I need too filter the iNotes calendar control in extlib. When I look in the examples in the extlib application I can see that it is suppose to be connected to a xecalendarJsonLegacyService.
The problem I find with this service is that I can't filter the content based on category or search as with the other view services.
I need to create different calendars/json data based on a search or category in a view.
I have looked at some of the other services but not sure if it is possible to use them instead.
If you have any ideas for how I should create my filter, please respond.
I have attached pictures below showing both the jsonservice and the calendarcontrol.
This is what the json data look like in the xsCalendarJsonLegacyService
{
"#timestamp":"20120311T171603",
"#toplevelentries":"3",
"viewentry":
[
{
"#unid":"37F0330979C04AF2C12579BE004F5629",
"#noteid":"32E1A",
"#position":"1",
"#read":"true",
"#siblings":"3",
"entrydata":
[
{
"#columnnumber":"0",
"#name":"$134",
"datetime":
{
"0":"20120314T100000"
}
},
{
"#columnnumber":"1",
"#name":"$149",
"number":
{
"0":119
}
}, etc...
You could implement your own REST service (or extension to existing one) in an extension library, but I guess you are looking for something easier.
Sorry no code, but maybe (and hopefully) an answer.
Have you looked at the xc:CalendarStoreCustomRestService custom control inside the Xpages Extension Library demo? It looks like they connected the calendar control with a normal JSON view store and that supports search en keys.
I found code you could use but you will have to extend the custom control. I think it is a new component that is not yet included as a xe: component inside the Extension Library.
This is how you use the control:
<xc:CalendarStoreCustomRestService id="cc4ccCalendarStoreCustomRestService"
storeComponentId="notesCalendarStore1" databaseName="#{sessionScope.databaseName}"
viewName="($Calendar)">
</xc:CalendarStoreCustomRestService>
This is your calendar component, it uses the above storeComponentId.
<xe:calendarView id="calendarView1" jsId="cview1"
summarize="false"
type="#{javascript: null == viewScope.calendarType? 'M' : viewScope.calendarType }"
storeComponentId="notesCalendarStore1">
<xe:this.loaded><![CDATA[${javascript:if (sessionScope.databaseName == null) {
return false;
} else {
return true;
}}]]></xe:this.loaded>
</xe:calendarView>
If you need some more info, this example is included inside the DWA_iNotesRest.xsp.
I googled a long time and the only solution I`ve found is to build your own Rest service
have you managed to filter the Calendar without this?
Related
I am trying to route between pages using basic if condition in Angular.
GoToHome() {
if(this.router.url=='/chat'){
console.log(this.router.url)
this.router.navigate(['login']);
} else {
this.router.navigate(['people']);
}
}
The problem is that the route chat isn't really correct, there are many pages in chat (chat\x , chat\y and many others) I want that it will work for all the pages in chat, but right now it doesn't work. If I write a specific route like chat\x it does work, but only for x. Is there a way to do it for all?
you can read and check Guards. Read about CanActivate method, maybe it will help you?
RouteGuards might do a better job of handling the redirects as per your requirement.
But a quick workaround would be to do a split() on the URL and compare for the chat part. Try the following
if(((this.router.url).split('/')[1]) === 'chat') {
// proceed
}
As other had said, best solution is to use Angular Guard https://medium.com/#ryanchenkie_40935/angular-authentication-using-route-guards-bf7a4ca13ae3.
Anyway to resolve your problem you can use startsWith() function which determines whether a string begins with the characters of a specified string.
GoToHome() {
if((this.router.url).startsWith('/chat'){
console.log(this.router.url)
this.router.navigate(['login']);
} else {
this.router.navigate(['people']);
}
}
There are many examples of doing this in axml, but I would like to have a complete binding using code behind. To be honest, I would like to have NO axml, but seems like creating all the controls programmatically is a nightmare.
I first tried the suggestions at:
MvxListView create binding for template layout from code
I have my list binding from code-behind, and I get six rows (so source binding is working); but the cells itself does not bind.
Then at the following url:
Odd issue with MvvmCross, MvxListViewItem on Android
Stuart has the following comment: Have looked through. In this case, I don't think you want to use DelayBind. DelayBind is used to delay the binding action until next time the DataContext is set. In Android's MvxAdapter/MvxListItemView case, the DataContext is passed in the ctor - so DataContext isn't set again until the cell is reused. (This is different to iOS MvxTableDataSource).
So in essence, the only example I see shows DelayBind, which shouldn't work.
Can someone please show me some examples... thanks in advance.
Added reply to Comments:
Cheesebaron, first of all, a huge thank you and respect for all your contributions;
Now, why not use axml? Well, as programmers, we all have our own preferences and way of doing stuff - I guess I am old school where we didn't have any gui designer (not really true).
Real reasons:
Common Style: I have a setup where Core has all the style details, including what all the colors would be. My idea is, each platform would get the style details from core and update accordingly. It's easy for me to create controls with the correct style this way.
Copy-Paste across platform (which then I can even have as linked files if I wanted). For example, I have a login screen with web-like verification, where a red error text appears under a control; overall on that screen I have around 10 items that needs binding. I have already got iOS version working - so starting on Droid, I copied the whole binding section from ios, and it worked perfectly. So, the whole binding, I can make it same across all platform... Any possible error in my way will stop at building, which I think is a major advantage over axml binding. Even the control creation is extremely similar, where I have helpers with same method name.
Ofcourse I understand all the additional layout that has to be handled; to be honest, it's not that bad if one really think it through; I have created a StackPanel for Droid which is based on WP - that internally handles all the layouts for child views; so for LinearLayout, all I do is setup some custom parameters, and let my panel deal with it. Relative is a different story; so far, I have only one screen that's relative, and I can even make it Linear to reduce my additional layout code.
So, from my humble point of view, for my style, code-behind creation allows me to completely copy all my bindings (I do have some custom binding factories to allow that), copy all my control create lines; then only adding those controls to the view is the only part that is different (then again, droid and WP are almost identical). So there is no way I can miss something on one platform and all are forced to be the same. It also allows me to change all the styles for every platform just by changing the core. Finally, any binding error is detected during compile - and I love that.
My original question wasn't about NOT using axml... it was on how to use MvxListView where all the binding is done in code-behind; as I have explained, I got the list binding, but not the item/cell binding working.
Thanks again in advance.
Here is part of my LoginScreen from droid; I think it's acceptable amount of code for being without axml file.
//======================================================================================================
// create and add all controls
//======================================================================================================
var usernameEntry = ControlHelper.GetUITextFieldCustom(this, "Username.", maxLength: 20);
var usernameError = AddErrorLabel<UserAuthorization, string>(vm => ViewModel.Authorization.Username);
var passwordEntry = ControlHelper.GetUITextFieldCustom(this, "Password.", maxLength: 40, secureTextEntry: true);
var passwordError = AddErrorLabel<UserAuthorization, string>(vm => ViewModel.Authorization.Password);
var loginButton = ControlHelper.GetUIButtonMain(this);
var rememberMe = new UISwitch(this);
var joinLink = ControlHelper.GetUIButtonHyperLink(this, textAlignment: UITextAlignment.Center);
var copyRightText = ControlHelper.GetUILabel(this, textAlignment: UITextAlignment.Center);
var copyRightSite = ControlHelper.GetUIButtonHyperLink(this, textAlignment: UITextAlignment.Center);
var layout = new StackPanel(this, Orientation.Vertical)
{
Spacing = 15,
SubViews = new View[]
{
ControlHelper.GetUIImageView(this, Resource.Drawable.logo),
usernameEntry,
usernameError,
passwordEntry,
passwordError,
loginButton,
rememberMe,
joinLink,
ControlHelper.GetSpacer(this, ViewGroup.LayoutParams.MatchParent, weight: 2),
copyRightText,
copyRightSite
}
};
I just came across a similar situation myself using Mvx4.
The first link you mentioned had it almost correct AND when you combine it from Staurts comment in the second link and just remove the surrounding DelayBind call, everything should work out ok -
public class CustomListItemView
: MvxListItemView
{
public MvxListItemView(Context context,
IMvxLayoutInflater layoutInflater,
object dataContext,
int templateId)
: base(context, layoutInflater, dataContext, templateId)
{
var control = this.FindViewById<TextView>(Resource.Id.list_complex_title);
var set = this.CreateBindingSet<CustomListViewItem, YourThing>();
set.Bind(control).To(vm => vm.Title);
set.Apply();
}
}
p.s. I have asked for an Edit to the original link to help others.
MMVMCross
Android
Windows 8
We had a View, call it FruitView displaying a ViewModel called FruitViewModel. The FruitViewModel can display lists of a particular type of fruit.
This all worked fine.
For a couple of reasons we created AppleViewModel and PearViewModel that inherit from FruitViewModel. They do not do anything, all calls are made to the base viewmodel.
I want to register the FruitView as the View for AppleViewModel and PearViewModel when I try and navigate to them using MvxNavigatingObject.ShowViewModel.
I cannot see how to override the default linking of Views to ViewModels. I read one post that suggested overriding GetViewModelViewLookup in the Setup class but that does not seem to exist. I also looked at CustomPresenters but that did not look like the right approach.
Anyone else done this?
Thanks
Pat
After spotting this question How to navigate to a ViewModel that extends an abstract class? (not one of the suggesting when i was posting) I found InitializeViewLookup that can be overridden in each platform's Setup.cs. I am augmenting the current mappings rather than replacing so have called base.InitializeViewLookup first.
protected override void InitializeViewLookup()
{
base.InitializeViewLookup();
var viewModelViewLookup = new Dictionary<Type, Type>()
{
{ typeof(AppleViewModel), typeof(FruitView) },
{ typeof(PearViewModel), typeof(FruitView) }
};
var container = Mvx.Resolve<IMvxViewsContainer>();
container.AddAll(viewModelViewLookup);
}
Thanks
Pat
I need to change the function that dictates the behavior of my Search form. I want the text to be "GO" instead of "Search" and the input type to be search instead of text.
Now, I already done that by editing the search.module, but is there a more convenient way? I want the theme to be 1 package deal and ready to go, not to have to edit other files from the Drupal installation.
It is for Drupal v.7.16
Thank you!
In your theme's template.php you can override any part of the search form by implement MYTHEME_form_alter.
For your example, it might look something like this:
function MYTHEME_form_alter(&$form, &$form_state, $form_id) {
if ($form_id == 'search_block_form') {
// Change form submit text
$form['actions']['submit']['#value'] = t('GO!');
// Change type to 'search'
$form['search_block_form']['#type'] = 'search';
}
}
For more background information about Tanis' solution, see the API documentation for hook_form_alter() and hook_form_FORM_ID_alter().
When I parse JSON fields coming from google maps, etc., it is a mess. Because they are not made specifically for my script I have to verify many details, epecially because the addresses are different in every country.
Short question: when the script finds a undefined property the script breaks...error..
How can I verify the property is defined?
if(data.Placemark[i].AddressDetails.Country
.AdministrativeArea.SubAdministrativeArea.Locality != null) {
/***do something***/
}
Something like that doesn't seem to solve the problem. Why?
In JavaScript, accessing a property of an object that does not exist returns undefined, not null - heck, you said it in the title.
So, assuming that all the previous properties do actually exist, you can check that the Locality property exists using typeof, like this:
if(typeof (data.
Placemark[i].
AddressDetails.
Country.
AdministrativeArea.
SubAdministrativeArea.
Locality) !== 'undefined') {
/***do something***/
}
Or, (I think) you can use hasOwnProperty():
if (data.
Placemark[i].
AddressDetails.
Country.
AdministrativeArea.
SubAdministrativeArea.hasOwnProperty('Locality'))
{
/*** do something ***/
}
First, In javascript you can use "try / catch" like java or other programming language, this can let your code continue running if something goes wrong...
for your issue, you can test that :
if (typeof(data.Placemark[i].AddressDetails.Country
.AdministrativeArea.SubAdministrativeArea.Locality)
&&
data.Placemark[i].AddressDetails.Country
.AdministrativeArea.SubAdministrativeArea.Locality.length>0) {
}