Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 11 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working on a site, and I am looking for basic profile icons such as:
http://akcdn.okccdn.com/media/img/icons/home_new_user_guide.png
I would use those, but I am sure those are typewritten.
Where would I be able to find similar icons that I can use for an open source project?
Thanks :)
Smashing Magazine has semi-regular free icon roundups, including icons in a wide variety of styles. They're also under a wide variety of licenses, so make sure you check before using one.
FindIcons is a great site where you can find all icons that you need in almost any format and any size (may vary). And you can sort search results by color, icon style, license etc. enjoy!
iconfinder.net is my go-to. It's been around forever.
Related
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 10 months ago.
Improve this question
Does anybody know what's the difference between using FontAwesome Kit and FontAwesome CDN?(in terms of advantages not the HTML tags)
Which one is better to use?
And what exactly is the Kit?
I've looked it up on their website but there's no clear explanation about the Kit concept!
All they say is:
It's a little bundle of settings and icons that we think is the best way to use Font Awesome.
In my experience two benefits in using a "Kit" is it allows restricting icons to specific domains. This might not be crucial if you are using a free account, but if you are using a pro account it is a nice feature. Plus, you can upload custom icons to your kit and call them like any other font awesome icon. The domain restriction also prevents your custom icons from being used elsewhere.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I was able to create a web site 10 years ago with Microsoft Frontpage without learning anything, today with a copy of Adobe Dreamweaver CS6, I can't even figure out a way to change the font size of a simple text. CSS is the thing, so I went through the CSS tutorials in w3 and I get it now. It's a good idea, but It is also a good idea to kill creativity, ie all sites like similar, see screenshot below. It sucks floppy disks.
My questions will be:
Does web 2.0 really kill creativity?
Is there a "modern" web design application that I don't need to go into these CSS thing?
Is there a way to create a circular navigation menu like this using css? I want to have this menu in the middle of the page, and with a button on the corner to activate it.
No it doesn't
You don't have to use CSS. You can use inline styles,
but it won't be right. Using the CSS is a good coding practice and
you just need to learn it better.
Yes. If you google it, you'll find several links. Here is just some examples:
https://css-tricks.com/building-a-circular-navigation-with-css-clip-paths/
http://www.cssscript.com/pure-css-circle-menu-with-css3-transitions-transforms/
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
How can I be sure that my web site can be viewed in smatphones (with different resolutions and screen's size) without any problem.
Is there a way to convert the couple html/css of a classic web site to be compatible everywhere.
Best regards.
I use http://mite.keynote.com/ to help test websites on mobiles that I don't have physically available. It's not perfect, but it's about the best testing suite I've seen and will definitely give you an idea of whether or not your design will work.
As for the actual design methodology, just make sure you don't specify anything in pixels or points, all dimensions should be specified with em's (or ex, etc) or percentages. From there, it's just a matter or trying things to see if they work.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I essentially want to be able to scale the entire site (images, elements, the whole sha-bang) to what ever browser size window the user is using. Anyone have success doing this and would be willing to share how?
I'm using HTML 5 by the way.
You need to start thinking about sizing your elements using percentages instead of pixels.
Take a look at this simple example and it may help you on your way. Good luck.
http://jsfiddle.net/hACbn/1/
Take a look at using responsive layouts:
Here's a half decent framework to get you started
http://gridpak.com/
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
what is the best for design full icons and images sprite for big site.. before UI Development or after ?
I don't believe that this is programming-related for one second, however I'd suggest that the best time for designing the icons and images for a site would be the same time at which the UI is being designed, since the icons/images have to fit the general aesthetic of the site itself.
Obviously this is only the initial design (and don't be afraid to amend, revise, re-design later) but it seems a mistake to think of icons and UI separately as distinct entities, rather than...symbiotic, maybe?