I know there's a lot of questions on this type of thing, but I haven't found one that answers my question. I have a "news feed" format site where you can filter the posts based on certain criteria. So, with some filters, you get content much taller than the browser window. With other filters, you can get no content.
When I use Webkit's Web Inspector, I see that an html {min-height:100%} does the trick for the <html> tag. I want the <body> to do exactly the same thing: be 100% when the content fits on the page, and expand otherwise.
However, I can't use a percentage height or min-height on the body when the height isn't set for <html>. It doesn't inherit a height to base its percentage off of. So what I end up with when the document has less than a full window of content is everything getting clipped off right and the foot of that content, which screws up my background and stuff.
Any ideas?
Maybe you can try something like this:
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 100%;
}
#content {
min-height: 100%;
}
I hope this helps solve the issue
From the limited details it sounds like all you need is to add is:
html,body{ height: 100%; }
And I am guessing that your background is on the body tag.
My suggestion is to set the height of the body to 100%. 100% means, that it should take equally much space as its parent element. So, if your html tag does what it's supposed to, just let the body tag take the same size:
<html style="min-height: 100%">
<body style="height: 100%">
</body>
</html>
Related
I'm laying out a website design and I have run into an error...
The html element is assigned a fixed width of 800px, the body element ID 'page' will not take up 100% width no matter what I try?
Heres the code...
<html>
<body id="page" >
/ content /
</body>
</html>
html {
width: 800px;
margin:0;
padding:0;
}
#page {
}
I have tried setting the #page to 'width:800px', 'width:100%', 'margin:0', 'margin:0 auto', etc. but no matter what there is always a 1px gap on the right side of #page. I've even tried setting 'width:801px' which didn't work, as well as setting the relative position left 1px in case it was overflowing left for some reason, but it's not...
Am I missing something stupid, is the program I am using buggy, or is it something else? Where I am from, 800px is the same as 800px so what's going on?
Thanks guys....
EDIT:
So, going back through previous projects I discovered what works for me. Whether it be the program I am using(free), or just something I'm missing this is what works for me and so resolves my issue.
<html>
<body>
/ content /
</body>
</html>
html {
width: 800px;
}
body {
margin: 0;
}
There's probably some extra css sneaking in somewhere. Check for any border property on your #page element.
Run this snippet, and there shouldn't be a single pixel gap.
html {
width: 800px;
background: lightgrey;
}
#page {
margin: 0;
border: none;
background: yellow;
}
<html>
<body id="page">
/ content /
</body>
</html>
it appears you are running into an inconsistency problem in the way browsers inject scrollbars into the page, see here:
Styling the `<html>` element in CSS?
I would start by using a css reset like normalize.css to get cross-browser consistency in behaviour then use your custom styles from there. Personally I never style the html element and work from the body down. Working like that I dont encounter these kinds of problems becuase they are dealt with by normalize.css.
I wanted to implement a sticky footer that will be pushed to bottom if content is less.
I have gone through various posts in this website and could see that two popular solutions (without flexbox) uses either
html, body
{
height: 100%;
}
OR
html
{
position: relative;
min-height: 100%;
}
I am posting only the parts of the solution which I did not understand. Posting my doubts here. Please help me to understand these solutions
(a) as stated, first solution uses 100% height for html and body. But what is 100% height here? Is it refers to the height of view port or height of the entire document?
(b) in first solution, If 100% height refers only to view port height, isn't it required to make the setting to min-height instead of height because if document is larger than the view port, restricting to 100% height is not relevant.
(c) I know we make a element relative so that its child absolute/relative elements gets position from it. But what is the meaning of making html relative as it has only document as its parent?
(d) also, from your experience is there any better solution (without flexbox)? Similarly there are many posts with respect to issues in mobile browsers while using such solutions (like ios8 issue when using 100vh). Whether these solutions have any such issues?
My html knowledge is very much limited. thanks for help.
Note: both solutions are working fine and giving sticky footer as required
A)
The html and body tags do not fill the entire window by default, so that code forces to be 100% of screen even when inside content is less.
Without:
With 100%:
B)
You can get away with having the <body> as 100% because the content inside by default will overflow and the <html> tag has overflow:auto on by default.
So, the following works, but the content will overflow the <body>
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
A better solution would be one of the following:
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
body {
overflow: auto;
}
Or
html{
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
}
The basic layout is
<body>
<div class="wrapper">
<nav></nav>
<myContent></myContent>
</div>
</body>
<footer></footer>
Where the footer should drop below the body and not be affected by the CSS of the body or its children.
I aim for the footer to be at the bottom of the page no matter how much or how little content the body contains. This CSS should do the trick:
body, html {
height: 100vh;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 96vh;
position: relative;
}
footer {
width: 100%;
height: 4vh;
position: relative;
bottom: 0;
font-size: .75em;
}
On inspection in my browser, the footer is contained within the body tag. This makes no sense. In addition, the footer shows its width to be the same as the viewport but does not reflect that in the demo model. Instead its left border is on the left side of the page and has about 10% vw worth of whitepace to the right. Setting backround-color: yellow confirms this. And finally, the position fails to go to the bottom unless <myContent> pushes it below the screen's view.
What's wrong with this set up?
In HTML5, most everything that is not specifically in a <head> or <body> element, whether you actually declare it so or not, gets assigned to whichever is appropriate. If the necessary element doesn't exist, it's created.
As per the HTML5 spec, <html>, <head>, and <body> are optional. Most browsers work by creating missing elements as necessary. (In my experience, mostly noticed with tables and <thead> and <tbody>.)
Note that the code you see by using the browser's inspector is usually the code that the browser is working with after "fixing" what it got from the server.
In HTML, the body tag encloses the visible elements of the page. HTML has a HEAD element, but that element is not for visible content, it is for non-visible elements such as links to stylesheets, etc. Your FOOTER element rightly belongs in the BODY element.
footer header and other specific semantic tag must be enclosed to body => http://www.w3schools.com/html/html5_semantic_elements.asp
The problem is, that having elements outside of the body is not valid HTML. Modern browsers will correct for this and move this elements inside.
Thanks for the above notes regarding footer/body placement. Last I read one could place the footer either inside or outside the body, but your comments have been noted.
My footer was misbehaving because the inspector zoom on the index page was changed, but not for any other pages. I don't how that happened, but resetting put it where it needed to be.
I'm working on a website that have pages that exceed 100% browser window height and ones that do not. So, what I need is the height to be at least 100% but higher if applicable.
My current CSS looks like:
html, body {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto;
}
This initially seemed to work fine but then I realized that <body> does NOT have the same height as <html> but rather seems to use the standard height. It is like <body> does NOT respect the min-height property.
Hopefully, someone can toss some ideas or shine some light on this.
UPDATE1 It seems like HTML is acting as if it was default too..
UPDATE2 http://jsfiddle.net/rpz4rd4c/5
UPDATE3 According to the suggested comment by ( MichaelHarvey ) the body height is relative to the html height ( not min-height ) if that was true the following code should work:
html {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto;
}
body {
height: 100%;
}
However, it doesn't.
FINAL UPDATE
The solutions provided on this page "work" however they might be buggy with JS plugins. I would recommend people to use 100vh solution or the one I accepted as answer ( mainly because it requires no CSS3 ). I guess a 100% accurate solution to a problem like mine (having all dividers and elements 100% non-related to browser window) would be to simply use inline CSS and use min-height at longer pages and a height at browser fitting ones. This might require some JS.
<3
This seems to work with Chrome:
html {
height: 100%;
}
body {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/rpz4rd4c/10/
Of course, this means the html element never takes the full child's height (only the viewports). Hopefully that's not an issue.
Viewport units to the rescue! The vh unit in CSS works relative to viewport height regardless of parent elements and all that fuss. Here's the CSS you should put on the body:
body{
min-height:100vh;
margin:0;
}
See http://jsfiddle.net/rpz4rd4c/3/ for my working example
EDIT: for your other elements that also need to be at least 100% height, just add min-height:100vh to their CSS styling as well. Thanks #misterManSam!
Without really understanding the why, perhaps this is what you're looking for?
html:
<html>
<body>
<div class='wrapper'>
<div class='inner'>
<!-- your content here -->
</div>
</div>
</body>
<html>
css:
html,body{
height:100%;
overflow:hidden;
}
.wrapper{
height:100%;
overflow:scroll;
background:#f9f9f9;
}
The html and body are always 100% height, and no matter what the content length it will still scroll. Not sure on the side effects of locking the html/body scrolling (lots of potential issues) however, so I'd be wary.
Example: http://codepen.io/jessekernaghan/pen/GocHg
I have a problem with fixing the footer to the bottom of the browser .. The problem is when resolution changes or windows resizes the footer content overlaps the content of the website, here is the current css for footer div
div.footer {
position:absolute;
bottom:0px;
}
Does anybody knows how can I fix this? Thank you
UPDATE:
This is what I need exactly but for some reason it doesn't work for my web page, it does work when I cut paste code to the blank page, but since my page is full with content and everything, what are the important elements to include? Hereis the url.
The above trick works only if my website has filled content if I have some lets say few lines the above trick doesn't work.
UPDATE II
My website has dynamic content so I think can't use this sort of CSS Sticky footers because sometimes the website will just have few lines sometimes be packed with content. Thats why the footer is not sticking to the bottom of the webpage.. its not problem to stick the footer if there is plenty content on the website the problem is without.
What you have here is a common problem for which there is no common answer, but what I would try if I were you since all these above suggestions apparently aren't working, I'd try to set my page container background to any color let say white (#FFFFFF) and I'd set background color of body to any other then white let say grey (#CCCCCC). And finaly set footer position to relative and of course it must be placed after everything if you want it alway to be at the bottom. This way you'll get what you need 100 % sure if you follow step by step instructions.
Checkout CSS Sticky Footer for an excellent cross-browser compatible method.
What that site essentially does is make the footer stick BENEATH the browser edge, and gives it a negative margin that has the same value as the footer's height. This way, the footer is sure to stick to the bottom.
You can add a push div to the last element before the footer in order to always assure that the footer doesn't overlap the content.
Given this example:
<html>
<body>
<div class="header" />
<div class="content" />
<div class="footer_push" />
<div class="footer" />
</body>
</html>
If <div class="footer" /> is always 75px high, use the following CSS:
html, body { height: 100%; } /* Take all available vertical space */
/* Push the bottom of the page 75px.
This will not make scrollbars appear
if the content fits already. */
.footer_push { height: 75px; }
/* Position the footer */
.footer { position: absolute; bottom: 0; height: 75px; }
Basically you need to give the footer a fixed height and to push the footer with another div of the same height to the bottom. There's however more browser specific stuff which you need to take into account:
The html and body must besides having a height of 100% no (default) margin to avoid the footer being pushed further to below that amount of margin.
The p and div elements throughout the page must have no margin-top to avoid the footer being pushed further to below that amount of top-margins in under each Firefox.
The "container" div must use min-height of 100% instead of height to avoid the footer to overlap the remaining of the content. IE6 which doesn't know min-height just works fine with height, so you'll need to add a * html hack for this.
All with all, here's an SSCCE, just copy'n'paste'n'run it:
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=EmulateIE7">
<title>SO question 1900813</title>
<style>
html, body {
margin: 0;
height: 100%;
}
p, div {
margin-top: 0; /* Fix margin collapsing behaviour in FF. Use padding-top if necessary. */
}
#container {
position: relative;
min-height: 100%;
}
* html #container {
height: 100%; /* This is actually "min-height" for IE6 and older. */
}
#pushfooter {
height: 50px; /* Must be the same as footer height. */
}
#footer {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
height: 50px;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="container">
<p>Some content</p>
<div id="pushfooter"></div>
<div id="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Edit: after more testing I realized that this indeed does not work in IE8 (I still consider it as a beta so I didn't really use/test it, sorry about that), unless you let it render in IE7 compatibility modus (insert sad smilie here) by adding the following meta tag to the <head> (which I already added to the SSCCE here above):
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=EmulateIE7">
or to let it render in quirks mode by using a "wrong" doctype (either remove the <!doctype> or pick one of the doctypes associated with painfully red Q boxes in IE here). But I wouldn't do that, that has more negative side-effects as well.
And, surprisingly, the http://www.cssstickyfooter.com site as someone else here mentioned here which used an entirely different approach also did not work in IE8 here (try to resize browser window in y-axis, the footer won't move along it as opposed to other browsers, including IE6/7). That browser keeps astonishing me. Really.
Try setting the footers Position to relative and playing around with a negative top margin to get it how you want it.
What you're looking for is a Sticky Footer, you can find a lot of resources like this one: http://ryanfait.com/resources/footer-stick-to-bottom-of-page/
try this:
#wpr{
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.dsp-tr{
display: table-row;
}
.dsp-tc{
display: table-cell;
}
#ftr-cnr{
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
}
#ftr{
background-color: red;
padding: 10px 0px;
font-size: 24px;
}
<div id="wpr">
<div class="dsp-tr">
<div class="dsp-tc">
body
</div>
</div>
<div class="dsp-tr">
<div class="dsp-tc" id="ftr-cnr">
<div id="ftr">
footer
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
display: table does not make it a table, a <div> is still a <div>, it just tells the browser to display it as table.
i tested it in chrome and firefox
let me know if it works for you.
We had this problem a few times. We could not find any cross browser CSS only solution. We finally resorted to JQuery. We wrote our own (i can't publish) but this one http://www.hardcode.nl/archives_139/article_244-jquery-sticky-footer.htm looks promising:
$(function(){
positionFooter();
function positionFooter(){
if($(document.body).height() < $(window).height()){
$("#pageFooterOuter").css({position: "absolute",top:($(window).scrollTop()+$(window).height()-$("#pageFooterOuter").height())+"px"})
}
}
$(window)
.scroll(positionFooter)
.resize(positionFooter)
});
Do you have a DOCTYPE declaration in the top of your HTML?
If so, there is a good chance I have a solution for you.
I was trying to do a height:100% table or div (assuming this is a basic cornerstone to the expanding footer feature)
No matter what I did, the 100% height didn't work! the elements just didn't stretch...
I narrowed it down to a very basic HTML
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Test1</title>
</head>
<body>
<div style="border: 2px solid red; height: 100%">Hello
World</div>
</body>
</html>
but the DIV didn't stretch all the way down (the 100% was ignored). This was true also for tables with plain height="100%" attribute.
As a desperate last result guess, I removed the DOCTYPE row, resulting in this code
<html>
<head>
<title>Test1</title>
</head>
<body>
<div style="border: 2px solid red; height: 100%">Hello
World</div>
</body>
</html>
And it worked!
I'm sure there is a good explanation, but I really didn't care since it solved the problem
Update
See related question (asked by me)
Depends on what you want to do. I you want it to be always visible on the bottom of your screen, you should use
div.footer{
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
}
Be sure to get some padding on the bottom of your body (or container, so that people can actually scroll to the bottom of the text). The main problem here is that when resizing everything it will overlap.
If you just want to have a footer that has a background-image / colour that stretches all the way till the end (for pages that are not fullpage height) you could try to use a faux column principle or even try to give your body the background colour of your footer and fix the header / content background.
Today I stumbled across this page:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~peterned/examples/csslayout1.html
Could be helpfull
I came up with a fairly simple solution that doesn't use any CSS height hacks or any of that.
You just set your <body> with the background you want the footer to have, and then put everything besides the footer in a <div> with the properties you would normally give to the body tag.
This gets the footer to "extend" its color to the bottom of the page when there is short dynamic content without expanding it needlessly when there is a lot of dynamic content. The "virtual body" div can still have a gradient followed by a solid color, and the footer's background is hiding in the body tag, only showing up on short pages. (Works great if you need a solid color to continue after your footer gradient ends, or if you just need the background to match the footer color)
CSS
body {background-color: #000; }
#primary_container { background: #FFF url('/images/bgvert.png'); background-repeat: repeat-x; }
#footer { background: #000; }
HTML
<body>
<div id="primary_container">
<!-- most content, can be short or long -->
</div>
<div id="footer">
<!-- if primary content + footer is less than browser height, body background color
displays below this. If it is more, you get normal scroll behavior to the end
of footer and body background color is never seen -->
</div>
</body>