeto = p.id)
inner JOIN cp_habilidade ON (cp_habilidade.id = cp_habilidade_projeto.id_habilidade)
JOIN cp_sub_categoria ON (cp_sub_categoria.id = p.id_sub_categoria)
WHERE (
p.nome like '%CSS%'
OR cp_habilidade.nome like '%CSS%'
)
This returns only cp_habilidade.nome = %CSS%, I need it all.
Thanks!
SELECT
p.id as id_projeto,
p.nome as nome_projeto,
p.id_tipo_projeto,
p.dhPostagem,
hp.id as id_habilidade_projeto,
h.nome as nome_habilidade
FROM cp_projecto p
JOIN cp_habilidade_projeto hp ON p.id = hp.id_projeto
JOIN cp_habilidade h ON h.id = hp.id_habilidade
WHERE p.id IN ( SELECT cp_habilidade_projeto.id_projeto
FROM cp_habilidade
JOIN cp_habilidade_projeto ON cp_habilidade.id = cp_habilidade_projeto.id_habilidade
WHERE cp_habilidade.nome LIKE '%CSS%' )
I run the above sql statement and i got this.[IMG]http://i1093.photobucket.com/albums/i422/walkgirl_1993/asd-1_zps5506632e.jpg[/IMG] i'm trying display the latest date which you can see the 3 and 4. For caseid 3, it should display the latest row which is the 2012-12-20 16:12:36.000. I tried using group by, order by. Google some website said to use rank but i'm not sure about the rank as i dont really get rank. Some suggestions?
select [Case].CaseID, Agent.AgentName, Assignment.Description, A.AgentName as EditedBy, A.DateEdited from Agent inner join [Case-Agent] on [Case-Agent].AgentID = Agent.AgentID inner join [Assignment] on Assignment.AssignmentID = [Case-Agent].AssignmentID inner join [Case] on [Case].CaseID = [Case-Agent].CaseID inner join (select EditedCase.CaseID, [EditedCase].DateEdited, [Agent].AgentName from EditedCase inner join [Agent] on [Agent].AgentID = [EditedCase].AgentID) A on A.CaseID = [Case].CaseID where [Assignment].AssignmentID = 0
To do it using RANK you just need to add the RANK to the subquery and get to rank the DateEdited for each CaseID and Agent and then in the main query put a WHERE clause to only select rows where the rank is 1. I think I have got the partition clause right - its a bit hard without seeing your data.
Like this:
SELECT
[Case].CaseID
,Agent.AgentName
,Assignment.Description
,A.AgentName AS EditedBy
,A.DateEdited
FROM Agent
INNER JOIN [Case-Agent] ON [Case-Agent].AgentID = Agent.AgentID
INNER JOIN [Assignment] ON Assignment.AssignmentID = [Case-Agent].AssignmentID
INNER JOIN [Case] ON [Case].CaseID = [Case-Agent].CaseID
INNER JOIN (SELECT
EditedCase.CaseID
,[EditedCase].DateEdited
,[Agent].AgentName
,RANK ( ) OVER (PARTITION BY EditedCase.CaseID, [Agent].AgentName
ORDER BY [EditedCase].DateEdited DESC ) AS pos
FROM EditedCase
INNER JOIN [Agent] on [Agent].AgentID = [EditedCase].AgentID) A on A.CaseID = [Case].CaseID
WHERE [Assignment].AssignmentID = 0
AND pos = 1
You could also change the sub query into an aggregate query that brings back the MAX date like this:
SELECT
[Case].CaseID
,Agent.AgentName
,Assignment.Description
,A.AgentName AS EditedBy
,A.DateEdited
FROM Agent
INNER JOIN [Case-Agent] ON [Case-Agent].AgentID = Agent.AgentID
INNER JOIN [Assignment] ON Assignment.AssignmentID = [Case-Agent].AssignmentID
INNER JOIN [Case] ON [Case].CaseID = [Case-Agent].CaseID
INNER JOIN (SELECT
EditedCase.CaseID
,MAX([EditedCase].DateEdited) AS DateEdited
,[Agent].AgentName
FROM EditedCase
INNER JOIN [Agent] on [Agent].AgentID = [EditedCase].AgentID
GROUP BY
EditedCase.CaseID
,[Agent].AgentName) A on A.CaseID = [Case].CaseID
WHERE [Assignment].AssignmentID = 0
AND pos = 1
You were on the right track; you need to use a ranking function here, for example row_number():
with LatestCase as
(
select [Case].CaseID
, Agent.AgentName
, Assignment.Description
, A.AgentName as EditedBy
, A.DateEdited
, caseRank = row_number() over (partition by [Case].CaseID order by A.DateEdited desc)
from Agent
inner join [Case-Agent] on [Case-Agent].AgentID = Agent.AgentID
inner join [Assignment] on Assignment.AssignmentID = [Case-Agent].AssignmentID
inner join [Case] on [Case].CaseID = [Case-Agent].CaseID
inner join
(
select EditedCase.CaseID
, [EditedCase].DateEdited
, [Agent].AgentName
from EditedCase
inner join [Agent] on [Agent].AgentID = [EditedCase].AgentID
) A on A.CaseID = [Case].CaseID where [Assignment].AssignmentID = 0
)
select *
from LatestCase
where caseRank = 1
I am trying to display posts from a table grouped by certain meta values from another table, and ordered by other meta values or post id if "recent" order is selected.
The best I came up with is:
SELECT `posts`.`id_post`,
m1.value AS REGIUNE,
m2.value AS JUDET,
m3.value AS LOCALITATE,
MAX(`posts`.`id_post`) AS ORDERBY
FROM `posts`
INNER JOIN `posts_meta` m1
ON(`posts`.`id_post`=m1.`id_post`)
INNER JOIN `posts_meta` m2
ON(`posts`.`id_post`=m2.`id_post`)
INNER JOIN `posts_meta` m3
ON(`posts`.`id_post`=m3.`id_post`)
WHERE
`posts`.`type` = 'published'
AND ( m1.`meta` = 'regiune' )
AND ( m2.`meta` = 'judet' )
AND ( m3.`meta` = 'localitate' )
GROUP BY posts.id_post
ORDER BY ORDERBY DESC
This however only works if we are not grouping by any meta value (m1.value, m2.value or m3.value).
This one should work...
SELECT `posts`.`id_post`,
m1.value AS REGIUNE,
m2.value AS JUDET,
m3.value AS LOCALITATE,
MAX(`posts`.`id_post`) AS ORDERBY
FROM `posts`
INNER JOIN `posts_meta` m1
ON(`posts`.`id_post`=m1.`id_post`)
INNER JOIN `posts_meta` m2
ON(`posts`.`id_post`=m2.`id_post`)
INNER JOIN `posts_meta` m3
ON(`posts`.`id_post`=m3.`id_post`)
WHERE
`posts`.`type` = 'published'
AND ( m1.`meta` = 'regiune' )
AND ( m2.`meta` = 'judet' )
AND ( m3.`meta` = 'localitate' )
GROUP BY 1,2,3,4
ORDER BY `posts`.`id_post` DESC