SSRS passing parameter in between values - reporting-services

I got some SSRS question. I need to pass in between values in parameters. How can I do it? Sample data:
No. Records
Student Name
5
Anne
5
Rick
4
John
3
Nick
2
Hazel
2
Rica
1
Mitch
The SSRS parameter should show something like this:
Select No. of Records:
1-2
3-4
5 or more
Boolean value is not working on this case

There are a few ways to do this, this is probably the simplest if it's not something you will repeat often.
Manually set your report parameter labels and values as follows
Then in you data query just do something like
SELECT *
FROM myTable t
WHERE
(#myParam = 1 AND NoOfRecords BETWEEN 1 AND 2)
OR (#myParam = 2 AND NoOfRecords BETWEEN 3 AND 4)
OR (#myParam = 3 AND NoOfRecords >= 5)
Make sure myParam is the name of your SSRS report parameter, it is case sensitive.

Related

mysql: specific item to be first and then to sort the rest chronologically to end then chronologically from beginning

Lets say I have the following table:
friends
_______
id name
1 johnny
2 tam
3 slick
4 mat
5 Rhanda
6 Tommy
7 ike
8 Spencer
9 Alan
I want to get all the friends list but I want the id 5 to be the first item in the list. I want the next item to follow chronologically until the end. Then the list start from the beginning until all results have been returned. So it should end like this...
friends
_______
id name
5 Rhanda
6 Tommy
7 ike
8 Spencer
9 Alan
1 johnny
2 tam
3 slick
4 mat
I have found and tried this but as you can imagine it's only returning the first item and then ordering the rest from 1 up. I have searched and worked on this for 2 days now and really could use some help. Any suggestions?
You can use:
order by (id >= 5) desc, id
This puts all ids 5 or greater first. Then it sorts each of the parts in ascending order.
MySQL treats boolean expressions as integers in an integer context, with 0 for false and 1 for true. So, to put the true values first, desc is needed.
You can add an expression to order clause like this:
select id, name from table
order by
case when id >= 5 then 0 else 1 end
, id

query the same field multiple times in the same query

I need to filter a table in mysql but can't get past the beginning.
The table has 2 fields:
ID_house house_feature
1 1
1 2
1 4
1 5
2 1
2 3
2 4
3 1
3 2
3 3
I need to filter this table using the following parameters:
house feature = 1
AND
house feature = 2
AND
house feature = 3
So that I get all houses with the requested feature.
I already tried to create something similar to this:
SELECT *
FROM houses
WHERE
house_feature = 1
AND
house_feature = 2
AND
house_feature = 3
But it doesn't work as I expected.
Is there a way to get this result with MySQL?
It seems that I acn filter the table using only the OR operator but this way I can't get the right result.
Thanks in advance for any help.
tony
You can do so ,by matching the distinct count of features per house ,so the house with exactly these 3 features will be returned
SELECT *
FROM t
WHERE
house_feature IN(1 ,2,3)
group by ID_house
having count(distinct house_feature) = 3
Demo

sql sum rows and put into columns of select

I have a table that essentially has:
person activity-code activity-value
There are multiple activity-codes (about 17 of them) and activity-values per person. For exmaple:
A 1 10
A 1 12
A 2 4
B 1 5
B 2 3
B 2 8
What I want is a select statement that returns something like:
A 22 4
B 5 11
So the first column is the person. The second column is the sum of all activity-values for the activity-code 1 for that person. The third column is the sum of all activity-values for the activity-code 2 for that person. etc...
In the end I want to do this and use the OUTFILE command in there as I want to dump the totals to a file to be imported into an excel file.
It seems like there is a subquery in there somewhere but I am not advanced enough to figure that out.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I can add detail if that is going to help.
Unfortunately for you, Mysql lacks the pivot command present in other databases, which makes this sort of thing a piece of cake. You're stuck with something like
select
person,
sum(case activitycode when 1 then activityvalue else 0 end),
sum(case activitycode when 2 then activityvalue else 0 end),
....
from
yourtable
group by
person

SQL - counting rows with specific value

I have a table that looks somewhat like this:
id value
1 0
1 1
1 2
1 0
1 1
2 2
2 1
2 1
2 0
3 0
3 2
3 0
Now for each id, I want to count the number of occurences of 0 and 1 and the number of occurences for that ID (the value can be any integer), so the end result should look something like this:
id n0 n1 total
1 2 2 5
2 1 2 4
3 2 0 3
I managed to get the first and last row with this statement:
SELECT id, COUNT(*) FROM mytable GROUP BY id;
But I'm sort of lost from here. Any pointers on how to achieve this without a huge statement?
With MySQL, you can use SUM(condition):
SELECT id, SUM(value=0) AS n0, SUM(value=1) AS n1, COUNT(*) AS total
FROM mytable
GROUP BY id
See it on sqlfiddle.
As #Zane commented above, the typical method is to use CASE expressions to perform the pivot.
SQL Server now has a PIVOT operator that you might see. DECODE() and IIF() were older approaches on Oracle and Access that you might still find lying around.

MS Access 2007 Rows to columns in recordset

I have a table which is like a questionnaire type ..
My original table contains 450 columns and 212 rows.
Slno is the person's id who answer the questionaire .
SlNo Q1a Q1b Q2a Q2b Q2c Q2d Q2e Q2f .... Q37c <450 columns>
1 1
2 1 1
3 1
4 1 1
5 1
I have to do analysis for this data , eg Number of persons who is male (Q1a) and who owns a boat (Q2b) i.e ( select * from Questionnaire where Q1a=1 and Q2b=1 ).. etc .. many more combinations are there ..
I have designed in MS access all the design worked perfectly except for a major problem ( Number of table columns is restricted to 255 ).
To be able to enter this into access table i have inserted in as 450 rows and 212 columns (now am able to enter this into access db). Now while fetching the records i want the record set to transpose the results into the form that i wanted so that i do not have to change my algorithm or logic .... How to achieve this with the minimum changes ? This is my first time working with Access Database
You might be able to use a crosstab query to generate what you are expecting. You could also build a transpose function.
Either way, I think you'll stil run into the 255 column limit and MS Access is using temporary table, etc.
However, I think you'll have far less work and better results if you change the structure of your table.
I assume that this like a fill-in-the-bubble questionnaire, and it's mostly multiple choice. In which case instead of recording the result, I would record the answer for the question
SlNo Q1 Q2
1 B
2 B
3 A
4 A C
5 A
Then you have far fewer columns to work with. And you query for where Q1='A' instead of Q1a=1.
The alternative is break the table up into sections (personal, career, etc.) and then do a join, and only show the column you need (so as not to exceed that 255 column limit).
An way to do this that handles more questions is have a table for the person, a table for the question, and a table for the response
Person
SlNo PostalCode
1 90210
2 H0H 0H0
3
Questions
QID, QTitle, QDesc
1 Q1a Gender Male
2 Q1b Gender Female
3 Q2a Boat
4 Q2b Car
Answers
SlNo QID Result
1 2 True
1 3 True
1 4 True
2 1 True
2 3 False
2 4 True
You can then find the question takers by selecting Persons from a list of Answers
select * from Person
where SlNo in (
select SlNo from Answers, Questions
where
questions.qid = answers=qid
and
qtitle = 'Q1a'
and
answers.result='True')
and SlNo in (
select SlNo from Answers, Questions
where
questions.qid = answers=qid
and
qtitle = 'Q2a'
and
answers.result='True')
I finally got the solutions
I created two table one having 225 columns and the other having 225 column
(total 450 columns)
I created a SQL statement
select count(*) from T1,T2 WHERE T1.SlNo=T2.SlNo
and added the conditions what i want
It is coming correct after this ..
The database was entered wrongly by the other staff in the beginning but just to throw away one week of work was not good , so had to stick to this design ... and the deadly is next week .. now it's working :) :)