I just asked an SQL related question, and the first answer was: "This is a situation where dynamic SQL is the way to go."
As I had never heard of dynamic SQL before, I immediately searched this site and the web for what it was. Wikipedia has no article with this title. The first Google results all point to user forums where people ask more or less related questions.
However, I didn't find a clear definition of what a 'dynamic SQL' is. Is it something vendor specific? I work with MySQL and I didn't find a reference in the MySQL handbook (only questions, mostly unanswered, in the MySQL user forums).
On the other hand, I found many references to stored procedures. I have a slightly better grasp of what stored procedures are, although I have never used any. How are the two concepts related? Are they the same thing or does one uses the other?
Basically, what is needed is a simple introduction to dynamic SQL for someone who is new to the concept.
P.S.: If you feel like it, you may have a go at answering my previous question that prompted this one: SQL: How can we make a table1 JOIN table2 ON a table given in a field in table1?
Dynamic SQL is merely where the query has been built on the fly - with some vendors, you can build up the text of the dynamic query within one stored procedure, and then execute the generated SQL. In other cases, the term merely refers to a decision made by code on the client (this is at least vendor neutral)
Other answers have defined what dynamic SQL is, but I didn't see any other answers that attempted to describe why we sometimes need to use it. (My experience is SQL Server, but I think other products are generally similar in this respect.)
Dynamic SQL is useful when you are replacing parts of a query that can't be replaced using other methods.
For example, every time you call a query like:
SELECT OrderID, OrderDate, TotalPrice FROM Orders WHERE CustomerID = ??
you will be passing in a different value for CustomerID. This is the simplest case, and one that can by solved using a parameterized query, or a stored procedure that accepts a parameter, etc.
Generally speaking, dynamic SQL should be avoided in favor of parameterized queries, for performance and security reasons. (Although the performance difference probably varies quite a bit between vendors, and perhaps even between product versions, or even server configuration).
Other queries are possible to do using parameters, but might be simpler as dynamic SQL:
SELECT OrderID, OrderDate, TotalPrice FROM Orders
WHERE CustomerID IN (??,??,??)
If you always had 3 values, this is as easy as the first one. But what if this is a variable-length list? Its possible to do with parameters, but can be very difficult. How about:
SELECT OrderID, OrderDate, TotalPrice FROM Orders WHERE CustomerID = ??
ORDER BY ??
This can't be substituted directly, you can do it with a huge complicated CASE statement in the ORDER BY explicitly listing all possible fields, which may or may not be practical, depending on the number of fields available to sort by.
Finally, some queries simply CAN'T be done using any other method.
Let's say you have a bunch of Orders tables (not saying this is great design), but you might find yourself hoping you can do something like:
SELECT OrderID, OrderDate, TotalPrice FROM ?? WHERE CustomerID = ??
This can't be done using any other methods. In my environment, I frequently encounter queries like:
SELECT (programatically built list of fields)
FROM table1 INNER JOIN table2
(Optional INNER JOIN to table3)
WHERE (condition1)
AND (long list of other optional WHERE clauses)
Again, not saying that this is necessarily great design, but dynamic SQL is pretty much required for these types of queries.
Hope this helps.
Dynamic SQL is simply a SQL statement that is composed on the fly before being executed. For example, the following C# (using a parameterized query):
var command = new SqlCommand("select * from myTable where id = #someId");
command.Parameters.Add(new SqlParameter("#someId", idValue));
Could be re-written using dynamic sql as:
var command = new SqlCommand("select * from myTable where id = " + idValue);
Keep in mind, though, that Dynamic SQL is dangerous since it readily allows for SQL Injection attacks.
Dynamic SQL is a SQL built from strings at runtime. It is useful to dynamically set filters or other stuff.
An example:
declare #sql_clause varchar(1000)
declare #sql varchar(5000)
set #sql_clause = ' and '
set #sql = ' insert into #tmp
select
*
from Table
where propA = 1 '
if #param1 <> ''
begin
set #sql = #sql + #sql_clause + ' prop1 in (' + #param1 + ')'
end
if #param2 <> ''
begin
set #sql = #sql + #sql_clause + ' prop2 in (' + #param2 + ')'
end
exec(#sql)
It is exactly what Rowland mentioned. To elaborate on that a bit, take the following SQL:
Select * from table1 where id = 1
I am not sure which language you are using to connect to the database, but if I were to use C#, an example of a dynamic SQL query would be something like this:
string sqlCmd = "Select * from table1 where id = " + userid;
You want to avoid using dynamic SQL, because it becomes a bit cumbersome to keep integrity of the code if the query get too big. Also, very important, dynamic SQL is susceptible to SQL injection attacks.
A better way of writing the above statement would be to use parameters, if you are using SQL Server.
Rowland is correct, and as an addendum, unless you're properly using parameters (versus just concatonating parameter values inline from provided text, etc.) it can also be a security risk. It's also a bear to debug, etc.
Lastly, whenever you use dynamic SQL unwisely, things are unleashed and children are eaten.
To most databases, every SQL query is "dynamic" meaning that it is a program that is interpreted by the query optimiser given the input SQL string and possibly the parameter bindings ("bind variables").
Static SQL
However, most of the time, that SQL string is not constructed dynamically but statically, either in procedural languages like PL/SQL:
FOR rec IN (SELECT * FROM foo WHERE x = 1) LOOP
-- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ "static SQL"
..
END LOOP;
Or in client / host languages like Java, using JDBC:
try (ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT * FROM foo WHERE x = 1")) {
// "static SQL" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
..
}
In both cases, the SQL string is "static" in the language that embeds it. Technically, it will still be "dynamic" to the SQL engine, which doesn't know how the SQL string is constructed, nor that it was a static SQL string.
Dynamic SQL
Sometimes, the SQL string needs to be constructed dynamically, given some input parameters. E.g. the above query might not need any predicate at all in some cases.
You might then choose to proceed to constructing the string dynamically, e.g. in PL/SQL:
DECLARE
TYPE foo_c IS REF CURSOR;
v_foo_c foo_c;
v_foo foo%ROWTYPE;
sql VARCHAR2(1000);
BEGIN
sql := 'SELECT * FROM foo';
IF something THEN
sql := sql || ' WHERE x = 1'; -- Beware of syntax errors and SQL injection!
END IF;
OPEN v_foo_c FOR sql;
LOOP
FETCH v_foo_c INTO v_foo;
EXIT WHEN v_foo_c%NOTFOUND;
END LOOP;
END;
Or in Java / JDBC:
String sql = "SELECT * FROM foo";
if (something)
sql += " WHERE x = 1"; // Beware of syntax errors and SQL injection!
try (ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(sql)) {
..
}
Or in Java using a SQL builder like jOOQ
// No syntax error / SQL injection risk here
Condition condition = something ? FOO.X.eq(1) : DSL.trueCondition();
for (FooRecord foo : DSL.using(configuration)
.selectFrom(FOO)
.where(condition)) {
..
}
Many languages have query builder libraries like the above, which shine most when doing dynamic SQL.
(Disclaimer: I work for the company behind jOOQ)
Is it something vendor specific?
The SQL-92 Standard has a whole chapter on dynamic SQL (chapter 17) but it only applies to FULL SQL-92 and I know of no vendor that has implemented it.
I think what's meant is that you should build the query dynamically before executing it. For your other questions this means that you should select the table name you need first and the use your programming language to build a second query for doing what you want (what you want to do in the other question isn't possible directly like you want).
Related
I have some code that translates a user's search word into a MySQL query:
String sql = String.format("SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_column = '%s'", value);
HibernateUtil.getCurrentSession().createSQLQuery(sql);
To test if I was protected—and because I think it would be fun to learn in this way—I wanted to try to SQL inject my own application. So I searched for:
x'; DROP TABLE test;--
which results in the following query:
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE my_column = 'x'; DROP TABLE test;--
But Hibernate throws a SQLGrammarException. When I run this code via phpMyAdmin, it correctly drops the test table.
How is Hibernate validating my SQL? Perhaps more importantly—is this protecting me against SQL injection or should I be using setParameter. If it's not protecting me, can I have an example of some SQL that will perform the injection. I think it would be fun to actually verify.
You are protected against execution of more than one statement because createSQLQuery allows exactly one statement. It is not Hibernate which protects you here, but your JDBC driver respectively your database - because it does not know how to handle the separator ; in the context of a single statement.
But you are still not safe against SQL injection. There are plenty of other possibilities to inject SQL in that case. Just one example:
Imagine you are searching for some user specific items in your query:
String sql = String.format(
"SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE userId = %s AND my_column = '%s'",
currentUserId, value);
The user can now enter:
x' OR '1' = '1
Which will lead to the SQL:
SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE userId = 1234 AND my_column = 'x' OR '1' = '1'
And because AND has higher precedence, he will see all items - even those of other users.
Even your provided example can be dangerous, for example
x' OR (SELECT userName FROM USER) = 'gwg
will let me know if your database contains a user that is called gwg (assuming that I know your database layout, which I could find out with similar queries).
According to Hibermate documentation, the method createSQLQuery "Create a new instance of Query for the given SQL string", so we can assume that Hibernate do the SQL checking for a single query on every call of this method.
Important: createSQLQuery is deprecated on Hibernate, please check out the link given above to see newers ways to execute SQL queries.
Now, speaking about how you could protect yourself from SQL injection, the best way to do it is using parameters on your query.
This question has the exactly example you are in need for, please check it out.
Hope this help you in your studies, good luck!
It is possible?
DECLARE #vTableName varchar(50)
SET #vTableName = (SELECT TableName FROM qms_Types WHERE Id = 1)
SELECT * FROM #vTableName
I have this error:
Msg 1087, Level 16, State 1, Line 3 Must declare the table variable
"#vTableName".
Short answer: No.
Long answer: Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. Use dynamic SQL if you have to, but if you're structuring your tables in a way where you don't know the table name ahead of time, it might benefit you to rethink your schema.
Here is a great resource for learning how to use dynamic SQL: The Curse and Blessings of Dynamic SQL
if you're trying to select from a table of that name, then you can do something like this:
DECLARE #vTableName varchar(50)
SET #vTableName = (SELECT TableName FROM qms_Types WHERE Id = 1)
EXECUTE('SELECT * FROM [' + #vTableName + ']')
my solution for this:
EXECUTE('SELECT * FROM ' + TableName + '')
It seems as though different folks are interpreting the OP differently.
I'm pretty sure the OP is asking for this type of concept / ability / maneuver...
"Put a table name into a variable and then use that variable as though it were a table name."
DECLARE #TableIWantRecordsFrom varchar(50)
-- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
SET #TableIWantRecordsFrom = (SELECT TableName FROM qms_Types WHERE Id = 1) -- (L1)
-- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-- Let's say, at this point, #TableIWantRecordsFrom ... contains the text 'Person'
-- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
-- assuming that is the case then...
-- these two queries are supposed to return the same results:
SELECT top 3 fname,lname,mi,department,floor FROM Person
-- ^^^^^^
SELECT top 3 fname,lname,mi,department,floor FROM #TableIWantRecordsFrom -- (L2)
-- ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
From reading all the responses and answers, it appears that this kind of maneuver can't be done - unless - you use dynamic SQL which...
can be a bit of a pain to create and maintain and
can be more work to create than the time it "saves" you in the future.
================================================================
There are other languages where this can be done... in literally, two lines of code (see (L1) and (L2) in above code) and not having to do a lot of formatting and editing.)
(I've done it before - there is another language where all you'd need is L1 and L2...)
================================================================
It is unfortunate that SQL Server will not do this without going to a decent amount of effort...
first write your SQL then
test it to make sure it does, in fact, work then
frame each line with tick marks and then escape your ticks that are now inside THOSE tick marks
declare the variable
set the variable to the sql statement you ticked above
(I may be missing some additional steps)
Oh, and then, if you ever need to maintain it
you need to either, be very careful and just edit it right there, as is, and hope you get it all just right -or- you may have saved a copy of it... un-ticked and un-variablized so you can edit the "real" sql and then when you're done you can RE DO these steps... again.
I think you want this:
DECLARE #vTableName table(TableName varchar(50))
insert into #vTableName
SELECT TableName FROM qms_Types WHERE Id = 1
SELECT * FROM #vTableName
The only way you can do this is through Dynamic SQL which refers to the practice of creating a T-SQL text and executing it using the sp_executesql (or simply exec)
Here is a helpful link about dynamic sql The Curse and Blessings of Dynamic SQL.
You should really think whether or not this is a case for dynamic sql or if there is another way for you to perform this operation.
I'm trying to implement a facebook search in my system (auto suggest while typing).
I've managed to code all the ajax stuff, but I'm not sure how to query the database.
I've created a table called People which contains the fields: ID, FirstName, LastName, MiddleName, Email.
I've also created a FTS-index on all those fields.
I want to create a stored procedure that will get as a parameter the text inserted in the query box and returns the suggestions.
For example, When I will write in the textbox the query "Joh Do"
It will translate to the query:
select * from People where contains(*, '"Joh*"') and contains(*, '"Do*"')
Is there a way to do that in stored procedure?
P.S
I've tried to use the syntax
select * from People where contains(*,'"Joh*" and "Do*"')
but it didn't returned the expected results, probably because it needs to search the words on different fields. Is there a way to fix that?
Thanks.
Try
select *
from People
where (FirstName Like '%'+ #FirstName + '%') and
(MiddleName Like '%'+ #MiddleName + '%') and
(LastName Like '%'+ #LastName + '%')
Also you may want to restrict the results to only return a maximum of say 10 by using:
select top 10
EDIT 1:
OK I now understand the problem better. I would use dynamic sql thus:
First create a split function e.g. Example Split function using XML trick
Then use dynamic sql:
declare #tstr varchar (500)
set #tstr = ''
select #tstr =#tstr + ' Contains(*, ''"'+ val + '*")' + ' and '
from dbo.split(#SearchStr, ' ')
set #tstr = left(#tstr,len(#tstr)-4)
select #tstr
Declare #dsql as varchar(500)
set #dsql = 'select * from People where '+ #tstr
exec (#dsql)
Also please note as per Remus, be aware of SQL Injections, the use of sp_executesql (instead of EXEC) would be better.
The problem is the open list nature of the argument. I can be Joh, it can be Joh Do, it can be Joh Do Na and so on and so forth. You have two main alternatives:
parse the input in the web app (in ASP I assume) and then call an appropriate procedure for the number of entries (ie. exec usp_findSuggestions1 'Joh', exec usp_findSuggestions2 'Joh', 'Do', exec usp_findSuggestions1 'Joh', 'Do', 'Na'). The first procedure uses 1 contains, the second has 2 contains .. and contains ... and the last has 3. This may look totally ugly from a DRY, code design and specially code maintenance pov, but is actually the best solution as far as T-SQL is concerned, due primarily to the plan stability of these queries.
pass the input straight into a single stored procedure, where you can split it into components and build a dynamic T-SQL query with as many contains as necessary.
Both solutions are imperfect. Ultimately, you have two problems, and both have been investigated before to quite some depth:
the problem of passing a list to a T-SQL procedure. See Arrays and Lists in SQL Server 2005 and Beyond
the problem of an undetermined number of conditions in the WHERE clause, see The Curse and Blessings of Dynamic SQL
The AJAX Toolkit has the "AutoComplete" control that provides this functionality out of the box. It is very simple to use.
Look at a sample here
I am dissecting some code and came across this,
$sql = 'SELECT page.*, author.name AS author, updator.name AS updator '
. 'FROM '.TABLE_PREFIX.'page AS page '
. 'LEFT JOIN '.TABLE_PREFIX.'user AS author ON author.id = page.created_by_id '
. 'LEFT JOIN '.TABLE_PREFIX.'user AS updator ON updator.id = page.updated_by_id '
. 'WHERE slug = ? AND parent_id = ? AND (status_id='.Page::STATUS_REVIEWED.' OR status_id='.Page::STATUS_PUBLISHED.' OR status_id='.Page::STATUS_HIDDEN.')';
I am wondering what the "?" does in the WHERE statement. Is it some sort of parameter holder?
Prepared statments use the '?' in MySQL to allow for binding params to the statement. Highly regarded as more secure against SQL injections if used properly. This also allows for quicker SQL queries as the request only has to be compiled once and can be reused.
The question mark represents a parameter that will later be replaced. Using parameterized queries is more secure than embedding the parameters right into the query.
SQL Server calls this parameterize queries, and Oracle calls it bind variables.
The usage varies with the language that you are executing the query from.
Here is an example of how it is used from PHP.
assuming that $mysqli is a database connection and people is a table with 4 columns.
$stmt = $mysqli->prepare("INSERT INTO People VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?)");
$stmt->bind_param('sssd', $firstName, $lastName, $email, $age);
The 'sssd' is a flag identifying the rest of the parameters, where s represents string and d represents digits.
? has no special meaning in MySQL WHERE = statements, only in prepared statements
The most common case where we see it is due to special meaning given to ? by several web frameworks like PHP and Rails.
? is just a syntax error at:
CREATE TABLE t (s CHAR(1));
SELECT * FROM t WHERE s = ?;
because it is unquoted, and in:
INSERT INTO t VALUES ('a');
INSERT INTO t VALUES ("?");
SELECT * FROM t WHERE s = '?';
it returns:
s
?
thus apparently without special meaning.
MySQL 5.0 prepared statements
MySQL 5.0 added the prepared statement feature which has similar semantics to the question mark in web frameworks.
Example from the docs:
PREPARE stmt1 FROM 'SELECT SQRT(POW(?,2) + POW(?,2)) AS hypotenuse';
SET #a = 3;
SET #b = 4;
EXECUTE stmt1 USING #a, #b;
Output:
hypotenuse
5
These also escape special characters as expected:
PREPARE stmt1 FROM 'SELECT ? AS s';
SET #a = "'";
EXECUTE stmt1 USING #a;
Output:
s
'
Rails example
In Rails for example, the question mark is replaced by an argument given by a variable of the library's programming language (Ruby), e.g.:
Table.where("column = ?", "value")
and it automatically quotes arguments to avoid bugs and SQL injection, generating a statement like:
SELECT * FROM Table WHERE column = 'value';
The quoting would save us in case of something like:
Table.where("column = ?", "; INJECTION")
These are prepared statements ,prepared statements offer two major benefits:
The query only needs to be parsed (or prepared) once, but can be
executed multiple times with the same or different parameters. When
the query is prepared, the database will analyze, compile and optimize
its plan for executing the query. For complex queries this process can
take up enough time that it will noticeably slow down an application
if there is a need to repeat the same query many times with different
parameters. By using a prepared statement the application avoids
repeating the analyze/compile/optimize cycle. This means that prepared
statements use fewer resources and thus run faster.
The parameters to prepared statements don't need to be quoted; the
driver automatically handles this. If an application exclusively uses
prepared statements, the developer can be sure that no SQL injection
will occur (however, if other portions of the query are being built up
with unescaped input, SQL injection is still possible).
http://php.net/manual/en/pdo.prepared-statements.php
The following doesn't work, but something like this is what I'm looking for.
select *
from Products
where Description like (#SearchedDescription + %)
SSRS uses the # operator in-front of a parameter to simulate an 'in', and I'm not finding a way to match up a string to a list of strings.
There are a few options on how to use a LIKE operator with a parameter.
OPTION 1
If you add the % to the parameter value, then you can customize how the LIKE filter will be processed. For instance, your query could be:
SELECT name
FROM master.dbo.sysobjects
WHERE name LIKE #ReportParameter1
For the data set to use the LIKE statement properly, then you could use a parameter value like sysa%. When I tested a sample report in SSRS 2008 using this code, I returned the following four tables:
sysallocunits
sysaudacts
sysasymkeys
sysaltfiles
OPTION 2
Another way to do this that doesn't require the user to add any '%' symbol is to generate a variable that has the code and exceute the variable.
DECLARE #DynamicSQL NVARCHAR(MAX)
SET #DynamicSQL =
'SELECT name, id, xtype
FROM dbo.sysobjects
WHERE name LIKE ''' + #ReportParameter1 + '%''
'
EXEC (#DynamicSQL)
This will give you finer controller over how the LIKE statement will be used. If you don't want users to inject any additional operators, then you can always add code to strip out non alpha-numeric characters before merging it into the final query.
OPTION 3
You can create a stored procedure that controls this functionality. I generally prefer to use stored procedures as data sources for SSRS and never allow dynamically generated SQL, but that's just a preference of mine. This helps with discoverability when performing dependency analysis checks and also allows you to ensure optimal query performance.
OPTION 4
Create a .NET code assembly that helps dynamically generate the SQL code. I think this is overkill and a poor choice at best, but it could work conceivably.
Have you tried to do:
select * from Products where Description like (#SearchedDescription + '%')
(Putting single quotes around the % sign?)
Dano, which version of SSRS are you using? If it's RS2000, the multi-parameter list is
not officially supported, but there is a workaround....
put like this:
select *
from tsStudent
where studentName like #SName+'%'
I know this is super old, but this came up in my search to solve the same problem, and I wound up using a solution not described here. I'm adding a new potential solution to help whomever else might follow.
As written, this solution only works in SQL Server 2016 and later, but can be adapted for older versions by writing a custom string_split UDF, and by using a subquery instead of a CTE.
First, map your #SearchedDescription into your Dataset as a single string using JOIN:
=JOIN(#SearchedDedscription, ",")
Then use STRING_SPLIT to map your "A,B,C,D" kind of string into a tabular structure.
;with
SearchTerms as (
select distinct
Value
from
string_split(#SearchedDescription, ',')
)
select distinct
*
from
Products
inner join SearchTerms on
Products.Description like SearchTerms.Value + '%'
If someone adds the same search term multiple times, this would duplicate rows in the result set. Similarly, a single product could match multiple search terms. I've added distinct to both the SearchTerms CTE and the main query to try to suppress this inappropriate row duplication.
If your query is more complex (including results from other joins) then this could become an increasingly big problem. Just be aware of it, it's the main drawback of this method.