I am having trouble sending a SQL statement through a DbContext using context.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand().
I am trying to execute
CREATE TABLE Phones([Id] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
[Number] [int],[PhoneTypeId] [int])
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Phones] ADD CONSTRAINT [DF_Phones_Id]
DEFAULT (newid()) FOR [Id]
GO
This fails with the error string
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ALTER'.
Incorrect syntax near 'GO'.
However running that exact statement in SSMS runs without errors? Any issues I need to resolve regarding the default constraint throught the DbContext. I have see problems with people using constraints and not having IsDbGenerated set to true. I am not sure how that would apply here though.
GO is not a part of SQL, so it can't be executed with ExecuteSqlCommand(). Think of GO as a way to separate batches when using Management Studio or the command-line tools. Instead, just remove the GO statements and you should be fine. If you run into errors because you need to run your commands in separate batches, just call ExecuteSqlCommand() once for each batch you want to run.
I know, necroposting is bad maner, but may be this post would save someone's time. As it was mentioned in Dave's post, GO is not a part of SQL, so we can create little workaround to make it work
var text = System.IO.File.ReadAllText("initialization.sql");
var parts = text.Split(new string[] { "GO" }, System.StringSplitOptions.None);
foreach (var part in parts) { context.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(part); }
context.SaveChanges();
In this case your commands would be splitted and executed without problems
Dave Markle beat me to it. In fact, you can change "GO" to any other string to separate batches.
An alternative implementation here is to use SMO instead of the Entity Framework. There is a useful method there called ExecuteNonQuery that I think will make your life a lot simpler. Here is a good implementation example.
Related
I have the following code attempting to truncate a table. The Joomla documentation makes me believe this will work, but it does not. What am I missing?
$db = JFactory::getDbo();
truncate_query = $db->getQuery(true);
//$truncate_query = 'TRUNCATE ' . $db->quoteName('#__mytable');
$truncate_query->truncateTable($db->quoteName('#__mytable'));
$db->setQuery($truncate_query);
echo $truncate_query;
exit();
If I use the line that is commented out to manually generate the SQL, it does work. The reason I am still looking to use the truncateTable function is that I am trying to include the truncation in a transaction. When I use the manual statement, the table is still truncated even if another part of the transaction fails, which is annoying since the other statements rely on data that is truncated, so if the table is emptied when it shouldn't be there is no data left to run the transaction again. Very annoying!
Here's how you call/execute your truncation query:
JFactory::getDbo()->truncateTable('#__mytable');
And now some more details...
Here is the method's code block in the Joomla source code:
public function truncateTable($table)
{
$this->setQuery('TRUNCATE TABLE ' . $this->quoteName($table));
$this->execute();
}
As you can see the truncateTable() method expects a tablename as a string for its sole parameter; you are offering a backtick-wrapped string -- but the method already offers the backtick-wrapping service. (Even if you strip your backticks off, your approach will not be successful.)
The setQuery() and execute() calls are already inside the method, so you don't need to create a new query object nor execute anything manually.
There is no return in the method, so the default null is returned -- ergo, your $truncate_query becomes null. When you try to execute(null), you get nothing -- not even an error message.
If you want to know how many rows were removed, you will need to run a SELECT query before hand to count the rows.
If you want to be sure that there are no remaining rows of data, you'll need to call a SELECT and check for zero rows of data.
Here is my answer (with different wording) on your JSX question.
I have been getting this annoying exception while trying to create a native query with my entity manager. The full error message is:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: During synchronization a new object was found through a relationship that was not marked cascade PERSIST: com.model.OneToManyEntity2#61f3b3b.
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.RepeatableWriteUnitOfWork.discoverUnregisteredNewObjects(RepeatableWriteUnitOfWork.java:313)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.UnitOfWorkImpl.calculateChanges(UnitOfWorkImpl.java:723)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.sessions.RepeatableWriteUnitOfWork.writeChanges(RepeatableWriteUnitOfWork.java:441)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.EntityManagerImpl.flush(EntityManagerImpl.java:874)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.QueryImpl.performPreQueryFlush(QueryImpl.java:967)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.QueryImpl.executeReadQuery(QueryImpl.java:207)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.QueryImpl.getSingleResult(QueryImpl.java:521)
at org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jpa.EJBQueryImpl.getSingleResult(EJBQueryImpl.java:400)
The actual code that triggers the error is:
Query query;
query = entityManager.createNativeQuery(
"SELECT MAX(CAST(SUBSTRING_INDEX(RecordID,'-',-1) as Decimal)) FROM `QueriedEntityTable`");
String recordID = (query.getSingleResult() == null ?
null :
query.getSingleResult()
.toString());
This is being executed with an EntityTransaction in the doTransaction part. The part that is getting me with this though is that this is the first code to be executed within the doTransaction method, simplified below to:
updateOneToManyEntity1();
updateOneToManyEntity2();
entityManager.merge(parentEntity);
The entity it has a problem with "OneToManyEntity1" isn't even the table I'm trying to create the query on. I'm not doing any persist or merge up until this point either, so I'm also not sure what is supposedly causing it to be out of sync. The only database work that's being done up until this code is executed is just pulling in data, not changing anything. The foreign keys are properly set up in the database.
I'm able to get rid of this error by doing as it says and marking these relationships as Cascade.PERSIST, but then I get a MySQLContrainstraViolationException on the query.getSingleResult() line. My logs show that its doing some INSERT queries right before this, so it looks like its reaching the EntityManager.merge part of my doTransaction method, but the error and call stack point to a completely different part of the code.
Using EclipseLink (2.6.1), Glassfish 4, and MySQL. The entitymanager is using RESOURCE_LOCAL with all the necessary classes listed under the persistence-unit tag and exclude-unlisted-classes is set to false.
Edit: So some more info as I'm trying to work through this. If I put a breakpoint at the beginning of the transaction and then execute entityManager.clear() through IntelliJ's "Evaluate Expression" tool, everything works fine at least the first time through. Without it, I get an error as it tries to insert empty objects into the table.
Edit #2: I converted the nativeQuery part into using the Criteria API and this let me actually make it through my code so I could find where it was unintentionally adding in a null object to my entity list. I'm still just confused as to why the entity manager is caching these errors or something to the point that creating a native query is breaking because its still trying to insert bad data. Is this something I'd need to call EntityManager.clear() before doing each time? Or am I supposed to call this when there is an error in the doTransaction method?
So after reworking the code and setting this aside, I stumbled on at least part of the answer to my question. My issue was caused by the object being persisted prior to the transaction starting. So when I was entering my transaction, it first tried to insert/update data from my entity objects and threw an error since I hadn't set the values of most of the non-null columns. I believe this is the reason I was getting the cascade errors and I'm positive this is the source of the random insert queries I saw being fired off at the beginning of my transaction. Hope this helps someone else avoid a lot of trouble.
There are few example out there but non of them are very clarified (or on old version).
I want to call MySQL procedure and check the return status (in rails 4.2). The most common method I saw is to call result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("call example_proc()"), but in some places people wrote there is prepared method result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute_procedure("Stored Procedure Name", arg1, arg2) (however it didn't compiled).
So what is the correct way to call and get the status for MySQL procedure?
Edit:
And how to send parameters safly, where the first parameter is integer, second string and third boolean?
Rails 4 ActiveRecord::Base doesn't support execute_procedure method, though result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection still works. ie
result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute("call example_proc('#{arg1}','#{arg2}')")
You can try Vishnu approach below
or
You can also try
ActiveRecord::Base.connections.exec_query("call example_proc('#{arg1}','#{arg2}')")
here is the document
In general, you should be able to call stored procedures in a regular where or select method for a given model:
YourModel.where("YOUR_PROC(?, ?)", var1, var2)
As for your comment "Bottom line I want the most correct approach with procedure validation afterwards (for warnings and errors)", I guess it always depends on what you actually want to implement and how readable you want your code to be.
For example, if you want to return rows of YourModel attributes, then it probably would be better if you use the above statement with where method. On the other hand, if you write some sql adapter then you might want to go down to the ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute level.
BTW, there is something about stored proc performance that should be mentioned here. In several databases, database does stored proc optimization on the first run of the stored proc. However, the parameters that you pass to that first run might not be those that will be running on it more frequently later on. As a result, your stored-proc might be auto-optimized in a "none-optimal" way for your case. It may or may not happen this way, but it is something that you should consider while using stored procs with dynamic params.
I believe you have tried many other solutions and got some or other errors mostly "out of sync" or "closed connection" errors. These errors occur every SECOND time you try to execute the queries. We need to workaround like the connection is new every time to overcome this. Here is my solution that didn't throw any errors.
#checkout a connection for Model
conn = ModelName.connection_pool.checkout
#use the new connection to execute the query
#records = conn.execute("call proc_name('params')")
#checkout the connection
ModelName.connection_pool.checkin(conn)
The other approaches failed for me, possibly because ActiveRecord connections are automatically handled to checkout and checking for each thread. When our method tries to checkout a connection just to execute the SP, it might conflict since there will be an active connection just when the method started.
So the idea is to manually #checkout a connection for the model instead of for thread/function from the pool and #checkin once the work is done. This worked great for me.
I running a Mysql Query to select some data, Sometimes i get a error called
mysql_fetch_assoc() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given
when i executed this following code,
$result = $this->db->execute($sql);
for ($i = 0; $data[$i + 1] = mysql_fetch_assoc($result); $i++);
array_pop($data);
how do i optimize this coding to prevent any errors ?
is there anything wrong with it ? should i ignore this error ?
That means that the query is buggy, whyever, most likely because you construct it using components from sources which you do not really check enough. A buggy statement throws an error (since no result can be computed). That error is returned as false instead of a mysql result ressource. Since you do not check if the query succeeded but blindly try to retrieve details from the result, you get this second error.
So there are four things you have to invest into:
you should always check if a query succeeded at all:
enclose your query into a conditional: if (FALSE!==($result=$this->db->execute($sql))) and only retrieve from the result ressource if that condition resolves to true.
make sure you really (really!) check all input data you use to construct your query. Checking here also means to encode and escape it correctly, also see point 4. for this.
in cases like this it is important to analyze what exactly it is that is going wrong. There is little sense in guessing what might be going wrong. So in addition to checking if the query succeeded at all (1.) you should also take a look at the error message mysql throws if this is not the case. Use the method mysql_error() for this. It is well documented just as every other function too.
you should rework your code and migrate from phps old, long deprecated mysql extension to either mysqli or PDO. Both are php extensions that offer more security against constructing buggy statements. Read about "prepared statements" and "parameter binding" for this.
I have a 'user' table with a field name 'process_salary?' which has a boolean datatype
#user = User.create(params[:user])
if #user.process_salary?
//some code here
else
//some code here
end
When I create a new object of user and check for process_salary it gives me following error
NoMethodError: undefined method `process_salary?' for #<User:0xb6ac2f68>
Why does this error occur? Can I avoid it without changing my column name?
When I check it with the debugger it crashes the first time, but after that it runs properly
The question-mark has a special meaning in ActiveRecord. It can be used to check whether a field is true. You are using it as part of your field name which wasn't such a good idea. You could try if #user.process_salary?? exists but I think ultimately it is easiest to change your database column to be called 'process_salary'.
Side note: The 'rails console' is really helpful for playing around with models.
As cellcortex posted, question marks at the end of column names are tricky in Rails. If you need to have it there for legacy reasons, you might be able access the attribute as follows:
#user['process_salary?']
or the more verbose:
#user.read_attribute['process_salary?']
You can of course test for nil using .nil?.