Absolute bottom position in scroll div? - html

Fiddle
I wish to align my buttons to the base of the container so I use:
.buttons{
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
}
This is fine for when there is not much content (the pink div in the fiddle), but when there is a lot of content (the orange div in the fiddle), the container scrolls and the buttons are not at the bottom of the container.
How can I have it so that the buttons are at the bottom of the container when it doesn't have a lot of content and they are at the bottom of the scroll (below the content) when there is a lot of content.

You have to add height:100%to html and body and then min-height:100%to your container like this (I have added a few more lines to make it look better):
body, html {height:100%; margin:0;}
* {box-sizing: border-box;}
.container{
min-height: 100%;
position: relative;
padding-bottom:30px;
}
p {margin:0;}
.buttons{
position: absolute;
bottom:0;
}
.pink{
background: pink;
}
.tomato{
background: tomato;
}
Here you have the FIDDLE
(add more content to check it out)
EDITED (fixed height)
Same concept just adding another container to use the min-height
NEW FIDDLE

I added an .inner container that has a min-height. If the content in there is low, then the .inner container will push your buttons to the bottom. If the content is more, then the .inner container will grow along.
.inner {
min-height: 149px;
}
Also note that the buttons have a position relative instead of absolute. When an element is absolute, it does not react to the page contents.
https://jsfiddle.net/76gbfrah/10/

Just wrap the content in another div with position relative and put the absolute elements you wish to overlay in that parent div. It will act as an overlay of sorts and will ignore the scrolling. 👍

Related

Clearfix with negative absolute positioning

I'm working on a project using a responsive layout. I have a div that goes beneath and around the header div. I did this with negative absolute positioning. The problem is the elements following that are getting positioned on top of it. The absolute positioning took that div out of the normal flow of the page and now stuff is stocking up on top of it.
Normally, I would just absolutely position the rest of of the elements in the content div, but the absolutely positioned div contains an image slider which is responsive so the height of the div varies depending on width of the screen.
<div id="container">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content">
<div id="absolutely_positioned"></div>
<div id="problem_div">
</div>
</div>
#container {
max-width: 1600px;
}
#header {
width: 52.5%
height: 146px;
}
#content {
position: relative;
}
#absolute_position{
position: absolute;
top:-100px;
}
The elements following the absolutely positioned div are getting stack on top of it? I'm not getting the problem: jsfiddle. Note that I had to fix some typos; double check your classes/IDs in the markup and stylesheet are matching.
CSS (with fixed typos):
#container {
max-width: 1600px;
border:2px dotted black;
}
#header {
width: 52.5%;
height: 146px;
border:1px solid red;
}
#content {
position: relative;
}
#absolutely_positioned{
position: absolute;
top:-100px;
background:blue;
}
Of course, this is assuming my comment above didn't isolate the problem being that your problem_div does not have a closing tag in the code you posted.
EDIT
In response to your comment above, I know your problem now. You will notice the blue box is aligning right underneath the red box. This is normal behavior because those are both relative divs. When you make a div absolute, not only does it ignore surrounding divs (but not containing divs) but the surrounding divs also ignore it. That is, the green box will not push the blue box down, only the red box will. To illustrate the answer further, if you click my jsfiddle you will see the problem_div text right underneath the header div, which is where it should be. The absolute div does not affect this behavior.
Just take off the
position:absolute;
and instead of using
top:-100px;
use
margin-top:-100px;
I fixed it on your jsfiddle.

Place a footer with Content positioned as absolute

I have a wrapper class that contains all the content on the web page. the problem is if the content is absolutely placed, it eats my footer. I have to place the content as absolute positioned.
It seems like the footer doesnot recognize that the content is absolute. Heres my code
<style>
* {
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto -4em;
}
.footer, .push {
height: 4em;
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="wrapper">
<img src="activity/Chrysanthemum.jpg" style="z-index: 1; position:absolute; width: 420px; height: 400px; left: 100px;top:260px; ">
<div class="push">
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer" >copyrights</div>
</body>
If I change the image style by removing the position:absolute property , everything looks normal. so my question is how can we place the footer at the bottom with absolute positioned contents?
Updated answer, regarding comment.
As I mentioned at my previous answer, this effect cannot be achieved using pure CSS. So, I will show the JavaScript approach. Add relevant IDs (see Fiddle), and add the following code at the end of your body. This code snippet will resize your wrapper when necessary.Note: When the page is smaller than the window's height, the page wrapper will still take the full height, because it's not possible to distinguish a height change by an absolutely positioned element.
<script>
(function(){
var wrapper = document.getElementById("wrapper");
var height = document.documentElement.scrollHeight;
wrapper.style.height = height + "px";
})();
</script>
Previous answer:
The issue is caused by the fact that absolutely-positioned elements do not affect the height/width of their parent.
To fix your code, apply the following CSS (only showing relevant CSS, updated postfixed by descriptive comments). Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/4ja2V/
html, body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
padding: 0; /* Get rid off the padding */
}
.wrapper {
position: relative; /* Necessary to properly deal with absolutely positioned
child elements. */
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto 4em; /* So that the content is visible when scrolled down*/
}
.footer {
height: 4em;
position: fixed; /* Positions your footer at a fixed position in the window*/
bottom: 0; /* At the bottom of the window*/
}
You were using a negative bottom-margin for .wrapper, which caused the element to "eat" the footer. When you're using absolutely poisitioned inner elements, there's no reliable pure-CSS method to get the real width/height of the .wrapper element. Hence the appearance of position:fixed.
The footer is defined to have a height of 4em. Because the footer is positioned at a fixed position (ie, the element won't move when scrolling down), it's necessary to apply an additional margin at the bottom of the wrapper element.
give your footer a fixed hight and then in your absolute class, do
bottom: heightOfYourFooter + 5px;

Help with footer always to bottom

I know this has been discussed here many times, but none of the answers I found here, seem to address my problem.
I have this variable (in height) layout, and wnat the footer to always stick to the bottom.
I have used the min-height: 100%; to the container div, and got it somehow to always be in the bottom. trouble is, it's sinking too low to the bottom.
I've put an example here:
http://jsbin.com/erono3
As you can see, my footer is at the bottom, but will go too far in the bottom, and even though there's space on the page to display it, it's creating a scroll bar.
Also, I'd like the main container to to be shown as big as the content is (i.e. closing the square), but right now, it looks like the container is going all the way to the bottom, and my footer is covering it.
What am I doing wrong there?
Thanks in advance
You should take a look at the link by Ben Lee again :). I have used that in your layout to achieve the effect you want. See it here: http://jsbin.com/erono3/2
The important thing is for the footer to be part of the container. The container has a min-height of 100%. So it occupies the whole screen always. The header is normal what ever it is inside.
Then you should have an inner container element (important), where your main content resides. In the link above, it has the id #body. This would have a padding-bottom (to give space to the footer.
The footer is absolutely positioned with a bottom:0px meaning it is always going to be at the bottom of the container (the container has to be position:relative).
EDIT (in response to the comment)
To make your footer span the entire page, but keep everything else centered, just do this:
remove the width off of the #containter, #container spans the whole page. Provide a width to the #body element in the link above and center it, using margin: 0px auto. You get the effect you wanted.
New link: http://jsbin.com/erono3/5
Here's a simplified version of this, which is worth reading for the explanation. See if you can adapt yours to fit.
CSS:
html, body, div {
margin: 0;
border: 0;
padding: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#wrap {
position: relative;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
}
#footer {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
width: 100%;
background-color: #aaa;
}
and HTML:
<div id="wrap">
<div id="content">Stuff goes here.</div>
<div id="footer">FOOTER</div>
</div>
The problem is you have a min-height of 100% on your container div. That means that the container will be 100% the height of its parent, which is the body tag which has a height of 100%. So if your viewport is 600px, then your body will be 600px, then your container will be 100% of that which is 600px, and then it will stick the footer after the container div which is why it goes below the veiwport.
So one thing you can do is just absolutely position your footer inside the body. Do this by changing your position to be absolute, and bottom:0px. It will float at the bottom.
You might want to put it in your container as well depending on what style you are going for and position it absolute in that and at the bottom.
Your problem is not that the footer is too low, but by making the body 100% it pushes the footer below the bottom of the page.
Consider putting the footer div inside the container div and getting rid of the margin-top: -5.5em and position: relative and it will work just fine.
http://ryanfait.com/sticky-footer/
* {
margin: 0;
}
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
.wrapper {
min-height: 100%;
height: auto !important;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto -142px; /* the bottom margin is the negative value of the footer's height */
}
.footer, .push {
height: 142px; /* .push must be the same height as .footer */
}
/*
Sticky Footer by Ryan Fait
http://ryanfait.com/
*/
This is particularly for anyone using ASP.NET master pages but also in general, if your content is also wrapped in a <form> element you will need to change
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
to
html, body, form {
height: 100%;
}

Scroll page content within specific area?

I'm designing a website which has fixed elements on the outer edges of a fixed-width layout. A div in the center is reserved for the content.
When the user scrolls, I want all of the content (besides said fixed outer navigation elements) to stay within the borders of that center element.
Here's a quick mockup of what I mean:
I could very easily set the overflow property of the center element to auto, and have everything remain inside. However, it's very important that a scroll bar not be present on the edge of that element.
Basically, I'm wondering how to either:
Restrict content to that area
(perhaps I could change the size and
positioning of the body element -- is
that allowed? -- and then position
the fixed elements outside of the
body.
Hide the scroll bar that appears
inside the div when using
overflow:auto
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
If possible, you should break your fixed position elements up into 4 separate sections (top, left, right and bottom). Then just make sure you pad you centre content area by their respective widths and heights so the content doesn't get overlapped:
HTML
<!-- 4 fixed position elements that will overlap your content -->
<div id="top"></div>
<div id="left"></div>
<div id="right"></div>
<div id="bottom"></div>
<div id="content">
<!-- Your content -->
</div>
CSS
html, body {
height: 100%;
}
#top, #left, #right, #bottom {
position: fixed;
left: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: 2;
background: red;
}
#top, #bottom {
width: 100%;
height: 20px;
}
#bottom {
top: auto;
bottom: 0;
}
#left, #right {
height: 100%;
width: 20px;
}
#right {
left: auto;
right: 0;
}
#content {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
padding: 25px; /* prevent content from being overlapped */
}
You can see it in action here.
Also note the position: relative on the content area. This is so z-index works correctly and the content is displayed below the fixed sections.
If you care about IE6/7 support, you'll need to add a CSS expression fix to get fixed position working properly in those awesome browsers.

Div on top of Div using z-index

I have the following divs in my HTML:
<div class="main">
<div class="bgimage"></div>
<div class="content">Text</div>
which is directly inside my body.
With the following CSS:
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 20px 0;
}
.content {
filter: alpha(opacity=50);
-moz-opacity: 0.5;
opacity: 0.5;
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
border: #000 thin solid;
width: 960px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
background-color: #000;
}
.bgimage {
position: absolute;
z-index: -1;
width: 1024px;
height: 768px;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
background-image: url(bg1.jpg);
}
Basically, I have a Div that with a display of a background image, and I will have another Div on top of this with transparency. This current code works, but my problem is when I am trying to take the content div down from the top.
When I add margin-top:100px, for example, is also brings the image down. I thought it would not touch it if it is not on the same z-index? Why does adding a margin also force the bgimage div down?
I have also tried making the div with class of content a position of absolute and a zindex, but then this won't centre. How should I solve this?
your CSS should be
.bgimage { position: relative; }
.content { position: absolute; }
so the .content will be positioned relative to the .bgimage
your current CSS makes the .bgimage position relative to the document.
see this link on CSS positioning
z-index has no relation to positioning: it only affects the rendering order of your elements. Position: relative tells the browser to render the element at the place it should be, and offset it by eventual left, right, top or bottom coordinates. Therefore, margins, paddings, etc. still affect it.
Only position: absolute guarantees position independance.
I see no need for "z-index"es or "position: absolute" in your code at all -- unless you have other complications that you have not revealed to us.
To center the background on the DIV class="main":
body{margin:0;padding:20px 0;}
.main{background:transparent url(bg1.jpg) no-repeat center top;}
.content{border:#000 thin solid;width:960px;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;background-color:#000;opacity: 0.5;filter:alpha(opacity=50);-moz-opacity: 0.5;}
The "center top" places the center-top of the background image on the center-top of the element it's applied to. You may want to apply a
min-width:1024px;_width:1024px;
to the same element -- to prevent a narrower window from hiding the edges (this will change how the element is rendered if the "viewport" is narrower than the background's dimensions).
The only thing your pre-modified code it can do that my modified code can't:
Crop the background image (if it is not natively 1024px x 768px) by using the css "width" and "height" properties
If the class="main" element already has a background image set, most browsers don't support the CSS3 required to stack multiple backgrounds on the same element
Some of what was stated about "z-indexing" and the "position" property above was correct but failed to mention:
you've taken your class="content" element out of "the flow". The ancestor elements won't grow when the content of class="content" element grows. This is an important and fundamental difference between "z-index"ed elements and elements that remain "in the flow".
Other side notes:
elements with the same z-index are stacked according to their order in the HTML (later in the HTML means they are drawn above on the screen)
"z-index"ing requires "position: (absolute|relative)", "z-index: (valid value)", and IIRC "(top|left|bottom|right): (valid value)" to take the element "out of the flow"
CSS absolute positioning is always done "relative" to the most recent ancestor that has a "position: relative", otherwise it uses the body tag by default. If the CSS you included is all that affects those divs, then your .content div will be positioned relative to the .main div, but your .bgImage will be positioned based on the tag.
If you want both .content and .bgImage to move in lockstep, then you'll need to add a "position: relative" to div.main.