Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am looking for a MySQL Framework. I have a database ready containing 100's of tables. I just want to attach a front-end to this database using which one can edit, modify and delete the data in the database. I am not willing to write php code for this work as I have some time-constraint. So does a solution for this exist? In my basic research I stumbled upon Xataface. How is it? Are there any other solution?
Thanks
There are some other as well:
HeidiSQL
phpMyAdmin
SQLyog and MONyog
For database modeling:
MySQL Workbench
You can try SQLyog which has 30-day free trial. You can download it from here. List of features available: http://www.webyog.com/en/sqlyog_feature_matrix.php
i would recommend phpmyadmin. It has many features and it more user friendly
The main PhpMyAdmin features are as follows:
User-friendly web interface;
Support for most MySQL functions like browse, drop, create, copy and
alter databases, tables, views, fields and indexes, execute MySQL
queries, manage stored procedures and functions;
Import data from CSV and SQL files;
Export data to various formats: CSV, SQL, XML, PDF, ISO/IEC 26300 -
OpenDocument Text and Spreadsheet, Word, Excel, LATEX and others;
Searching globally in a database or a subset of it;
And much more.
For an user interface, you can try phpmyadmin as a web based and a lot of desktop applications depending upon your operating systems.
If you are looking at a programming framework for the user, then cakephp or rails are an excellent option - you would have to need extra tables for storing metadata though.
If you are looking for a GUI to work with MySQL databases, you can try dbForge Studio for MySQL. Try Trial or free Express edition. Here it is a list of features.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm needing to make a stand-alone application with NodeJS for Windows, Mac, and Linux
My first option for the database was SQLite but it's very small for my big data
My reason for using MySQL is that support many data and it's quickly
But the big problem is installing MySQL that it's hard to install it with end-user
And the important note is I packaging the NodeJS project and convert to exe file
Also, I use mosquito broker in this project and still no problem in the run this application.
Can I use MySQL like SQLite (stand-alone)?
Thanks
It's bad if you think Sqlite is weak
Because it's the best choice for your needing
It's simple, high performance, stand-alone and many features
My suggestion is using SQLite
Finally, I decide to use the same Sqlite because :
"SQLite supports databases up to 140 terabytes in size"
Also, I assign database file for each device and I think that is the best solution without Mysql database
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working on a project with MongoDB database but in Opencart database configuration there isn't an option for NoSQL database. I'd like to integrate Opencart into my project. Can someone guide me how to use Opencart using MongoDB? Is it possible that Opencart only uses MySQL database?
Is it possible that Open cart only uses MySQL database?
All of the internal queries in Opencart are written in SQL and you can (in theory) use any database which supports it like Oracle, Sybase, Microsoft SQL Server, Access, Ingres, PostgreSQL and of course MySQL. According to the MongoDB docs:
Does MongoDB support SQL?
No. However, MongoDB does support a rich query language of its own.
For examples on using MongoDB’s query language, see MongoDB CRUD
Operations
You'll need to choose a database that supports SQL.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm a bit confused of this and I just want to ask: which one is a better database for our project?
Our project is a library system using bar code and a online website for the reservation of books and for the user to view if the book is available or not...
Both system and website mush have one database.
I just wanted to ask this because I'm confused about these 2 databases.
I already tried using the workbench of mysql and people keep saying that I should use sql in wamp. But I don't know the difference and what will be the outcome in storing data in our system and web.
This question is both subjective and unclear, but I'll try to add some information regardless:
WAMP (Windows, Apache, MySQL, PHP) isn't a database, it's a software stack using mySQL as the database.
By definition, you can't use WAMP (ie PHP) if you're using VB.NET: You're using WIMVB (Windows, IIS, MySQL or another database, and VB)
If you're using .NET, it usually makes sense to complete the Microsoft stack and use SQL Server, making your stack into: Windows, IIS, SQL Server and VB.NET (Although I'd recommend using C#.NET, not VB, as you'll it more widespread while being every bit as capable.
MySql would be a better choice for most applications, in my opinion. It as a good connector for .Net, and will be more flexible down the road. I would be more likely to use WAMP for a simple application with little chance for later enhancements -- a quick one-time app.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I am starting a simple windows forms application that requires a database to store inventory and purchasing records (less than 1000 items). What I want to ask is for your opinion which 'lite' database should I use for this small project, considering that the prerequisites I'll be installing in a client computer should have 'minimal' file size.
The client computer has a running OS of Windows 7, and I don't want him to install so many files, such as the .NET framework and the server that hosts the database, just to install the main application I'm currently developing.
What I'm really asking from you guys is to find out which of these two commonly known databases should I use, and look for the 'right recipe' to be used when building the installer. Thank you.
Of the two, SQLite is simpler to install and deploy. Fewer files, smaller distribution footprint and fewer configuration options to deal with (mostly because SQLite is a library that links into your application where as MySQL is a full client/server RDBMS).
SQLite is made for extremely simple database needs, and is probably a good fit based on your description.
I have never heard of MySQL Lite and a web search turned up nothing, so I will assume you meant MySQL. MySQL is a RDBS client/server system and probably major overkill unless you plan to store many records, or to have multiple people accessing the database at the same time.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working on an open source project which can use a number of DBMS' as backend. So far we supports SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008 but we would also like to support some additional databases including some file based DBs.
Note: The file based databases must work on a 64-bit platform, so MS Access is not an option as there is no 64-bit provider AFAIK.
Which DBMS should a database centric open source project support in your opinion?
SQLite, definitely.
Provide ODBC support, then the end-user can choose from just about any database going.
Firebird, either in its embedded variant or as a (small footprint) server.
MySQL, it's a widely used free/open source RDBMS.
Not a file based DBMS, but you didn't say it had to be, only that you wanted a few of those too.
Support these: sqlite,mysql,postgresql
You don't mention what language you're developing in. Some, like Java, have standard database APIs, so supporting multiple SQL servers is easy, provided you can use the common denominator of the SQL language in your application.
I agree that firebird can be better than SQL Lite and M$SQL Express , or even is better than mysql , scales better with the number of CPUS and is more mature (triggers , and transactions are implemented for many many light years ago)