I have a Flixel project with multiple FlxCamera's. One of them is the main play area, and another is the radar display within the HUD to the right of the main area. I want to add a layer (FlxGroup) to just the radar camera, and I also want to exclude my other layers from the radar camera so they don't randomly show up in the radar's area.
My question is, how do I tell the cameras to only show objects in certain FlxGroup's?
Figured this out on my own. Each object needs to be given a reference to an Array containing references to the FlxCamera objects you want it shown on, and this needs to happen (usually) when the object is first made. The first time a FlxObject calls update(), if its cameras is null, it assigns FlxG.cameras as a default, which means all of the active cameras will display the object.
I did this by making a few static Array's in my Main class, one for each camera group, and then in the constructor for my various classes, I would set their cameras variable to point to the corresponding Array.
The biggest frustration: Currently FlxGroup does not pass its cameras on to its members. Hopefully this will be added into future versions of Flixel so that FlxGroup's can be assigned a camera group and have all their children also automatically assigned the same camera group.
Related
I have several images in my scene, I managed to make the zoom and pan work but the problem is, All of the images are zooming in at the same time. The scripts are place on each gameobject. I used gameobject for the images.
You need apply a filter so you just appli the transformations to one game object, since every one of them are GameObjects I recommend use raycast to sellect an object and then activate his Zoom.cs script just for this object.
I sugest to use just one Zoom.cs in the scene instead of every object having his own copy, then change your function to work with one game object as a paremeter and, when you touch your game object then that object will be the one to suffer the transformation.
If you doesn't want to implement a raycast or change your function at all, then you could set all the images inside a matrix, or use an index system, the central image, or the index you designed, will be the one to suffer the transformations. so you can scroll betwen your gaery and be sure that just the image that you designate in your matrix/index will be the choosen one. The trouble here is that you need to fully control the scroll animation so no one of the images will be in a wrong place like in between two index.
I am currently working on an entity system based game using artemis and libgdx and I am wondering how I should handle level changing in such a configuration.
For example, with a Mario-like platformer:
First Mario starts the level, the engine instantiates a new World() loading the tilemap and initializing all the objects.
What if Mario goes through a pipe? The world inside the pipe is a new World()? or does the camera only focus on another part of a world?
If we have a new world, artemis doesn't allow detaching an entity from a world, so may I clone the player entity and add it to the new world?
Does someone know how to handle this kind of level part changing (Mario's part / Abe's odyssey screens)? What are the common ways to achieve this using an artemis-like framework?
Think about decoupling the building of each particular level so that your world object can take in a specific level that could either read in the position of entities like the mario blocks and pipes or just define them in that specific level class. Allow your world to set new level as a method or you could create a new world object each time and unattach the old one for garbage collection. For something like the world in the pipe if you didn't want to have to load it while the player was already in the level than you could build the room or area somewhere off in the distance and use the pipe to teleport the character to a spot inside the room.
I would create some LevelTagComponent and add it to all entities that are level-specific. Custom Manager should do the rest - turn off some entities when Mario goes into a tunnek or remove them when level is being completely changed.
I finally decided to add a room object layer defining rectangles (see picture below)
Each room is a rectangle with it's x, y coordinate and width, height dimensions. Each room defined the bounds where the camera is allowed to move, if the player intersect with another room, the camera slide from room n to room n+1 along the x axis or the y axis, if the room is bigger than the screen, the camera is allowed to scroll.
I have been able to improve performance and to solve a lot of issues using this approach, it is possible to only process the entities contained within the current room instead of calculating the full world at each frame.
I am new to Lua scripting, and game development. So please I am just a noob in Lua.
I have searched the net for solutions to my problems, without any luck.
I use Photoshop, Corona, Dusk, json and Tiled on windows7.
I am creating a "board" like game, i.e. Setlers. I am using a world map, as the background. The background image of the game area is a world map (world.png file). I have no problem here.
I would like to create transparrent clickable objects matching the countrys borders on my gamemap with all parameters and values (I have added in Tiled) stored in the object. So When the player clicks on the country the transparrent object (on top of the map) is the one clicked and an eventlistener acts on the click.
In Tiled I can create all the objects I need, naming them + assigning parameters and other values.
If I add object.alpha value in Tiled, the alpha value is passed on to corona and working there.
How can I read these data from the json/tmx file in Corona and adding them to a lua table?
The way I am thinking to use the Tiled map and its objects, is to create one polyline trace of each country’s border (creating one object per country). Then place each “country traced object” on top of the world.png map, also naming the object with the countrys name like “object.name = TileBritannia” and also the other properties for use in game.
My problem is getting the objects info, like object.name, and an eventlistener reacting to a click on the object.
Is a polyline the right way to create a clickable area on a map, when I use a png file as a background image?
What is the best way to create a country border objects, in one layer or with all countries as individual object layers in Tiled.
Can I create one layer with sub objects and still access them in my code?
How do I get the object name and other properties, set in Tiled.
When I try to use the (local britannia = tiledMap:load("britannia.json")) the "load" is not working, getting a nil value.
I am looking for a code that will extract/get/read the object.name i.e. “objBritannia” or "TileBritannia". from the json/tmx file.
When I try to read the different parameters from the json file, I don't get the result I expect. I get the result = function: 046A73B0, was hoping for an object name of some sort.
Please provide links to or code example.
I have edited the question.
Thanks
For questions 1 and 2: I have not used Tiled, but based on Corona Tiled, you have the right strategy in mind. That page makes me think that you can just use tap event listener to detect tap. If you are having issues with the example on that web page, please update your question to be more specific. If tap event handling doesn't work (maybe you're talking about a different Tiled lib), look a Polygon fill and Point in Polygon detection, because that's basically what you need to do. Try some stuff from there. If it still doesn't work for you, then update your question with specifics otherwise it will be likely get closed (it is a little too broad as it is).
For #3, Lua is a dynamic language that supports adding properties to objects in one line. So upon the example on the Corona Tiled page, all you would have to do is
tiledMap = require("tiled")
local britannia = tiledMap:load("britannia.json")
britannia.name = "Britannnia"
local Zulu = tiledMap:load("zulu.json")
zulu.name = "zulu"
Naturally you will probably have a whole bunch so you will create a function that you call for each tile. It's not clear what map.layer["objBritannia "].nameIs("TileBritannia") is supposed to do so I can't comment.
i am working with several nested movieclip objects in a project. but i get into trouble with the buttons i created and implemented in the nested movieclips:
to describe it in a simple way:
I have a main movieclip with five frames, including two buttons with listeners to browse between the frames. Then inside of one Frame I have another movieclip with its own buttons. i instanciated it by hand not through code and gave it a specific name like "nestedMc".
Now I dont want to build the Listeners for those buttons inside the class of the nested movieclip class but in its parent class, which works fine until i then goto another frame in the main movieclips timeline and come back.
obviously every time flash enters a frame its contents get created anew (and therefore get new instance names). I could now try solve this through filling the frames via code.
But maybe there is another way to make sure the frame contains the same instance everytime i enter?
Timeline scripting is a dirty business, and really, a carry-over compatibility layer for Actionscript 2 projects. Whenever possible, I highly recommend not doing it, and simply keeping all of your code in your document class. As you're experiencing, timeline code causes headaches.
Consider instead just creating both states of your Stage (it sounds like that's what your two buttons are jumping between) and simply hiding them offstage or setting their alpha to zero and their mouseEnabled state to false. Furthermore, if the purpose of your frames is to play animation (a tween), consider instead switching to a much more powerful suite such as TweenLite. Moving an object over a hundred pixels (smoothly) can be as easy as:
TweenLite.to(redBall, 3, {x:100});
Now, if you're manually adding these items to the stage, as long as the object is a dynamic one, you can assign an instance name to it which will be saved between frame loads. Be aware the object name is not the same as the instanced name. For example:
var redBall:Ball = new Ball();
redBall.name = "bubbles";
The object's name is Ball, but it's represented as a variable called redBall. Its actual DisplayList name will likely be ambiguous (such as "Instance71"), and I can manually define it as "bubbles". 3 different names for the same object, all very different and necessary.
Even if you give the object a displayList name, you may not be able to reference it through code unless you enable Automatically declare stage instances, which basically creates on each object a pointer to the displayList object.
That said, you can always fetch the object by other means. Obviously, your buttons are always appearing, but you're trying to find a very specific object on the stage. At this point, we can use getChildByName() or getChildAt().
Hope that helps.
-Cheers
When do we need to pass reference to the stage from one as3 class to another like in this tutorial
http://asgamer.com/2009/as3-flash-games-for-beginners-firing-weapons-with-delays
he added a ref to the stage from the bullet class to the ship class
as I understand a reference is needed when we want to use a function in a certain class from another class but why do we have to reference the stage isn't it only one stage for the whole project or each class has it's own stage ?
I am very confused
Thanks
Only objects that are connected to a stage will be shown on screen. In the tutorial he is adding the lasers onto the stage display list so that it appears on screen. Until it is added, it will not be rendered regardless of the visible property.
See this for more info about the display list.
#Geotarget is correct, but the answer is a little bit indirect.
Objects that are not on the display list do not actually have a reference to stage. So if, for example, you create a var mc:MovieClip = new MovieClip(); which is not added to the display list (as in addChild(mc)), then mc.stage will be null. (Also, checking if(mc.stage){[...]} is also a way to verify if the MovieClip is part of the display list yet.)
So you can pass a reference to the stage to non-display-list objects to allow them access to things like stageWidth.
Yes, a reference is needed when you wanna have to access a function present in that particular class ( to which reference belongs). This is one of the uses.
There is only one stage for the whole project.
In the tutorial you are following, both the classes are using the reference of a COMMON Stage, so that both of them can access the Stage.
It's like giving the address of a place to two people. So that both of them can go there. Naturally, giving addresses doesnot mean, we are building two places for each of them.
V.