I have an HTML table whose cells contain, among other things, spans, like this:
...
<td>
<span style="height: 20px; width: 20px; margin-left: 2px;">
<span style="height: 20px; width: 20px; margin-left: 2px;">
<span style="height: 20px; width: 20px; margin-left: 2px;">
</td>
...
I'm looking for a way to shrink the width of those spans, rather than line wrap them, when the containing table cell is too narrow to show them all on one line. I tried playing around with setting the spans' max-width to 20px and then using a percent for the width, but that does not work because the table cell tries to be only as wide as its contents.
The minimum table cell width would be the width needed to display the header on 1 line.
For the visual types, here's what I currently have when there is enough width:
Here's what I currently have when there is not enough width:
And here's what I would like it to look like when there is not enough width for each span to be a full 20px:
In case it's not obvious, the spans are the colored squares in the TXEs, RDBs, and RavenNets columns.
Use <td nowrap> or <td style="white-space:nowrap;"> to avoid the wrapping. A table cell should generally expand to fit its contents, unless it is allowed to wrap, or you have constrained its width in some other way.
Have you considered setting a min-width on the td? or a wrapper div inside the td, but outside the spans?
This sorta kinda seems to do something close to what you want in Firefox 3.6. The crucial requirement seems to be that the table's width cannot be in pixels.
<!DOCTYPE HTML>
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"
href="http://yui.yahooapis.com/3.0.0/build/cssreset/reset-min.css">
<style type="text/css">
.indicator {
display:block;
white-space:nowrap;
min-width:8px;
max-width:300px;
width:100%;
}
.indicator li {
border:outset 2px;
display:inline-block;
height:80px;
min-width:2px;
max-width:80px;
padding:0 0 0 2px;
width:25%;
}
.ok { background:#0f0 } .caution { background:#ff0 }
.alert { background:#f00 } .inactive { background:#0ff }
table { width:100% }
td { width:100% }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table><tr><td>
<ul class="indicator">
<li class="ok"></li> <li class="caution"></li>
<li class="alert"></li> <li class="inactive"></li>
</ul>
</td></tr></table>
</body>
</html>
I couldn't find a satisfactory pure-CSS way to do what I wanted. I already had an application config file implemented (like a .ini file, more or less) so I just added my desired width to this config. It's not a general-purpose solution but it fits my requirements just fine.
Related
Under some situations, Firefox grossly miscalculates the widths of some DOM elements, which in turn causes layouts to break.
This jsFiddle gives an example of the problem. The numbers displayed below the table are the widths (in pixels) of the div that is shaded dark-gray, and of its parent (as reported by jQuery). Compare the results produced by the latest versions of Firefox (or IE 11) and Chrome (or Safari). Chrome always reports 250 for both widths (as expected), but Firefox always reports a larger number (though the exact number may depend on the OS and/or version of FF and/or phase of the moon). As a result, there's not enough room to render the svg elements in the next td at 3/row.
(More bewildering still: the numbers displayed below the table will vary according to the number of svg elements included in the second td element.)
This erratic/unpredictable behavior makes it practically impossible to design a layout.
How can I ensure that FF will compute such widths correctly, or alternatively, how can I work around this bug?
EDIT: updated jsFiddle (including the link to it).
Now, to keep the gods of SO happy:
body > div,table,table *{outline:1px solid red;}
html,body{height:100%;}
*{
-webkit-box-sizing:border-box;
-moz-box-sizing:border-box;
box-sizing:border-box;
}
*{margin:0;padding:0;border:0;}
table{
border-spacing:0;
border-collapse:collapse;
}
body{
font-family:courier;
font-size:13px;
background-color:palegoldenrod;
}
body > div{
width:312px;
margin:0 auto;
padding:40px 0 0;
background-color:white;
min-height:100%;
}
label{
display:block;
padding:0 1ex;
}
.button-container{
color:white;
background-color:#555;
}
.button-container > div{
display:inline-block;
}
.button-container > div:first-child{
font-weight:bold;
}
.ul-container > div{
width:100%;
border:1px solid black;
-webkit-border-radius:4px;
border-radius:4px;
}
ul{list-style:none;}
li{
width: 72px;
float:left;
margin: 0px 5px 1px;
padding: 0px 5px;
border-width: 1px;
line-height: 14px;
}
br{
clear:left;
}
body > div > div:last-child{margin:40px;}
<body>
<div>
<table><tbody><tr>
<td>
<div class="button-container">
<div>xxxx xxxxx</div>
<div>
<label> <input type="radio"> xxxx xxxx xxx xxxx xxxx </label>
</div>
</div>
<div class="ul-container" style="width: 250px;">
<div style="width: 248px;">
<ul style="width: 246px;">
<li>A</li><li>B</li><li>C</li><li>D</li><li>E</li><li>F</li><li>G</li><li>H</li><li>I</li>
</ul>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</td>
<td>
<div>
<svg width="20" height="20"></svg><svg width="20" height="20"></svg><svg width="20" height="20"></svg><svg width="20" height="20"></svg><svg width="20" height="20"></svg><svg width="20" height="20"></svg><svg width="20" height="20"></svg>
</div>
</td>
</tr></tbody></table>
<div></div>
</div>
(function ($) {
var $msg = $('body > div > div:last-child');
function showw (sel) {
var w = $(sel).width();
$('<span>', {text: '' + w})
.css('margin-left', 5)
.appendTo($msg);
console.log(w);
}
showw('.button-container');
showw('table td:first-child');
}(jQuery));
If you remove the inline-block rule for .button-container > div, it forces the two divs to sit on separate lines, allowing the table to take on a consistent width.
What is happening there is the browser is trying to put the elements on the same line. A cell in a table with no explicit width or overflow instructions will grow wider to accommodate the content lines inside it. Because the two elements are inline, they are considered a single line. The text wraps as you would expect (the browser does a good job protecting the integrity of your content), but this is arbitrary as far as the width calculation goes; it affects the calculated width of the line that the elements form, and therefore pushes the table cell open wider. The browser is trying to take what you gave it and make sense of it while it also tries to preserve the integrity and legibility of your data, because it is a table and that's what tables do.
This is another good example of why tables are not the right tool for layout. They are designed to accommodate and present data, so they do a good job flowing and sizing around text. Different user agents have different strategies when it comes to how this is accomplished -- that is all within the specification. When you abuse the element, you wind up having to contend with design properties that do not suit your use case.
Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/Cy7dA/
It isn't "miscalculating the width" at all.
Your problem is simply that your label and input are different widths in both browsers. The extra width is then pushing the button-container and td out further.
Try to get your input/label combo consistent between the browsers (you probably need explicit margins on the input) and your problem is solved.
I have a set of rows in a table, containing code-blocks, looking like this:
<td style='border-bottom: 1px solid lightgray;'>
<div>
<code>-1245</code>
</div>
<br />
<div>
<code>-12455</code>
</div>
<br />
<div>
<code>-1245</code>
</div>
<br />
<div>
<code>-1245</code>
</div>
<br />
<div>
<code>-1245</code>
</div>
</td>
And some CSS, like so:
<style scoped>
.k-grid code {
width: 45px;
color: lightslategray;
}
</style>
My problem here is that I need the code boxes to have all the same width, and not a width based on the content (fluid like).
I.e. when I have the number 1234, the box is displayed with one width, and when I have the number 12345, the box is expanded to another width.
I cannot seem to override this locally using the CSS. Any suggestions?
Update
Found a solution that suits my needs, based on the answers below.
Css:
.k-grid code {
line-height: 1.25;
display: inline-block;
width: 50px;
color: lightslategray;
}
HTML <code> element is an inline wrapper. In order to apply width, you need to change type of display to block or inline-block:
td code {
display: block;
width: 70px;
margin: 2px 0;
}
In this case, you won't need to wrap <code> elements by <div>:
<table>
<tr>
<td>
<code>-1245</code>
<code>-12455</code>
<code>-1245</code>
<code>-1245</code>
<code>-1245</code>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
Here is the JSBin Demo.
Update
First I should note that I used margin property before only for the previous demo, remove that. Also, It's better to reset line-height property of <code> elements:
td code {
display: block; /* Or inline-block */
width: 50px;
line-height: 1;
}
TW Bootstrap applies a margin-bottom property to its .progress element. Reset the margin in your stylesheet if needed:
.progress {
margin: 0; /* <-- Override Bootstrap default style */
}
However, in this case I think it's better to place each line in a separate row (<tr>).
I created a Demo on the basis of your posted image.
Here is the JSBin Demo #2.
Before:
After:
I'd like to keep the height of the original "before" version, as this fits with the rest. Editing height doesn't seem to do the trick properly :S
I'd like to have a line that starts right after my text on the same line, I've tried with the following simple code
<html><body>My Text<hr/></body></html>
It seems that <hr> is not an option because it is always on a new line and I'd like the line to start at the right of my text.
Any help ?
The <hr> has default styling that puts it on a new line. However that default styling can be over-ridden, in the same way as it can for any other element. <hr> is in essence nothing more than an empty <div> with a default border setting.
To demonstrate this, try the following:
<div>Blah blah<hr style='display:inline-block; width:100px;' />dfgdfg</div>
There are a number of ways to override the styling of <hr> to acheive your aim.
You could try using display:inline-block; along with a width setting, as I have above. The down-side of this approach is that it requires you to know the width you want, though there are ways around this - width:100%;, and the whole line in a container <div> that has overflow:hidden; might do the trick, for example:
<div style='overflow:hidden; white-space:nowrap;'>Blah blah<hr style='display:inline-block; width:100%;' /></div>
Another option would be to use float:left;. You'd need to apply this to all the elements in the line, and I dislike this option as I find that float tends to cause more problems than it solves. But try it and see if it works for you.
There are various other combinations of styles you can try - give it a go and see what works.
Using FlexBox Property this can be achieved easily.
.mytextdiv{
display:flex;
flex-direction:row;
align-items: center;
}
.mytexttitle{
flex-grow:0;
}
.divider{
flex-grow:1;
height: 1px;
background-color: #9f9f9f;
}
<div class="mytextdiv">
<div class="mytexttitle">
My Text
</div>
<div class="divider"></div>
</div>
Try this:
<html><body>My Text<hr style="float: right; width: 80%"/></body></html>
The inline CSS float: right will keep it on the same line as the text.
You'll need to adjust the width if you want it to fill the rest of the line.
Using inline or float, as far as I tested it doesn't work properly even if this was my first thought. Looking further I used the following css
hr {
bottom: 17px;
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
div {
background:white;
position: relative;
width: 100px;
z-index: 10;
}
html
<div>My Text</div><hr/>
Demo http://jsfiddle.net/mFEWk/
What I did, is to add position relative in both elements (to give me the advantage of z-index use). Also from the moment I had position:relative for hr I moved it from the bottom:17px. This move it above the div that contains the text. Applying z-index values and adding background:white for the div puts the text above the the line. Of course don't forget to use a width for the text, otherwise will take the whole width of the parent element.
<div style="float: left">Some text</div>
<hr style="clear: none; position: relative; top: 0.5em;">
Exactly what you want.
Try this. It works
<p style="float:left;">
Hello Text
<hr style="float:left; width: 80%"/>
</p>
You can also use this to draw a line between texts like
Hello -------------------------- Hello
The OP never specified the purpose of the line, but I wanted to share what I ended up doing when I was making an html template where the user needed a line to write on after the document was printed.
Because the hr tag defaults to its own line and defaults to being centered in the line, I decided to use a div and style it instead.
HTML
This is my text.<div class='fillLine'></div>
CSS
.fillLine {
display:inline-block;
width: 200px;
border-bottom: 1px solid black;
}
JSFiddle Demo
Style Div for Line After Text
Hope that helps anyone who had the same goal as me.
hr {
width: {so it fits on the same line as the p tag};
}
p {
float: left;
width: {enough to accomodate the hr};
}
That sort of make sense?
<p>My text</p>
<hr />
Here's one potential approach, but it has some assumptions/requirements. Your question should be edited to give more specific information about what you're building.
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Blah</title>
<style type="text/css">
body {
background-color : white;
font-family : Arial;
font-size : 16px;
}
.wrap {
background: transparent url(px.png) repeat-x 0px 85%;
/* Different fonts or text sizes may require tweaking of that offset.
px.png is a one-pixel(though can be thicker if needed) image in whatever color you want the line */
}
.inner {
background-color : white;
/* Should match the background of whatever it's sitting over.
Obviously this requires a solid background. */
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="wrap"><span class="inner">Here is some text</span></div>
</body>
</html>
I used the following technique:
Give the container div a background-image with a horizontal line.
Put an element (like <h3>) in the container div (I have it on the right so float: right; )
Use the following css:
.line-container {
width: 550px;
height: 40px;
margin-top: 10px;
background-image: url("/images/horizontal_line.png");
}
.line-container h3 {
padding-left: 10px;
float: right;
background-color: white;
}
Below code did the job for me
HTML File:
----------
<p class="section-header">Details</p><hr>
CSS File:
----------
.section-header{
float: left;
font-weight: bold
}
hr{
float: left;
width: 80%;
}
INLINE:
-------
<p style="float: left;font-weight: bold">Details</p><hr style="float: left;width: 80%;">
Why doesn't the "aaaaaaaaa..." go to a new line and go out of div?
<head>
<style type="text/css">
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
#container {
background: #888888;
color: white;
width: 200px;
padding: 20px;
}
#container li {
list-style: none;
}
#container td {
padding-right: 20px;
}
</style>
</head>
<div id="container">
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>one</td>
<td>
<ul>
<li>two</li>
<li>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa</li>
</ul>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
If there aren't any spaces in your word then your table will expand to fit the word. There isn't much you can do about that (not with css anyway). Word wrap only works with actual word (i.e. with spaces in them).
A solution that will work for you though is to use the (soft hyphen)
<li>aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa</li>
will break in the middle. It will only break there if it needs to - if it doesn't fit in the parent container.
There are a number of other solutions available, most of them are unreliable cross-browser or break your design:
The word break tag : <wbr> is unreliable.
The overflow CSS statement will either break your design (overflow:auto) or hide content (overflow:hidden)
So basically, no easy solution. Soft-hyphen will work best if you can use it.
You could look into hyphenator, a way to automate work breaks like that on your website.
For your edit, if it's a variable then I would definitely with hyphenator.
What you are looking for is css3 feature word wrap: http://www.css3.info/preview/word-wrap/
This have some browser compatibility issues but I think if you are determined to use such long words, this is an option.
This is a sample: http://jsfiddle.net/VXgdS/2/
Ok, I had a simple layout problem a week or two ago. Namely sections of a page needed a header:
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Title Button |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
Pretty simple stuff. Thing is table hatred seems to have taken over in the Web world, which I was reminded of when I asked Why use definition lists (DL,DD,DT) tags for HTML forms instead of tables? Now the general topic of tables vs divs/CSS has previously been discussed, for example:
DIV vs Table; and
Tables instead of DIVs.
So this isn't intended to be a general discussion about CSS vs tables for layout. This is simply the solution to one problem. I tried various solutions to the above using CSS including:
Float right for the button or a div containing the button;
Position relative for the button; and
Position relative+absolute.
None of these solutions were satisfactory for different reasons. For example the relative positioning resulted in a z-index issue where my dropdown menu appeared under the content.
So I ended up going back to:
<style type="text/css">
.group-header { background-color: yellow; width: 100%; }
.group-header td { padding: 8px; }
.group-title { text-align: left; font-weight: bold; }
.group-buttons { text-align: right; }
</style>
<table class="group-header">
<tr>
<td class="group-title">Title</td>
<td class="group-buttons"><input type="button" name="Button"></td>
</tr>
</table>
And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.
So can anyone do the equivalent without tables?
The requirements are:
Backwards compatible: to FF2 and IE6;
Reasonably consistent: across different browsers;
Vertically centered: the button and title are of different heights; and
Flexible: allow reasonably precise control over positioning (padding and/or margin) and styling.
On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:
Why CSS should not be used for layout; and
Tables vs CSS: CSS Trolls begone
EDIT: Let me elaborate on the float issue. This sort of works:
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; overflow: hidden; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-title { float: left; padding: 8px; }
.group-buttons { float: right; padding: 8px; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="group-header">
<div class="group-title">This is my title</div>
<div class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></div>
</div>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.</p>
<p>So can anyone do the equivalent without tables that is backwards compatible to at least FF2 and IE6?</p>
<p>On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Thanks to Ant P for the overflow: hidden part (still don't get why though). Here's where the problem comes in. Say I want the title and button to be vertically centered. This is problematic because the elements are of different height. Compare this to:
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; overflow: hidden; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-header td { vertical-align: middle; }
.group-title { padding: 8px; }
.group-buttons { text-align: right; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<table class="group-header">
<tr>
<td class="group-title">This is my title</td>
<td class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></td>
</tr>
</table>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly. It's simple, as backward compatibile as it gets (that'll work probably even on IE5) and it just works. No messing about with positioning or floats.</p>
<p>So can anyone do the equivalent without tables that is backwards compatible to at least FF2 and IE6?</p>
<p>On a side note, I came across a couple of interesting articles today:</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
which works perfectly.
There is nothing wrong with using the tools that are available to you to do the job quickly and correctly.
In this case a table worked perfectly.
I personally would have used a table for this.
I think nested tables should be avoided, things can get messy.
Just float left and right and set to clear both and you're done. No need for tables.
Edit: I know that I got a lot of upvotes for this, and I believed I was right. But there are cases where you simply need to have tables. You can try doing everything with CSS and it will work in modern browsers, but if you wish to support older ones... Not to repeat myself, here the related stack overflow thread and rant on my blog.
Edit2: Since older browsers are not that interesting anymore, I'm using Twitter bootstrap for new projects. It's great for most layout needs and does using CSS.
Float title left, float button right, and (here's the part I never knew until recently) - make the container of them both {overflow:hidden}.
That should avoid the z-index problem, anyway. If it doesn't work, and you really need the IE5 support, go ahead and use the table.
This is kind of a trick question: it looks terribly simple until you get to
Say I want the title and button to be vertically centered.
I want to state for the record that yes, vertical centring is difficult in CSS. When people post, and it seems endless on SO, "can you do X in CSS" the answer is almost always "yes" and their whinging seems unjustified. In this case, yes, that one particular thing is hard.
Someone should just edit the entire question down to "is vertical centring problematic in CSS?".
In pure CSS, a working answer will one day be to just use "display:table-cell". Unfortunately that doesn't work across current A-grade browsers, so for all that you might as well use a table if you just want to achieve the same result anyway. At least you'll be sure it works far enough into the past.
Honestly, just use a table if it's easier. It won't hurt.
If the semantics and accessibility of the table element really matter to you, there is a working draft for making your table non-semantic:
http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/#presentation
I think this requires a special DTD beyond XHTML 1.1, which would just stir up the whole text/html vs application/xml debate, so let's not go there.
So, on to your unresolved CSS problem...
To vertically align two elements on their center: it can be done a few different ways, with some obtuse CSS hackery.
If you can fit within the following constraints, then there is a relatively simple way:
The height of the two elements is fixed.
The height of the container is fixed.
The elements will be narrow enough not to overlap (or can be set to a fixed width).
Then you can use absolute positioning with negative margins:
.group-header { height: 50px; position: relative; }
.group-title, .group-buttons { position: absolute; top: 50%; }
# Assuming the height of .group-title is a known 34px
.group-title { left: 0; margin-top: -17px; }
# Assuming the height of .group-buttons is a known 38px
.group-buttons { right: 0; margin-top: -19px; }
But this is pointless in most situations... If you already know the height of the elements, then you can just use floats and add enough margin to position them as needed.
Here is another method which uses the text baseline to vertically align the two columns as inline blocks. The drawback here is that you need to set fixed widths for the columns to fill out the width from the left edge. Because we need to keep the elements locked to a text baseline, we can't just use float:right for the second column. (Instead, we have to make the first column wide enough to push it over.)
<html>
<head>
<title>Layout</title>
<style type="text/css">
.group-header, .group-content { width: 500px; margin: 0 auto; }
.group-header { border: 1px solid red; background: yellow; }
.valign { display: inline-block; vertical-align: middle; }
.group-content { border: 1px solid black; background: #DDD; }
.group-title { padding: 8px; width: 384px; }
.group-buttons { padding: 8px; width: 84px; text-align: right; }
</style>
<!--[if lt IE 8]>
<style type="text/css">
.valign { display: inline; margin-top: -2px; padding-top: 1px; }
</style>
<![endif]-->
</head>
<body>
<div class="group-header">
<div class="valign">
<div class="group-title">This is my title.</div>
</div><!-- avoid whitespace between these! --><div class="valign">
<div class="group-buttons"><input type="button" value="Collapse"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="group-content">
<p>And it works perfectly, but mind the hacks.</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The HTML: We add .valign wrappers around each column. (Give them a more "semantic" name if it makes you happier.) These need to be kept without whitespace in between or else text spaces will push them apart. (I know it sucks, but that's what you get for being "pure" with the markup and separating it from the presentation layer... Ha!)
The CSS: We use vertical-align:middle to line up the blocks to the text baseline of the group-header element. The different heights of each block will stay vertically centered and push out the height of their container. The widths of the elements need to be calculated to fit the width. Here, they are 400 and 100, minus their horizontal padding.
The IE fixes: Internet Explorer only displays inline-block for natively-inline elements (e.g. span, not div). But, if we give the div hasLayout and then display it inline, it will behave just like inline-block. The margin adjustment is to fix a 1px gap at the top (try adding background colors to the .group-title to see).
I would recommend not using a table in this instance, because that is not tabular data; it's purely presentational to have the button located at the far right. This is what I'd do to duplicate your table structure (change to a different H# to suit where you are in your site's hierarchy):
<style>
.group-header { background: yellow; zoom: 1; padding: 8px; }
.group-header:after { content: "."; display: block; height: 0; clear: both; visibility: hidden; }
/* set width appropriately to allow room for button */
.group-header h3 { float: left; width: 300px; }
/* set line-height or margins to align with h3 baseline or middle */
.group-header input { float: right; }
</style>
<div class="group-header">
<h3>This is my title</h3>
<input type="button" value="Collapse"/>
</div>
If you want true vertical alignment in the middle (ie, if the text wraps the button is still middle-aligned with respect to both lines of text), then you either need to do a table or work something with position: absolute and margins. You can add position: relative to your drop-down menu (or more likely its parent) in order to pull it into the same ordering level as the buttons, allowing you to bump it above them with z-index, if it comes to that.
Note that you don't need width: 100% on the div because it's a block-level element, and zoom: 1 makes the div behave like it has a clearfix in IE (other browsers pick up the actual clearfix). You also don't need all those extraneous classes if you're targeting things a bit more specifically, although you might need a wrapper div or span on the button to make positioning easier.
Do a double float in a div and use the clearfix. http://www.webtoolkit.info/css-clearfix.html Do you have any padding/margin restrictions?
<div class="clearfix">
<div style="float:left">Title</div>
<input type="button" value="Button" style="float:right" />
</div>
<div class="group-header">
<input type="button" name="Button" value="Button" style="float:right" />
<span>Title</span>
</div>
I've chose to use Flexbox, because it made things so much easier.
You basically need to go to the parent of the children you want to align and add display:box (prefixed of course). To make them sit in the sides, use justify-content. Space between is the right thing when you have elements which need to be aligned to the end, like in this case (see link)...
Then the vertical align issue. Because I made the parent of the two elements, you want to align a Flexbox. It's easy now to use align-items: center.
Then I added the styles you wanted before, removed the float from the title and button in the header and added a padding:
.group-header, .group-content {
width: 500px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.group-header{
border: 1px solid red;
background: yellow;
overflow: hidden;
display: -webkit-box;
display: -moz-box;
display: box;
display: -webkit-flex;
display: -moz-flex;
display: -ms-flexbox;
display: flex;
-webkit-justify-content: space-between;
-moz-justify-content: space-between;
-ms-justify-content: space-between;
-o-justify-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
webkit-align-items: center;
-moz-align-items: center;
-ms-align-items: center;
-o-align-items: center;
align-items: center;
padding: 8px 0;
}
.group-content{
border: 1px solid black;
background: #DDD;
}
.group-title {
padding-left: 8px;
}
.group-buttons {
padding-right: 8px
}
See Demo
I agree that one should really only use tables for tabular data, for the simple reason that tables don't show until they're finished loading (no matter how fast that is; it's slower that the CSS method). I do, however, feel that this is the simplest and most elegant solution:
<html>
<head>
<title>stack header</title>
<style type="text/css">
#stackheader {
background-color: #666;
color: #FFF;
width: 410px;
height: 50px;
}
#title {
color: #FFF;
float: left;
padding: 15px 0 0 15px;
}
#button {
color: #FFF;
float: right;
padding: 15px 15px 0 0;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="stackheader">
<div id="title">Title</div>
<div id="button">Button</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The button function and any extra detail can be styled from this basic form. Apologies for the bad tags.