I have seen that while developing websites, vertically centering a container (of fixed height) inside a container of random height always comes as a nightmare for the web developer (at least, me) while when it comes to horizontal centering a container (of fixed width) inside a container of random width, the margin:0px auto; tends to serve an easy way out in the standard model.
When things can be as simple as that why doesn't CSS work out with the margin:auto 0px; when it comes to centering a container of fixed height inside a container of random height? Is there any specific reason to do so?
It's really less of a nightmare than you think, just don't use margins. vertical-align is really what you should rely on for fluid-height vertical centering. I threw together a quick demo to demonstrate my point:
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html,
body {
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
}
span {
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
#any-height {
background: #000;
text-align: left;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
vertical-align: middle;
display: inline-block;
}
<span></span>
<div id="any-height"></div>
See: http://jsfiddle.net/Wexcode/jLXMS/
The right answer for your question is that margin: auto 0 doesn't work the same way that margin: 0 auto works because width: auto doesn't work the same way height: auto does.
Vertical auto margin works for absolutely positioned elements with a known height.
.parent {
position: relative;
}
.child {
position: absolute;
top: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; left: 0;
width: 150px;
height: 150px;
margin: auto;
}
Use flexbox parent
One of advantages of using margin: auto compared to justify-content: center / align-items: center is ability to scroll child item that is overflowing parent
html, body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
.parent {
display: flex;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.inner {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: green;
margin: auto;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="inner">
</div>
</div>
CSS
.aligncenter{
display: -webkit-box;
display: -moz-box;
display: box;
-webkit-box-align: center;
-moz-box-align: center;
flex-align: center;
-webkit-box-pack: center;
-moz-box-pack: center;
flex-pack: center;
}
HTML
<div class="aligncenter">
---your content appear at the middle of the parent div---
</div>
.aligncenter {
display: -webkit-box;
display: -moz-box;
display: box;
-webkit-box-align: center;
-moz-box-align: center;
flex-align: center;
-webkit-box-pack: center;
-moz-box-pack: center;
flex-pack: center;
}
<div class="aligncenter">
---your content appear at the middle of the parent div---
</div>
Note
This CSS class work with almost all browsers
Related
I am having issues with a nested flexbox container with an image inside of it. I need the image to maintain its 16x9 ratio always and would like the parent (or another div) to always be the exact size of the image, as I am using its coordinates to create a laser pointer feature and send it to other users.
I currently have the following Code:
#container {
display: -webkit-box;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
-webkit-box-align: center;
-ms-flex-align: center;
align-items: center;
-webkit-box-pack: center;
-ms-flex-pack: center;
justify-content: center;
max-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
padding: 0 2rem 2rem;
}
#container > div {
position: relative;
max-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
display: -webkit-box;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
-webkit-box-align: center;
-ms-flex-align: center;
align-items: center;
-webkit-box-pack: center;
-ms-flex-pack: center;
justify-content: center;
}
#container img {
height: auto;
max-height: 100%;
width: auto;
max-width: 100%;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="inner">
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/1600x900/000000/fff">
</div>
</div>
The #inner div and image match size when the #container is wider than the image:
However, when the image is full width, the #inner div is taller than the image:
Removing the #inner height works for the smaller widths, however the image then blows out of the container as the screen gets wider:
I have also tried some other solutions, such as adding object-fit: contain; to the image, and using a ratio-class with a padding-top of 56.25%, but can't seem to get any of these solutions to be fully responsive.
Any ideas are much appreciated!
If I get the idea correctly should be like this.
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
body {
margin: 0;
}
#container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
#inner {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
#inner img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="inner">
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/1600x900/000000/fff">
</div>
</div>
Edit:
If you set your inner div as display inline block, it will always be the same size as the child image:
body{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing:border-box;
}
#container {
display: -webkit-box;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
-webkit-box-align: center;
-ms-flex-align: center;
align-items: center;
-webkit-box-pack: center;
-ms-flex-pack: center;
justify-content: center;
width: 100%;
padding: 2rem;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
#container > div {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
background: red;
font-size: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
#container img {
height: auto;
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
display: block;
}
as in this example: https://jsfiddle.net/nzs21bem/
Is this what you are looking for?
You need to add some styles to your image so the ratio is preserved.
And display the image as a block element instead of the default inline style,
which has some padding to it.
.imgblock {
background: red;
margin: 30px;
}
.imgblock img {
width: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
.imgblock1 img {
display: block;
}
<div class="imgblock imgblock1">
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/1600x900/000000/fff">
</div>
That should make the parent the same size as the child image.
As you can see the difference in these 2 examples: https://jsfiddle.net/no1rqx6f/
Image stretches if I don't use object-fit contains. Stretches in width, losing aspect ratio.
object-fit contain fixes that.
The problem is, the element itself is not contained, just the visible image. Which means if I make the image clickable, the whole element area (even outside the image) is clickable.
https://jsfiddle.net/nyysyngp/10/ (or see code below)
I just want the visible image to be clickable. This seems to work on Firefox, but not Chrome.
body, html
{
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: red;
display: flex;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
#media
{
display: flex;
background-color: #262423;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
flex-direction: column;
flex-grow: 1;
}
#media_split
{
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
align-items: center;
}
#media_image_container
{
height: 50%;
width: 100%;
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 0;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
background-color: green;
}
#media_image
{
object-fit: contain;
max-height: calc(100% - 4em);
max-width: calc(100% - 4.7em);
min-height: 100px;
min-width: 100px;
cursor: pointer;
}
#media_tv
{
height: 50%;
width: 100%;
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 0;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
background-color:blue;
}
<div id='media'>
<div id='media_split'>
<div id='media_image_container'>
<img id='media_image' src='https://i.imgur.com/F26h0tq.jpg'>
</div>
<div id='media_tv'></div>
</div>
</div>
Well some months later I found a solution. Just by adding "position: absolute" to #media_image the problem went away, which in my case didn't break anything else.
In #media_image_container remove display: flex; and add text-align: center;
It will fix the issue.
This question already has answers here:
Center and bottom-align flex items
(3 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
I'm trying to get one flex item to be centered vertically and horizontally.
I'd like for some text to be fixed to the bottom of the flex container.
margin-top:auto on the text just shoves the inner box to the top. Ideas?
.container {
background: lightblue;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
padding: 10px;
}
.container .box {
background: goldenrod;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="box"></div>
<span>Text</span>
</div>
Here's the codepen.
Try the below instead:
.box {
background:goldenrod;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
margin: auto;
}
Here is one way of doing it.
Add position: relative to your .container CSS rule, and then use absolute positioning on .box to position the span to the bottom of the parent container.
You can center the text by allowing .box to have 100% width and then using text-align: center.
.container {
background: lightblue;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
padding: 10px;
position: relative;
}
.box {
background: goldenrod;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
}
span {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="box"></div>
<span>Text</span>
</div>
Since flexbox alignment involves the distribution of free space in the container, margin-top: auto won't work in this case because there's no counterweight on the other side.
Therefore, one method for centering the box and bottom-aligning the text involves creating a duplicate of the text element and placing it on the opposite side of the box. This will create a counterweight.
With equal balance on both ends, flex alignment properties (including auto margins) can work.
In this case, even justify-content: space-between would work.
Of course, you'll need to apply visibility: hidden to the duplicate element.
.container {
background: lightblue;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
padding: 10px;
}
.box {
background: goldenrod;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
margin: auto 0; /* or instead use justify-content: space-between on .container */
}
span:first-child {
visibility: hidden;
}
<div class="container">
<span>Text</span>
<div class="box"></div>
<span>Text</span>
</div>
OR, instead of a duplicate element, use a pseudo-element.
A less intrusive and more semantically proper method would use a pseudo-element as the duplicate. However, for this method to work, you would need to know the height of the actual element, because you would need to match it precisely.
Something like this will work to create equal balance:
.container::before {
content: "";
height: 15px; /* must match actual element's height */
}
.container {
background: lightblue;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
padding: 10px;
}
.box {
background: goldenrod;
height: 30px;
width: 30px;
}
span {
height: 15px;
}
.container::before {
content: "";
height: 15px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="box"></div>
<span>Text</span>
</div>
I have the following HTML
<div class="parent">
<div class="left-colum">Some paragraphs of text</div>
<div class="right-column"><img src="image.jpg"></div>
</div>
The right-column has the width of the image, but since it holds different size images its width is unknown. I want the left-column to take whatever is needed but with a max-width of 150px. I also want the image in the right-column centered vertically.
In the end it should look like the example below, but I have a hard time time getting this together. How would I do this?
edit: I have the following CSS, but the right-column isn't at 100% height so I can't start trying to vertically center the image yet:
.parent{
position: relative;
height: 100%;
}
.left-colum{
float: left;
max-width: 150px;
}
.right-column{
float: right;
height: 100%;
}
You could use nested flexbox see the comments inline.
body {
margin: 0;
}
.parent {
display: flex;
height: 100vh; /*viewport height*/
}
.left-column {
background: pink;
max-width: 150px;
}
.right-column {
background: gold;
flex: 1; /*expand*/
display: flex;
justify-content: center; /*center x*/
align-items: center; /*center y*/
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="left-column">Some paragraphs of text</div>
<div class="right-column">
<img src="//dummyimage.com/100">
</div>
</div>
Use flex display on columns and set display:flex; align-items:center; justify-content: center on right div and max-width: 150px; on left div. Also be aware of vendor prefixes for browsers in order to properly use flex property.
.parent {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.left-column {
max-width: 150px;
display: flex;
}
.right-column {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
display:center;
}
I have 2 divs next to each other that I center vertically and horizontally using flex and justify-content/align-items.
Example
HTML:
<div class="inner">
<div class="section green">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/hEOMgVf.png">
</div>
<div class="section red">
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/nEybO1g.png">
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.inner {
float: left;
width: 500px;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background-color: #343434;
text-align: center;
}
.section {
float: left;
flex: 1;
}
.green { background-color: #7dc242; }
.red { background-color: #ed1c24; }
My issue is that I need to set the height of both 'section' divs to the same as well as centering them vertically and horizontally. You can see in the JSFiddle below that the green background isn't the same height as the red. How can I make both divs the full height of the container div?
Here's a simplified JSFiddle of what I have:
http://jsfiddle.net/beK28/1/
To achieve the effect you want, you shouldn't try to do any of the alignment in the container element and instead should set .section to also be display:flex. Then you can justify and center the images correctly within the children elements.
.section {
align-items: center;
display: flex;
flex: 1;
justify-content:center;
text-align: center;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/beK28/8/
You also don't need to use float, that's the whole point of using flexible containers.
Your elements aren't stretching vertically anymore because you've set align-items: center. If you want them to be equal height, it has to be the default value of stretch. If your elements were multi-line, then you could use align-content: center instead, which will give you the effect you're looking for. For single-line flex items, it does not appear that you can have vertical centering + equal height through Flexbox alone.
http://jsfiddle.net/beK28/6/
.inner {
float: left;
width: 400px;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
align-content: center;
background-color: #343434;
text-align: center;
height: 500px;
}
Note, however, that you can have flex items with the display property of table-cell.
http://jsfiddle.net/beK28/7/
.inner {
float: left;
width: 400px;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
background-color: #343434;
text-align: center;
height: 500px;
}
.section {
display: table-cell;
flex: 1;
}
I've had problems with stretch/centering before, and ended up formatting as display: table-cell:
.inner {
float: left;
width: 500px;
display: table;
background-color: #343434;
text-align: center;
}
.section {
display: table-cell;
width: 50%;
vertical-align: middle;
}