I want to know, is there a log that saves all the changes made by users to a database just like in git where all the commits can be viewed by each user so that if any error occur we know who did it.If there is one how to get it? or how to create one that will do it?
Problem I'm facing is that a table's data has been altered by one of the developers but there is no way to find when and who did it and also I am struggling to find all the changes that has been done to the table.
Databases typically do not provide auditing as standard. I typically implement it within my application. However, for a faster result, there are some plugins for mySQL which you could try.
So we've got a MYSQL database with very sensitive information and we want to prevent it from being exported by a developer/admin who has access to it, while still allowing them to access database while working on their duties.
In simple terms we want to prohibit mass select on specific tables.
Ideally it would be an option to disable mass select, something like limit 0, 1 enforcement for all SELECT queries on specific tables. Is it possible to configure MYSQL like that? Any other ideas how to prevent database from being exported?
Any solution I can think of when someone needs to access your production data within MySQL and you want to apply the principle of least privilege leads to separation of users and to the page on GRANT command in MySQL documentation.
But as I said in a comment to you question, it is much easier to develop a procedure to generate an impersonated sample of your data, so that your developers would not have access to the production data.
I'm looking into using CloudBees for some application prototyping. I am using free accounts right now, I am not paying any subscriptions at the moment.
The first step for me is to create a MySQL database to host my application's data. I've done so (and it was pretty easy!). I also use Liquibase to manage the database (I've started this work using local H2 databases for the pre-prototyping), and I've been able to construct everything as expected.
As part of checking whether liquibase created the tables, I brought up the MySQL database in NetBeans. And, it did function well. But I can also see other schemas as well as the schema I just created. They're all innocently named (test, test_6hob). But, I can see the tables and view their data.
My question is around the visibility of the data that's in the CloudBees database. Is the database created for the free accounts viewable to other people connecting to the same machine? Does this change if I use a paid account? Or is it more the nature of how the database was created? I can see other schemas (and their data) but I have no idea if other people can see mine? Is there a permissions-aspect I need to ensure I set? I've fairly ignorant with the inner-workings of MySQL.
While this is a prototype, were I to move into using CloudBees for production applications, I wouldn't want the data to be visible to anyone who happened to connect to the same database as my application. It's entirely possible that I'm missing something in this new cloud world. :)
Thanks for any info
All CloudBees MySQL databases are secured separately (although will be in shared instances unless you have a dedicated server) - they are not readable by any other account by default.
However, it is possible for the database owner to grant access to users from other accounts on that same database server if you really wanted to - even though it makes very little sense to do so (and your special user configuration will be lost during a failover).
So this is what has happened for the test databases that you can see - the database owner has opened up security on those databases / tables.
This question is probably off topic but i'll bite anyway. The database data is private to your account. Actual hardware/vm's maybe shared but the data/database is not.
Is there a way to check who was the last person or list of people who update a given proc in SQL server 2008? Is there a built in utility command, dash board, or 3rd party tool out there which can provide this insight?
Thanks
Right-click on the database node in SSMS, choose Reports>Standard Reports>Schema Changes History. This'll give you a list of changes - however, if the changes was not made recently you may not be able to find it on this report - it does not show "all changes, ever"!
Your question indicates you have several troubling problems that need to be addressed.
First you should be using source control and storing all changes to procs in it. Then you can see who made what change and be able to revert to previous versions.
Next, if this problem occurred on production, you need to limit the production rights to only a dba and people assigned a configuration management role (Either configuration pepeople, dbas, or managers). Application developers should not have any rights to create or update objects on prod at all.
You can also set up trigger to monitor and record all changes to databases. Look up DDL triggers.
#Will A gives you a short-term solution but it may not be valid for the research you need if the change was not recent.
What is the simplest way to allow one user write access and everyone else read-only access to a MS Access database on a local network?
I trust my users, but unfortunately Access saves changes to data as soon as the row of a table is deselected. Accidental keystrokes are saved without the user asking for the changes to be saved.
Some thoughts on controlling user rights to a Jet data store:
if you really want to lock things down, you'll never manage it with Jet, as it's inherently vulnerable because the user has to have WRITE access to the MDB file.
if you are content with controlling rights to the data in your front-end application, you could provide different front ends (one for WRITE users and one for READ-ONLY).
if you're not using ACCDB format, you can use Jet user-level security. It's a surprisingly complicated technology if you really want to lock down access to the data -- you have to follow all the instructions in the Jet Security White Paper to the letter, or your data will be open to anyone with the standard Jet workgroup file. And even once you're done, it is crackable (though not without spending $$$ to buy cracking software). BTW, database passwords before Access 2007 were completely useless and easily cracked. Access 2007 enhances the security by raising the level of data encryption, but a database password causes lots of issues and doesn't allow you to have more than one level of access (unless you provide two different front ends with different passwords -- cf. #2).
if you just want to use Jet ULS to control access in your front end, you can add your users to groups and then check the group membership in your front-end UI objects (i.e., forms), and give WRITE permission to the users who are in the user group that provides that level of access. The easiest way to do this, assuming you have more READ-ONLY users than those with WRITE permission is to have the READ-ONLY users log on as the default admin user (i.e., you do nothing for their setup), and have the WRITE users log on as a user in the group with WRITE permission. In other words, if they aren't logged on as user "admin", they have full WRITE access.
another alternative is to use NTFS security groups. API code for that is found on the Access Web, but it does require a Windows administrator to implement for you. Again, you would be limiting access in your front end application, rather than actually restricting user rights in the back-end MDB.
Only Jet ULS actually allows you to prevent a READ-ONLY user (who hasn't cracked your workgroup file) from editing your data. All users have to have network access to your back-end MDB, but you can make it hard for them to get to the data even without jumping through the hoops in implementing Jet ULS. Here are some steps to do that (and yes, all of these are a form of "security by obscurity" and will only slow down a READ-ONLY user determined to hack your back end):
Right click each table in your back end and turn on the HIDDEN attribute. This can also be done in code (see SetHiddenAttribute in Help). Naturally, if the end user sets their Access options to display hidden tables, this won't do anything. But most end users don't know about that, and if your users are running your app in the runtime, they won't have the option.
Change the back-end database's Startup Properties to not display the database window and to not use special keys. You can find code for setting the startup properties in the Help topic for "AllowBypassKey".
In your back-end, create a macro named AutoExec with one command, Quit. With special keys disabled, there is no way to prevent the execution of this macro, and as soon as the user attempts to open the back end (even if they hold down the SHIFT key, i.e., the standard keystroke for bypassing all startup routines), the database (and the instance of Access) will close.
Now, all of these things can be undone by someone who knows what they are doing. If you gave me a back end with these things implemented, I'd be in it in about 5 minutes, simply by running code in another Access database to change all these startup properties to give me access.
But your end users likely don't have that level of expertise. Any such user who does probably ought to be a WRITE user, no? :)
Yes, of course -- all of these things are easily hackable by anyone who knows how. But it's also easy to break into your house in seconds for the person with the right tools. That doesn't mean you don't lock the doors, even though it's not bulletproof protection from burglary.
Another consideration is that if you provide your users only the Access runtime instead of full Access, they won't be able to undo any of these settings in your back-end MDB.
Last of all:
Security is not solely a technical issue -- most of it is, in fact, a people problem. In order for people to do their work, you have to trust them to a certain extent in giving them access to your data. There is no technical solution to the problem of the untrustworthy system administrator, for instance, and the only way to fully protect your data is to not give them any access to it at all.
The easiest way would be to use share permissions. Grant write access to a group and put the users who must write to the database in that group. Put everyone else in a read group. This assumes you have a Windows domain, of course.
Here is a site that has some information on securing Access databases. It deals with Access 2000, there may be more options for newer versions.
This is the cheeky answer, but if you need better security, seriously consider upgrading to a more robust RDBMS.
I think it is possible using an ODBC connection to use Access as an interface to almost any database. For example, I have successfully configured a SQL Server 2008 Express Edition database with 2 users, one read/write and one read-only. I have been able to connect to the database from Access by opening an ODBC data source. So a user can have the Office-based report-generating and mail-merging functionality they are familiar with. But with any database server you wish.
This conversation may be a little old, but for some reasons I got the same problem recently. It will not suit to everyone, cause it relies not on M$ SQL Server but on MySQL. Use the MySQL ODBC connector (available here: http://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/odbc/), and store your tables on a MySQL server. The Access user's rights on tables will inherit from the MySQL user's rights. Pretty easy to customize...
Fact is, there is NO functional security for an access database.
The link below sells software that will 'recover' your access database Even if it has a a password.
It is a good thing they exist. Their program saved one of my customer's butts once when their previous programmer died and no one else had the password. Thanks to this program we could not get in and no data was lost.
http://www.stellarinfo.com/access-recovery.htm
And before you even think it, No, I do not work for them.