I'm trying to add localization support to a Google Chrome Web App and, while it is easy to define strings for manifest and CSS files, it is somewhat more difficult for HTML pages.
In the manifest and in CSS files I can simply define localization strings like so:
__MSG_name__
but this doesn't work with HTML pages.
I can make a JavaScript function to fire onload that does the job like so:
document.title = chrome.i18n.getMessage("name");
document.querySelector("span.name").innerHTML = chrome.i18n.getMessage("name");
but this seems awfully ineffecient. Furthermore, I would like to be able to specify the page metadata; application-name and description, pulling the values from the localization files. What would be the best way of doing all this?
Thanks for your help.
Please refer to this documentation:
http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/i18n.html
If you want to add localized content within HTML, you would need to do it via JavaScript as you mentioned before. That is the only way you can do it.
chrome.i18n.getMessage("name")
It isn't inefficient to do that, you can place your JavaScript at the end of the document (right before the end body tag) and it will fill up the text with respect to the locale.
Dunno if i understand exactly what you are trying to do but you could dynamically retrieve the LANG attribute (using .getAttribute("lang") or .lang) of the targeted tag and serve accordingly the proper values.
Related
There are several topics* about setting up a max file size for a input type=file, but there is apparently no pure-standard HTML way to do so (nothing in the HTML spec).
So, is there any pure-HTML way to set a max file size on a input type="file"?
Is there a request for such feature, like a maxsize="..." attribute to let the browser filter out the files the user can selected, or do we have to stick to Javascript File API for years (or ever)?
*Topics:
JS File API: Limit the size of an file upload (html input) or How to check file input size with jQuery?
HTML never-saw-that-in-any-standard: HTML Upload MAX_FILE_SIZE does not appear to work
This is not part of the HTML spec, so there is no "pure HTML" way to do this.
I could only find this mention from 2013 with no reaction. Couldn't find any mentions in https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues
Sounds like it's something you could suggest, see FAQ - Is there a process for adding new features to a specification? for the recommended way to suggest new features to the working group. Please post the link to the discussion here if you do bring it up.
Though since there's a JS workaround, I guess this won't be high on anyone's to-do list.
i created a site, And added pages to my site, since page size exceeds i need to create pagination in html i have created this method
123
in this way i created
Problem is when i add new page i need to replace all code again like this
1234
ever time when i add new page i need to replace all code is ther a way to do this without PHP
Can sombody help me any idea to do this in html
Do not re-invent the wheel. Use datatables, they provide sorting, pagination (client side and server side), export and a number of additional features.
http://datatables.net/
Include the files and just add this.
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#example').dataTable();
} );
This is a very basic and good example, you should go for it.
http://datatables.net/examples/data_sources/dom.html
This cannot be done purely in HTML. You must use something like PHP, or you could use Javascript.
You can make just one HTML file called "Pagination.html" include all your links there and then include that Pagination on every page using one of the following methods.
You can use Javascript: javascript
Or you can use html5: html5
Or there are also, others solutions to solve your problem like this: other
You better use some Javascript oriented solution, html5 support for including files still very poor.
unfortunately, this won't be possible without using some other technology that is not HTML. You can dynamically generate pages using javascript (JS), PHP or other technology, but not just raw HTML.
You can name your pages something like:
page_1.html
page_2.html
and then whichever editor you are using probably has a search & replace function, so you could use that to speed up things. I hope this helps.
I want to know how the coded-ui in web application utilizes DOM of that page. Or is it related to that page's rendered html is coming?
Edited: If suppose i have a grid having rows and column and i want to capture any particular column in it, then do coded-ui takes the help of the rendered html in this process (id,tagname etc) ?
you can utilize the htmlcontrols which is listed in below url:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.visualstudio.testtools.uitesting.htmlcontrols.aspx
I used codedui jquery extensions available in NuGet here
. Once you will add this dll as a reference you can make use ExecuteScript() method for running a jquery script inside coded-ui. Similary you can make use of other built in members.
If I use a data URI to construct a src attribute for an HTML element, can it in turn have another data URI inside it?
I know you can't use data uri's for iframes (I'm actually trying to construct an OSDX document and pass it to the browser with an icon encoded in base64 but that's a really niche use case and this is more of a general question), but assuming you could, my use case would look like:
var iframe = document.createElement('iframe');
var icon = document.createElement('image');
var iSrc = '*[REALLY LONG STRING]*/';
iframe.src='data:text/html,<html><body><image src="'+iSrc+'" /></body</html>
document.body.appendChild(iframe);
Basically what I'm after is is there anything in a data uri that would break a parent data uri?
Yes you can. I really thought it was impossible, as did everyone I asked.
Example:
Pasting the following into your browser's URL bar should render a gmail logo in an html page that says hello world.
data:text/html,<html><body><p>hello world</p><img src="" /></body></html>
or for a shorter example courtesy of Pumbaa80:
data:text/html,<script src="data:text/javascript,alert('hello world')"></script>
MSDN explicitly supports this:
Data URIs can be nested.
An old blog entry talks a little bit more about embedding images within CSS using data: :
Neither dataURI spec nor any other mentions if dataURI’es can not be nested. So here’s the testcase where dataURI’ed CSS has dataURI’ed image embedded. IE8b1, Firefox3 and Safari applied the stylesheet and showed the image, Opera9.50 (build 9613) applies the stylesheet but doesn’t show the embedded image! So it seems that Opera9 doesn’t expect to get anything embedded inside of an already embedded resource! :D
But funny thing, as IE8b1 supports expressions and also supports nested data URI’es, it has the same potential security flaw as Firefox does (as described in the section above). See the testcase — embedded CSS has the following code: body { background: expression(a()); } which calls function a() defined in the javascript of the main page, and this function is called every time the expression is reevaluated. Though IE8b1 has limited expressions support (which is going to be explained in a separate post) you can’t use any code as the expression value, but you can only call already defined functions or use direct string values. So in order to exploit this feature we need to have a ready javascript function already located on the page and then we can just call it from the expression embedded in the stylesheet. That’s not very trivial obviously, but if you have a website that allows people to specify their own stylesheets and you want to be on the safe side, you have to either make sure you don’t have a javascript function that can cause any potential harm or filter expressions from people’s stylesheets.
I need to display an image in an S-Control is SFDC. I would like to be able to reference a static resource like <apex:image url="{!$Resource.TestImage}" />, but that only works in VisualForce pages and I have to modify and existing S-Control (switching to VF is not an option).
What's the best way to accomplish this, so frustrated with the general lack of documentation and hackishness of SFDC development.
Thanks all
You can upload your image to Documents tab and later use normal <img> tag to display it on S-Controls, Visualforce pages and email templates (last one - if this will be an "externally available image"). The generated URL to view it will look somewhat like
https://c.na7.content.force.com/servlet/servlet.FileDownload?file=015A0000001IFxZ
(my test org sits at na7.salesforce.com instance and the last part is gnerated object's ID)