I have a question what I couldn't find an answer for.
Google Chrome has an option to change screen size so you could see if your site is responsive. By setting it to 1366x768 it seems to be perfect, but if using laptop/changing screen resolution to 1366x768 it doesn't fit suddenly only if changing zoom value to 80%. I know I'm not providing any code here, just wondering why such thing is happening?
In my experience this has been due to using absolute pixel values and font sizes. I personally have found using em and percentages % rather than px helps at times as well as using a responsive grid system, whether directly coded in CSS or through something like Bootstrap. I would highly recommend Bootstrap as it is very easy to get into and will save you tons of time.
Related
I am currently trying to build a personal profile page. It's a work in progress, and I know little HTML, but I'm getting there.
I'm having an issue with my webpage with regards to how it scales with changes of the browser window size. On my (quite wide) screen at university, it looks fine. However, reducing the browser window size manually - or simply viewing it in a full size browser window on a smaller screen - appears to mess everything up - it doesn't look very nice. Text goes close to my pictures, and it all looks a bit tatty.
I think this is probably because my design is quite poor.
1. Is it because my design is bad or is there something else I'm doing blatantly wrong?
My current idea for a solution is to resize things so that they would look more reasonable on a smaller screen (i.e. on a normal sized laptop). I'm worried that this might end up making things look a bit odd on a bigger screen, though.
2. Is it possible/within reason for a beginner to have two different designs, one for smaller screens and one for big screens, which could be detected and then utilised depending on what screen size viewer is using? Should my page be designed to simply work with whatever screen size?
3. If I do reorganize the page such that it works better with smaller
screens, is there a way to "lock" this design in place, so that it
doesn't get messed up if someone views my page in a wider window?
Perhaps a way to ensure that only the boundaries of the page increase
in width?
What I'm essentially asking is how I should go about designing my page in order to resolve the evident issue - where the issue is that it looks rubbish when the browser window is any smaller than the max size of my screen at university.
You've created your page using tables. It is not a good practise nowadays exactly due to the problems your are facing. In practise, tables should not be used for layout purposes.
To make your layout fluid it'd be better to develop using div with float and relative positioning.
You can see another discussion related to this topic here
https://webmasters.stackexchange.com/questions/6036/why-arent-we-supposed-to-use-table-in-a-design/6037
You could use css property #media, to handle different styles for different screen width: https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_mediaquery.asp
I recently took up web programming, and this issue plagues my site. I set all the font sizes using px values in css and aligned everything using divs, absolute positioning, and more px values. It looks fine until I try zooming in and out, at which point the text size and page size decrease at different rates, resulting in comparitively huge text when zoomed all the way out. This also renders viewing the site on a mobile device completely impossible. I've read that font sizes should be specified with ems not pxs, but that didn't fix it.
What is going on?
It's an easy problem to get into, particularly for a beginner. Consider moving divs to percentage values etc. In terms of mobile viewing and standard desktop browsing, I would suggest you try using a grid system.
One popular example which is very easy to use & I think is great for beginners is 960.gs
I'm afraid without code snippets and your question being very generalised, its unlikely we can help.
There are also ready to go grid systems that shift the page around depending on screen size but I wouldn't recommend them until you are comfortable using 960.gs
I would also try http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/, it makes it very easy to create a nice looking site. As redditor mentions, using pixels can result in weird behaviors when zooming especially for positioning elements. I would try to use something like bootstrap or 960, or one of the other grid systems.
I need to put together website for mobile devices, so iPhones and various androids. The problem is I struggle with getting viewport right and other settings. My goal is so webpage would be coded for specific width e.g. 640px wide. Then once open device would zoom it in/out to the width of the screen so everything became larger or smaller same like after zoomig in/out via pinching on the device screen.
So I would like to develop it for lets say 640px width and depending on device it would scale up or down once open. So if device screen would be 960px wide it would automatically scale to this width via viewport somehow. Is this possible at all to have it coded for predefined width in css and have zoomed in/out as needed by device itself?
I apologize if the question is too generic, will explain details if needed.
EDIT:
So the most common approach if I understand correctly is to provide few layout versions for most commons screen sizes? Using media queries in css provide different values for widths, fonts sizes etc is that right?
If I decide however to go with percentages rather than media queries, given the design provided I think still would have a problem with resizing fonts as layout has images with text in it and text needs to be proportional to the image. Also percentages would take care of widths, height might be an issue though as the images would have to be resized vertically too. Some parts of the design would need to "fit" each other it seems and it would become problem I think.
Now if I simply build a website of certain width, lets say 640px I should be able to position everything on the screen with pixels, no diffeent from normal non-mobile website.
So I tried to set <meta name="viewport" content="width=640"> and inside of a page set width of widest container in css to 640px making page width 640px basically. If I understand correctly it will set up viewport to exact width of the page. So the page would be build as any other non-mobile webpage. User will have to adjust scale by pinching as when the page opens it is usually zoomed in/out for some reason. Is my understanding of what is happening here correct or is there some problem with it. Having it predefined size takes care of different mobile screen sizes as viewport is always same, fits into page width and only scale seems the problem, that is unless I'm missing something here.
I also should have mentioned that I need to do only portrait and make it only option, so no landscape view (that will be another question).
Would love to know your thoughts and I appreciate all the answers so far.
This is called Responsive Web Design when a website adjusts according to screen size...
You can make this kind of responsive website easily through CSS3 Media Queries:
How to write CSS Media Queries for common types of devices
Responsive Web Design: What It is and How to Use It
If you google for Responsive Web Design you will find lots more information on this topic. It's really an amazing method to make your website look great on all devices from small to large screens.
We have a series of tutorials on creating web pages using responsive web design. If you want a quick introduction to it checkout Introduction: Creating a Responsive Web Design, it lists common mobile phone and tablet sizes, so it might lead you to the answer you need. You can find the link to our tutorial series in the article. The solutions provided use Bootstrap in order to provide easy to create pages. And it also provides free samples of responsive web design pages.
I hope this helps to provide the answer that you need, if not, then please let us know if we can provide any further assistance.
Regards,
Arnel C.
InMotion Hosting Community Support Team
Specify the width in percentage say width=100%,which automatically adjusts the width with the screen.
Im looking for some options regarding scaling some HTML elements for use on a large screen (like a kiosk). I'm currently using CSS3 scale() to get a relatively cross-browser scale (thanks to cssplease), but seeing if anyone else has any better suggestion.
Primarily, I'm looking at rendering widgets (HTML, js, and images) on a large scale (from 400x200px to 800x500 for example). While I could rewrite each widget for a larger scale, I thought I'd check my options.
Is there something that SVG can do, or canvas? CSS3 scale() is okay, but images need to be replaced with high-res versions. Text spacing seems to also be slightly off.
Thanks!
CSS3 Transforms are still the best option for what I want, especially for browser performance.
Not sure if Understood you right, but if you need your website, images, videos etc to look good on any screen (with any resolution) you could try to go for responsive design. You have option of using css media queries to adjust website for different screen resolutions, it will also maintain original image quality etc.
http://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/responsive-design-in-3-steps
http://webdesignerwall.com/tutorials/responsive-design-with-css3-media-queries
http://coding.smashingmagazine.com/2012/03/22/device-agnostic-approach-to-responsive-web-design/
I found them very help full and once you get into it you would easily build scalable websites ;))
This may be an extensive retrofit but you might be able to define your elements' dimensions using ems then use media queries to increase the base font size for different screen sizes. So if your base font size is 16px, you main column might be 47em, sidebar 12em, for an approximate site width of 1000px. You could then use media queries to detect a larger browser and all you need to do is increase the base font size to 20px and viola your site is now 25% bigger.
I have started learning some web development lately and have noticed lot's of sites just use Pixel dimension to specify sizes of thins as well as the overall size of the body.
This seems counter intuitive to me (maybe because I am used to programing for Android)
But this could make the website a pain to view on lower res screens and less useful on higher end screens.
Is this really the way things are done? Does this not cause to much problems?
Thanks.
EDIT: how would one go about implementing a less fixed size site?
There are pros and cons to doing things like this.
Pros: It allows you to have full control over where everything is placed as sometimes with relative sizing things will move in unexpected ways.
Cons: Well you mentioned them! Different size screens will give the site a different look.
But overall to some people it is more important that everything remains in the right place than that everything looks great on all screen sizes. Ultimately it depends on the preference of the designer. Also remember that uses on higher resolution screens can zoom in and those on lower resolutions can zoom out!
Peaces and pears.
Each to their own, so long as they are consistant and know what they are doing that is all that matters.
I have recently starting using grid templating which uses pixel dimensions for containers and I really enjoy it. Considering that 960.gs (960px) is an accepted size width for a website, if you know that you do not want to develop a fluid template, then why not use fixed width pixels.
If I am going to have a mobile version of my phone, then I serve the mobile version not my 960px website, and in any case, most phones intuitively display websites anyway. (At least the latest phones, obviously not the old Nokia 8210's ;).