How to write AdminCleint Mock test - junit

I am using kafka and Spring and stuck to write one Junit Test case.
Following is piece of code that I want to test.
you it can be seen KafkaAdminClient.create( is static method and I am unable to mock this.
Could some suggest me how I can achieve mocking for this.
public
boolean isBrokerRunning() {
boolean isKafkaRunning = true;
try {
ListTopicsResult topics = createAdminClient().listTopics();
topics.names().get();
} catch (InterruptedException | ExecutionException e) {
isKafkaRunning = false;
}
return isKafkaRunning;
}
public AdminClient createAdminClient() {
Properties properties = new Properties();
properties.put("bootstrap.servers", bootstrapServers);
properties.put("connections.max.idle.ms", 10000);
properties.put("request.timeout.ms", 3000);
return KafkaAdminClient.create(properties);
}

I also faced this same issue. After spending around 2 hrs I managed to use MockAdminClient.
Just create a MockAdminClient with dummy nodes and controller.
Node controller = new Node(0, "localhost", 8121);
List<Node> brokers = Arrays.asList(
controller,
new Node(1, "localhost", 8122),
new Node(2, "localhost", 8123));
AdminClient mockAdminClient = new MockAdminClient(brokers, controller);
final NewTopic newTopic = new NewTopic("some_topic", 1, (short) 1);
mockAdminClient.createTopics(ImmutableList.of(newTopic));
assertTrue(testClass.topicExists("test_topic", mockAdminClient));

In case the AdminClient have to be initiated in the constructor, where AdminClient static methods have to be mocked. I did this using MockedStatic from Mockito-Inline and MockAdminClient
#BeforeEach
void setUp() {
// Creat mock Admin Client
final Node controller = new Node(0, "localhost", 8121);
final List<Node> brokers = Arrays.asList(
controller,
new Node(1, "localhost", 8122),
new Node(2, "localhost", 8123));
mockAdminClient = new MockAdminClient(brokers, controller);
try (MockedStatic<AdminClient> adminClientMockedStatic = Mockito.mockStatic(AdminClient.class)) {
adminClientMockedStatic.when(() -> AdminClient.create(anyMap())).thenReturn(mockAdminClient);
KafkaProperties kafkaProperties = new KafkaProperties();
kafkaProperties.setBootstrapServers(Arrays.asList("dummyBootstrapServer:0001"));
kafkaFacade = new KafkaFacade(kafkaProperties);
}
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(kafkaFacade, "numberOfPartition", NO_OF_PARTITIONS);
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(kafkaFacade, "retentionValue", 86400000);
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(kafkaFacade, "replicationFactor", NO_OF_REPLICAS);
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(kafkaFacade, "priority", PRIORITY);
ReflectionTestUtils.setField(kafkaFacade, "prefix", TOPIC_PREFIX);
}

Related

StateHasChanged not updating on Blazor server app

I am working on a Blazor Server app over a SignalR connection with an ASP.NET Core API, this code works fine in WebAssembly but for some reason it doesn't works in Blazor Server app.
I suspect the problem is that StateHasChanged() isn't making effect, since Console.WriteLine($"Company Name: {item.CompanyName}, Volumn: {item.Volume}"); is printing in console but MarketData isn't updating UI at StateHasChanged().
For more context; full code is explained here:
https://www.webnethelper.com/2022/01/aspnet-core-6-signalr-creating-real.html
But I guess it's just a common fix; but I can't find the solution.
I've also tried with InvokeAsync(() => StateHasChanged()); as mentioned here in stackoverflow but It didnt work. Can anyone help me fix this issue?
private HubConnection? hubConn;
private string? ConnectionStatusMessage;
public List<Market> MarketData = new List<Market>();
public List<Market> MarketReceivedData = new List<Market>();
private List<string> xSource;
private List<int> ySource;
private List<object> source;
protected override async Task OnInitializedAsync()
{
xSource = new List<string>();
ySource = new List<int>();
source = new List<object>();
await service.GetMarketEndpoint();
await Start();
}
private async Task Start()
{
hubConn = new HubConnectionBuilder().WithUrl("https://localhost:7193/marketdata").Build();
await hubConn.StartAsync();
if(hubConn.State == HubConnectionState.Connected )
ConnectionStatusMessage = "Connection is established Successfully...";
else
ConnectionStatusMessage = "Connection is not established...";
}
private void MarketDataListener(string chartType)
{
hubConn.On<List<Market>>("SendMarketStatusData", async (data) =>
{
MarketData = new List<Market>();
foreach (var item in data)
{
Console.WriteLine($"Company Name: {item.CompanyName}, Volumn: {item.Volume}");
xSource.Add(item.CompanyName);
ySource.Add(item.Volume);
}
source.Add(ySource);
source.Add(xSource);
MarketData = data;
StateHasChanged();
await js.InvokeAsync<object>(chartType, source.ToArray());
xSource.Clear();
ySource.Clear();
});
}
private void ReceivedMarketDataListener()
{
hubConn.On<List<Market>>("CommunicateMarketData", (data) =>
{
MarketReceivedData = data;
StateHasChanged();
});
}
public async Task Dispose()
{
await hubConn.DisposeAsync();
}
async Task generateLineChartTask()
{
MarketDataListener("marketLineChart");
ReceivedMarketDataListener();
await service.GetMarketDataAsync();
}
async Task generateBarChartTask()
{
MarketDataListener("marketBarChart");
ReceivedMarketDataListener();
await service.GetMarketDataAsync();
}
The main difference here is that Blazor Serverside is multithreaded so the callbacks from the circuit will execute on a different Thread.
StateHasChanged() has to be executed on the main (UI) thread so call it like InvokeAsync(StateHasChanged), which is short for InvokeAsync(() => StateHasChanged()).
And be aware of other threading risks. Ie, don't share data like Lists between threads.

HttpAsyncClient isn't making request if setConnectionManagerShared is set to true

For some reason HttpAsyncClient isn't making request if setConnectionManagerShared is set to true. I found this bug but couldn't figure out what I'm missing.
Here is how I create new client
def apply(proxy: Option[HttpHost], cookieStore: Option[CookieStore]) = {
val builder = HttpAsyncClients.custom.
setConnectionManager(connManager).
setConnectionManagerShared(true).
setDefaultCredentialsProvider(credentialsProvider).
setDefaultRequestConfig(defaultRequestConfig).
setSSLStrategy(sslStrategy)
proxy.map(builder.setProxy)
builder.setDefaultCookieStore(cookieStore.getOrElse(new BasicCookieStore)) // Use custom cookie store if necessary.
// Create an HttpClient with the given custom dependencies and configuration.
val client: HttpAsyncClient = new HttpAsyncClient(builder.build)
client
}
Full class is located is here.
What should I change ?
DefaultConnectingIOReactor ioReactor = new DefaultConnectingIOReactor();
PoolingNHttpClientConnectionManager cm = new PoolingNHttpClientConnectionManager(ioReactor);
CloseableHttpAsyncClient client1 = HttpAsyncClients.custom()
.setConnectionManager(cm)
.build();
CloseableHttpAsyncClient client2 = HttpAsyncClients.custom()
.setConnectionManager(cm)
.setConnectionManagerShared(true)
.build();
client1.start();
client2.start();
final CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(2);
FutureCallback callback = new FutureCallback<HttpResponse>() {
#Override
public void completed(HttpResponse result) {
latch.countDown();
System.out.println(result.getStatusLine());
}
#Override
public void failed(Exception ex) {
latch.countDown();
System.out.println(ex.getMessage());
}
#Override
public void cancelled() {
latch.countDown();
}
};
client1.execute(new HttpGet("http://httpbin.org/get"), callback);
client2.execute(new HttpGet("http://httpbin.org/get"), callback);
latch.await();
// I am aware this is sloppy
client1.close();
client2.close();

SSIS Scripting Component: Get child records for creating Object

Got it working - Posted My solution below but will like to know if there is better way
Hello All
I am trying to create Domain Event for a newly created (after migration) domain object in my database.
for Objects without any internal child objects it worked fine by using Script Component. The problem is in how to get the child rows to add information to event object.
Ex. Customer-> Customer Locations.
I am creating Event in Script Component- as tranformation- (have reference to my Domain event module) and then creating sending serialized information about event as a column value. The input rows currently provide data for the parent object.
Please advise.
Regards,
The Mar
Edit 1
I would like to add that current I am doing processsing in
public override void Input0_ProcessInputRow(Input0Buffer Row)
I am looking for something like create a a data reader in this function
loop through data rows -> create child objecta nd add it to parent colelction
Still on google and PreExecute and ProcessInput Seems something to look at .
This is my solution. I am a total newbie in SSIS , so this may not be the best solution.
[Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Pipeline.SSISScriptComponentEntryPointAttribute]
public class ScriptMain : UserComponent
{
IDTSConnectionManager100 connectionManager;
SqlCommand cmd = null;
SqlConnection conn = null;
SqlDataReader reader = null;
public override void AcquireConnections(object Transaction)
{
try
{
connectionManager = this.Connections.ScriptConnectionManager;
conn = connectionManager.AcquireConnection(Transaction) as SqlConnection;
// Hard to debug failure- better off logging info to file
//using (StreamWriter outfile =
// new StreamWriter(#"f:\Migration.txt"))
//{
// outfile.Write(conn.ToString());
// outfile.Write(conn.State.ToString());
//}
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
//using (StreamWriter outfile =
// new StreamWriter(#"f:\Migration.txt"))
//{
// outfile.Write(" EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE"+ ex.ToString());
//}
}
}
public override void PreExecute()
{
base.PreExecute();
cmd = new SqlCommand("SELECT [CustomerLocation fields] FROM customerlocationView where custid=#CustId", conn);
cmd.Parameters.Add("CustId", SqlDbType.UniqueIdentifier);
}
public override void PostExecute()
{
base.PostExecute();
/*
Add your code here for postprocessing or remove if not needed
You can set read/write variables here, for example:
Variables.MyIntVar = 100
*/
}
public override void Input0_ProcessInputRow(Input0Buffer Row)
{
Collection<CustomerLocation> locations = new Collection<CustomerLocation>();
cmd.Parameters["CustId"].Value = Row.id;
// Any error always saw that reader reamians open on connection
if (reader != null)
{
if (!reader.IsClosed)
{
reader.Close();
}
}
reader = cmd.ExecuteReader();
if (reader != null)
{
while (reader.Read())
{
// Get Child Details
var customerLocation = new CustomerLocation(....,...,...,);
customerLocation.CustId = Row.id;
locations.Add(customerLocation);
}
}
var newCustomerCreated = new NewCustomerCreated(Row.id,,...,...,locations);
var serializedEvent = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(newCustomerCreated, Formatting.Indented,
new JsonSerializerSettings { TypeNameHandling = TypeNameHandling.Objects, ReferenceLoopHandling = ReferenceLoopHandling.Ignore });
Row.SerializedEvent = serializedEvent;
Row.EventId = newCustomerCreated.EventId;
...
...
...
....
..
.
Row.Version = 1;
// using (StreamWriter outfile =
// new StreamWriter(#"f:\Migration.txt", true))
// {
// if (reader != null)
// {
// outfile.WriteLine(reader.HasRows);
//outfile.WriteLine(serializedEvent);
// }
// else
// {
// outfile.Write("reader is Null");
// }
//}
reader.Close();
}
public override void ReleaseConnections()
{
base.ReleaseConnections();
connectionManager.ReleaseConnection(conn);
}
}
One thing to note is that a different approach to create connection is to
get the connection string from connectionManager and use it to create OLEDB connection.

StructureMap DBServiceRegistry and MVC-mini-profiler?

If I use this code in each Repository class then I get SQL profiling to work but I want to move that code from each class into the class where StructureMap handles the DB.
Example of a Repository class:
public DB CreateNewContext()
{
var sqlConnection = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["connection"].ConnectionString);
var profiledConnection = ProfiledDbConnection.Get(sqlConnection);
return DataContextUtils.CreateDataContext<DB>(profiledConnection);
}
public SqlRecipeRepository(DB dataContext)
{
_db = CreateNewContext();
}
Now I want the dataContext variable to be the profiled version and so come from my DBServiceRegistry class.
Here is the DBServiceRegistry class:
public class DBServiceRegistry : Registry
{
public DBServiceRegistry()
{
var sqlConnection = new SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["GetMeCooking.Data.Properties.Settings.server"].ConnectionString);
var profiledConnection = ProfiledDbConnection.Get(sqlConnection);
For<DB>().HybridHttpOrThreadLocalScoped().Use(() => DataContextUtils.CreateDataContext<DB>(profiledConnection));
//Original method just had this:
//For<DB>().HybridHttpOrThreadLocalScoped().Use(() => new DB());
}
}
This code does not cause any errors but I don't get the SQL profiling, what am I doing wrong?
The comment is correct, by creating the sql connection outwith the For line, you are overriding the scope command.
Far better to encapsulate the whole lot into an anonymous delegate
using System.Configuration;
using System.Data.SqlClient;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using StructureMap;
using StructureMap.Configuration.DSL;
using Xunit;
public class DBServiceRegistry : Registry
{
private string connString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings["GetMeCooking.Data.Properties.Settings.server"].ConnectionString;
public DBServiceRegistry()
{
For<DB>().HybridHttpOrThreadLocalScoped().Use(
() =>
{
var sqlConnection = new SqlConnection(connString);
var profiledConnection = new StackExchange.Profiling.Data.ProfiledDbConnection(sqlConnection, MiniProfiler.Current);
return DataContextUtils.CreateDataContext<DB>(profiledConnection);
});
}
}
You can use unit tests to verify that the scope is correct (test syntax is xunit.net)
public class DBRegistryTests : IDisposable
{
private Container container;
public DBRegistryTests()
{
// Arrange (or test setup)
container = new Container(new DBServiceRegistry());
}
[Fact]
public void ConnectionsAreSameInThread()
{
// Create two connections on same thread
var conn1 = container.GetInstance<DB>();
var conn2 = container.GetInstance<DB>();
// Assert should be equal because hybrid thread is scope
// and test executes on same thread
Assert.Equal(conn1, conn2);
// Other assertions that connection is profiled
}
[Fact]
public void ConnectionAreNotSameInDifferentThreads()
{
var conn1 = container.GetInstance<DB>();
// Request second connection from a different thread
// (for < c# 4.0 use Thread instead of task)
var conn2 = new Task<DB>(() => this.container.GetInstance<DB>());
conn2.Start();
conn2.Wait();
// Assert that request from two different threads
// are not the same
Assert.NotEqual(conn1, conn2.Result);
}
public void Dispose()
{
// Test teardown
container.Dispose();
}
}

Ehcache hangs in test

I am in the process of rewriting a bottle neck in the code of the project I am on, and in doing so I am creating a top level item that contains a self populating Ehcache. I am attempting to write a test to make sure that the basic call chain is established, but when the test executes it hands when retrieving the item from the cache.
Here are the Setup and the test, for reference mocking is being done with Mockito:
#Before
public void SetUp()
{
testCache = new Cache(getTestCacheConfiguration());
recordingFactory = new EntryCreationRecordingCache();
service = new Service<Request, Response>(testCache, recordingFactory);
}
#Test
public void retrievesResultsFromSuppliedCache()
{
ResultType resultType = mock(ResultType.class);
Response expectedResponse = mock(Response.class);
addToExpectedResults(resultType, expectedResponse);
Request request = mock(Request.class);
when(request.getResultType()).thenReturn(resultType);
assertThat(service.getResponse(request), sameInstance(expectedResponse));
assertTrue(recordingFactory.requestList.contains(request));
}
private void addToExpectedResults(ResultType resultType,
Response response) {
recordingFactory.responseMap.put(resultType, response);
}
private CacheConfiguration getTestCacheConfiguration() {
CacheConfiguration cacheConfiguration = new CacheConfiguration("TEST_CACHE", 10);
cacheConfiguration.setLoggingEnabled(false);
return cacheConfiguration;
}
private class EntryCreationRecordingCache extends ResponseFactory{
public final Map<ResultType, Response> responseMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<ResultType, Response>();
public final List<Request> requestList = new ArrayList<Request>();
#Override
protected Map<ResultType, Response> generateResponse(Request request) {
requestList.add(request);
return responseMap;
}
}
Here is the ServiceClass
public class Service<K extends Request, V extends Response> {
private Ehcache cache;
public Service(Ehcache cache, ResponseFactory factory) {
this.cache = new SelfPopulatingCache(cache, factory);
}
#SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
public V getResponse(K request)
{
ResultType resultType = request.getResultType();
Element cacheEntry = cache.get(request);
V response = null;
if(cacheEntry != null){
Map<ResultType, Response> resultTypeMap = (Map<ResultType, Response>) cacheEntry.getValue();
try{
response = (V) resultTypeMap.get(resultType);
}catch(NullPointerException e){
throw new RuntimeException("Result type not found for Result Type: " + resultType);
}catch(ClassCastException e){
throw new RuntimeException("Incorrect Response Type for Result Type: " + resultType);
}
}
return response;
}
}
And here is the ResponseFactory:
public abstract class ResponseFactory implements CacheEntryFactory{
#Override
public final Object createEntry(Object request) throws Exception {
return generateResponse((Request)request);
}
protected abstract Map<ResultType,Response> generateResponse(Request request);
}
After wrestling with it for a while, I discovered that the cache wasn't being initialized. Creating a CacheManager and adding the cache to it resolved the problem.
I also had a problem with EHCache hanging, although only in a hello-world example. Adding this to the end fixed it (the application ends normally).
CacheManager.getInstance().removeAllCaches();
https://stackoverflow.com/a/20731502/2736496